spinofflive
Wanganui Chronicle editor Mark Dawson
Wanganui Chronicle editor Mark Dawson

MediaJuly 1, 2017

A response to the newspaper editor who thinks feminism may cause male suicide

Wanganui Chronicle editor Mark Dawson
Wanganui Chronicle editor Mark Dawson

On Thursday Mark Dawson, the editor of the Wanganui Chronicle, published an editorial suggesting that ‘the growing empowerment of women’ is partly to blame for New Zealand’s high rate of male suicide. The Mental Health Foundation’s Sophia Graham responds.

Dear Mr Dawson,

I read your editorial ‘Tough topic we need to talk about’ with dismay. Many people responded with outrage to your speculation that male suicide is caused by female empowerment, and the Mental Health Foundation echoes the criticism you have received and strongly encourages you to issue an immediate retraction and apology. I note that NZME, publisher of your paper, has already removed your column from their website.

You wrote of the disproportionate number of men dying by suicide compared to women, suggesting: “one explanation for this disproportion may be the growing empowerment of women and their increasing role in society.”

“…Is it an unfortunate side effect that men feel less secure, less sure of their place in a world where they were once more dominant?”

Firstly, to answer your question, no, male suicides are not “an unfortunate side effect” of recent female empowerment. Male suicide rates have been significantly higher than female suicide rates since at least the 1920s. Many countries see a similar pattern. Suicide prevention research since the 1920s has found changes in male suicide rates are tied more closely to economic pressures than changing social roles.

Mr Dawson, your comments are not only wrong, they’re dangerous. We know many men still find it extremely difficult to ask for help when they’re going through a hard time. Alongside other agencies in New Zealand we work hard, every day, to encourage men not to let pride or fear prevent them from seeking and accepting the help they need. We all go through difficult times and we all deserve support.

Your editorial undermines this message and reinforces toxic stereotypes that contribute to men feeling they must soldier on and never show a sign of weakness.

Wanganui Chronicle editor Mark Dawson

I encourage you to reflect not only on the anger caused by your ill-informed words, but also the hurt. There are thousands of empowered women around New Zealand who have used their agency and education to work to support men from all walks of life to seek help and recover from challenges they face throughout their lives.

Among your readers will be countless women who live with the grief of suicide loss every day, who may have read your editorial and felt guilt or shame and perhaps wondered whether if they had just been a little less empowered and more dependent, their loved one might still be alive. This is a disgraceful message to send to these women. You owe each of them an apology.

Many people who have lost someone to suicide are left with questions that are difficult or impossible to answer. They seek desperately to understand why their loved one took their life and what could have prevented it. Contrary to your headline, your editorial shed no light on this issue for them but instead sought to place blame where none is warranted.

Additionally, you showed a marked lack of compassion toward women who live with depression, anxiety and other mental illnesses. Women experience almost twice the rates of psychological distress as men and are more than twice as likely to be hospitalised for intentional self-harm. The issue is not as black and white as you would have it appear. There are no winners here.

As an editor of a newspaper, you should know better. Journalists have an important role in shaping social attitudes to, and perceptions of, suicide. Your careless and dangerous words betrayed the trust your readers place in you as an editor and a leading voice in your community.

I acknowledge your editorial contained some valid and interesting remarks on the how the pressures men face can contribute to suicide. It’s a shame these were left unexplored.

There are a large number of organisations who would be willing to work with you to better understand the complexities of suicide and mental health in New Zealand, the Mental Health Foundation is among them. By talking to suicide prevention experts in your community or the Mental Health Foundation we could work together to support our shared goal of preventing suicide in New Zealand.

Sophia Graham is the communications and marketing manager at the Mental Health Foundation of New Zealand.

For information about preventing suicide, see mentalhealth.org.nz/suicideprevention

Where to get help:

Lifeline – 0800 543 354

Suicide Crisis Helpline (open 24/7) – 0508 828 865 (0508 TAUTOKO)

Depression Helpline  – 0800 111 757 – this service is staffed 24/7 by trained counsellors

Samaritans  – 0800 726 666

Youthline (open 24/7) – 0800 376 633. Text 234 for free between 8am and midnight, or email talk@youthline.co.nz.

0800 WHATSUP (0800 9428 787) – Open between 1pm and 10pm on weekdays and from 3pm to 10pm on weekends. Online chat is available from 7pm to 10pm every day at www.whatsup.co.nz.

Healthline – 0800 611 116

For more information about support and services available to you, contact the Mental Health Foundation’s free Resource and Information Service on 09 623 4812 during office hours or email info@mentalhealth.org.nz


The Spinoff Media is sponsored by MBM, an award-winning strategic media agency specialising in digital, with vast experience across all channels. We deliver smart, tailored media solutions as well as offering a leading data and analytics consultancy.Talk to us about your communications challenges and how MBM can help bring you success through the power of media and technology.

Keep going!
mega-yourcouncil

MediaJuly 1, 2017

The Wellington City Council is brawling with the Dominion Post and it’s quite full on

mega-yourcouncil

On Thursday the Dominion Post published a story critical of the fees the Wellington City Council charged Lions fans to park camper vans in the city. A few hours later the Council gave back double. Duncan Greive reports on a brawl in the capital.

Variations on the phrase “never argue with anyone who buys ink by the barrel” have been attributed to everyone from Mark Twain to Winston Churchill, with an obscure Republican congressman the most likely inventor. Yesterday the Wellington City Council decided to ignore the maxim in a very public way, “calling out” what the council characterised as “seriously irresponsible journalism” by Wellington’s daily newspaper, the Dominion Post.

The Wellington City Council’s headline and standfirst (image: screengrab)

This is – I think this is the right phrase – deeply fucking weird. Councils have large communications staff and produce a phenomenal body of written material, the vast majority of it purposefully and studiedly bland. This is a typical sentence of this mostly unread tributary of the written word: “this is a great opportunity to connect with Sir Peter Blake’s legacy and the work that is happening daily to increase environmental awareness among young people and the public.”

The WCC’s story was not like that.

It gives the council’s version of events in an entertaining style, before editorialising thus: “The DomPost should hang its head in shame for running such a sloppy, useless and frankly ill-considered story that’s brought Wellington into disrepute.”

The offending Dom Post story (image: screengrab)

The original Dom Post story was quite full on too. It said the “toilets, 300 metres away over a muddy field, smelled of urine” and that Lions fans were “being forced to pay £75 (about $130) a night to park their campervans on Wellington City Council land” [emphasis added]. It was strong stuff – but not markedly different from the kind of coverage local government receives the world over.

Unsurprisingly, the Dominion Post was not pleased with being told their story was “sloppy, useless”. Executive editor Sinead Boucher replied on Twitter, suggesting “perhaps the ‘call out’ could have started with a call to the editor (who firmly stands by the story) instead of a PR smear.”

Twitter exchange from Thursday (image: twitter)

There has since been a volume of communication between Fairfax, publishers of the Dominion Post and the council. Fairfax’s central region editor-in-chief Bernadette Courtney told The Spinoff that “the general tenor from the council was that we would have to agree to disagree,” she wrote. “At no stage was a correction sought.” Late Friday Courtney told The Spinoff that “an email has come to us outlining what [the WCC] term are factual inaccuracies,” though she also added pointedly “there is still no request for a correction”.

The Spinoff has been supplied the email Courtney sent to Wellington City Council CEO Kevin Lavery, which you can read here. “I am astounded that the council’s media unit chose to take this action without any discussion with the news director or indeed myself,” she writes. “This is contrary to the way we operate as a media organisation and contrary to what occurred in the reporting of this story – we contacted the council for comment.”

I asked the WCC’s Richard Maclean why the Council had chosen to go direct to its public, rather than litigating the matter privately. “Given the amount of vile abuse we were getting, and given that we were being treated so unfairly we wanted to get it out quickly,” he said. “We’ve done it before, but we do it incredibly rarely.”

Both stories were widely distributed socially, which to an extent explains the pace at which the WCC acted. Even if the Dom Post were inclined to run a correction – which seems highly unlikely, to be fair – it would have run the following day and only flashed past the Stuff homepage, if it made it there at all. It’s also very hard being council: people moan about rate rises, yet when you find an alternative source of revenue – which no one is forced to pay, incidentally – you get slammed for it.

That said, the aggression of the Council response implies that we might be cresting a new frontier in local government media strategies. Earlier this year the Hamilton City Council remonstrated with the Waikato Times over its coverage of a crashed car which had sat wedged in a man’s fence for a week. The Council went public with their “truth… to prevent further unwarranted negative comments about our staff and actions”.

While it’s somehow both a cliché and a giant stretch to compare New Zealand local government with Trump’s administration, it does feel like both Hamilton and Wellington’s comms departments have awoken to the fact that should they disagree with reporting on their work, they can tell their side of the story using just as emotive an angle as a journalist would. They, too, can cry “fake news”. And given the pace with which stories flame and then die online, and the chasm in scale between an incorrect fact and its correction, it’s entirely understandable that they might take the opportunity to defend themselves. Or, as Trump’s press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders put it, “when attacked he’s going to hit back”.

Still, while “sloppy, useless” is no “bleeding badly from a face-lift”, it is on the same continuum of alternative facts and interpretation. And it seems odd for a city with as liberal a constitution as Wellington to be taking style tips of any form from the current White House.

The Spinoff understands that conversations between Fairfax and the WCC are ongoing, and as we publish the council has not responded to questions about the specific points of fact they dispute. The public, to the extent it’s aware of the dispute all, is unlikely to be able to pick a favourite out of actors as universally unloved as journalists and bureaucrats.

Right now, neither side is budging, and more may yet emerge from the fight. But while it’s fun to watch this kind of explosion from afar from time to time, a permanent change in relations between councils and the papers which cover them to this kind of mutual antagonism would likely suck for both organisations – and the ratepayers and newsreaders caught between them.


The Spinoff Media is sponsored by MBM, an award-winning strategic media agency specialising in digital, with vast experience across all channels. We deliver smart, tailored media solutions as well as offering a leading data and analytics consultancy.Talk to us about your communications challenges and how MBM can help bring you success through the power of media and technology.