spinofflive
Auckland Art Gallery Toi o Tāmaki.
Auckland Art Gallery Toi o Tāmaki.

ĀteaMarch 27, 2021

‘Unsafe space for Māori’: Auckland Art Gallery in turmoil as staff question leadership

Auckland Art Gallery Toi o Tāmaki.
Auckland Art Gallery Toi o Tāmaki.

Against the backdrop of an unprecedented exhibition of Māori art, staff members are speaking out on the gallery leadership. Leonie Hayden reports.

A landmark survey of contemporary Māori art, Toi Tū Toi Ora, opened at the Auckland Art Gallery late last year to a wave of critical and popular acclaim. In stark contrast to the plaudits for the exhibition, however, the institution has been plagued by internal ructions leading up to and since its launch. Concerns around gallery leadership and cultural safety have culminated in the suspension of an employee accused of leaking a recording of a heated all-staff meeting, the resignations of 11 staff, half the gallery’s Māori advisory board standing down and a lengthy complaint submitted via the staff union.

The unrest follows the departure of the gallery’s curator Māori, Nigel Borell (Pirirākau, Ngāi Te Rangi, Ngāti Ranginui, Te Whakatōhea) soon after the opening of the exhibition.

More than 800 people attended the Toi Tū Toi Ora opening night event on December 4, which saw a who’s who of Māori arts practitioners, media personalities and community leaders filling the central Auckland gallery. While arts patrons and gallery supporters celebrated the launch, disquiet simmered underneath. News of Borell’s resignation had not yet been made public, but many of his supporters, including artists featured in the exhibition, wore badges that read “NB” in large type; and, beneath, “Not today coloniser”, a message of solidarity with the curator.

Borell announced his resignation in an interview with NZ Herald’s Canvas magazine in January, citing irreconcilable differences with the gallery’s director, Kirsten Lacy, with whom he had worked closely on Toi Tū Toi Ora. He told Canvas that he and Lacy, who arrived from Australia having previously worked as the deputy director at the National Art Gallery, had “different ways of viewing aspirations for Māori”.

Artist Elizabeth Ellis, the former chair of the gallery’s Māori advisory board Haerewa, and a foundation member since its creation in 1994, also announced her resignation in November. In the same story, she told the Herald it wasn’t a “protest” resignation. Since, however, four more foundation members have resigned.

In a letter provided to The Spinoff, dated February 18, sent on behalf of Ellis, Dr Benjamin Pittman, Mere Harrison Lodge, Fred Graham and Dr Patu Hohepa, the group states: “We have valued our time guiding and supporting the curator Māori and wider gallery, ensuring it is a culturally safe place for all. However, changes over the past two years at Auckland Art Gallery Toi o Tāmaki have set a different vision for Māori.” The letter is addressed to Lacy, who took up the role of director in May 2019.

In response to questions from the Spinoff, Lacy said via email this was “not a total surprise” as “some of the members had indicated they were going to retire once they had achieved a long-held aspiration of exhibiting Toi Tu Toi Ora”.

She added that the gallery is undertaking “structural changes” which included a discussion about Haerewa extending its memberships to include mana whenua voices. “This has not occurred but this may have been seen as a change of direction for some Haerewa members.”

Kirsten Lacy. Photo: supplied

A former board member spoken to by The Spinoff says that membership has never been closed to mana whenua – Ngāti Whātua carver Bernard Makoare was a member of Haerewa for six years – but that the board is primarily for arts experts whose main role is to support the curator Māori. The former member said Auckland Council recognises 19 iwi with mana whenua interests in Auckland, and a 10-person board cannot give representation to all on mana whenua status alone.

Lacy said the resignations could be attributed to “a mix of retirement, new employment opportunities, study leave and leaving the region”.

On Borell’s resignation, she said: “Nigel has spoken for himself publicly and to many in the community on the reasons for his resignation and there is nothing additional that I can add to his comments. It was his decision and choice to make, and, as I said at his farewell, I wish nothing but the very best for him in his next endeavours.”

She said a new curator Māori will be appointed “in the coming weeks”.

Multiple sources have told The Spinoff the breakdown of the relationship between Lacy and Borell was in part a result of decisions on the leadership of the discussion series to accompany Toi Tū Toi Ora.

The Auckland Art Gallery website shows a cancelled October 28 event was a conversation with three Māori artists, to be hosted by Lacy.

The cancelled Toi Talks event.

In response, Lacy said that Borell was “consulted on a specific public programme to be delivered in October over a number of meetings. When he advised me that he disagreed with the tenets of the programme and the inclusion of a series of Māori guests being included, I cancelled the programme and it was not delivered.”

The staff meeting

A recording of an all-staff meeting that took place on January 18 has been the subject of an employment “misconduct” investigation, leading to the suspension of a Māori employee who worked as a security guard.

The staff member was stood down for a number of weeks under suspicion of circulating the recording and for tweeting in support of Borell’s exit and his interview in Canvas. They attended the January 18 meeting in person, but say there is no evidence that they made the recording or circulated it.

The 40-minute recording features opening remarks from Lacy and Helen Te Hira, the general manager kaupapa Māori for Auckland Unlimited – Auckland Council’s economic and cultural agency, a recent merger of ATEED and Regional Facilities Auckland, which oversees the Auckland Art Gallery. In it, Lacy addresses negative press received by the gallery and herself. She references a number of new Māori roles and initiatives at the gallery and talks about her relationship with Ngāti Whātua and other Māori arts experts, but makes no mention of Haerewa or Borell. Te Hira acknowledges both in her remarks, and gives mihi to the kaiārahi Māori working within the gallery.

A number of gallery staff are then heard voicing their concerns about racism and cultural safety at the gallery, and a lack of transparency around five recent staff redundancies, which included people of colour. Some of the speakers are audibly distressed and in tears. The final comments come from a staff member asking the gallery’s leadership to take responsibility for the events leading to Borell’s resignation, and not to gloss over it by talking about the future.

Sandy Adsett’s Puhoro, commissioned for Toi Tū Toi Ora (Image: Auckland Art Gallery Toi o Tāmaki)

Union action

The Auckland Art Gallery’s union, the PSA, has issued a member submission to Auckland Unlimited on behalf of more than 50 Auckland Art Gallery employees. Staff received an acknowledgement of receipt on March 17.

In the submission, a copy of which has been seen by The Spinoff, staff union members say the “most significant” issue is “lack of competency in leadership and an ongoing lack of trust between gallery leadership and gallery staff”.

They argue that other avenues taken to raise these issues have “not resulted in any meaningful outcomes”. The submission says a lack of senior staff who “live and lead from a place of te ao Māori” makes the gallery an “unsafe space for Māori” and the existing cultural framework, including the longstanding relationship with Haerewa, has been undermined; bullying is “rife” in the workplace, they say; staff fear they will be in the “firing line” if they raise issues; and positions previously held by “ethnic minority staff” have been downgraded to much lower salary scales.

The staff behind the submission say Lacy’s approach is “at odds with the rest of the staff” and her leadership style is “autocratic”. They claim she “regularly misses team meetings and then dismisses group recommendations that are agreed in the meetings”. Concerns are raised around the appointment of external contractors, too. “Decision-making on programmes, acquisitions and expenditure, including investment made in personal projects and multiple external consultants, is done without [the] transparency expected of a public institution,” reads the submission.

One staff member currently working at the Auckland Art Gallery  told The Spinoff the mood at the gallery right was close to “mutinous”.

“In the hui that I’ve been in, 100% of union members have supported the submission, and in fact there’s probably even more staff that aren’t unionised who would side with the submission too,” they said.

Lacy’s video series Cultured Conversations, in which she interviews arts and arts-adjacent subjects, also comes under fire. “It does not appear to serve the gallery beyond providing networking opportunities for the director,” reads the submission. It claims that staff are not consulted on guests, nor are relevant staff invited to meet and engage with guests, such as Māori staff welcoming Māori guests.

Lacy defended the Cultured Conversations exercise, saying it was a “director-led programme amongst some 3,000 public programmes and events” and it has been a “very effective programme in raising the profile of the importance of the arts and culture to Tamaki”. She said she has invited Māori cultural leaders to meet with staff at staff meetings, and five guests have presented to staff over the past few months.

Since the recorded meeting in January, smaller departmental meetings have been held to discuss the issues that were raised. The PSA submission claims that the issues around Borell’s departure have not been properly addressed, and staff have been made to feel they cannot discuss it in the workplace. Lacy disputes the point. She told The Spinoff that Auckland Art Gallery and Auckland Unlimited are currently engaging with the union to understand the issues being raised, and “how current they are”.

“Like many other organisations experiencing the impact of Covid, the gallery staff and programme have also been impacted. I have been very concerned for the wellbeing of my staff over the past year.”

Nigel Borell. Photo: Supplied

One staff member told The Spinoff that the experience was “disempowering”, saying: “It’s a hard place to work, not because of the work itself, but because of the unacknowledged historical trauma. There seems to be a lack of will to actually look at what is. Instead you just get ‘that’s not going to happen again’. Well it has happened, and no one’s talking about it.

“The thing that blows my mind is that it feels like she’s being protected at the expense of the gallery. That’s blowing the minds of the people who have committed their entire lives to the place.”

The PSA document also details a range of concerns that pre-date Borrell’s resignation. Workloads are described as “exhausting” and “relentless” as a result of understaffing, and staff say they are concerned the high workload will continue throughout 2021.

“Everyone passionately believes in what they’re doing,” the staff member said, “and people are so committed to their colleagues, but there’s no real infrastructure of support for the actual people who make up the gallery.

“The best bit about the gallery is the staff. That’s why people turn up every day.”

When approached by The Spinoff, Borell wouldn’t be drawn further on his reasons for leaving, or the ongoing issues between gallery staff and leadership. Instead he paid tribute to the staff and the artists who contributed to Toi Tū Toi Ora, saying “it’s about Māori being at the centre of their own story”.

“This in itself is an act of tino rangatiratanga: of sovereignty as guaranteed under Te Tiriti o Waitangi. These current actions are a powerful reminder of why that is important.”

Illustration of a person wearing a tino rangatiratang t-shirt, holding a sign that says "I'm over racism in Aotearoa". Illustration by Gabrielle Baker
Illustration: Gabrielle Baker

ĀteaMarch 24, 2021

Putting racism into words

Illustration of a person wearing a tino rangatiratang t-shirt, holding a sign that says "I'm over racism in Aotearoa". Illustration by Gabrielle Baker
Illustration: Gabrielle Baker

Māori health advocate Gabrielle Baker looks at a landmark survey that puts into words what so many Māori already know: racism in Aotearoa affects us every day.

“I mean, I think New Zealand is the best place on the planet, but it is a racist place” – Taika Waititi, 2018

This week, Te Atawhai o Te Ao – an independent Māori research unit based in Whanganui – released Whakatika: A Survey of Māori Experiences of Racism. The report is heavy, but it is also the culmination of years of incredible work to give expression to what most of us experience as Māori in Aotearoa.

Te Atawhai o Te Ao researchers surveyed over 2,000 Māori between February 2019 and February 2020 at Māori-centred events across Aotearoa. The survey was run in-person (rather than online) and to be eligible to fill in the survey people needed to be Māori and 16 years or older.

Talking about racism is not new for us. In the 1980s, the landmark Puao-Te-Ata-Tū report drew a line in the sand about racism and its impacts on Māori. It identified institutional racism within the then-Department of Social Welfare and championed an anti-racist, by Māori, for Māori approach. And even before then Māori were talking about and protesting racism and colonisation in all sorts of ways – within whānau, on marae, in churches, as hapū and iwi. Māori researchers have pointed at inequities between Māori and non-Māori and other examples of racism over the decades, building an evidence base on how this affects our health and wellbeing as Māori.

What the Whakatika report does that is especially new, however, is shine a light on the everyday impacts of racism in a way that helps us to make sense of our experiences.

Illustartion of four Māori people and a quote from the Whakatika survey: "93% of Māori felt racism impacted on them on a daily basis. 96% said it was a problem for their wider whānau, at least to some extent."
Illustration: Gabrielle Baker

Some of the instances of racism covered in the report are what might be called micro-aggressions – the subtle instances of discrimination or judgment that leave you wondering “yo, is this racist?” This includes things like receiving slow or no service in shops (89% of people said they were less likely to get service in a shop than other people, because they are Māori). Or having to explain or spell your tūpuna name all the time (like 53% of the people surveyed).

Other instances of racism are more coordinated and actively reinforced by institutions (like local governments) or industries (like media). The survey asked questions about colonial statues and 63% of Māori were left riri at the use of our shared public spaces to commemorate harmful colonial figures. And most Māori (79%) said that they felt non-Māori media portrayed Māori negatively all of the time or often.

The approach taken by Te Atawhai o Te Ao is to draw together these different types of racism, characterising them as attacks on our rangatiratanga. Here rangatiratanga is used as shorthand for the wellbeing that whānau, hapū and iwi had before colonisation and also captures Māori aspirations and rights guaranteed under Te Tiriti o Waitangi.

The survey questions about traditional kai, in particular, show just how these attacks on rangatiratanga affect us across generations. Being able to gather, prepare and eat the foods of our tūpuna is a way to keep our traditions alive. Sharing this with younger generations is one of the best parts of being Māori. While 76% of Māori said they or their whānau had knowledge about traditional kai, a large proportion of people (32%) felt a deep sense of loss when they couldn’t harvest or buy Māori kai and this only got worse with age.

Illustration of a person eating kina, wearing a beanie that says "I heart kina". Illustration by Gabrielle Baker
Illustration: Gabrielle Baker

I should probably at this point make it clear that the illustrations throughout the Whakatika report, and in this article, are mine (commissioned by Te Atawhai o Te Ao). In illustrating such a dark and harmful topic, the challenge was to humanise the content without trying to make everyone look irrationally happy about having our rights eroded systematically. When it came to kai, I looked at the survey data and started to intensely miss the smell of Dad preparing kina and pāua in my childhood kitchen. I understood the 64% of kaumātua who shared their deep sense of grief at not being able to access traditional kai.

The heartening thing you’ll find in Whakatika is the ways that Māori push back against racism. Across all parts of the survey Māori talk about the support of whānau in processing and understanding our experiences of racism (for example 62% of Māori say they talk to their whānau after seeing negative portrayals of Māori in media stories). Māori also create safe spaces for each other, to express our Māori identities, and the survey shows we feel most comfortable with whānau, at home or at iwi events.

There is a lot of ground covered in the Whakatika report, including a challenge for those of us (including government agencies) who think that a bit of unconscious bias training will fix all this up. While there are recent signs that suggest the government, media groups and businesses (here and overseas) are prepared to acknowledge racism or ‘bias’, we have every reason to be sceptical. We know that gains are easily lost from a change in political will (see for example, the race-based policies review following a speech at Orewa in the 2000s). Which is why it is important that these same groups engage with the findings of the Whakatika report and its observations that eliminating racism requires support for mana motuhake, protection (and respect) of our Te Tiriti rights and “a constant, consistent, Māori focused, multipronged approach”.

Whakatika is available here. You’ll find a treasure trove of background material too, including literature reviews by Dr Rawiri Tinirau, DrCherryl Smith, and Meri Haami, and some sweet illustrations.