4chan, 8chan and Kiwi Farm: the places where hate lives. Photo: Kao Nguyen /AFP/Getty Images.
4chan, 8chan and Kiwi Farm: the places where hate lives. Photo: Kao Nguyen /AFP/Getty Images.

MediaMarch 19, 2019

The online cesspits where hate found a home

4chan, 8chan and Kiwi Farm: the places where hate lives. Photo: Kao Nguyen /AFP/Getty Images.
4chan, 8chan and Kiwi Farm: the places where hate lives. Photo: Kao Nguyen /AFP/Getty Images.

Not for the first time, the bleakest corners of the internet have apparently spawned real world tragedy. What is 4chan, and how does it foment so much hate?

Even as the nation was plunged into a whirlwind of shock, horror and grief, there were plenty of online communities that had an opposite, chilling reaction – and every one of them has users based here in New Zealand.

As has been widely noted, this was a crime of and for the internet. From references to Pewdiepie, the world’s most famous YouTuber and darling of anti-Semites, to the livestream, to the ridiculous pastiche of memes, alt-right talking points and idiotic jargon that made up the shooter’s press kit, this was an act designed for virality and thick with vicious irony. Many experts have warned against extended coverage of the manifesto, which is filled with a mixture of vitriol, intentionally ludicrous lies, and various traps for the uninformed journalist, though that has apparently not stopped credulous swallowing of the shooter’s shitposting.

It’s the exact mixture of hate, misinformation, meta-irony and plausible deniability that is the lifeblood of the online cesspits where hate found a home. In these communities, humour is used as a weapon, a shield, and a way out in much the same way an edgelord at high school will complain “it was just a joke” when they’re inevitably punched out.

It’s both an effective strategy and wholly unoriginal. In discussions on how to deal with the alt-right, commentators often refer to a passage from Jean-Paul Sartre’s essay Anti-Semite and Jew.

“Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies,” he writes.

“They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert.”

Following the attacks, “Subscribe to Pewdiepie” was carved into the Holocaust Memorial in Brooklyn, and spray painted adjacent to a large red swastika at a school in Oxford – an absurdist meme, funny only to the internet-obsessed, weaponised into a statement of hate, with inbuilt plausible deniability: “it’s just a joke”. Swastikas were also sprayed on a sign by the rainbow walk in Wellington.

But despite the surface-level frivolity, both the anti-Semite and the extremely online radical (if they’re not in fact the exact same person) have the same end goal: violence. And while you’re increasingly unlikely to meet anyone offline who’s willing to put their face to such debate – another common trait is real-world cowardice – in the dark corners of the internet they meet each other.

Since the Christchurch mosque shootings there have been strong, well-argued calls to bring the tech giants to heel. The attacks were streamed to Facebook, and uploaded to Twitter, YouTube and Reddit. All are culpable, gargantuan and hard to pin down. But the forums where hate lives, the damp holes where the attack was fomented, announced, celebrated and dissected, have long been a home for the worst frothings of extremism. They are currently inaccessible in New Zealand after Spark and other ISPs blocked their domains, in an unprecedented moment of coordination and censorship. It remains unclear how long the ban will last, but anyone who has visited the sites knows what lurks within.

4chan: portal to hate

For a certain generation of internet users, 4chan was and is both a transgressive timesuck and an increasingly frightening portal to the worst of the internet. An image board designed after Japanese sites primarily used to discuss anime, in the early 00s, 4chan became a meme factory, pumping out ‘lolcats’, rage comics, and all the fodder that would one day end up on places like 9gag. But several of the boards, which are independent silos with their own cultures and taboos, soon developed a reputation for minimal moderation and a tolerance for extreme violence – most notoriously the ‘random’ board /b/.

Users, buoyed by their anonymity and encouraged by an increasingly rabid community, began encouraging and celebrating the suicide of their own members and others, harassing women, crippling businesses with targeted attacks and generally luxuriating in one-upping each other in feats of cruelty, ultimately culminating in the Gamergate controversy – a subject which was soon banned on the platform.

8chan: double the grim

For some, that meant 4chan was too heavily moderated, too hostile to ‘free speech’. These users migrated to 8chan, a direct copy with less moderation, created by an American computer programmer who boasts of having had the idea during a psychedelic trip.

8chan’s list of controversies is a chronicling of the past decade of sin on the internet: child porn, ‘swatting’, Trump, the alt-right, QAnon, incel extremism and now this, New Zealand’s darkest day. On Friday afternoon, minutes before the attack began, the Christchurch gunman informed 8chan users he’d be making an ‘effort post’ – as opposed to a low-effort ‘shitpost’. The announcement linked to his ravings, his Facebook account and the livestream. Users were rapturous, liveblogging the attack, commending the shooter and expressing glee and disbelief.

“The madman actually did it!” read comment, after comment, after comment.

It’s a phrase anyone who’s followed Trump and his rabid fanbase since the 2016 campaign will recognise. Over on The_Donald, the Reddit forum which refers to Trump as a ‘God Emperor’, the refrain is a common response to the edgier of Trump’s behaviours, as the ‘Troll in Chief’ fulfills their political aims, which could be summarised as hurting anyone outside the immediate community.

Kiwi Farms: scraping the barrel

Today the Herald reports Joshua Moon, a former 8Chan administrator allegedly sacked for promoting paedophilia, has refused police requests to hand over data relating to links and posts that appeared on his website Kiwi Farms during the attack. Kiwi Farms, the name of which is unrelated to New Zealand, is a hotbed of racism and bullying, generally targeted at Muslims, refugees, the trans community and the mentally disabled.

“You’re a small irrelevant island nation barely more recognisable than any other nameless pacific sovereignty. You do not have the clout to eradicate a video from the internet and you do not have the legal reach to imprison everyone who posted it,” he told police in an email.

“If anyone turns over to you the information they’re asking for they’re not only cowards but they’re f***ing idiots.”

Kiwi Farms is currently blocked by New Zealand ISPs.

Closer to home, an 18-year-old arrested for propagating livestreams during the police response to the Christchurch shootings has been remanded in custody, and court filings imply he may have had advance warning of the attack. The teenager, who is subject to name suppression, is alleged to have posted a picture of the mosque in Deans Ave with the phrase “target acquired”, some time between the 8th and the 15th of March.

His link if any to the attack is unknown, but he certainly views himself as a member of the same community, whose tendrils extend from site to site, platform to platform, and onwards into the real world.

Keep going!
deleted

MediaMarch 19, 2019

The quiet deletion of the Islamophobic archives

deleted

How New Zealand and international organisations are dealing with inflammatory and racist moments in their pasts. UPDATED to include apparent false information from the National Party, and the National party’s subsequent response.

In the wake of the Christchurch terror attack, organisations around New Zealand have removed content which might be seen as part of the culture which mainstreamed and enabled Islamophobia and anti-immigrant sentiment. These range from promoters to media outlets to political parties, though few are drawing attention to what they have removed or publicly stating their motivations. However others which have long-harboured or propagated Islamophobic views have opted to leave them on their platforms.

Newstalk ZB have deleted an opinion column by its Christchurch-based host Chris Lynch, who in 2017 asked “Does Islam have any place in public swimming pools?” When asked what prompted the removal, Jason Winstanley, head of talk at NZME, said “we removed the article as it was upsetting people”. When Listener journalist Donna Chisholm pointed to the column after Lynch appeared on CNN, Lynch replied: “Being critical of religion is part of democracy. However, these awful events has certainly given me pause for thought.”

Similarly an image of Newstalk ZB’s Mike Hosking holding up an image of a t-shirt with a white supremacist symbol on it has now been taken down, largely due to customer pressure on his show’s sponsor at BNZ. Hosking’s employer, NZME, had “assured us that neither Mike Hosking or his team were aware the symbol used held an alternative meaning”, said a BNZ spokesperson in a tweet.

OMG VIP, promoters of Jordan Peterson’s recent New Zealand tour, have removed an image of the rightwing author hugging a fan wearing a t-shirt emblazoned with the slogan “I’m a proud ISLAMAPHOBE” from their site. They have not yet responded to a request for an explanation. 

Simple Host, which had been hosting the NZ National Front’s site on its servers, took the site down in “less than a minute”, after a complaint was made. Simple Host’s Patrick Power said that he bought the company two years ago, and was unaware that the National Front were among the “hundreds” of hosted sites he inherited upon purchase. “I don’t want to cause anyone aggravation or grief,” he said. The Dominion Movement, another alt-right movement, had made its site private not long after.

In a tangent to the deletion stories, Sean Plunket, ex RNZ Morning Report host and former communications manager for The Opportunities Party, turned right leaning provocateur for Magic Talk, claimed to have deactivated his Twitter account.

As of Monday evening, however, it had not been deactivated – “just had a break for a few hours…felt good”. In a widely criticised recent tweet he said, “the neo nationalist right are the result of the virtue signalling exclusionary left”. 

Following the publication of this story, Plunket contacted the Spinoff objecting to the deactivation of his Twitter account being reported alongside other deletions. He said he has never expressed any Islamophobic or anti-immigrant views.

At a corporate level Twitter’s response to the tragedy has been as haphazard as that of Facebook. The Spinoff editor Toby Manhire flagged a flagrantly Islamophobic and anti-semitic account on Friday which posted images of the gunman’s weapons and still-live links to copies of the video of the atrocity which first circulated on Facebook. 

As of writing, more than three days later, and despite numerous others also officially reporting the account, it remains live.

Another example of deletion that was linked to Friday’s attacks was the disappearance of the National Party page pointing to a petition to stop the UN migration pact. The National party told the Spinoff it was wrong that the page had been removed following Friday’s terrorist attack. “As part of our normal web maintenance, pages on our website are routinely archived after the completion of a petition,” said a spokesperson on Sunday. “This petition was started in December 2018 and was archived some weeks ago, well before any of the recent tragic events in Christchurch.”

(UPDATE 9:38AM: Multiple sources on Twitter have contested National’s version of events, noting that Google caches of the page as live on the afternoon of the 15th. The Spinoff has placed calls and emails to National party HQ seeking an urgent explanation why we were apparently given false information, and will update the story as soon as we hear back from them. UPDATE 10:37AM: Newsroom’s Thomas Coughlan reports that Simon Bridges has suggested the page was deleted by an “emotional junior staffer” on Friday night.)

UPDATE: 12:44pm: The National party has provided the below statement regarding the misinformation provided on Sunday.

National party statement, issued 12.20pm

While there has been significant purging of content, much remains live, and many of those who have been or hosted prominent critics of Islam have yet to issue repudiations of their past statements. Whale Oil is still running “This is how New Zealand will turn into a muslim state”. Kiwiblog still hosts “A case for immediate cessation of all Muslim immigration”.

When I asked that site’s editor David Farrar whether he had contemplated deleting the post, he said that he had, but decided against it. “I think you do more harm when you don’t allow it to be debated,” he said. “Then you drive it to 4Chan [an extremist site Spark blocked on Friday] where people will see far worse.”

Both the comments on that story and the general debate immediately after the shooting were rife with abhorrent statements about Muslims. Farrar says this did give him pause, and he made the decision to temporarily turn on manual comment moderation. When asked why the slaughter of Muslims would drive his commenters toward Islamophobia, he replied “I think the problem is that people see [the massacre] as part of a global political battle, and they [commenters] haven’t shown enough empathy.”

Another individual criticised for historic statements holds one of the highest offices in the land: the deputy prime minister. Winston Peters has made multiple statements equating mainstream Muslims with extremists. He also harboured in his caucus Richard Prosser, who wrote an infamous column calling for banning Muslim people from flying on western airlines, and referred to their homeland as “Wogistan”. Peters said it was “an extreme view which we don’t share as a party”, but rejected the suggestion his MP was inciting hatred.

In 2005 Peters gave a speech which described Islam as “like the mythical Hydra – a serpent underbelly with multiple heads capable of striking at any time and in any direction.” The Spinoff has asked his office whether he intends to issue a statement about his past rhetoric involving Muslims, but has yet to receive a response.