spinofflive
Donald Trump gestures after speaking at the West Palm Beach Convention on November 6 (Photo by JIM WATSON/AFP via Getty Images)
Donald Trump gestures after speaking at the West Palm Beach Convention on November 6 (Photo by JIM WATSON/AFP via Getty Images)

The BulletinNovember 7, 2024

The morning after the night before: Trump returns to the White House

Donald Trump gestures after speaking at the West Palm Beach Convention on November 6 (Photo by JIM WATSON/AFP via Getty Images)
Donald Trump gestures after speaking at the West Palm Beach Convention on November 6 (Photo by JIM WATSON/AFP via Getty Images)

The 45th president will become the 47th, with Republicans winning the Senate and on track to control the House too, writes Stewart Sowman-Lund in today’s edition of The Bulletin.

To receive The Bulletin in full each weekday, sign up here.

A political comeback like no other

The race was predicted to be tight, but in the end it wasn’t really. Former president Donald Trump will return to the White House, comfortably, with the latest projections reporting Trump has secured over the required 270 Electoral College votes and is leading in several key states yet to be called. It puts him on track to pull in a result bigger than Joe Biden’s in 2020 and, in contrast to his 2016 win, he will also take the popular vote.

At the time of writing, the Republicans have also secured the Senate while the House of Representatives is still up for grabs. It’s a remarkable comeback story for Trump, who left the presidency in 2021 in a violent cloud as supporters stormed the Capitol, and has spent much of the past three years in and out of court. ABC’s live election coverage repeatedly emphasised that the election would be historic – the choice between the first female president or the first president that had been convicted of a crime. Here’s how Rolling Stone magazine summarised it in a tweet.

Writing for The Post, Luke Malpass said the past four years of Joe Biden now looked like a “Covid-era aberration”, with Trump improving his performance in virtually every state counted so far. “America has moved to the right,” said Malpass. “The result reveals two Americas, divided along cultural lines. The prosperous, mostly coastal cities, rich with economic opportunity and the beneficiaries of globalisation and the parts of the country left behind by that prosperity and the cultural change it has wrought.”

How Harris became linked to Biden’s failures

The mood at the Harris camp was understandably sober. The vice president did not address supporters gathered on election night, reported the Herald’s Thomas Coughlan, though it’s intended she will do so today. It’s now being reported that Harris will speak at 10am NZT, earlier than initially expected.

In analysis for ABC shared here by RNZ, Leigh Sales laid out six reasons why Harris was always on track to lose last night’s election. Among them, the state of the US economy. While Harris was not the president over the past four years, she has been inextricably linked to it as veep – and the Trump campaign did its best to blame her for the actions of the wider administration. Sales noted that while the economy has improved under the Biden administration, Americans “feel like they’re doing it tougher than they ever have”. That so-called “vibecession” has been felt around the world. New Zealand has, to some extent, experienced it too – while we have dipped in and out of recession, many feel we’ve been stuck in one for a lot longer.

The signs of this were apparent as soon as the early polls emerged yesterday, reported AP. While Harris voters were motivated by the fate of democracy, Trump backers were most worried about immigration and inflation. At the end of the day, that messaging won out.

The immediate ramifications

Former prime minister John Key, who publicly backed Trump, tempered his messaging slightly in an interview with Newstalk ZB’s Ryan Bridge this morning. On the prospect of Trump introducing heavy tariffs on foreign goods, Key acknowledged there would be “quite big repercussions” for New Zealand. “There is some downside for New Zealand and I’m not going to sugarcoat that, and they concern me.”

The New Zealand dollar took an immediate hit, the Herald’s Jamie Gray reported (paywalled), dipping by about US1c while local wholesale interest rates spiked. In an interview with RNZ’s Lisa Owen last night, Tim Groser, the former NZ ambassador to the US during the first Trump term, warned Americans that they may find their cost of living increases as a result of the incoming president’s proposed tariffs. “All of the responsible economists… are saying this is a disaster… The estimate is this will add between $2,000 and $4,000 to the average American household’s bill a year. They’re going to find this out the hard, bloody way.”

How the world reacted

World leaders, including prime minister Christopher Luxon, have congratulated Trump on his election victory. Many sent out statements before some of the major US news networks had called the election for the Republican candidate, but after Trump had claimed victory himself. The BBC reported that Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu, who had a troubled relationship with outgoing president Joe Biden, was among the first to share his congratulations, along with UK leader Keir Starmer.

Ukraine’s president Volodymyr Zelensky said he appreciated Trump’s commitment to the “peace through strength” approach in global affairs. “This is exactly the principle that can practically bring just peace in Ukraine closer.”

Matthew Hooton, in a column for the Herald (paywalled), noted that the world was entering its most dangerous period since World War II – but argued the US was entering its most dangerous time since the Civil War. “Trump [is] threatening to abandon Ukraine, withdraw the US’s security in Europe which will encourage Russia’s Vladimir Putin to expand his ambitions westward, launch a global trade war and collapse the World Trade Organisation.”

An election like no other

To finish, a brief reflection on what has been a long and exhausting election campaign. Until 100-ish days ago, it was meant to be Joe Biden facing up against Trump last night. We all remember the disastrous debate performance that ultimately triggered his decision to leave the race, paving the way, he believed, for a new generation of political leaders (and search data suggests a lot of people didn’t realise he had quit the race until this week, somehow). The Spinoff’s Toby Manhire noted the Jacinda Ardern-esque glimmers in the sudden ascension of Harris – an anti-Trump figure that could unify America.

The New Yorker has wrapped 25 “stunning moments” from this year’s election campaign that it claims “fell out of a coconut tree”. From the end of the Biden campaign, to a failed assassination attempt on Trump, to claims that the people of Springfield were “eating the pets” – it’s been a long ride. Now, the world prepares for whatever comes next.

Keep going!
Costello, Peters, Verrall and Hipkins (Image: The Spinoff)
Costello, Peters, Verrall and Hipkins (Image: The Spinoff)

The BulletinNovember 6, 2024

Conflicts over conflicts: Why perception in politics matters

Costello, Peters, Verrall and Hipkins (Image: The Spinoff)
Costello, Peters, Verrall and Hipkins (Image: The Spinoff)

Tensions over tobacco regulations hit boiling point in parliament yesterday, writes Stewart Sowman-Lund in this extract from The Bulletin.

To receive The Bulletin in full each weekday, sign up here.

Alleged conflicts on both sides

The battle over tobacco products heated up once again yesterday, with Labour and the unions taking aim at the government for publicly criticising public servants they say are just doing their jobs. It all started last month: Winston Peters, with the protection of parliamentary privilege, revealed that a sister in law of Labour’s health spokesperson Ayesha Verrall was a Ministry of Health official that had worked alongside the associate health minister, Casey Costello. Peters said the official should have disclosed her relationship to Costello, though the Ministry of Health defended its worker saying she had done everything right (but admitted it should have done more to manage the perceived conflict).

Yesterday, speaking for the first time since the claims were first levelled, Verrall denied she had ever received leaked information from her sister in law and called on Peters to “justify his comments”, while Hipkins called Peters’ decision to publicly name a public servant “reprehensible”.

In question time, the book was flipped. Hipkins questioned the government on its own alleged conflict of interest. As Stuff’s Glenn McConnell reported, the Labour leader asked the prime minister how he could be confident “conflicts of interest [were] being appropriately managed”, referencing advice provided to Costello he believed was linked to the tobacco industry. Luxon, in his response, chose to reiterate the claims about Verrall’s sister in law and was asked by the Speaker to apologise.

But wait…

There’s more. The Public Service Association later criticised Costello and the government for comments made about another public service worker. On Monday night, 1News reported that a Ministry of Health official had privately criticised advice used by Costello to justify cutting tax on heated tobacco products. In response, Costello accused the official of “undermining the government’s harm-reduction approach to reducing smoking rates”.

The PSA’s national secretary Kerry Davies, reported RNZ’s Craig McCulloch, said Costello’s remarks were “unacceptable within our democratic system” and could have a chilling effect. “Here we have an inexperienced minister intimidating officials because she is simply unhappy with their advice,” she said. “How is that good for our democracy?”

Part of a bigger picture

These issues are but tiny bites out of a larger debate over conflicts of interest circling the government’s controversial moves to wind back tobacco regulations. We’ve talked about it before, but a lot of it stems from ongoing in-depth reporting by RNZ’s Guyon Espiner, who has raised questions over possible interference by the tobacco industry in the government’s decision-making (strenuously denied by Costello, the PM and other ministers). Luxon, appearing on Morning Report yesterday morning, appeared irked by the continuing questions over tobacco rules and his minister’s decision making. “I think what’s frustrating is that Radio New Zealand frankly just wants to talk about this single issue every single week,” he said.

But the ongoing questions lobbed at each side over tobacco regulations aren’t the only claims of conflicts of interest that have been raised this term. The auditor general is currently probing how conflicts of interest were handled in regards to the government’s controversial fast-track bill, while one of the ministers involved – Shane Jones – faced accusations of undisclosed lobbying over a dinner with a mining boss earlier in the year. Nicole McKee, the minister with oversight for gun rules, has similarly been criticised for ongoing ties to the gun lobby and for previously failing to declare her firearms safety business. Then, as Bryce Edwards noted here, there is the evergreen suggestion that MPs with large housing portfolios are conflicted when making decisions that benefit them. These are, clearly, all distinct issues – and conflicts of interest are nothing new. But conflicts or the appearance of conflicts also invite suspicion over government decision-making, as Simon Wilson argued in the Herald earlier this year (paywalled).

The strange saga of Stephen Rainbow

I must stress that there’s no evidence of a conflict of interest here, but the ongoing peculiarity surrounding the recent hiring of a new chief human rights commissioner is worth highlighting for similar “optics” reasons. The Spinoff’s Madeleine Chapman has been doing excellent reporting in this area, revealing texts from early this year in which Stephen Rainbow acknowledged he “didn’t get the HRC [Human Rights Commission] job”. But as we all know, he was indeed appointed.

Chapman has previously reported that Rainbow wasn’t shortlisted for the role by the independent panel tasked with compiling candidates, and was listed as “not recommended” after he was subsequently handpicked for the shortlist by justice minister Paul Goldsmith. As Chapman summarised: “Somewhere between May 22 and August 16, Rainbow went from being an unsuccessful, ‘not recommended’ candidate, to being the successful candidate. Previous questions put to the justice minister about the qualifications and appointment of Rainbow received a brief response that the panel simply recommends candidates, it doesn’t appoint them.”

Asked to comment during question time yesterday, Goldsmith said he alone did not appoint Rainbow. “Cabinet made the decision and the government made the appointment. The government made the appointment because he is a very well-qualified person who would do a great job.”

But wait there's more!