spinofflive
Avatar 2
Photo: Supplied

BusinessDecember 8, 2022

‘Like seeing the first images from the moon’: How Wētā gave Avatar 2 its visual wow factor

Avatar 2
Photo: Supplied

Making a three-hour film full of digital water effects required computing superpowers on a scale the Wellington studio had never used before.

Wētā FX had a problem. By the beginning of 2020, the Wellington-based digital effects company had already started work on Avatar: The Way of the Water, the sequel to James Cameron’s record-breaking 2009 blockbuster. It soon realised it didn’t have the internal computing power to handle his vision. “There is a version of this story where we cannot compute this,” Wētā’s clearly relieved VFX producer David Conley admitted to me recently. “Our pipeline was pushed beyond what we’ve ever been expected to produce.”

Water, babies and rope are some of the hardest things Wētā has been asked to digitally recreate in the big budget, high profile shows and movies it’s worked on. Cameron’s Avatar sequel, released next week, is almost entirely set on the water-filled planet of Pandora. The striking 3D scenery, water vistas and underwater shots needed to not only top the original film, they needed to be compelling enough to hold attention for the movie’s three-hour-plus runtime – an extreme film, even by James Cameron’s titanic standards.

Avatar 2
A digital sequence from Avatar: The Way of the Water. (Photo: Supplied)

Wētā headed to Northland and spent hours filming water patterns and waves, then analysed the footage to work out how it would digitally recreate the natural water world for Cameron’s blockbuster project with their current levels of processing power. On other recent shows, like Marvel’s She-Hulk, Wētā found its ambitions were outpacing its Miramar data centre, already one of the largest in the Southern Hemisphere. “We knew at a certain point in time the amount of data that we had to process is far more significant than the bandwidth that we can have in our local data centre,” says Conley.

Increasing the capacity of its own computing centre wasn’t an option. “A data centre at the local level was going to be … a feat that required collusion with local government entities,” says Conley. “That is a daunting task in Wellington in the Miramar area, and we simply didn’t want to undertake that sort of effort.”

So, like any future-focused tech company, they outsourced it, and found what they needed in the cloud. AWS, Amazon’s fast-growing cloud company that has data banks built across the world and is reaping the rewards of its outlay with a $1 trillion valuation, seemed to have what it needed. But there were teething issues. “None of us had ever done it,” says Conley, who was speaking in Las Vegas as part of AWS’ annual expo Re:Invent. “AWS didn’t understand our business. We didn’t understand the barriers.”

 

As they began working, Wētā found the amount of computing power it needed kept increasing. “We started with a little bit,” says Conley. “No, double that. No, quadruple that.” Soon, they’d used all of Australia’s data capacity, and had Singapore on standby, at one point making daily phone calls to ensure its demands could be met. (Amazon’s $7.5 billion New Zealand data centre is underway in Auckland, but isn’t expected to be operational for several years).

What does all this behind-the-scenes computing power mean for cinema-goers? The difference, says Conley, can be seen in every single frame. As the results of Wētā’s digital world building in Avatar started being rendered, staff would gather around office computers and gasp at the results. “The first images that we got back … [it was] like seeing the first images from the moon,” says Conley. “You say, ‘Oh, wow … we could do this.’ We were there. And it was great.”

He promises that those who venture out to cinemas to see the results for themselves next week will “see some CG-related images that are unbelievable.” At times, even he thought: “We made all those bubbles, all that sea kelp … there’s no way that came out of a computer.” It’s not just Avatar 2 showing off Wētā’s improved tech skills – Marvel’s Black Panther: Wakanda Forever and Prime Video’s Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power have also benefitted from Wētā’s new-found ability to create the kind of digital shots its always dreamed of.

But Avatar 2 is, by any measure, the biggest project Wētā FX has ever undertaken. “We ended up rendering close to 3.3 billion thread hours (a way of measuring computing power),” says Conley. “In the span of eight months we produced nearly three times our annual output.” Conley hopes to eliminate the thought, “That looks fake,” from viewers’ minds, and says Wētā wants to get  visual fidelity down to a “sub pixel level”.

Avatar
A digital effects shot from Avatar 2. (Photo: Supplied)

Much is riding on next week’s Avatar release, including multiple sequels shot by Cameron at the same time as Avatar 2. Conley won’t be drawn on whether or not the film his team helped make is any good. Like any digital effects creator, he’s “only seen it in tiny chunks”. But recent social media reviews sound promising, and many early critics praised Wētā’s digital effects, labelling it “a stunning digital marvel” and “visually breathtaking”. “I’m almost convinced James Cameron shot Avatar: The Way of the Water on another planet,” quipped one viewer. 

Wētā’s ultimate goal, says Conley, is to use their new supercomputing powers to recreate, on a movie screen, the wow factor he had when visiting the South Island for the first time. “It’s like nothing I’ve ever seen down there,” he says. When he got home, he was disappointed to find his phone snaps failed to recreate the wonder and beauty he’d had seeing it in person. Does he really believe digital filmmaking can get us there? “Oh yeah,” he says with unwavering faith. “It’s going to happen.”

This story was written from Amazon Web Services’ Re:Invent expo in Las Vegas. Flights and accomodation were provided by AWS.

St James in disrepair (Image design: Archi Banal)
St James in disrepair (Image design: Archi Banal)

OPINIONBusinessDecember 7, 2022

The case against saving the St James

St James in disrepair (Image design: Archi Banal)
St James in disrepair (Image design: Archi Banal)

There are two easy ways to get rich: find one very wealthy sucker or find a million very poor suckers. As a public, it’s our duty to make sure we don’t become the million poor suckers, argues Dan Taipua.

A wealth of public buildings, a poverty of millionaire developers

In the theatre of my mind, I stand on top of the St James complex with a cricket ball in my hand. From this position I can throw that cricket ball and hit the Auckland Town Hall, Civic Theatre, Q Theatre, Aotea Centre (Kiri Te Kanawa Theatre and Herald Theatre), the Basement Theatre if the ball rolls for a bit and the Auckland Art Gallery with some effort for an uphill trajectory.

Publicly controlled buildings, restored and maintained for the public good.

Meanwhile, in the theatre of public relations, the privately-owned St James is seeking no less than $30m for renovation. An investment of funds drawn directly from Aucklanders who do not own that building.

We who support the arts (and I do support the arts) will cry, “we must support the arts!”, while several existing and healthy performing venues are less than 100m from the St James’s front door. Supporters of colonial style architecture will cry, “we must support colonial style architecture!”, while the Auckland Town Hall and the beautifully-renovated Auckland Art Gallery lie in that same 100 metre radius, and a fully-restored Civic Theatre with its beautiful Orientalisms is literally across the road.

How to escape a gaping hole of sunk financial costs: Dig upwards!

I’m not an expert on the structural condition of the St James complex, but I’m familiar with the building as I worked inside the venue up until the time it caught on fire (the first of two times) in 2007. I was working on the fated night a chunk of the building simply fell from the upper levels and injured a concert-goer.

st james
Restoration work remains unfinished at the St James theatre (Photo: Sonya Nagels)

Like most punters, I enjoyed the concert experience the theatre offered and the almost-stately decor of the lobby and mezzanine areas. As a worker, though, I also saw the derelict state of the Odeon and Regent theatres, which are attached to the building but almost never mentioned in subsidy-seeking press releases. I’ve been into the basements of the complex and the backstages and the roofing and walls and in-betweens. Those spaces were a wreck 15 years ago, and it’s difficult to see how two internal fires and general decay would have improved their state.

All this is to say that lovely memories of the concert theatre, which you’ll recall you’ve only seen in the dark, betray the actual condition of the site. In my opinion, there is no way on earth that $30m will cover the costs of its repair, not even close. But once the public has committed that massive amount and it peters out, what will we do with an unfinished theatre? We know the answer is that the public will burden future costs.

St James
The upper levels of Auckland’s St James theatre (Photo: Sonya Nagels)

The public good demands public control

Most people would see the tangible value in creating $30m worth of cycle lanes, even if they didn’t believe those lanes were a priority. Almost no one would see the value in handing me $30m to pave my own driveway, even if I promised it would offer emerging cyclists a world-class venue on which they could pedal about, creating a dynamic sense of community and fulfilling climate change goals eke noa etc. It’s still my driveway, and your $30m, no matter the claims I make about its lofty and indeterminate future uses. I will also be charging the same members of the public for tickets and booking fees, much like a theatre or concert.

The current proposition that the St James should receive funds from both local and central government is a complete reversal of how we should understand the arts and public/private support. There is a long tradition of benefaction supporting Auckland arts. Our gallery carries the names of many wealthy donors who decided to give something back. We also have an equally long tradition of the public bailing out failed commercial enterprises, resulting in a net loss of both public funds and art.

Recently the Bank of New Zealand auctioned off the most significant collection of NZ art in our collective history, with none of that art or money flowing back to the public. The deep, stinging, infuriating irony is that New Zealanders bailed out BNZ to the tune $1b in the 1990s.

Fool us once, shame on us. Fool us twice, shame on us again.