spinofflive
Image design: Tina Tiller
Image design: Tina Tiller

BusinessMarch 27, 2024

Cuba Street businesses face an existential threat – wider footpaths

Image design: Tina Tiller
Image design: Tina Tiller

When tourists come to Wellington, Cuba Street is always at the top of their bucket list, because of its famous car parking facilities. But now the council wants to take that away. 

Business owners on Cuba Street, New Zealand’s oldest and most successful pedestrianised shopping area, need your help. Wellington City Council is threatening to upgrade their street.

The upgrade would make the narrow footpaths between Ghuznee and Vivian St two metres wider, relieving the pedestrian traffic jams that occur at peak times, and creating space for al fresco dining. It would also add extra loading zones for delivery vehicles. 

But at what cost? In the name of green, woke idealism, this plan will put every business on Cuba Street at risk, because it will remove 20 on-street car parks. It will choke the life out of the street and make it impossible for customers to access the shops. 

People don’t go to Cuba Street because it’s a pedestrian-friendly, vibrant and interesting place to spend time. They go there because of the plentiful and convenient car parking. In the morning and evening rush hour, pedestrians go out of their way to walk along Cuba Street, because they love the resplendent views of 2016 Subaru Outbacks idling beside them.

This is what the savvy business owners of upper Cuba Street understand, and the out of touch council simply don’t: trying to increase foot traffic in a shopping district is a fool’s errand. People don’t shop in retail and hospitality businesses, cars do. Some “policy analysis” at our national transport agency might argue pedestrians shop more frequently and spend proportionately more money than any other transport mode. But that is plainly ridiculous. If those pedestrians can afford to go to cafes, why can’t they afford a car? 

Sure, pedestrian-friendly shopping areas might work in Amsterdam, or Copenhagen, or London, or Dublin, or New York, or Paris, or Melbourne, or Sydney, or in Wellington slightly further down the exact same street, but this part of Cuba Street is different. It won’t work here. 

Running a successful retail or hospitality business without publicly-provided car parking is as impossible as running a supermarket with a bike lane outside it. Cities aren’t about experience or connections. They aren’t about friends meeting up for coffee, chatting and laughing, enjoying the sights and dawdling around a bunch of shops. They are an interconnected network of parking spaces for SUVs. 

Some Cuba Street business owners are fighting back. They’ve launched a campaign called “Park It: Stop the removal of Cuba Street Car Parks”, with a petition and posters in their shop windows. The petition was started by Karl Tiefenbacher, narrow loser of the Lambton Ward by-election and owner of Kaffee Eis, the third-best ice cream shop on Cuba Street. Tiefenbacher is well-accustomed to being knocked around by the cruel powers of government. In his own words, he only lost the by-election because 18-year-old students are allowed to vote. A couple of years earlier, he was forced to close his Oriental Parade shop because of greedy employees demanding the minimum wage.

According to the petition, the wider footpaths and slightly fewer car parks would “represent a real threat to the survival of many of the businesses in the immediate area”. Among the businesses that have joined the campaign are several cafes, a bar, a bookshop, an op shop, a jeweller, two barbers and a lawnmower shop (why is there a lawnmower shop on Cuba Street?).

Cuba Street businesses with Park It campaign posters in their windows. (Photos: Joel MacManus)

The Park It posters were on full display last weekend at CubaDupa, when the entire Cuba Street precinct and most adjacent streets were blocked off to all vehicle traffic. The festival drew a crowd of 120,000 people, who presumably were all very frustrated at the lack of parking available. If those additional 20 car parks on upper Cuba Street had been open, there’s no telling how much it would have skyrocketed the attendance. It could have been as high as 120,020. 

That begs the question: where did the other 120,000 people at CubaDupa park their cars? Maybe they parked slightly further away from their destination. Perhaps they parked in one of the 14 parking buildings within a 500m radius of Cuba Street. In theory, they could have walked, biked or taken public transport, but that seems a bit far-fetched. 

To truly realise the great economic potential of Cuba Street as a premium shopping destination, we must prioritise the most efficient form of transport for dense urban centres in the 21st century: the automobile. 

Cuba Street is the jewel in Wellington’s crown. When tourists come to Wellington, Cuba Street is always at the top of their bucket list, because of its famous car parking facilities. A Cuba Street without on-street parking is unimaginable. We must fight this upgrade with bloodied hands.

‘Hutt Valley, Kāpiti, down to the south coast. Our Wellington coverage is powered by members.’
Joel MacManus
— Wellington editor
Keep going!
Much Moore’s Groovy Gumdrops (Photo: Stewart Sowman-Lund, design Tina Tiller)
Much Moore’s Groovy Gumdrops (Photo: Stewart Sowman-Lund, design Tina Tiller)

KaiMarch 22, 2024

Vegan advocates claim dessert branding ‘misleading’, MPI says otherwise

Much Moore’s Groovy Gumdrops (Photo: Stewart Sowman-Lund, design Tina Tiller)
Much Moore’s Groovy Gumdrops (Photo: Stewart Sowman-Lund, design Tina Tiller)

Much Moore says the ‘more plant based, less dairy’ label used on some of its products is meant to inform customers. But not everyone is convinced, reports Stewart Sowman-Lund.

A “frozen dessert” by popular budget ice cream brand Much Moore has been criticised by vegan advocates for potentially misleading consumers over its ingredients. But the Ministry for Primary Industries, and the manufacturer itself, disagree. 

Much Moore makes a range of ice cream, or “frozen dessert”, products available at major supermarkets nationwide. Among those is its lower cost “Marvels” range, which includes flavours like Groovy Gumdrops and Chocolate Cookies, described on the brand’s website as being “delicious, nutritious and affordable”.

But it’s the labels on some of these products that have vegan advocates concerned. Prominently visible on the front of the tubs is a white leaf in a green bubble surrounded by the text “more plant based” and “less dairy”. 

Despite the leaf label, the Marvels products still contain milk products and, in the case of Groovy Gumdrops, “gelatine from beef”, leading vegan advocates to accuse the brand of misleading the public. “We really dislike this labelling. It’s very misleading and is not clear at all,” said Claire Insley, a spokesperson for the New Zealand Vegan Society. “We have been trying to get the [Food Standards Authority] to apply proper labelling laws, however they claim there is no problem and that consumers are not confused.”

Some other Marvels products, with the Chocolate Cookies flavour showing the “more plant based” tag (Photo: Stewart Sowman-Lund)

When a photo of the same branding was shared to Reddit earlier in this month, others were equally critical. “While the label does say more plant based and less dairy, the green leaf symbol is a visual cue for fully plant based/vegan people,” said one. “I think they should just have something like ‘reduced dairy’ on there.”

Insley from the Vegan Society said the label was “trying to mislead people” into thinking the product was plant based. “It is not 100% plant based and we would like the Food Standards Authority to take these labels seriously,” she said.

Consumer NZ agreed with the Vegan Society that the labelling could lead people to believe the product was vegan-friendly. “Our take is this packaging risks misleading New Zealanders – given the product contains milk, milk solids and gelatine from beef, the word ‘more’ is doing a lot of heavy lifting,” a spokesperson said.

But Much Moore said its labelling was intended to inform consumers, rather than mislead. “The intention of our wording ‘more plant based, less dairy’ and logo is to communicate the product contains more plant based ingredients than dairy ingredients. It is intended to be informative,” the manufacturer said in a statement.  “We believe a consumer might be interested in understanding this fact… The comparison we are trying to communicate is the plant vs dairy content.”

But how much less dairy content is in “Groovy Gumdrops” anyway? Enough for it to not actually be called ice cream at all. The Marvels products are instead labelled “frozen dessert” as opposed to ice cream. The Australia and New Zealand Food Standards Code notes that ice cream must contain no less than 100 grams per kilogram of milk fat and at least 168 grams per litre of food solids. The more premium Much Moore Awesome range contains “10% milk fat”, according to the ingredients list, which would meet the requirements to be called ice cream. No such percentage is listed on the “more plant based” budget range of “frozen desserts”.

As a comparison, the ingredients list on a tub of vanilla bean ice cream by premium brand Kāpiti showed 14% milk fat as well as fresh cream (39%) and fresh whole milk (22%).

Much Moore’s Groovy Gumdrops (Photo: Stewart Sowman-Lund, design Tina Tiller)

A comparison of the ingredients list between the Much Moore Marvels “Groovy Gumdrops” and the more expensive Much Moore Awesome “Gumdrops” flavours show both products contain largely the same ingredients, though the cheaper variation has water added and some citric acid – which is technically a plant product. There is no label on the pricier variant touting its plant-based ingredients. 

However, the Ministry for Primary Industries agreed with Much Moore’s reasoning, telling The Spinoff that the product labelling was compliant with the Food Standards Code as it did not make claims that the product was vegan or dairy-free. “Gelatine from beef and milk solids are clearly listed as ingredients,” the ministry’s food safety deputy director-general Vincent Arbuckle said. 

The use of the leaf symbol and the colour green also weren’t misleading, Arbuckle added. “It is up to the manufacturer to determine what they put on their label, so long as it complies with all relevant legislation,” he said. “A manufacturer must be able to support any claims it makes about a product. In this case, it must be able to demonstrate the quantity of plant-based and dairy ingredients the product contains compared to similar full-dairy products.”

Insley said while she hadn’t been made aware of Much Moore’s label before, “this kind of thing deeply annoys me and the rest of the Vegan Society”. She has urged anyone else concerned with “misleading product labels” to inform the society.

The Commerce Commission wouldn’t comment specifically, but said that businesses must not give people “false or misleading information” or “create a misleading impression about a product”. Any business that did this would be at risk of breaching the Fair Trading Act.