spinofflive
Getty Images
Getty Images

SocietyJanuary 14, 2019

Rodeo is animal cruelty dressed up as entertainment

Getty Images
Getty Images

Animals shouldn’t be dying in the name of ‘entertainment’, writes Green Party animal welfare spokesperson Gareth Hughes. It’s time to ban rodeo in New Zealand.

Imagine being chased out of a cage by a rider on a horse, lassoed around the neck and jerked violently off your feet, then wrestled to the ground and tied up. This is the reality for calves as young as three months old at New Zealand rodeos. Do this to a companion animal like a cat and a dog and you would be jailed. Do this on a farm and you could be investigated and prosecuted. Do it in front of a crowd at a rodeo and it is called entertainment.

This summer in New Zealand, animals are being terrified, hurt and killed for fun. Last week it was revealed a second animal, a horse, died at the Gisborne rodeo. It only became public because someone from the rodeo community took the brave step to come forward and alert SAFE. The New Zealand Rodeo Cowboys Association president Lyal Cocks eventually confirmed the second animal had died saying to RNZ, “After it competed it went out into the yards out the back, and for some inexplicable reason it went into a post and died, it was instantaneous – it was very strange, freakish.”

It’s not freakish – it’s the fourth known rodeo death in the past year. We’ll never know how many other animals are dying at training events because rodeos are operating secretively. Many rodeos now refuse to allow people to film the events to try and stop footage from reaching the public. They’ve clearly got something to hide if they won’t allow filming.

For me, it was watching the footage of rodeo events that motivated me to speak out and call for a ban on this cruel and archaic form of entertainment. As an animal lover I was horrified at what I saw. Just search for some of the slow motion video online and you’ll see animals terrified, bulls wrestled to the ground by their neck, horses bucking wildly and animals shocked with electric prodders.

Rodeo events rely on inflicting pain and fear in animals to get them to perform. Rodeos only “work” when animals are running for their lives, riled up and bucking wildly. Common injuries include broken ribs, backs and legs, punctured lungs, deep internal organ bruising, haemorrhaging, ripped tendons, torn or stretched ligaments and muscles, broken necks, torn trachea, spinal damage and disc rupture, bruising, and subcutaneous tissue damage. When the National Animal Welfare Advisory Committee looked at rodeo last year they found only one event, barrel racing, didn’t have moderate or serious welfare concerns.

Rodeos are banned in a number of countries, including the United Kingdom, and specific events like calf-roping are outlawed in many others including Canada and Germany.

Closer to home, Auckland Council prohibits rodeo on council-owned land and a 2016 Horizon poll found 59% of Kiwis want to see an end to rodeo, with 68% stating they felt closest to the statement that “Rodeo causes pain and suffering to animals and it is not worth causing this just for the sake of entertainment”.

A number of vets, and animal rights groups such as SAFE and the SPCA, have also spoken out against rodeo. The Green Party believes animals should not suffer to provide entertainment for people. We support a ban on the use of animals in rodeo events and are calling on the Minister for Animal Welfare to act.

In the past, dog fighting, bear baiting and cock fighting were all considered fun, community entertainment, but thankfully our animal welfare standards have improved and that’s no longer the case. It’s time to consign rodeo to the history books, where it belongs.

Keep going!
someone writing on a notepad with a stetescope in front of them
Most doctors have discovered computers, but some still depend on people being able to read their handwriting. (Image: Getty Images)

SocietyJanuary 12, 2019

Inventing illness? What it’s like when your GP won’t believe you’re in pain

someone writing on a notepad with a stetescope in front of them
Most doctors have discovered computers, but some still depend on people being able to read their handwriting. (Image: Getty Images)

Hannah Gibson has been living with chronic illness for most of her life. So why does she still struggle to get medical professionals to take her condition seriously?

Before I found my current GP, I always had the urge to censor myself went I went to the doctor. To make my story palatable, less daunting. To put the doctor at ease. This was the result of 22 years of learning the culture of biomedicine, gaining an understanding of the kinds of illness or presentation of symptoms many doctors (note, not all) prefer to hear about. I don’t make up symptoms; any time I have come to a doctor’s door I have genuinely needed help. Which makes it all the more painful when a doctor’s eyes glaze over as they mentally clock out, wishing they had a different version of sickness in front of them. I can see when they get excited at the prospect of seeing something unique, and I even see their frustration when they can’t diagnose me easily.

I think my shame around medical professionals began in a doctor’s office at age 10, where I went for help for the severe fatigue, pain, migraines, constant nausea and vision impairment – among other things – that I was experiencing. I always blame my need to say ‘sorry’ on being Scottish, on being brought up by an Irish Catholic family. ‘I was born feeling shame,’ I joke to friends. But I think it began in that doctor’s office. After testing for things that I did not have, he told me if I just ‘pulled my socks up’ I’d be fine. I genuinely felt incredibly ill and my mother, a nurse, was concerned. I just sat there, confused and feeling like I should apologise for taking up the doctor’s time with my complaints.

I have medical conditions that are identifiable by Western scientific testing measures. And I appreciate the influence these tests have (or perhaps I’m infuriated – there’s a thin line between love and hate) more than other people because I also have medical conditions that do not fit into nicely square boxes that can be labelled ‘simple’, or even ‘legitimate’.

I call a ‘condition of legitimacy’ one which is treated as if the complaint is not the patient’s fault. When you present with a condition of legitimacy there’s more empathy, more recognition, more respect.

The opposite happens when a doctor is presented with a condition that is not common or easily figured out, or has yet to have scientific explanations (think of all the conditions that have only become legitimised relatively recently, once they were identified – like multiple sclerosis or epilepsy). Too often, the problem is treated as if it is the patient’s fault. At first attempts might be made to find the cause or provide relief, but if the patient does not respond – or is termed ‘a mystery’– the medical profession’s interest levels tend to lessen.

Recently there has been a jump in stories of New Zealanders with complex chronic conditions like Ehlers-Dahnos, fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome/ME and endometriosis who are being treated like their symptoms are fictitious. The word ‘psychosomatic’ is bandied around, a triumphant cry that doctors use when they mistake a complex case as something that is ‘an invention’, ‘attention-seeking’ or ‘laziness’, simply because it doesn’t fit into the neat categories that biomedicine holds so dear. I know doctors want to be able to diagnose problems, but I worry that too often when things are challenging they brush people off.

But calling someone living with chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, dysautonomia, and other complex conditions ‘inventive’ or ‘factitious’ doesn’t actually make the problem go away. The pain stays; the fatigue too. And the frustration and feeling of being utterly alone increases, because many of us are brought up to believe in our doctors. I know it’s a big ask – but please, doctors, treat our suffering with more respect.

Trust me, there is little worse than sitting in a space where others devalue your experience and suffering. For Māori, the value of an experience is judged differently to that of Pākehā. I count myself lucky that I am not Māori and dealing with disability. Older people are sometimes trusted less because of their age. There are countless women  – both friends and those I’ve met in my research – who have been belittled when they go to the doctor with abdominal pain. And as for those who live with mental illness, we read of so many people falling through the cracks.

I know there are amazing doctors out there. Some of them listen, and are dedicated to trying to figure out what is wrong. And when they can’t, they keep going. They empathise. They care. And it is these moments that have the power to make patients feel heard and valued. For me, being heard – really heard – has had as much of a positive impact on me as getting the actual diagnoses. I know this because the times when some specialist has made particularly distressing comments that belittle me or my body, I have struggled with feeling unworthy of medical care.

If I could speak directly to all doctors, I’d beg them: Please see each patient as a human being who is there for your help, who might be suffering – and understand that what you say will impact on whether they come back, whether they tell their family to come back. Don’t think about the colour of someone’s skin before you even ask what their ailment is. Don’t look at a long list of symptoms as something suspicious or too difficult to address. Don’t dismiss older patients who require your attention and respect. Be the point in a person’s journey where they are cared for and valued, regardless of the symptoms you are presented with.

Yes doctors are most likely overworked. Yes they probably have too much paperwork. Yes, it’s bloody challenging. But doctors choose this profession, and are in a privileged position – I want them to be empathetic rather than superior. And when they don’t know something, I want them to be honest and seek the answer.

Medical professionals would do well to realise that patients are trying to take control of their health journeys. They want to know more about their bodies and what it means – so, doctors, if it seems like a patient knows too much about their problem, please don’t belittle them. Knowledge is not just there for you to share.

And if you are one of the good doctors, thank you. But you need to help to effect change too. By working with other doctors, specialists, nurses and counsellors, you can encourage the medical profession to move forward, becoming a better ally for patients – no matter their symptoms.

But wait there's more!