spinofflive
0305-old-cartoonists-v1-1-850×510

ĀteaAugust 13, 2018

Al Nisbet no longer has a job and today has been a good day

0305-old-cartoonists-v1-1-850×510

Al Nisbet’s loudest detractor bids farewell to the controversial cartoon slinger.

Today dawned like any other. My cat jumped on the bed and started coughing up a hairball. I forgot to get a new towel before jumping in the shower and had to do the hallway streak of shame. I wore odd socks for the fourth day running.

Little did I know the day would bring such joyful news that my legs would do an involuntary celebration dance.

Stuff cartoonist Al Nisbet announced the media giant will no longer be publishing his work.

The contentious cartoonist draws cartoons that regularly punch down at Māori and Pacific people, women and those in poverty. It is always framed as ‘saying what we’re all thinking’ without much knowledge or research beyond that, and rigorously defended as ‘free speech’.

Nisbet has been a thorn in the side of a media outlet that, at least in my perception of it, is otherwise trying it’s hardest to talk about the harm done, historically and presently, to marginalised people. Their dedicated #metoo reporting unit is placing the lived experience of women and gender-diverse people who have been sexually assaulted and harassed in overwhelming numbers on their homepage. This extraordinary Treaty of Waitangi multimedia resource makes plain with data and empirical evidence what so many have attempted to deny.

He has held them back. You can’t talk about the importance of the Treaty while elsewhere in the organisation the principles of partnership it seeks to represent are being trampled on by a bigot.

In the saddest exit interview of all time, Nisbet told NewtalkZB’s Chris Lynch: “These days there seems to be a tsunami of lefty thinking which totally doesn’t appeal to me as a cartoonist. You’re meant to look at all angles.”

That he thinks framing the #metoo movement as a witch hunt (a metaphor he used very badly) is showing ‘all the angles’ of a story denies the fact that sexual assault is a prevalent, ubiquitous part of women’s lives that has remained underreported since the dawn of time. Hundreds of women have contacted Stuff to report their experiences. In scientific terms, you can draw some pretty solid conclusions from a sample size that big. That’s not an angle, it’s a fact.

He went on to describe his cartoons as “more retro than old fashioned.”

Synonyms are hard.

“[Stuff] are trying to push a lefty agenda,” he told Lynch. “Everything’s lovely, everything’s wonderful. We don’t want to point at the truth of anything I’ve been saying cos that’s not right, you know, not PC.”

“I even said to the editor when she rang me up to tell me I was no longer needed ‘I may as well go and live in North Korea, cos I think we’ll have more free speech’.”

Chris Lynch had the decency to meet that with a brief, stunned silence.

Unfortunately for Nisbet’s lefty agenda conspiracy theory, Stuff cartoonists Trace Hodgson and Mike Moreu were also reshuffled out of the organisation a few months ago – both are proud lefties (if by Nisbet’s definition a lefty is someone with an actual soul) who have thus far not announced any plans to move to North Korea.

Which tends to suggest it is simply a cost-saving decision, part of a wider reshuffle, and not Stuff making a stand on the kind of values they want to project in the media landscape. But whatever. I’ll take it.

He labelled other cartoonists as ‘cutesy’ and ‘pathetic’, presumably meaning Tom Scott and Sharon Murdoch whom he called out as ‘lefties’ later in the interview, and whom Stuff have retained.

My favourite part of the interview has to be the mispronunciation of ‘feminazi’, which draws out the word to sound like ‘naasi’ and is a wonderful representation of all the words and concepts Nisbet clearly does not understand (hear the glorious pronouncement at 07:44), foremost being the concept of free speech.

So here are a few articles he can read up on now that he has some more spare time on his hands:

Paradox, utopia and Don Brash: on liberalism and free speech

Whakawhanaungatanga, not censorship: A Māori perspective on ‘free speech’

Hate speech is not Free speech

Don’t let the door hit you on the ass on the way out.

Stuff, Monday 13 August, 2018. Image: Jeff Bell / Facebook

 

Keep going!
mwwl

ĀteaAugust 10, 2018

The power struggle in the Māori Women’s Welfare League

mwwl

Māui Street editor Morgan Godfery with an exclusive look at the internal rift threatening the Māori Women’s Welfare League.

A remit to expel controversial Māori Women’s Welfare League members will go the League’s AGM this year, National President Prue Kapua confirmed in a statement to Māui Street.

The remit is aimed at expelling Pauline Rewiti, a South Auckland social worker and president of the Rongopai branch, and seven other witnesses who submitted evidence in a court case against the League.

The remit is the latest move in a bitter power struggle within the League.

“It saddens me that following the High Court hearing on 2nd July I was threatened with dismissal along with all [seven] of my witnesses – Māori women of mana and integrity,” said Rewiti.

Rewiti is taking a case against the League after its National Executive secured 180 amendments to the constitution in 2013 including a controversial amendment allowing presidents to serve more than one term.

In the past, it was customary for League presidents to serve only one term. The only presidents to have served more than three years are founding president Dame Whina Cooper (1951-1957), Whaea Ruiha Sage (1964-1968), Dame Miraka Szaszy (1973-1977), Dame Georgina Kirby (1983-1987) and incumbent president Kapua, the well-respected Auckland lawyer.

“The current National President and some National Executive members made [the decision to threaten dismissal] on their own on 27th May five weeks before the hearing,” said Rewiti.

“My dismissal and seven others were then withdrawn, but only temporarily with the threat of permanent dismissal following the decision of the High Court.”

But Kapua maintains no members were threatened with dismissal, only invited to answer concerns put to them.

“To be clear, no dismissals were threatened in respect of Mrs Rewiti and the 7 witnesses,” said Kapua.

“In order to deal with the matter in a much fairer and more transparent manner, the National Executive decided to set out the concerns raised about the actions of Mrs Rewiti and 7 witnesses who swore or affirmed affidavits in support of the High Court proceedings against the League.  They each received a letter outlining matters that they were invited to respond to.”

The invitation to respond was later withdrawn, but the remit proposing Rewiti and the witnesses’ dismissal will still go the League’s Annual Conference this year.

“That will be a matter for the membership as a whole,” said Kapua.

The Annual Conference is scheduled for 10 November.

In a public petition uploaded to Change.org, Rewiti – whose branch patron is Whaea Hine Puru, the daughter of League legend Dame Whina Cooper – alleges that nearly 500 members have resigned from the League in the last four years, frustrated at its changing culture.

One prominent East Coast member (who wished to remain anonymous) resigned recently, hōhā with the “BS” going on within the League.

But other members who spoke to māui street maintain the better option for Rewiti and her supporters would have been to appeal the constitutional changes using “internal processes,” and that court action is causing unnecessary conflict.

The High Court’s decision has been reserved.

Timeline

July 2011: the High Court rules Hannah Tamaki, “Bishop” Brian Tamaki’s flamboyant wife, can contest the League’s presidency after officials removed her name from the ballot in response to a branch stacking scandal. Although the Court rules in Tamaki’s favour, Justice Kos finds ten Destiny-related branches invalid and ineligible to vote;

September 2011: Tamaki loses the presidential election to Whaea Katarina O’Brien;

November 2011: a constitutional review panel is convened and work begins to address issues like branch stacking;

June 2012: Tamaki is stood down as a League member;

September 2013: the constitutional review and consultation ends. The National Council – that is, the League in its Annual Conference – passes the revised constitution;

September 2014: Prue Kapua, who was a member of the constitutional review panel, is elected to the presidency;

September 2017: Kapua is re-elected. Judicial review proceedings are filed in the High Court in 2018 claiming Kapua’s re-election was unconstitutional;

November 2018: League AGM is scheduled.

Subscribe to Morgan Godfery’s Māui Street newsletter here.