spinofflive
A black and white image of destruction in Gaza with images of Donald Trump, Benjamin Netenyahu and Winston Peters laid over the top in colour
Donald Trump, Benjamin Netenyahu and Winston Peters

OPINIONPoliticsabout 2 hours ago

New Zealand and Gaza: Confronting and not confronting the unspeakable

A black and white image of destruction in Gaza with images of Donald Trump, Benjamin Netenyahu and Winston Peters laid over the top in colour
Donald Trump, Benjamin Netenyahu and Winston Peters
New Zealand has been firm in its stance against Israel’s onslaught on Gaza, yet has been silent on the United States’ enabling of it, argues Robert Patman.

The National-led coalition government’s policy on Gaza seems caught between a desire for a two-state diplomatic solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and closer alignment with the US, which supports a Netanyahu government strongly opposed to a Palestinian state

In the last 17 months, Gaza has been the scene of what Thomas Merton once called the unspeakable – human wrongdoing on a scale and a depth that seems to go beyond the capacity of words to adequately describe. 

The latest Gaza conflict began with a horrific Hamas terrorist attack on Israel on 7 October 2023 that prompted a relentless Israel ground and air offensive in Gaza with full financial, logistical and diplomatic backing from the Biden administration. 

During this period, around 50,000 people – 48,903 Palestinians and 1,706 Israelis – have been reported killed in the Gaza conflict according to the official figures of the Gaza Health Ministry, as well as 166 journalists and media workers, 120 academics,and more than 224 humanitarian aid workers.

Moreover, a fragile ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, signed in mid-January, seems to be hanging by a thread. 

Israel has resumed its blockade of humanitarian aid to Gaza and cut off electricity after Hamas rejected an Israeli proposal to extend phase 1 of the ceasefire deal (to release more Israeli hostages) without any commitment to implement phase 2 (that envisaged ending the conflict in Gaza and Israel withdrawing its troops from the territory).

Over the weekend, Israel reportedly launched air-strikes in Gaza and the Trump administration unleashed a wave of attacks on Houthi rebel positions in Yemen after the Houthis warned Israel not to restart the war in Gaza.

New Zealand and the Gaza conflict

Although distant in geographic terms, the Gaza crisis represents a major moral and legal challenge to New Zealand’s self-image and its worldview based on the strengthening of an international rules-based order.

New Zealand’s founding document, the 1840 Treaty of Waitangi, emphasised partnership and cooperation between indigenous Māori and European settlers in nation-building.

While the aspirations of the Treaty have yet to be fully realised, the credibility of its vision of reconciliation at home depends on New Zealand’s willingness to uphold respect for human rights and the rule of law in the international arena, particularly in states like Israel where tensions persist between the settler population and Palestinians in occupied territories like the West Bank.

New Zealand’s declaratory stance towards Gaza

In 2023 and 2024, New Zealand consistently backed calls in the UN General Assembly for humanitarian truces or ceasefires in Gaza. It also joined Australia and Canada in February and July last year to demand an end to hostilities. The New Zealand foreign minister, Winston Peters, told the General Assembly in April 2024 that the Security Council had failed in its responsibility “to maintain international peace and security”.

He was right. The Biden administration used its UN Security Council veto four times to perpetuate this brutal onslaught in Gaza for nearly 15 months.

In addition, Peters has repeatedly said there can be no military resolution of a political problem in Gaza that can only be resolved through affirming the Palestinian right to self-determination within the framework of a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian dispute.

‘Help keep The Spinoff funny, smart, tall and handsome – become a member today.’
Gabi Lardies
— Staff writer

The limitations of New Zealand’s Gaza approach

Despite considerable disagreement with Netanyahu’s policy of “mighty vengeance” in Gaza, the National-led coalition government had few qualms about sending a small Defence Force deployment to the Red Sea in January 2024 as part of a US-led coalition effort to counter Houthi rebel attacks on commercial shipping there.

While such attacks are clearly illegal, they are basically part of the fallout from a prolonged international failure to stop the US-enabled carnage in Gaza. In particular, the NZDF’s Red Sea deployment  did not sit comfortably with New Zealand’s acceptance in September 2024 of the ICJ’s ruling that Israel’s continued presence in the occupied Palestinian territory (East Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza) was “unlawful”.

At the same time, the National-led coalition government’s silence on US president Donald Trump’s controversial proposal to own Gaza, displace two million Palestinian residents and make the territory the “Riviera” of the Middle East was deafening. 

Furthermore, while Wellington announced travel bans on violent Israeli settlers in the West Bank in February 2024, it has had little to say publicly about the Netanyahu government’s plans to annex the West Bank in 2025. Such a development would gravely undermine the two-state solution, violate international law, and further fuel regional tensions.

New Zealand’s low-key policy

On balance, the National-led coalition government’s policy towards Gaza appears to be ambivalent and lacking moral and legal clarity in a context in which war crimes have been regularly committed since October 7. Peters was absolutely correct to condemn the UNSC for failing to deliver the ceasefire that New Zealand and the overwhelming majority of states in the UN General Assembly had wanted from the first month of this crisis.

But the New Zealand government has had no words of criticism for the US, which used its power of veto in the UNSC for over a year to thwart the prospect of a ceasefire and provided blanket support for an Israeli military campaign that killed huge numbers of Palestinian civilians in Gaza.

By cooperating with the Biden administration against Houthi rebels and adopting a quietly-quietly approach to Trump’s provocative comments on Gaza and his apparent willingness to do whatever it takes to help Israel “to get the job done’, New Zealand has revealed a selective approach to upholding international law and human rights in the desperate conditions facing Gaza

Robert G. Patman is an Inaugural Sesquicentennial Distinguished Chair and specialist in international relations at the University of Otago.

The first tranche of cuts ahead of Te Pūkenga’s disestablishment have affected over 150 roles.
The first tranche of cuts ahead of Te Pūkenga’s disestablishment have affected over 150 roles.

Politicsabout 2 hours ago

More than 150 jobs cut and one campus closed as Te Pūkenga disestablishment looms

The first tranche of cuts ahead of Te Pūkenga’s disestablishment have affected over 150 roles.
The first tranche of cuts ahead of Te Pūkenga’s disestablishment have affected over 150 roles.

Jobs, courses and a campus are on the chopping block as the first tranche of cuts reaches Aotearoa’s polytechs and training institutes.

At least 154 roles, one campus and multiple courses across 10 institutes of technology and polytechnics (ITPs) have been cut as the government prepares to disestablish the nation’s largest vocational education provider Te Pūkenga, documents released under the Official Information Act (OIA) reveal.

Three of Aotearoa’s biggest ITPs (Wintec, Whitireia and WelTec and Toi Ohomai) have already faced significant cuts in the lead-up to Te Pūkenga’s disestablishment, to be completed by the end of 2026, as many institutions have implemented early restructures in order to get ahead of Te Pūkenga’s end, and to meet the government’s “right sizing” – ie downsizing – targets for ITPs. Te Pūkenga was created in April 2020 by the merging of New Zealand’s 16 institutes of technology and polytechnics.

In a first tranche of cuts between November 27, 2023 and December 19, 2024, the Waikato Institute of Technology, or Wintec, was the hardest hit with 46 full-time equivalent roles (FTEs) cut, its Hamilton Gardens campus set to close and 12 courses scrapped. Wintec had frozen arts course enrolments late last year while the Te Pūkenga cuts loomed, but with consultations with staff now closed,  none of its arts programmes have been affected “due to feedback received”, the documents note.

At Whitireia and WelTec in the Wellington region, nearly 30 FTEs will be reduced and the institution has also scrapped its NZ Diploma in Māori and Pacific Performing Arts programme. Campuses in Petone and Porirua, as well as its performing arts school Te Auaha, will see changes to staffing and location, as well as the loss of childcare facilities, which have already closed.

Wellington’s Te Auaha campus on Dixon Street.

Bay of Plenty-based Toi Ohomai, which serves 14,000 students, will see 21 FTEs reduced and 16 programmes discontinued across its seven campuses, with programmes on the chopping block ranging from forestry and youth work to health and hairdressing. 

Smaller vocational education provider Western Institute of Technology at Taranaki (WITT) has seen three programmes closed, and two paused, as well as the removal of one leased campus, yet to be decided. The Nelson Marlborough Institute of Technology, Universal College of Learning and the Eastern Institute of Technology have seen fewer than four roles affected, with the latter also losing its apiculture programme and commercial road transport courses.

Roles affected across the ITPs range from managers to teachers, as well as a Māori content advisory manager and Tiriti partnerships director. According to the documents, 14 lecturers, 11 tutors, eight National Ako Network directors, seven heads of domain and 10 academic staff members are affected.

Green MP and tertiary education spokesperson Francisco Hernandez, who made the OIA request that led to the documents being released, said the government’s “disorganised, haphazard approach to vocational reform has left learners and their communities in the lurch”.

“People in Aotearoa deserve opportunities to develop their skills,” he said. “High-quality, publicly provided skills and trades training is so important to empower people to support themselves, their whānau and their communities.”

Francisco Hernandez

Te Pūkenga noted that some changes in role numbers occurred in conjunction with vacancies, meaning staff were not directly impacted as the roles in question were not filled at that point. However, the Tertiary Education Union’s national secretary Sandra Grey told The Spinoff that this meant the duties of the unfilled roles would have to be picked up by the remaining staff. “There are more jobs vacant than this list would guess, and that means more work for the people who are left.

“It’s really pressured for the Te Pūkenga staff right now,” Grey said. “They just have no clue what direction the minister wants the sector to head, and that means people are leaving of their own accord. They just don’t want to be a part of it any more.”

She said the union was initially successful in demanding no jobs be cut as a result of Te Pūkenga’s disestablishment. However, after the government brought in private accounting companies to go through the books of the polytechnics last year, the ITPs were given a right-sizing order to ensure they could be independent and financially viable by the time Te Pūkenga goes.

That meant cutting courses and whole programmes that had fewer students enrolled than what was seen as financially viable, and removing duplications between courses and roles. “The type of savings required by this government are of such a great extent that you couldn’t just cut a few cups of coffee and break even,” Grey said. “At this time, Te Pūkenga itself is able to stabilise, [but] the individual divisions cannot. So, it does beg the question of why you would break Te Pūkenga when it’s now actually able to operate effectively.”

The ‘really complex’ mission to replace Te Pūkenga

Te Pūkenga’s closure was announced in November 2023, as part of the new government’s 100-day plan. By July, replacing the provider remained the only objective not ticked off on the government’s second quarterly action plan, with prime minister Christopher Luxon at the time saying finding a substitute for the provider “genuinely has been really complex”. 

In December 2024, tertiary education minister Penny Simmonds confirmed the government had begun the process of disestablishing Te Pūkenga and expected polytechnics to operate independently from 2026. That month, a paper – titled “A redesigned vocational education and training system – legislative framework” – considering the breakdown of Te Pūkenga and the creation of a new tertiary entity was read by the Cabinet Social Outcomes Committee.

From Simmonds, the paper proposed a legislative framework which would allow ITPs, currently considered business divisions of Te Pūkenga, to “stand alone, be part of a federation, merge with other tertiary education institutions, or be sold”. The framework would also allow for Te Pūkenga’s existing vocational provisions to be transferred to a university, and Simmonds wrote that she had also sought advice on a dual-sector entity.

A separate cabinet paper submitted by the minister was read in June 2024 cited “long term” issues with financial stability in the institutes of technology and polytechnics, which had reportedly worsened under Te Pūkenga since it was established in April 2020.

Grey said the expectation for a merger could leave smaller institutions as an “afterthought”, that the federation model suggested by the minister was “problematic” and would lead to further cuts and reliance on online teaching, which wouldn’t suit all students. “That’s like saying, ‘I’m putting eight failing businesses into my business’,” Grey said. “It just causes strain within the system, and I don’t think it will serve communities, employers or students very well at all.”