According to media reports, a slowing of the Earth’s rotation is likely to bring an increase in the number of severe quakes. What do NZ scientists say?
The report follows a conference presentation last month by two US researchers who suggest a slowing of Earth’s rotation is correlated with an increase in earthquakes of magnitude 7 or higher.
In a paper presented to the Geological Society of America, scientists Roger Bilham of the University of Colorado in Boulder and Rebecca Bendick of the University of Montana suggested “variations in the speed of Earth’s rotation could trigger intense seismic activity, particularly in heavily populated tropical regions”, reports the Observer. “Although such fluctuations in rotation are small – changing the length of the day by a millisecond – they could still be implicated in the release of vast amounts of underground energy, it is argued.”
The NZ Science Media Centre asked experts to comment on the reports – here are their responses.
Professor Martha Savage, Institute of Geophysics, Victoria University of Wellington:
The correlation occurs with a “phase lag” of about five years, which means that the minimum in rotation rate precedes the peak in earthquakes by about five years. Roger Bilham suggests that the correlation could be used to predict, in general, that the occurrence of earthquakes over magnitude 7 will be larger this year (and in the next five years) than it was in the previous five years.
He also suggests two possible explanations for the correlation: the slight change in the Earth’s shape caused by the slower rotation might put extra stress on the crust, or tectonic plates may act like “a loose cannon sliding upon the deck of a rolling ship” and don’t quite keep up with the change in motion of the mantle underneath them, again causing stress to build up in the crust.
The next five years can therefore serve as a test of his hypothesis, but there are no specific predictions about exactly where the increased earthquakes will be. In any case, it is a good reminder to keep up to date with your earthquake preparedness in terms of making sure that you have enough water and food for a week and by checking that your belongings are appropriately fastened in case there is a large earthquake.
Professor Mark Stirling, Chair of Earthquake Science, University of Otago:
The Otago Earthquake Science group does not support the primary conclusion of this article. We see it as yet another example of a fortuitous correlation between earthquake occurrence and an unrelated phenomenon.
Earthquake rates fluctuate greatly around the plate boundaries of the world, and many explanations for the fluctuations have been provided over the years (eg Super Moon, Diurnal controls, Earth Orbit Eccentricity). While the researchers involved in this most recent work are very well known and regarded, we have no basis to support their conclusions at this time.
GNS Science is unable to provide a meaningful comment on this research. It appears to be a conference presentation and very preliminary rather than peer-reviewed research, so there is no detail for us to examine.
It is true there have been periods of elevated rates of large earthquakes in the past 100 years. However, if you go looking for correlations with other natural phenomenon, you will almost certainly find some interesting matches.
Dr Virginia Toy, senior lecturer, Department of Geology, University of Otago:
A lot of people attempt to make statistical correlations between occurrence of natural events/hazards and other environmental phenomenon. For example, there are studies of whether earthquakes are preceded by “lightning” or related to “solid earth tides”. Some of these yield statistically defendable correlations; others don’t. I tend to think of them in the context of Ken Ring … the man who writes about apparent statistical correlations between the phase of the Moon and the weather.
I am sure the statistical correlation [in this study] is more defendable than Ken Ring’s work. However, it shouldn’t inspire panic. The story has reported the researcher’s statements in a way it sounds like we will get a jump from six to 20 large earthquakes per year. I don’t think this is likely.
Dr Tim Stahl, lecturer in tectonic geology, University of Canterbury:
Professors Bilham and Bendick are respected scientists in earthquake geology and seismic risk. I would look forward to seeing this study in a peer-reviewed journal, with some reporting of the statistical tests for the significance of the observed relationships and with further consideration of potential mechanisms. As with any conference abstract or presentation, it is difficult to judge the scientific merit of the claims being made until they have undergone rigorous peer-review and additional testing by other research groups.
It is important to note that the authors explicitly state in the abstract that the precise locations, times, or magnitudes of earthquakes cannot be predicted, even if their observations and interpretations are eventually confirmed by other researchers.
The Spinoff’s science content is made possible thanks to the support of The MacDiarmid Institute for Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology, a national institute devoted to scientific research.