spinofflive
The Christmas poll rush. Image: Jason Stretch
The Christmas poll rush. Image: Jason Stretch

PoliticsDecember 13, 2024

All those recent political polls: a quick recap

The Christmas poll rush. Image: Jason Stretch
The Christmas poll rush. Image: Jason Stretch

ICYMI: that festive pileup of opinion polling, in one snapshot.

It’s just like London buses. You wait for ages for a poll to arrive and then a rush of them arrive at once. In the blur of December you might well have missed them. What, you’re probably asking, is the story?

The story of four polls – that’s Verian for 1News, Freshwater Strategy for the Post, Curia for the Taxpayers’ Union, Talbot Mills for the Labour Party (as provided to Stuff) and Roy Morgan – published in the last fortnight is this:

The most recent of those polls, for 1News, is just a hair’s breadth from the election result 14 months ago, and it’s been pretty consistent in the intervening time. With one exception: the sole party to really leap, presumably as a result of the treaty principles bill and the pushback it has generated, is Te Pāti Māori.

If we take the average of those four polls (they haven’t been weighted for authority or sample size or anything like that, but this is a finger in the wind) and plug it into a parliament, the seats would fall this way:

National: 41

Labour: 37

Greens: 14

Act: 12

NZ First: 8

Te Pāti Māori: 8

Chop that into blocs, and the parties of the governing coalition has 61, the opposition trio has 59.

Speaking of the treaty principles bill: the legislation, now in the hands of the justice select committee, was subject of a question in the Verian/1News poll. Asked if they supported the bill, 23% said yup, 36% said nope, and 39% said they didn’t know enough about it to answer either way.

What of the Chris-off? Verian has Luxon holding a decent lead, 24% to 15% and Curia is in the same terrain, at 27.1% preferring Luxon to Hipkins’ 18.9%. Not so Talbot Mills, where it’s Hipkins by a whisker, 22.7% to 22.1%, while the Freshwater poll matched the two men called Chris – in fact both were called Christopher in their polling – head to head, and Hipkins was a skerrick above Luxon, by 42% to 41%. 

As repeated ad nauseam in US election, the metric arguably to rule them all is track – that is, is the country on the right track or wrong track. Freshwater measured a majority for wrong: with 48%, against 35% who said right track. According to Roy Morgan, meanwhile, 46.5% said right direction and 42.5% wrong – that’s a cheering result for the government, with the first “right direction” victory in the survey since January 2022.

Keep going!
Candace Owens speaks at the Conservative Political Action Conference 2022 (Photo by CHANDAN KHANNA/AFP via Getty Images)
Candace Owens speaks at the Conservative Political Action Conference 2022 (Photo by CHANDAN KHANNA/AFP via Getty Images)

OPINIONPoliticsDecember 12, 2024

What we should have done with Candace Owens is nothing

Candace Owens speaks at the Conservative Political Action Conference 2022 (Photo by CHANDAN KHANNA/AFP via Getty Images)
Candace Owens speaks at the Conservative Political Action Conference 2022 (Photo by CHANDAN KHANNA/AFP via Getty Images)

Immigration NZ could have made any decision on the controversial speaker’s visa and it would’ve been better than a minister intervening.

It’s happened again. As the world turned and things progressed in their natural way, we as a country have managed to trip over our own feet, face first into a vat of eggs.

Immigration New Zealand has been “cracking down” a lot lately. They’ve been stricter on issuing visitor visas, particularly when they believe there’s a risk of someone overstaying. Two weeks ago the agency confirmed it was investigating popular Youtuber IShowSpeed’s visa status after concerns were raised that he had not applied for the correct working visa. (His free global promotion of all parts of New Zealand to millions of followers was raised as a reason to look past any visa errors.)

And a month ago, Immigration New Zealand denied controversial American speaker Candace Owens an entertainment visa. The reason? People excluded from other countries (ie denied entry) are automatically denied entry here. Owens’ Australian visa application was denied in October, with Australian immigration minister Tony Burke saying: “Australia’s national interest is best served when Candace Owens is somewhere else.”

Owens is known around the world for her extreme views, ranging from anti-semitism (downplaying and at times outright denying the Holocaust), to conspiracy theories about pedophile rings at Disney. It was not particularly surprising that Australia denied her entry and even less surprising that Immigration New Zealand followed suit.

All we had to do, then, was nothing.

But Owens’ team got in touch with associate minister for immigration Chris Penk and asked him to intervene. “After considering representations made to him, including the importance of free speech”, Penk reversed the Immigration NZ decision and has granted Owens her visa for an event next year, a spokesperson for his office told Stuff.

The decision is being celebrated by the Free Speech Union and the like, and almost guarantees that her event will be the talk of town on both sides of the political spectrum. Unfortunately it also means we once again enter the clown ferris wheel of outrage and counter-outrage that comes every time politicians get involved in these matters.

This isn’t even to suggest that I think Candace Owens should never have been granted a visa. In fact, part of me believes if she had simply been granted an Australian one, granted a New Zealand one, and held a mediocre event for her fans, it would have been less embarrassing and potentially less harmful than this.

Granting a visa is fine, if frustrating for some. Denying a visa is also fine, if frustrating for others. Denying a visa then granting it after a minister has had a free speech 101 chat with someone is the worst of all worlds.

What we should have done, at any point in this mess, is nothing.

Politics