spinofflive
Was this the light that the prime minister stared at while designing the traffic light framework? Probably not tbh. Photo: RNZ / Angus Dreaver
Was this the light that the prime minister stared at while designing the traffic light framework? Probably not tbh. Photo: RNZ / Angus Dreaver

OPINIONPoliticsDecember 2, 2021

Excuse me, what colour is this? 

Was this the light that the prime minister stared at while designing the traffic light framework? Probably not tbh. Photo: RNZ / Angus Dreaver
Was this the light that the prime minister stared at while designing the traffic light framework? Probably not tbh. Photo: RNZ / Angus Dreaver

Attention drivers and other people who have from time to time looked at traffic lights: this is a scandal, writes Toby Manhire.

A brave new epoch in the New Zealand Covid response commences this week, as the alert level system is stashed away with old curtains and faded dreams in the attic, to be replaced by a bright new alternative: the traffic light framework. 

The new system is based, naturally, on three colour settings. There’s red, there’s orange and there’s green. No green at the outset, mind you; all of the South Island is orange and the North Island is striped orange and red like Dick Van Dyke’s blazer in Mary Poppins. 

The official state-issued map for the South Island as it goes into the traffic light system (left) and an orange (right).

So far, so why-are-you-telling-me-this-everyone-knows-it-already. I’ll tell you why. In reading around the traffic light framework I stumbled across something that will chill right-thinking citizens to their bones. 

The shocking revelation is this: the official, state-approved settings for New Zealand traffic lights – the actual ones that stick out of the tarmac at intersections – are red, green, and, please take a seat, yellow

There’s no orange. There’s not even an amber. There’s just – I shit you not – yellow.

Here is an instructional image from the New Zealand Rode Code. From the official documentation.

Look at it. Look again. What colour do you see?

Here is an actual New Zealand traffic light. 

‘Yellow’ lo (Photo: RNZ / Angus Dreaver)

I repeat: what do you see? 

Orange.

Let’s zoom out on that official Road Code image for a moment. 

There it is. “Yellow.”

A banana is yellow. SpongeBob Squarepants is yellow. Tova O’Brien’s coat is yellow. The preferred sandpaper of the Australian cricket team is yellow. That traffic light described above as a “yellow light”? Not yellow. 

The yellow light in the Road Code (left) and an orange (right).

Concerned about colours and my country, I pinged an email to Andrew Knackstedt, media guy at Waka Kotahi/NZTA. “I’ve just discovered,” I spluttered, “that the official nomenclature for traffic lights on NZ roads, including the Road Code, has the lights as red, green, and …. yellow! Yellow!? Can someone tell me why this is? Am I losing my mind?”

His reply was as swift as it was cruel. “Pretty simple answer really,” said Andy. “Because the signal is yellow.”

He added: “The advice in the Road Code reflects what is set out in legislation and in Land Transport Rules. See sections 3.2 and 3.4 of the Road User Rule for example.”

He was right enough about that. There it was in black and white – and yellow.

It’s a compelling case. Or would be, were it not for the sake that the light is manifestly fucking orange.

Andy wasn’t through. “This isn’t unique to NZ – most other jurisdictions also refer to yellow lights – see below from South Australia, for example,” he wrote, linking me to a South Australian state government site that I refused, on principle, to click on.

“Cheers,” he ended, laughing as he (presumably) cranked up Coldplay on the Waka Kotahi ghettoblaster and told all his colleagues about the idiot who’d written to him ranting about orangeness.

I thanked him for his response, bitterly. He emailed again an hour or so later.

“One of my learned colleagues has also just confirmed that the Australian/New Zealand Standard for traffic signals (AS/NZS2144:2002 Traffic signal lanterns) also refers to red, yellow and green. The same will likely be true for the North American and European standards.”

Yes, Andy, I know the Americans say “yellow” for their middle traffic light. But they also call their domestic sporting contests “the world series” and inedible mounds of gloop “cheese”. I reject this egregious American imperialism. I don’t know about continental Europe, but the British call it “amber”, which is really just another word for “orange”. They don’t call it yellow because it’s not yellow. It’s orange (amber).

We don’t do the red/amber get ready thing in New Zealand, maybe we should, that’s for another day.

If we called it amber, I’d be fine. Westminster system and all that. But orange is better, in keeping with our distaste for the posh, pretentious excesses of British life, such as the House of Lords, simulated sex with pigs and the word amber.

I went to the office of the New Zealand prime minister. She, after all, had got this one right – the colour in the Covid response traffic light framework is clear, unambiguous and true: orange. After a delay of some days – were they hiding something? – they came back and confirmed they didn’t focus group the colours. They didn’t do market research. It was clear they hadn’t consulted sections 3.2 and 3.4 of the Road User Rule or AS/NZS2144:2002 or the South Australian Driver’s Handbook. They’ve got a pandemic to tackle. What they’d done instead is look at traffic lights, noticed that the middle one was orange and written down “Orange”. 

I leave the final word to my colleague Natalie, probably the sharpest knife in the office; a person who calls a spade a spade, bullshit bullshit and something that is orange orange. 

“You’re either an amber gambler or running a late orange,” she said, in response to other colleagues who had shared wrong opinions in our work Slack. “There is no yellow. If there was, Cobb & Co would use pineapple instead of orange juice. End of.”


Follow Gone By Lunchtime on Apple PodcastsSpotify or your favourite podcast provider.

Keep going!
Mayor Phil Goff is proposing a billion-dollar climate action package as key policy in the upcoming annual budget. (Photo: Supplied. Additional design by Tina Tiller)
Mayor Phil Goff is proposing a billion-dollar climate action package as key policy in the upcoming annual budget. (Photo: Supplied. Additional design by Tina Tiller)

PoliticsDecember 1, 2021

Goff proposes new Auckland levy to tackle climate change, while ruling out airport shares sell-off

Mayor Phil Goff is proposing a billion-dollar climate action package as key policy in the upcoming annual budget. (Photo: Supplied. Additional design by Tina Tiller)
Mayor Phil Goff is proposing a billion-dollar climate action package as key policy in the upcoming annual budget. (Photo: Supplied. Additional design by Tina Tiller)

After another revenue-crippling lockdown, Auckland Council has some hard decisions to make if it wants to fulfil its commitments to tackling climate change. Mayor Phil Goff says a new targetted rate is the way to go.

Up to a billion dollars could be invested into climate change initiatives over the next decade under a range of new proposals announced today by Auckland mayor Phil Goff.

In a morning press conference, Goff revealed that he will be seeking support from the public and councillors for a new climate action targeted rate (CATR) to be introduced in next year’s annual budget. The new fixed rate, which is separate to general rate charges that are based on council valuations and property use, is predicted to raise $574 million directly, with a further $471 million to come through co-funding arrangements with central government. With the rate paying for significant upgrades of Auckland’s public transport system, including the purchase of 66 low-emissions buses and the establishment of new routes – meaning 170,000 more Aucklanders will live within 500m of a bus stop – it is expected to have the effect of generating more council revenue from increased bus and train usage. Plans will also invest $228 million for walking and cycling infrastructure and $13.3 million for tree planting in areas like Māngere and Ōtara, which have the lowest urban canopy coverage of any suburb in Auckland. 

Goff says this is the “most significant action taken by this or any council to respond to climate change”.

“For a person with a median-value home worth $1.18 million, the Climate Action Targeted Rate will represent a contribution of around $1.10 a week. So what I’m proposing meets the requirements of prudent financial management of our funds and with the climate action targeted rate, it’s council showing some vision for the future and being prepared to act to preserve the fundamental needs of kids growing up in this country,” he says. 

“We’ve declared a climate emergency, we’ve adopted a climate action plan, and so we’ve now got to walk the talk. Climate change is happening right now and so we need to respond with urgency.”

Council’s chief economist unit estimates the Auckland economy lost between $85-100 million per day during level four lockdown and $50-70 million under alert level three. Goff says not only has the latest lockdown had a major detrimental impact on council’s revenues, but with rising interest rates and inflation, council does need new forms of revenue, along with finding further savings. 

“We have been selling surplus non-strategic assets, and leasing out or selling car parks, and we’ll continue to do that, and continue to search for savings and value for money – so I’ll be pulling all those levers.”

From left, Mayor Phil Goff, Angela Dalton, and Fa’anana Efeso Collins. (Photo: Supplied)

‘You never sell the house to pay for the groceries’

One lever Goff won’t pull, however, is selling some of council’s big ticket assets, like its airport shares. Council officials have presented councillors a range of options on how it can service debt and meet its spending obligations, including the proposal to sell its 18% share in the Auckland International Airport, which is said to be valued at around $1.5 billion

“I made a very clear commitment at the last election not to sell any shares in Auckland International Airport or Watercare, and I intend to honour that commitment,” says Goff.

He also points out that before Covid hit, the shares were netting ratepayers $60 million a year in dividends. 

“You never sell your house to pay for the groceries,” the two-term mayor says. “The advice I’ve got from officers is that while you might free up money in the short term, it comes at the cost of reducing our revenue stream in the long term. If we were to sell the shares, the cost would be the equivalent of a 3% rate rise.”

But Manurewa-Papakura ward councillor Angela Dalton isn’t keen to write the proposal off just yet. She argues there must be better ways to fund council’s climate change plans than new rates. “We pay a lot of interest on our debt so what’s the best thing to do?” she asks. “Do we get a cash injection and pay down the debt that will save us more money than we get in dividends from the airport? That’s the value of having the conversation.”

She says the decision not to consider selling shares or any significant asset has been driven by “political mandate” rather than logic.

“At the last annual plan, we didn’t even have the discussion. But if we continue to increase rates, who’s going to want that? I don’t belong to any political party, and so I like to go in there without having to toe the line on an ideology or policy. There’s a lot of people who are struggling in this current crisis. And there’s a lot of things we need to invest in, and we can’t continue to rate our way out of that.”

Fellow South Auckland councillor Fa’anana Efeso Collins is on Goff’s side of the issue. “I am proud of the decision the people of Manukau made many years ago to buy and retain airport shares so the dividends could support the aspirations of the city,” he says.

“Flicking off airport shares now, when prior to Covid they were making us $60 million per year, is a mistake in my eyes. I acknowledge that our revenue hole is gaping and will take time to rebound, so we need to find alternative forms of revenue that will give us the ability to reach a financial holding pattern.”

Collins says one way to solve its budget issues would be for central government to return GST on rates back to councils. “I would welcome a serious conversation with central government about more of the nation’s tax take being shared with Auckland Council.”

Goff agrees, saying such a policy would be worth “several hundreds millions a year” to council coffers. 

“We were created as a supercity, covering a third of the country’s population, and we’ve been confronted with a massive deficit in infrastructure that we have needed to build up. So if local government is to play a real role in the governance of this country we need devolved forms of revenue [like sharing the GST take].”

Politics