spinofflive
Kevin Parker, the lead and brain child of Tame Impala.
Kevin Parker, the lead and brain child of Tame Impala.

Pop CultureFebruary 17, 2020

Tame Impala’s Kevin Parker isn’t here for the hype

Kevin Parker, the lead and brain child of Tame Impala.
Kevin Parker, the lead and brain child of Tame Impala.

Tame Impala’s new album The Slow Rush dropped over the weekend to universal acclaim. Jordan Hamel talked to the band’s frontman, Kevin Parker, about the five year gap between albums, and where the band fits into riock music in 2020.

Kevin Parker’s musical baby Tame Impala steadily rose to indie prominence in the early 2010s, becoming a critical darling first in Australia (Parker hails from Perth) with the debut LP Innerspeaker, and then internationally with the follow-up Lonerism. Then, with the release of the 2015 album Currents, Tame Impala was catapulted into a new stratosphere of music stardom, occupying the rare position of being adored by both critics and the music-listening public. 

After Currents, anticipation for more Tame Impala was at an all time high, but instead of riding the hype train straight into a follow-up, Parker took a step back and focussed on other projects. He quickly became one of the most sought after producers and collaborators in the industry, working with superstars like Travis Scott, SZA, snd Lady Gaga.

Now, after a four year studio hiatus, Tame Impala is back with The Slow Rush. Departing from Currents’ heavily synthesized sound, Parker embraces more organic elements here – dusted drum breaks tumble, disco rhythms meld into the mechanical bounce of classic acid house, and lilting percussion patterns are spread throughout. 

The album is concise at just under an hour, which is apt as Parker uses that hour to explore ideas of temporality and impermanence. The Slow Rush constantly shifts in perspective, looking forward and back, jumping between the past, present and future in both lyrics and melody. It gets you feeling like you’re trapped in a moment, some weird time vortex, aa paradoxical as the albums title, and while you know it’ll be over soon and you’ll have to press repeat or go do something else with your day, you just want to enjoy it in the moment. 

While Parker could have left Tame Impala behind and saved himself the pressure and anxiety of trying to top one of the decades biggest albums, he jumped back down the rabbit hole and fans everywhere will be glad he did. Ahead of the album’s release, Parker talked to us about the new album, learning from collaboration and ignoring the background noise.

How does it feel to finally have a new album finished?

Honestly, relieved to have it done, but weirdly I can still listen to it.

What are you liking about the album at the moment?

At the moment when I think about it I’m proud of the rhythms of all the songs – whether it’s drums or percussion, I wanted every song to have a rhythmic element. I just wanted it to be more advanced in that way.

There’s been quite a gap between Currents and The Slow Rush, how has it been stepping away from Tame Impala to work on other projects?

It wasn’t intended to be like that, but I’m glad it worked out that way. It’s funny because as soon as I finished Currents all I wanted to do was make another album straight away, to kind of right all my wrongs. I felt like I’d messed up. So I thought I was gonna put [Currents] out quickly, then move on, but it was more successful than I thought it would be.

Now I sort of feel the same way, I just want to make a new album straight away. 

Do you have a favourite artist you’ve collaborated during your time away from Tame Impala?

I think the Travis Scott collaboration was the most fun, because it’s one of those collaborations where I was involved from the ground up. I’d spent a few studio sessions with him at different times, we’d hang out at the studio at the start and then I gave him the demos I had been working on, and I came back about six months later, it was fun, it was really good to feel his energy.

Did you learn much from Travis that you’ve used in making The Slow Rush?

Definitely. He doesn’t sweat the small stuff which I think is great advice. Just try to see everything as it is, see it from as far back as you can. You know what I mean? Try to look at it as a thing, as one big mood and not be obsessed with the small details.

So what’s the big mood of The Slow Rush then?

Lyrically I like the idea of this album being that time is racing. Like time is racing, but only when we’re not paying attention.

You have a [reputation] of being quite solitary during the studio process. Does it take a toll when you emerge out the other side?

For sure, it’s all part of it and I wouldn’t want it to be any different. Sharing the burden with someone else might be nice, but I just have to accept that it’s mine. It’s also a sign that I put my all into it, for me to be certain that I have given it everything I can, just being absolutely fucked after finishing an album.

So you’ve got the album release coming up and then a North American tour. Do you get to spend much time at home in Perth these days?

Yeah, it’s basically back to back tours. But I’ll be in Perth for the next few months which will be nice.

Are we gonna see you in Aotearoa any time soon?

Yes! There’s an Auckland show coming up in April.

 I’ve been thinking about everyone’s Spotify Wrapped lists, and for a lot of people neo-psych/psych-rock/psych-pop or however people define it has been a huge part of their decade, particularly in New Zealand. How do you feel about that scene? Do you have a relationship with it?   

Wow, that’s good to hear! I didn’t realise it was so big in New Zealand. People often tell me that there’s a psych rock resurgence and that I played a big part in it, but the only time I’ve noticed its rise is when people ask me about it. I’ve never really felt like I was part of a scene. I actually don’t like the idea of belonging to one scene. Every artist is part of a genre in a way, but if I played a part in it and that helps others then great! 

What was the last great album you listened to that wasn’t yours?

I haven’t listened to any albums in ages, I’ve been so caught up in my own shit. But Tyler the Creator’s IGOR was amazing!

‘The Slow Rush’ is available everywhere you can stream albums right now. Tame Impala are playing the Spark Arena on 16 April, get your tickets here.

Gwyneth Paltrow’s the goop lab has been roundly slammed on social media, with the exception of the orgasm episode. But how does it hold up?
Gwyneth Paltrow’s the goop lab has been roundly slammed on social media, with the exception of the orgasm episode. But how does it hold up?

Pop CultureFebruary 16, 2020

Emily Writes: The Goop Lab’s orgasm episode fails to reach a satisfying climax

Gwyneth Paltrow’s the goop lab has been roundly slammed on social media, with the exception of the orgasm episode. But how does it hold up?
Gwyneth Paltrow’s the goop lab has been roundly slammed on social media, with the exception of the orgasm episode. But how does it hold up?

Emily Writes reviews the now infamous orgasm episode of the even more infamous Netflix show The Goop Lab.

It was four days after the fourth person asked me to review the orgasm episode of Netflix’s The Goop Lab that I finally sat down to watch it.

I don’t like Gwyneth Paltrow but I also don’t like the public dislike for her. She doesn’t seem to deserve the vitriol against her. If being basic meant you’re worthy of a public crucifixion well, hell, there wouldn’t be enough room on the hill for us.

Still, I avoid films she’s in and I’ve not had any interest in watching The Goop Lab. I hate the idea of Goop. The whole premise, the whole concept – it irritates me. A bunch of rich white women floating along “optimising” themselves. It’s just so fucking insufferable.

So, to say I wasn’t feeling charitable toward The Goop Lab would be an understatement. I’ll be honest and admit part of me was just looking forward to slamming it.

But you know what – it was fine. Just fine.

I only watched one episode; I could not handle watching the drugs episode. Because if I take mushrooms I’ll get arrested but they’re allowed to call it therapy. I could not watch the therapy episode because He Ara Oranga : Report of the Government Inquiry into Mental Health and Addiction has screeds on how long it takes to access even the most simplified mental health care, so I have no interest in watching people who can afford it get it free. A bunch of privileged folks trying out culturally appropriated methods as a lark when the He Ara Oranga report referred to over-medicalisation or, simply, medicalisation of mental health responses as inappropriate, and inconsistent with holistic te ao Māori and Pacific views – it just feels gross.

So, I skipped these episodes knowing I’m truly not the target audience. And the others, which cover things like swimming in cold water? I live in Wellington, I’m good.

Betty Dodson, who heads up most of the orgasm episode of The Goop Lab.

I settled on the orgasm episode – ‘The Pleasure is Ours’.

I’ll get it out there straight away: I’m thrilled that any person with a platform is talking about the gendered orgasm gap. I’ve said it before, but I’ll say it again – there’s a massive orgasm gap out there. An analysis of over 30 studies performed over the past 80 years found only 25% of women are consistently reaching orgasm during vaginal sex.

This is full on. It means only a quarter of women are climaxing regularly. Twenty percent of us (cis women) don’t have orgasms when having vaginal sex with a cis man. And 5% of us never climax. Cis men, on the other hand, are having orgasms at least 90% of the time. I get messages and emails daily about it from women all around the world.

It’s something we really need to talk about. My hero Betty Dodson, who I have also written about before, is featured in the episode. She’s a sex educator who has taught thousands (if not millions) of women how to orgasm. She has a patented method called The Betty Dodson Technique that has actually been studied. Of the 500 women who tried it 465 reached climax. She has her own barbell sex toy. I mean – she’s incredible.

And she’s the star of the episode, honestly. Betty Dodson wearing a denim jacket telling Gwyneth Paltrow that women need to learn to “run the fuck” is quite entertaining.

Betty Dodson, in the midst of the orgasm episode of The Goop Lab.

She’s partnered with Carlin Ross, a former lawyer who monetised Betty’s work and created DodsonRoss with her. Porn immediately came up in their discussion of shedding shame and loving our genitals. I’m not sure Carlin has ever seen porn since the 90s because her comments about labia lips being cut and burnt off, dyed pink, and other tales of genital mutilation sounded like your grandfather talking about the demon weed and how it can kill you.

Statistics about a 45% increase in labiaplasty held no context. Is that an increase of 50 more surgeries? 50,000? 500,000? How many were for medical reasons?

The point – that all vulvas are different and it’s awful that people worry about how theirs looks – is a valid one. But we’re intelligent women, aren’t we? Do we need to be scared into agreeing with that statement? Do we need to shame sex workers who are probably doing more to combat that stigma than anyone?

I watch porn that I pay for (Erika Lust if you’re asking) and I have seen dozens of vulvas and they all looked different. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a labia that looked surgically altered? No surer way to know all vulvas are different than to see a bunch of them in porn.

Betty Dodson, maker of iconic faces.

It just seemed so strange that of all of the legitimate critiques of porn – consent, people being paid properly for their work, safety – the focus was on performers getting labiaplasty which just doesn’t seem like a thing? Or maybe I’m extremely wrong. I recognise that the “It’s not a problem for me, so how is it a problem for anyone else” is very on-Goop brand so I’ll stop there.

What the episode gets right is showing a bunch of vulvas up close in all of their beauty. And showing the clitoris and identifying vulva and vagina. It’s unsurprising to know that 60% of women surveyed (according to Goop) couldn’t identify their vulva. All of that is Good Stuff.

The other star of the episode is Lexi, a queer woman from Shanghai. She talks about feeling shame and feeling disconnected from her body. They introduce her to a sexuality doula who gets them to make lots of eye contact which teaches them vulnerability. According to the doula, the left eye is your feminine side which seems like absolute garbage to me. They give each other massages which teaches them communication. It’s all fine. Just fine.

Lexi then went to New York for a session with Dodson and Ross. And then for the climax of the show: Dodson coaches Ross to climax on air.

It was all fine, but it left me wondering again, as I always do with these kinds of shows – about accessibility. It’s a short show that obviously can’t cover everything. But a bunch of conventionally attractive thin people sitting naked in a room and loving themselves isn’t that revolutionary.

What about fat women? What about disabled women? Trans women? Can you talk about loving yourself and your body while excluding the people most hurt by a society that prioritises white, thin, cis? If you want to talk about shame, stereotypes, hatred – to leave out these women is absurd.

Every woman is shamed in some way for having sexual desires that aren’t in service to men. But there are levels here – and the shame heaped on women increases the more marginalised you are. ‘The Pleasure is Ours’ gets a “you tried” medal. And that’s about it. It isn’t the revolutionary television people think it is. But it’s a start.

Let’s just not settle for scraps though. We want a full going over, thanks. Not just the tip.