spinofflive
Gilbert & George (Image: Supplied)
Gilbert & George (Image: Supplied)

PartnersJuly 20, 2022

The art icons who made provocation their profession

Gilbert & George (Image: Supplied)
Gilbert & George (Image: Supplied)

A new show at Auckland Art Gallery Toi o Tāmaki marks the first major local presentation of work by epochal British artists Gilbert & George. Chloe Lane talks us through some of the exhibition’s highlights and looks back on their 50-year career. 

“The Singing Sculpture” is the work that secured Gilbert & George’s place in the art history books. First performed in 1969, it was living proof that art could be anything – and that “anything” could be highly creepy. The metallic face paint and doll-like dance movements that support Gilbert & George’s quivering rendition of the nostalgic ditty “Underneath the Arches” is the stuff of particularly strange nightmares.

Who are these men decked out in tweed? A 1971 New Yorker “The Talk of the Town” column from around the time of the first US performance of this work states: “Their dealer insists they are not putting anybody on.” In 2022 the nature of Gilbert & George – two men, one artist – and the sincerity of their output is unquestionable. And yet there remains a remarkable tension between the serious, political, controversial and even horrifying content of their work, and its eerie and sometimes even comedic execution.

Gilbert & George: The Tāmaki Makaurau Auckland Exhibition 2022 at Auckland Art Gallery Toi o Tāmaki is the first major New Zealand presentation of Gilbert & George’s work. Since the 1970s they have made monumentally large-scaled “pictures” that montage photographs with self-portraits. This exhibition includes 61 of these pictures, covering six groups that span the period 2008–2020: Beard Pictures (2016), Jack Freak Pictures (2008), Scapegoating Pictures (2013), London Pictures (2011), Utopian Pictures (2014), and New Normal Pictures (2020).

The exhibition isn’t organised chronologically or thematically. Rather, it operates as a journey through Gilbert & George’s 21st century – if you can say that the little metal ball in a pinball machine is on a journey. No, it’s not a quiet, gentle, easygoing experience. Quiet and easygoing isn’t how Gilbert & George have, even after fifty years, maintained such a fierce grip on their confrontational edge, and their relevance.

KNIFE STRAIGHT, 2010. Courtesy of the Artist

As artists, Gilbert & George are documentarians first. The London Pictures use the headline posters (literally – they nicked the posters from outside local newsagents) made to sell newspapers to present a “moral portrait” of London and its inhabitants. In “Knife Straight” (2011) the 27 posters that make up the picture are presented in their original black and white. Except for the word knife, which in each headline is bright, blood red. Gilbert & George loom behind the text, only their heads flesh-coloured, their bodies, naturally tweed-suited, dissolving into a background of florals that have the quality of the limp mesh curtains hanging in your grandparents’ house. Creepy factor: still pretty high. Gilbert & George’s expressions are maybe the eeriest aspect of this work, hovering somewhere between concerned, ambivalent, accusatory – it’s hard to nail them down.

BEARDWISE, 2016. Courtesy of the Artist and Thaddaeus Ropac

There is visual tension in all of Gilbert & George’s pictures. Considering the old “painting” stuff of colour, line and composition, these are the works of masterful practitioners. “Beardwise” (2016) from Beard Pictures presents Gilbert & George in a saturated red, donning feathery beards made of montages of golden leaves, their expressions blank, even possessed. Their heads are sandwiched between fencing and barbed wire, and hemmed in from all sides by floating cameos of tarnished silver. The colour palette in other pictures from this series is similarly limited and sickly: sharp purples, mint greens and bright oranges feature heavily. Many of the works also have Gilbert & George drawn with darkened, sunken eyes. It is unnerving – they appear vampiric.

BRITISHISM, 2008. Courtesy of the Artist and White Cube

A 2017 opera titled The Naked Shit Songs by Dutch composer Huba de Graaff reconstructs a 1996 Gilbert & George interview. An excerpt from the libretto has the interviewer asking the pair, “What’s so scary about life?” 

It’s a terror,” Gilbert & George reply. “It’s a terror.” 

What’s a terror?”

“Everything.”

It’s difficult to ignore this sentiment. Everything is terrifying in the Jack Freak Pictures, which take the blue, red, and white of the Union Jack and hack it to bits. “Britishism” (2008) has the graphically busy and exciting quality of a death metal album cover. And the Union Jack here has been separated, shattered, and rotated so that if it still operates within the language of flags it is only because these new shapes have an echo of swastikas or anarchy symbols. The figures of Gilbert & George in this picture are blue and red. They are small and multiplied in such a way that their miniatures look like rows of teeth revealed by a mouth that is, what – yawning? Crying? Screaming? We’re getting beyond creepy here.

NCP, 2013. Courtesy of the Artist

The Scapegoating Pictures present monochromes of Gilbert & George’s East London streets. The hard asphalt and metal of the scenes are softened by the fuzzy lines of spray paint that both reveal and reduce the flesh-tone figures of Gilbert & George. In these works they shimmer, and occasionally dance, while being rained down on by nitrous oxide canisters. “NCP” (2013) has them trapped inside a matrix of metal scaffolding. Their bodies are revealed only through floating Microsoft Paint-like lassos. Around them fly similarly shaped windows (vortexes, holes?) revealing another background in their favourite blood-red. They are dancing in this picture, but reluctantly – as if someone off-screen might be pointing a gun at them. 

BAG DAY, 2020. Courtesy of the Artist

None of the figures in the New Normal Pictures of 2020 are dancing. Instead Gilbert & George appear as if they are being buffeted by invisible, menacing forces. On those same East London streets, they are struggling to remain standing, and in some pictures they have even failed, collapsing in the likes of a bus shelter. “Bag Day” (2020) has them decked out in pressed red suits, plonked down on what look like the blank bases for a couple of torn-down statues. Crumpled plastic zip-lock bags hover in front of a nuclear sunset. A pair of skinny looking dogs look left and right, as Gilbert & George look skywards. What do they hope to find up there? Except for the dogs, the unsettling factor here is low. The tone is more of devastation, exhaustion, maybe disbelief? Whichever, it hurts a bit to look at.

Gilbert & George, who married in 2008, will readily sing the praises of Margaret Thatcher, and it’s not hard to find texts on their interest in skinheads. Their word on those blank bases and the recent toppling of colonial statues: “Shameful.” They have spent decades making pictures that are intentionally, unforgivably confrontational, which say exactly what the artist wants to say. They have also used that time to construct an aura around themselves, as provocateurs. They will tell you, “We want our art to bring out the bigot from inside the liberal and conversely to bring out the liberal from inside the bigot.” One reason it might be so hard to pin down what the Gilbert & George figures in their pictures are thinking is because this is where they operate best: a monumental grey area of sentiment and intent. You’re meant to feel uncomfortable and to have questions – about them, and for yourself. But are Gilbert & George, their figures always front and centre, just as they were in that earliest, creepiest sculpture, the heroes or anti-heroes? Can’t they be both?

Keep going!
(Photo: Amanda Rogers/Te Papa, 2019)
(Photo: Amanda Rogers/Te Papa, 2019)

PartnersJuly 19, 2022

The Single Object: A cultural history of the Toby’s Seafood uniform

(Photo: Amanda Rogers/Te Papa, 2019)
(Photo: Amanda Rogers/Te Papa, 2019)

Te Papa’s Nina Tonga unwraps the story of a fish and chip shop uniform.

The Single Object is a series exploring our material culture, examining the meaning and influence of the objects that surround us in everyday life.

On recent trips home to visit my parents I have been tackling that drawer of stuff that I have promised for decades to clear. Among the high school reports and university course readers, I couldn’t get past my scrapbook-like diaries bulging with letters, Stagecoach bus tickets and photos. Flicking through the pages of my seventh form diary I was confronted with my teenage obsession with recording my life as if I was worried I was going to develop amnesia the minute I left high school. I recorded EVERYTHING: who I spoke to on the phone, how I felt after watching Dawson’s Creek, my (never-ending) love of Keanu Reeves, and the pantheon of hot guys I never spoke to at the Newmarket bus stop. Revisiting this time capsule made me think about what it was like to grow up as a Tongan in East Auckland and how this Collins A5 diary had, at one point, been my most treasured possession. 

It was the absence of these kinds of material histories and youth narratives in Te Papa’s Pacific Culture’s collection that inspired our 2017 youth-focused co-collecting project. Project 83: Small Things Matter was one of three co-collecting projects designed to build Te Papa’s Tongan collections by sharing our curatorial authority with members of Tongan communities in Auckland. The project was a collaboration with the Year 13 Tongan language class at Sir Edmund Hillary Collegiate in Otara, Auckland, and their teacher, the incomparable Mrs Maata Fusitua. 

Our desire to collaborate with the Tongan community was heavily influenced by the pioneering Vanuatu Cultural Centres Fieldworker Network, which has been running for more than four decades. We took inspiration from their network of over 100 volunteer ni-Vanuatu fieldworkers who are actively documenting their own cultural knowledge and kastoms. In a similar fashion to the fieldworkers programme, we brought Year 13 Tongan language students to Te Papa for a two-day intensive workshop to design and name their co-collecting project. Part of the workshop included back-of-house tours through the Pacific Cultures collections, where we shared with the students treasures of our Tongan collection including the late, great Bill Sevesi’s electric-blue lap steel guitar. We also tried to demonstrate the breadth of our collecting by taking them into the history collections and showing them objects such as the Desert Disruptive Material uniform that belonged to Corporal Willie Apiata VC.

Nina Tonga and Elisapeta Fononga, one of the students who participated in Project 83: Small Things Matter (Photo: Ane Tonga)

In the end, it was a simple object in our collection that catalysed their project: a small conus aureus shell donated to Te Papa by Kupa Kupa, a member of the Tokelauan community in Porirua. For Kupa, this humble shell collected in 1989 along the edge of the lagoon of Fakaofo atoll represented his connections to his homeland. Hearing the powerful story of this seemingly ordinary object inspired the students to subtitle their project “Small Things Matter”. Kupa’s shell modelled for the students the potential for museums to be sites where their “things”, big or small, mattered. Through this shell they could see themselves and their “things” having a place in the museum alongside the most valuable Tongan objects such as ngatu (tapa cloth) and kie (fine mats). 

Over several months, we spent time with the self-described “youth agents” in their classroom, and met their parents and fellow teachers as they undertook the task of writing themselves into our museum collections. As museum curators, these visits opened us up to their stories and the dynamics of their home and school lives: Polyfest, speech comps and NCEA assessments. Like us, they shared our curatorial burden of cultural representation and their own preconceived notion of what museums collect and value. To counter this, they asked themselves: “What does growing up Tongan in Ōtara look like for me?” Together, their final collection of over 30 objects painted a diverse picture of youth experience: class photographs, first bibles, brass band jackets, a first trumpet handed down through family, an original song and a ta’ovala worn on a sweet 16th birthday. 

Among the array of objects was a Toby’s Seafood work uniform comprising a cap, T-shirt, hoodie and name badge with the name “Peta”, belonging to Elisapeta Fononga. Toby’s Seafood is a New Zealand-owned business that operates five stores across Auckland, in Ōtāhuhu, Massey, Glen Eden, Manurewa and Glen Innes. Toby’s is an institution. They are renowned for their fresh fish and shellfish and I can’t say enough about their raw fish and fry bread. Elisapeta worked part-time at Toby’s Seafood Ōtāhuhu for four years starting as a Year 9 student in 2013. Her mum previously worked for Toby’s at the Ōtara market and was able to get Elisapeta and her cousin part-time jobs. 

One of nine children, Elisapeta moved to New Zealand from Tonga with her family in 2006, when she was six years old. At an earlier point of the project she had considered giving us her first ever photograph – not the usual family snap we had expected but rather a standard passport photo for her immigration documents. Although we were excited at the prospect of the passport photo, Elisapeta’s final choice of her work uniform also carried her migration narrative as a young Tongan woman. As one of the only students in her class that held a part-time job, her uniform serves as a powerful object that speaks to the agency of young people and the contribution they can make to their families, our workplaces and our country.

Elisapeta Fononga and her uniform (Photo: Amanda Rogers/Te Papa, 2019)

Elisapeta’s sense of responsibility to contribute to the aspirations and collective success of her family is evident in the NCEA Level 3 essay she wrote to accompany her uniform:

“Growing up and seeing my parents struggling with their finances to help provide for our family motivated me to work. I was so impatient that I begged my mum for a part-time job, which led to me working at Toby’s Seafood.”

At this, her first part-time job, she worked long 12-hour days from 7am-7pm on the weekends, mostly at the cash register, helping out cooks and welcoming and hosting customers in the shop. Toby’s provided the free T-shirt and she had to pay for her remaining uniform – the jacket cost $17.50 and the cap was $20. She was getting paid what was then the minimum wage of $15.75 per hour. Writing candidly, Elisapeta shared some of the hardships of juggling work and school: lack of sleep, arriving late to school and the ongoing challenge of keeping up with assignments. Yet, despite her personal struggles, her perseverance was part of a collective sacrifice. As she writes:

“I knew this would be difficult but it was the only way I could help my parents’ struggles and needs.”

I reconnected with Elisapeta in January this year and decided we should catch up at Toby’s Seafood in Ōtāhuhu for a walk down memory lane – and a feed of raw fish and fry bread, of course. Covid-19 had definitely changed things – under the red light setting there was no inside-dining – yet this didn’t stop the constant stream of people taking a number and waiting outside while their order was prepared for them. It was clear from the clusters of people patiently chatting and waiting outside that Toby’s Seafood is a central hub of the community. As a family-owned business, their role in the community is well known. During the lockdown in 2020, the owner of Toby’s Seafood, Patrick Tobin, supported Waipareira Trust to store and distribute over 250 tonnes of food to help West Auckland families in need.

This sense of community was immediately evident when it was our turn to enter the shop. After leaving school Elisapeta worked there on and off, and still knew many of the staff, including some from their schooldays at Sir Edmund Hillary Collegiate. Walking in with Elisapeta, we received a warm reception from the employees; it felt like we were in a family kitchen rather than a business. For many of her former co-workers, Elisapeta’s uniform also represents their stories and their collective pride in their work and workplace. After RNZ published a story about her uniform in 2018, Elisapeta recalls arriving at work and being met with hugs and kisses from her co-workers, thanking her for sharing her story through her uniform. She also received messages from the owners of the family-owned business who were also moved by her story. 

‘Love The Spinoff? Its future depends on your support. Become a member today.’
Madeleine Chapman
— Editor

Elisapeta still remembers her shock at their response to her story. “I didn’t think it was going to be this big,” she says. It was all the more surprising since during the co-collecting project she’d doubted that her uniform would be “good enough” or that it would be counted as “Tongan stuff”.

Elisapeta’s royal blue work uniform is Tongan stuff. The one she donated to Te Papa was actually one of her brand new uniforms that she had yet to wear to work – she gave us her best.

Elisapeta’s story, told through her work uniform, creates a foundation for Te Papa to continue to tell the stories of the working lives of young Pacific people. It’s a mission that will become increasingly important. Treasury’s Pacific Strategy 2022-2025 estimates that in 15-20 years one in five children will be Pacific; in the workforce, one in eight will be Pacific. These projections also signal to us as museum curators that there will be more youth stories to tell. Elisapeta’s work uniform will stand in for the story of her family, her colleagues and those that are yet to come. Her uniform holds pride of place in our collection, alongside those of her fellow youth agents, as an example of the role Pacific communities have at the museum to shape our collections and the stories we tell. 

But wait there's more!