Image: Tina Tiller
Image: Tina Tiller

SocietyJune 27, 2020

We asked New Zealanders what the world will look like post-Covid-19

Image: Tina Tiller
Image: Tina Tiller

New polling shows New Zealanders expect to see the environment take a back seat to economic recovery, little change in fortune for low-paid essential workers, and a long wait for tourism to return to pre-Covid 19 levels, writes Stephen Mills of UMR Research.

There’s been a lot of speculation about what changes the Covid-19 pandemic will bring to the world. If history is any guide to the accuracy of similar predictions, most of the theorising will be hopelessly wrong.

Following the GFC, the political left hoped, even assumed, that the overwhelming evidence of the amorality, if not immorality, of the elite financial business sector would push voters at least modestly towards more left-wing positions.

Instead, much of the Western world, with a few obvious exceptions such as New Zealand, has moved to the populist right. Will Covid lead to greater international cooperation to solve problems, such as pandemics, climate change and immigration, that obviously cross borders, or will the trend towards more aggressively nationalist politics continue?

Some hope that a fairer and more equal economy can be built from the Covid shock. They hope that the evidence that massive government responses have been necessary to save lives and economies will make voters more appreciative of the role of government. 

Some think there could be more support to improve conditions for low-paid essential workers, such as rest home staff and cleaners, who continued to work through lockdown at considerable risk to their wellbeing, while only earning low wages.

The adoption of wage subsidies and increased benefit payments in many countries have also, at least to a degree, reopened debates on the merits of a UBI.

Some on the right are looking to free business from regulatory constraints to enable them to drive economic recovery.

There were musings that the evidence of environmental recovery and the dominance of cyclists and pedestrians on roads under tight lockdowns would increase support for a cleaner environment. 

This was not the case following the GFC, when public support for measures to reduce climate change faded in tough times. Prior to the GFC, right-wing parties had moved to at least pay lip service to climate change. After the 2008 crash, they quickly backed away.

There’s also been speculation about whether New Zealand will be better placed in a post-Covid world, possibly benefiting from higher demand for our food and more tourists attracted to our image as a largely Covid-free destination.

Asked what they expected to happen in a post-Covid world, across a range of issues, New Zealanders surveyed by UMR Research in April and May seemed to expect a move to the left but were not convinced about Aotearoa’s economic prospects. They were also not of the opinion that the environmental movement would be strengthened.

On the political front, given a choice, 78% thought “Western governments will be much more involved in planning economies to ensure, for instance, the existence of a national airline and local supply of health equipment and pharmaceuticals”; while 22% thought “Western economies will stay open with governments leaving supply of almost all goods to private businesses”. There was little difference by voting intention on this expectation.

The empty main street of Clyde. (Photo: George Driver)

Fifty-seven percent thought “the large number of New Zealanders having experience of the wage subsidy will increase support for a universal basic income, which is a payment made to all adult New Zealanders sufficient to cover the basics”; 35% thought “a universal basic income will still be seen as too expensive and reducing the incentive to work”.

A UBI has support from elements of both the right and left in politics but has been associated more with Labour in New Zealand. Labour voters (65%) were more likely to expect support for the UBI to increase than National voters (43%). Renters (63%) were also more likely to expect support to increase than those who own freehold homes (48%).

On taxation and creating a more equal society, a majority expected no change.

Forty-four percent went for the option that “the massive amount of taxpayer money that has been spent to rescue New Zealand businesses and help New Zealanders on high incomes will soften attitudes towards taxes such as wealth and capital gains taxes in order to reduce inequality”; 56% thought “there would still be overwhelming opposition to capital gains and wealth taxes”. Fifty-two percent of Labour voters thought there would be more support for a CGT and wealth taxes (despite it being ruled out by the prime minister), compared to 30% of National voters.

There was not much hope held for those in low-paid but essential pandemic occupations. Only 31% thought “people working in low-status and low-wage occupations such as cleaning and home care, who worked right through the outbreak, will get more credit and higher pay”; 69% thought “not much will change for them”.

On the international political front, more expected countries to turn inward. Forty-three percent thought “there will be a big lift in international cooperation to stop viruses spreading”; 57% thought “countries will become more nationalist and put their own needs first”.

When it came to the outlook for the New Zealand economy, there was some hope for food but not so much for tourism. 

Fifty-four percent went for the option that “there will be strong export demand for New Zealand food” and 46% for the option that “most of the world will retreat behind high tariff barriers and international trade will take a long time to recover”. Older New Zealanders were more positive on this count than younger New Zealanders.

Only 28% thought “there will, when borders reopen, be a boom in tourism to New Zealand”; 72% thought “it will be many years before international tourism to New Zealand returns to pre-Covid 19 levels”.

There’s not much hope when it comes to the environment either. Thirty-eight percent thought “people all around the world have seen how quickly water and air quality improved while economies slowed and will therefore want to maintain that cleaner environment”; while 62% believed “people want economies to boom again and will not worry too much about the environmental consequences”.

To finish on a positive note, most New Zealanders expected we would maintain that community spirit evident during the neighbourly walks of lockdown. Sixty-five percent thought “we will be more community minded and look out for people we don’t know”; while only 35% took the opposite view that “we will be more suspicious and intolerant of others in our community”. 

We asked: “Looking ahead, when the Covid-19 outbreak is over, which of the following options do you think is more likely?”

Keep going!
An underused Māngere cycle way (Photo: Justin Latif)
An underused Māngere cycle way (Photo: Justin Latif)

SocietyJune 26, 2020

Beyond the hype: Why is no one riding Māngere’s award-winning cycleways?

An underused Māngere cycle way (Photo: Justin Latif)
An underused Māngere cycle way (Photo: Justin Latif)

South Auckland’s multimillion-dollar bike paths set a new gold standard, but getting locals on track with council’s grand plan has proved an uphill battle.

A scene from the 1962 film The Loneliness of the Long Distance Runner often plays through my mind as I ride along the relatively new multimillion-dollar award-winning cycleways around Māngere. 

The reason for this random movie flashback, as I hurtle down these debris-strewn emerald corridors, is that I’m often alone on these bike lanes, a bit like the film’s main character who takes long solitary runs around the streets near his boys’ home. 

In the three or so years I’ve been commuting along the Te Ara Mua Future Streets cycleways, it’s so rare for me to see another cyclist that when I spot someone I’m almost compelled to chase them down like Tom Hanks looking for Wilson on his desert island.

The Te Ara Mua Future Streets research team, led by Hamish Mackie’s consultancy firm Mackie Research, is currently conducting follow-up studies into how the project has changed transport behaviours in the community, and what key lessons can be taken on board for future projects. 

“We’ve seen positive changes that we’d expect, like lower traffic speeds, and evidence that crossing roads is now much easier for people,” Mackie says. 

“In terms of the amount of walking and cycling, at this stage we haven’t seen huge change to be honest, as usage is pretty much consistent, but we will be able to get a longer-term understanding through further analysis next year.”

So, after all this time, why aren’t people using these cycleways?

Ben Ross, an urban geographer and spatial planner for cOlab and Associates, has followed the project’s development closely. He feels there is a certain arrogance in the way governmental agencies operate in places like South Auckland. 

“There’s definitely an element of classism at play – you have these engineers and designers coming out of the city, they do some consultation, do the project, but there’s no follow-up and the community don’t have that place to give that ongoing feedback.”

Mackie says it has also become clear that to get locals using the new infrastructure, investment into building up local champions is required, as well as dealing to things like stray dogs. “The biggest lesson from all of this is that more support is needed to ensure there are positive voices who can articulate in their own way the importance of walking and cycling.  

“If you spend a lot of money on a cycleway or pathway, it totally undermines that investment if you don’t take care of the barriers to people using it.”

The Te Ara Mua Future Streets cycleways around the Māngere Town Centre are part of a wider $10.4-million project that was officially opened in 2016 and was funded by the NZ Transport Agency, Auckland Transport, and the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board. The project was established to combat both the high rates of serious road crashes in the area, and to encourage people to take up walking and cycling to reduce the prevalence of obesity. 

Ministers from both National-led and Labour-led governments have highlighted the project as an example for other communities to follow, and the cycleways have even won awards. 

NZTA’s 2017 Bike to the Future Awards gave the Supreme prize to the project based on its ability to make cycling “a more attractive transport choice”.

So why invest millions in a bunch of new walkways and bike lanes and not do more to get people using them?

Teau Aiturau at his bike hub in Māngere (Photo: Justin Latif)

Mackie says Māngere local Teau Aiturau was identified early on as a potential community leader in activating the cycleways, but he acknowledges more could have been done to support Aiturau in this role. 

Aiturau, or Mr T as he’s known around the community, is a bike fanatic. For more than six years he’s been voluntarily running a bike club for children and adults, teaching safety skills and maintenance as well as managing events to encourage people into riding. 

He has been given access to a large council-owned workshop at the back of a park, about 1.5km from the Future Streets cycleways, to use as a base for supporting riders in the area. But he has struggled to attract people to the site, given its lack of visibility. 

He’s grateful to Auckland Council for providing him such a large workshop, but admits he had always hoped to create a bike hub, similar to those in Henderson, Mission Bay or Glen Innes, right next to where the cycleways were built.

“Being based right by the pools would be better because that’s where all the kids are – it’s the perfect spot. The downfall is that no one can see us here,” he says. “They’ve built them [the cycle lanes] but no one’s riding them. They say they support us and they give us funding for a few activations, but it’s not just me, there’s a team of people. 

“The vision is for Māngere to be the bike capital of the Pacific – we can still make it happen. I just need the space.”

In 2018, Toni Helleur, a Māngere central resident and the crime protection officer for the Māngere Town Centre, took it upon herself to get Aiturau a large container kitted out with solar panels and gear to fix and store bikes. It was almost a done deal, but they needed final approval from the Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board and Auckland Council’s parks department. 

Māngere central local Toni Helleur (Photo: Justin Latif)

“The first issue raised was that the logo was wrong, and then they said no due to health and safety,” explains an exasperated Helleur. “But we had agreement from Council’s onsite pools staff to make sure it met all the health and safety guidelines.”

Māngere-Ōtāhuhu local board chair Lemauga Lydia Sosene says her board supported the container idea but she believes it’s been held up by council staff. “It’s frustrating because I can see people wanting to get things done and the council processes slow things up.”

Auckland Council team leader, parks and places, David Barker says the council is also in favour of a container for Aiturau. 

“Auckland Council is extremely supportive of Mr T’s activities at Centre Park. In the case of this initiative, the Kāinga Ora container was used for another purpose. Auckland Council Parks did not oppose the idea. If a suitable container became available, it’s safe to say that an application to temporarily locate it somewhere close to the Moana-[Nui-]ā-Kiwa Pools for Mr T to run events and encourage more people to cycle would, I am sure, be supported by council.”

So despite all parties showing keenness for a local bike hub to be set up, there’s still no bike hub and no one is willing to say why.     

Auckland Transport and NZTA both say they have been trying to get more people cycling in the area as well. “In Māngere we continue to work with the local bike hub and Time To Thrive – To Stay Alive charitable trust [Aiturau’s registered charity],“ says an AT spokesperson. 

“[Through] planning and delivery of cycling activations, including guided rides, community events and cycle training for the community, including adult bike skills and children’s learn-to-ride sessions – all of which help encourage uptake of cycling.”

NZTA’s senior manager system design Robyn Elston cites the agency’s Safe and Healthy Streets South Auckland programme, which aims to “improve transport choice and quality-of-life outcomes in Māngere”. She says the initiative is “undertaken with input from, and for the benefit of, the local communities of Māngere”.

But you would be forgiven for thinking something’s missing, given the lack of visible success ie more people using the cycleways.

Mackie says the answer could be as simple as paying a guy like Aiturau to be a “community health ambassador” who would kick-start more ongoing activity. “If we want real change to happen, there needs to be much more investment, in the right way.”

One person who does love the cycle lanes is John Catmur. Originally from Great Britain, he has lived in central Māngere for six years, working as a pastor for the local Baptist congregation. 

Local pastor John Catmur (Photo: Supplied)

“When I ride in the cycle lanes of Māngere, I feel like I belong on the road. It feels so safe, so I can just relax and have fun,” he says. 

However, these lanes weren’t built for guys like John and me, and even though we appreciate them, it seems unfair having such an expensive project only being used by a couple of e-bike enthusiasts like us. 

The film I mentioned in my introduction is not merely a tale of a working class kid who finds solace in long-distance running, quitting the sport when he realises how his upper-class headmaster is manipulating him. It’s a snapshot of the growing divide between rich and poor in 1960s England.

These cycleways also highlight such a disconnect. At face value this project seems like such a good idea for a community beset with type 2 diabetes and obesity, but for a variety of reasons the community hasn’t got the memo. 

Manukau ward councillor Fa’anana Efeso Collins was elected the same year this project was completed. He’s all too familiar with Auckland Council making flawed assumptions and in this instance he sees the Future Streets project as part of a wider issue that will only get worse unless local and central government takes a different approach to community engagement.

“Future Streets is just one example where people in my ward feel like big changes are just being done to them, without a real understanding of why or how they can input,” says Collins. “So rather than just slap something in and then gap it, we need to journey and consult with communities in more meaningful ways. It might cost a bit more, but in the long run it will mean our investments actually deliver on the healthier communities we all want to see.”