spinofflive
Image: Tina Tiller
Image: Tina Tiller

PoliticsJune 10, 2022

Is Anthony Albanese’s musical offering to Jacinda Ardern grounds for war?

Image: Tina Tiller
Image: Tina Tiller

The prime minister has been gifted Powderfinger, Spiderbait and Midnight Oil LPs by her new trans-Tasman counterpart. Legal expert Andrew Geddis considers the appropriate level of response.

The “national leaders swapping presents” ritual is a funny old one. Rooted in deep common values of reciprocity and respect – gift-giving is a universal trait among not only human cultures, but our close animal relationsit also serves an important signal-sending function. Not only should a leader’s choice of present show some thought about who its recipient is, but it will say something about the place it is coming from. And this signalling can then lead to some pretty weird moments.

Like when Jacinda Ardern received a large portrait of herself from Vietnam’s Prime Minister. Or when the Bulgarian President gifted US President George W. Bush a puppy named “Balkan of Gorannadraganov, passive-aggressively committing the Bush family to 15-years-or-so of pet ownership. Or when Barack Obama was given a $50,000 crocodile attack insurance policy by Australia’s Northern Territory’s Chief Minister.

But has a present between national leaders ever been a valid justification for resorting to armed force? After all, we’ve all experienced a birthday or seasonal holiday gift sparking familial meltdowns – haven’t we? Why couldn’t the same thing happen on the international stage?

Following Jacinda Ardern’s visit to Sydney to see new Aussie PM Anthony Albanese, we may be about to find out. Being their first meeting in person as PMs, and with each heading a Labo(u)r government, this represents an important reset in the two countries’ relationship. What gifts, then, were chosen to mark this new beginning?

Good haul (Photo: Jacinda Ardern)

As detailed in The Spinoff’s Live Updates, the two leaders went with music. And it being 2022, meaning that everything old and inconvenient is now cool again, they went with music on vinyl. Gifting music makes sense for them – after all, both leaders have it as a big part of their backstory (as well as actually liking it in the real world). DJ Ardern and DJ Albo, although the latter seems more prone to dropping actual song lyrics into his public pronouncements. And we all know music is a window into culture, making it the perfect way to say something about how a leader wants their country to be perceived.

Jacinda Ardern’s choices, which reflect the impeccably correct tastes of her consigliere Grant Robertson, tracked the old wedding maxim. Something old, in the form of The Clean’s 1981 EP Boodle Boodle Boodle. Something new, with Reb Fountain’s 2021 album Iris. Something borrowed, being the AK-79 compilation where Aotearoa New Zealand first stole punk and never gave it back. And something blue, through Aldous Harding’s self-titled debut album.

We can quibble around the edges of this selection. If four albums was the magic number, maybe Dunedin nostalgia could have been set aside for a tangata whenua voice in the form of Alien Weaponry’s “Tangaroa”. I mean, Albanese dropping a needle on “Ahi Kā” might well help to stiffen his spine for the upcoming fight to deliver on the Uluru Statement from the Heart.

But it’s nevertheless a laudable good faith effort, reflecting Aotearoa’s cultural innovation and development across time. Plus, given Albanese’s demonstrated fondness for “left-of-the-dial” alternative music, it comes across as personally curated. You could well imagine him listening to any of these discs and actually appreciating what he hears. 

What, then, did Ardern receive from Albanese in turn? Dross, that’s what. Absolute cultural garbage. 

Sure, you could make a case for including Midnight Oil in a gift bundle, given their bravery in carrying support for aboriginal rights and environmental issues out onto the Australian pub music circuit. Respect where respect has been earned.

But … Spiderbait? A ‘90s-era pop-punk outfit whose biggest hit was a cover/appropriation of a 1930s blues song? And then … Powderfinger? A band whose commercial success was evocatively described to me as being due to the fact that they make music for people who don’t like music. Or, as this NME article puts it, “Music For Straight Men To Hug To”.

Even given the cultural constraints operating on “Albo” – in Australia’s political climate, even your choice of pyjama pants can become a weapon for the Murdoch media to wield against you – this is a pretty average offering. And it’s not as if there weren’t plenty of options available – Australia is the land of Courtney Barnett (or, better yet, Jen Cloher). He could have pushed the boat out and invited Ardern to rock out to Amyl and the Sniffers. And even if throwback legacy value were a prerequisite to inclusion, Yothu Yindi or Dirty Three are just sitting there waiting to be picked up.

But, no. In exchange for our cultural taonga, Ardern (and by extension, us) has been handed a triplet of meat-and-potatoes nostalgia guitar bands that vaguely handwave toward the “alternative” while still sitting safely within the general cultural mainstream.

Enough for us to take our tank and declare war on Australia? Listen to this, then try telling me that we should just give peace a chance.

Keep going!
(Image: Archi Banal)
(Image: Archi Banal)

OPINIONPoliticsJune 9, 2022

We need to turn the tide of public sentiment on three waters

(Image: Archi Banal)
(Image: Archi Banal)

Accusations of asset theft and racist fear-mongering risk stranding the three waters reform programme, with future generations the ones who will suffer.

The government’s three waters reform programme has been a contentious topic. But behind the cloak of media soundbites and misinformation there is a lot of good happening. 

Let us wind back the clock to August 2016. Public confidence in a fundamental service was shaken. A third of Havelock North’s residents contracted campylobacter due to a failure by the council to embrace or implement the high standard of care required of a public drinking-water supplier. At least three people died.

Fast forward to 2020 and the government’s inquiries found that across the country there are historic levels of underinvestment in all three waters – drinking, waste, and stormwater – in the tens of billions of dollars. Couple this with growth and service level improvements and communities are staring down the barrel of $120-185bn of investment over the next 30-40 years. Not to mention over a third of treatment plants are in breach of consent conditions at any one time. 

No government could, in good conscience, sit on its hands. 

Enter Taumata Arowai – the government’s first stand on the issue. Now established, the dedicated water services regulator is charged with ensuring drinking water supplies are safe and reliable for Aotearoa. The future of water service delivery is changing regardless of the government’s reforms. These are expensive services to provide. Upgrading services to meet public health standards, maintain the infrastructure, meet community and environmental expectations and combat future challenges will see the costs of delivering these services increasing across the country. 

By June 2021, the government had spent some time working jointly with local government – through the joint central local government steering committee and extensive engagement – and agreed to reform the country’s three waters by consolidating 67 councils’ three waters arrangements into four publicly owned water services entities. 

Regrettably, not everyone in local government had the foresight (or humility) of the members of the joint central local government steering committee. Minister Nanaia Mahuta, her department and officials were flogged by elected members around the country who were more concerned with retaining power and “accountability” than protecting the long-term health, environment and wellbeing outcomes their communities deserve. Put simply, their egos (and mayoral chains) were more important than their communities. 

The soundbites flowed with accusations of asset theft, and racist and abhorrent fear-mongering playing to a vocal minority. The three waters reform programme is at real risk of stranding – something my (yet-to-exist) children will regret on my behalf. 

Alan Sutherland, the man who was responsible for Scotland’s similar reforms in 2002 (only now being heralded as a success), described New Zealand’s reforms as a three-legged stool. You take one leg away, and the whole thing falls over. We desperately need to turn the tide of public sentiment of the three waters reform. 

A three-legged stool?

Legs one and two are straightforward and (relatively) undisputed. The first is the need for more effective standards regulation – which is helpfully locked in with Taumata Arowai now in full swing. The second is economic regulation to help ensure water services are delivered efficiently and priced fairly. This is well under way as part of reforms.

The third leg, on the other hand, is the most contentious, but it is also the biggest load bearer – better governance. Without it, the benefits of reform will not be realised. 

There is a lot that falls to this leg, but broadly it comes down to who owns the water service entities and who tells those entities what to do. 

Somewhere along the way, truth got in the way of good politics. Over the past 12 months or so, there have been allegations of asset theft, misinformation that Māori would charge royalties for water and that communities, especially smaller communities, would lose their say in water delivery. 

None of this is true. Continued public ownership is a bottom line of the reform programme, and the government is going to extensive lengths to ensure this never changes. You (and I) will continue to own water service delivery arrangements in much the same way we do today. The difference being, our councils will band together – collectively owning the new water service entities for the good of all of Aotearoa. 

Now comes good governance. Right now, politicians make the call about where investment goes, trading off sewerage flows into the harbour with a new conference centre on Wellington’s waterfront. 

On the other hand, the new entities will be given their strategic direction by a representative group of council and iwi (dubbed co-governance), which will help to guide investment prioritisation (think swimmable rivers or improving services to underserved communities). A board of experts will decide how to deliver that. 

On top of this, the government is making sure that you and I also have a say in how this is done, with consultation requirements being placed on the entities and the creation of consumer forums. 

The coming together of communities and iwi will bring a long-term, wellbeing-focused approach to water services delivery, but the entities (and those in charge of them) will be kept on their toes for delivery by your trusty local councillor. The other two legs of the stool (standards and economic regulation), meanwhile, will ensure that the new system is sustainable and delivering the benefits promised. 

Mō tātou, ā, mō kā uri a muri ake nei. For us and our children after us.

Mike Chatterley was formerly the commercial and financial lead for the three waters reform programme

Politics