spinofflive
Screen Shot 2017-11-15 at 2.08.02 pm

MediaNovember 15, 2017

‘Mum’s the word’: The online influencers secretly paid to go on 1News

Screen Shot 2017-11-15 at 2.08.02 pm

TVNZ has pulled a story about Kmart from its site after The Spinoff obtained emails showing two online ‘influencers’ received undisclosed payments to appear. The revelations raise fresh questions about the murky and unregulated world of the influencer economy. Alex Casey investigates.

Two prominent online “influencers” appeared in a 1News story about Kmart without having disclosed payments from a PR company acting for the retailer, The Spinoff has learned. News of the secret payment, which came to light in emails leaked to The Spinoff, has prompted TVNZ to remove the story from its online archive and pledge a review of its processes, saying it had on this occasion been “duped”.

In the item, which aired in April 2016, parenting and lifestyle bloggers Melissa Jack (The Best Nest) and Maria Foy (Happy Mum, Happy Child) appeared at Kmart in St Lukes shopping centre, Auckland. Jack extols the “reawakening and rediscovery of Kmart” in an interview with journalist Rebecca Wright. Nobody at TVNZ was made aware that the influencers, put forward by the PR company Undertow Media for interview, had accepted remuneration to the value of $500 each to take part.

Both Jack and Foy have made strong statements about the importance of disclosing commercial relationships with brands they write about. Foy specifically stated this year that she has never been paid by Kmart.

In an email obtained by The Spinoff, an account manager from Undertow Media set out the terms for the appearance. “Kmart is keen to move forward with both Maria and Melissa for tomorrow from 3.45pm to 4.45pm for the One News x Kmart interview opp,” she wrote. “As discussed, each blogger will receive $250 cash payment (as invoiced via The Bloggers Club) and $250 Kmart store credit (provided via gift cards tomorrow onsite) for their involvement in the opportunity and also to repost the One News video link across their socials.”

Foy replied the following morning: “Thanks for sending all the details through. Mum’s the word on the remuneration.”

As the story went to air, the bloggers can be seen strolling through Kmart, picking up products and chatting. Although Foy’s interview didn’t make the final cut, “consumer blogger” Jack featured heavily. “The last 18 months have just seen this sort of reawakening and rediscovery of Kmart,” she said, before explaining how a coveted hexagonal copper candle holder became something of a “treasure hunt” that spread through social media. “People have created Kmart fan pages, normally these domains were reserved for celebrities or sports stars.”

Given the cultural context of the story, Foy and Jack made for logical interview subjects at the time. Kmart – specifically Kmart homeware products – have taken on a cult-like status in recent years thanks to low prices and high social media frenzy aided by “instagram mums”. If it’s not a hexagonal copper candle holder, it’s a Dyson-rivalling vacuum cleaner or an affordable Scandi-inspired shoe rack.

Kmart did not respond to The Spinoff’s request for comment.

Editor of newsgathering at TVNZ Phil O’Sullivan told The Spinoff that although the story had merit at the time and that there was “genuine interest” in the popularity of Kmart, the revelation cast doubt over the subjects’ views. “We can’t have a story up if money has changed hands between the person who is commenting on this brand and the brand itself,” he said.

Had the financial arrangement been disclosed to One News, Jack and Foy would not have been considered. “Why would we do that? It demeans the story, it brings the whole thing into question.”

As mentioned in the emails, both influencers are a part of The Bloggers Club, a digital talent management agency with the likes of Anika Moa and How to Dad on their books, whose purpose is “to connect brands and people by building meaningful relationships.” The influencer industry is now estimated to be a billion dollar one which has as much of a stronghold in New Zealand as anywhere else. Take Shaanxo, who has 8.3 million followers across her various channels and was listed by Forbes as one of the most powerful beauty influencers in the world. She lives in Palmerston North.

Palmerston North’s Shaaanxo

One of the many PR agencies that has enlisted the services of local influencers is Auckland’s Undertow Media, which currently boasts clients including Cotton On, Roadshow Films and Cadbury. “We know how to create waves, resulting in exceptional earned media, events and marketing strategies for the products and clients we represent,” the website announces. In March of 2016, Undertow were working with Kmart on the launch of their new Kmart Living range, and facilitated the financial arrangement between The Bloggers Club, Foy and Jack prior to the the appearance on 1News.

Undertow Media confirmed the transaction took place, stating that they were contacted by 1News to cover “the mass hysteria over Kmart products” and approached Foy and Jack for what began as an unpaid interview opportunity. An Undertow spokesperson told The Spinoff in an email that after the shoot was set up, the influencers’ management at The Bloggers Club requested a fee. With a tight deadline, Undertow agreed to reimburse them with $250 cash and $250 in Kmart vouchers.

Screengrab from Melissa Jack’s instagram

Having been alerted to the arrangement by The Spinoff yesterday, 1News made their own contact with Melissa Jack to verify the claims. She denied payment for the appearance, but 1News were informed within an hour by Undertow that the transaction had indeed occurred. Neither The Bloggers Club, nor Foy or Jack when contacted individually, responded to The Spinoff’s requests for comment. When the claims were put to Jack over the phone, she hung up.

Asked if this sort of payment arrangement happened regularly, Undertow said it is “not very common” for their company, but noted that “we are seeing more and more requests for payment” from influencers, for social coverage in particular. TVNZ’s O’Sullivan said this was the first time this situation had occurred in his three years at TVNZ. “The issue is that we take a lot of people on trust. If it is that we have to ask every person in our news stories if they’ve been paid … well, that might be something that we have to start doing.”

In March this year, Australia introduced new transparency rules around paid influencer content. New Zealand currently does not have any specific regulations in place around influencers disclosing when they have received money to endorse a product. In The Spinoff’s short documentary The Influencers, editor of StopPress Damien Venuto noted that “There is no disclosure happening consistently enough” and that “there is certainly a level of risk in deceiving people into thinking they are just promoting this on their own accord.”

The Kmart story is all the more pertinent as both the bloggers involved, like many other influencers seeking a transparent relationship with their audience, have openly addressed issues around the importance of disclosure in their writing. “I started the week off stressing about disclosure, wondering what my readers think about sponsored posts,” Melissa Jack said in a blog post published in August of last year. “But you know what? I got paid for that picture, and I told you that too (ie disclosure).”

Maria Foy voiced a similar stance in a blog post published last month titled “Full Disclosure“. “I dislike it incredibly when people don’t know if something is sponsored or not,” she wrote, outlining the lengths she goes to make it “painfully obvious” when she has been paid to promote something. The post concluded: “There is nothing worse than seeing people lie to their audience and their audience has no idea.”

Foy made specific mention of her relationship with Kmart in a Stuff feature published last month exploring how influencers are driving retail trends. “The overall products the brand sells has to fit in with my audience,” Foy was quoted as saying. “Kmart is definitely one of these brands, but I have never been paid to do any work for them.” In the same article, Bodo Lang, a marketing lecturer from the University of Auckland, warns that “you don’t know who is being rewarded or incentivised to say what” when it comes to influencer marketing.  

Undertow told The Spinoff that, despite paying the influencers for their time, they did not have any editorial control over their messaging and therefore did not deem it necessary to disclose the fee at any stage. “As genuine Kmart fans [they] were happy to give their own opinion on what was happening in the market.” On their own blog wrapping up their work with Kmart at the time, Undertow refer to the 1News interview as “the icing on the cake.”

With the story now removed from the TVNZ site, O’Sullivan says that 1News will be examining its processes, and installing more checks to ensure that people are who they say they are. “The lesson for us in this is that we just have to be a lot more wary of these so-called experts or bloggers that are talking in that consumer affairs space,” he said. “There’s lots of people with really genuine stories out there and we need to keep relying on that. When we get duped by people like this, it just mucks the system up.”

Screen Shot 2017-11-13 at 1.20.30 PM

MediaNovember 13, 2017

We should have had a problem with Louis CK long before now

Screen Shot 2017-11-13 at 1.20.30 PM

Last week five women accused comedian Louis CK of sexual harassment, charges he admits are true. Sam Brooks writes about why Louis CK has always been a problematic comedian – and not just for this.

These are the facts.

Louis CK sexually harassed a bunch of women. The women came forward to the New York Times (although rumours had been floating about for years beforehand).

He admitted that he had done so, in a strange and poorly worded apology.

His career – at least for the time being, because history has taught us that men do bounce back from this stuff (hello Mel Gibson, star of Daddy’s Home 2) – is over. HBO has ended production deals, FX has removed him from shows that he had in production, Netflix released a statement saying they will not release his next special (but they still carry three of his old ones).

Louis CK is also someone who has been hugely influential in the world of stand-up comedy, whether you’re a comedian, a casual comedy fan or a comedy die-hard. You’ve probably heard of Louis CK. His show Louie won lots of awards. People love his comedy, for whatever reason; he’s talking truth to power, he’s saying what we’re all thinking, or he’s ‘very relatable’ (where relatable means that dudes can relate to you).

I’ve never been a fan of Louis CK. I say this not to jump on the post-sexual assault hatewagon, as if that was a thing that actually exists, but because his comedy makes me uncomfortable, and the praise around it makes me even more uncomfortable. I’ll get into that later.

Earlier this year, I wrote a piece where I listed my five favourite comedy specials, which all happened to be by women (who I believed, still believe, and will ever believe, are funnier than men). I got a lot of impolite comments saying I was wrong for not including Louis CK. People, mostly dudes, mostly white dudes, loved him.

I later wrote a piece, a little bit tongue-in-cheek, headlined “Is Louis CK only good because white dudes told you so?”. It was less about CK, and more about what art is perceived as universal and great and what art isn’t. (Spoilers: It’s art by white dudes that is the former, everybody else take the bus thanks.) When the New York Times shit hit the internet fan last week, there was a whole lot of silence from those dudes, those mostly white dudes. And it’s a pretty telling silence.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fcja4WFFzDw

Here’s another uncomfortable fact: Louis CK has been doing homophobic, racist and sexist material for years. Louis CK’s joke about the word ‘faggot’ has over a million hits on YouTube. Another one, ‘Offended by the N word’ has three million hits on YouTube. Countless jokes rely on the objectification or otherness of women. (All this is before you get to the amount of jokes that revolve around masturbation or people watching him masturbate, which is… an uncomfortable amount.)

Many of his jokes use minorities as targets and punchline, and CK has hidden behind a thin sheen of relatability and everymanness to make that acceptable – not just acceptable, but successful. For the past ten years he’s been one of the most successful and popular stand-up comedians in the world. Homophobic jokes haven’t stopped that, racist jokes haven’t stopped that, and sexist jokes sure as shit haven’t stopped that.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dF1NUposXVQ

So why has it taken a New York Times article confirming his sexual harassment for people to get properly and fully offside with him, even quietly? Why is the other stuff okay for his fans and this isn’t?

This is not to say that this shouldn’t have been the sexual harassment straw that broke the camel’s back. I’m incredibly thankful that in 2017 we’re in a social media landscape where these stories are starting to come out in major news outlets with actual consequences for harassers, predators and abusers from all levels of society, not just the entertainment industry.

Just like it’s easy to be friends with a mean person who is nice to you but makes jokes at everybody else’s expense, it’s easy to like a comedian who makes jokes at other people’s expense but isn’t lobbing jokes at you. It’s fun to splash somebody with water, it might be fun to get splashed sometimes, but it’s not at all fun to get splashed so much that you feel like you’re drowning. If you’re encountering homophobia, racism or sexism in your daily life, the last thing you want to do is encounter it in comedy.

I’m not gonna go watch Eddie Murphy’s homophobic comedy set, sorry. I’m gonna go watch Maria Bamford talking about her depression in frank and honest ways. I’m also not going to watch Dave Chapelle’s latest special (I have watched it, but in this hypothetical world I haven’t yet watched it) which has a lengthy riff about homosexuality. I’m going to watch Cristela Alonzo talk about getting catcalled.

And not all of Louis CK’s material is homophobic, racist or sexist. A lot of his material relies on him doing that thing where you address a character flaw in a way that is safe for you, gently make light of it, and then hope it excuses you from actually working on that character flaw. It’s a feint at vulnerability without the follow-through. Which is about as appealing as it sounds, once you realise that’s what it is.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=grjMbV64q60

The truth is I’ve never liked Louis CK because I’ve never found him funny. I like intelligence in my comedy, I like truth, I like punching up (or punching inwards), I like all the things that people seem to like about Louis CK, but I never got those things from Louis CK. I got someone who was speaking from a place of incredible, unquestioned privilege and consistently punching down at easy targets because it was safer and easier to do so. I never liked his show for the same reason, it felt like a show about the problems of a man who considers his problems to be the most important, with no awareness of the problems of those around him.

And again, if you’re encountering men in your life who consider their problems to be the most important problems in the world, with no awareness of the problems of those around them, the literal last fucking thing you want to do is encounter them in comedy.

It’s difficult to re-examine something you’ve loved all these years and realise that it’s problematic and the thing that you loved makes somebody else feel shitty and unsafe. I had the misfortune of watching the Absolutely Fabulous film on a plane a few days ago. There’s a lot of transphobic jokes in there that made me really uncomfortable not just because of the targets of those jokes, but because I’ve been watching Jennifer Saunders and Joanna Lumley since I was a small child, and I’ve turned to that show for comfort in times both good and bad. It’s shitty and difficult to see them make jokes that make another group feel smaller, feel less than, or feel othered.

We all want to feel safe, we all want to feel seen, we all want to feel heard. Maybe, to Louis CK’s fans, there’s some part of them that feels safe and heard when they hear those jokes. Maybe hearing him saying “I gotta cut around you faggots every Sunday” makes them feel better. Maybe “That’s just white people getting away with saying nigger. Don’t hide behind the first letter like a faggot” makes them feel better. Whatever it is about watching Louis CK that made them feel better, feel safe or feel heard, it’s something they need to examine.

And it needed to happen way before it became widely known that he was a sexual predator.