spinofflive
Tiananmen square in Beijing, China. Photo: 123RF
Tiananmen square in Beijing, China. Photo: 123RF

PoliticsJune 22, 2023

What do New Zealanders think about China ahead of Chris Hipkins’ visit?

Tiananmen square in Beijing, China. Photo: 123RF
Tiananmen square in Beijing, China. Photo: 123RF

Not many of us trust Beijing to act responsibly in the world – but we still really want Chinese yuan.

Less than a week out from prime minister Chris Hipkins’ visit to China — the first visit to our largest trading partner for a New Zealand prime minister since Jacinda Ardern’s 2019 trip — New Zealanders’ attitudes towards China remain mixed.

The key takeaways from the Asia New Zealand Foundation’s latest Perceptions of Asia and Asian Peoples survey show a continuing downward trend in New Zealanders viewing China as a friend, though perceptions have warmed since mid-2022 when China made assertive moves in the Pacific.

According to the survey, more New Zealanders (37%) view China as a “threat” than a “friend” (30%). Only Russia and North Korea were ranked as bigger threats, with 72% and 69% of Kiwis identifying the two countries as threats to New Zealand. Also consistent with previous recent surveys, New Zealanders have once again named Japan, Singapore and South Korea as our best friends in the region. These results, which are drawn from data collected in November 2022, are broadly in keeping with findings from 2021.

Not only do New Zealanders view China as a threat, they also see it as one of the least “trustworthy” major powers, with only 13% of respondents expressing having trust in China to ‘act responsibly in the world’. The statistic should be a cause for concern to policymakers in Beijing, says Jason Young, director of the New Zealand Contemporary China Research Centre at Te Herenga Waka. “I would hope that [Beijing] would reflect on that in the sense of maybe changing some of their behavior in the [Pacific] region.”

By contrast, New Zealanders see the United Kingdom and Japan as the most trustworthy major powers, with over 55% of respondents expressing “very high” or “high” trust in each of the two. These were followed by France, Germany and the United States.

College students watch the opening of the 19th Communist Party Congress in Huaibei, October 18, 2017. (Photo: STR/AFP/Getty Images)

While Perceptions of Asia surveys have shown a steadily downward trend in New Zealanders’ attitudes towards China since 2020, the most recent survey shows that public sentiment has, at least, warmed somewhat since a significant dip in mid-2022. The Asia New Zealand Foundation June 2022“mini-poll” found that only 13% of New Zealanders saw China as a friend, while 58% viewed it as a threat.

Jason Young points out that the survey does not go into detail on why New Zealanders’ impressions have shifted, but speculates that China’s actions in the South Pacific – including foreign minister Wang Yi’s Pacific tour and the signing of various agreements with Pacific nations, particularly a security agreement with the Solomon Islands –  in the first half of last year could likely provide some explanation for the June 2022 souring.

Although perceptions of China may have bounced back somewhat since this time last year, the general downwards trend remains clear. Also significant, almost two thirds of New Zealanders are at least “fairly concerned” about the potential for conflict over Taiwan, with 30% of Kiwis reporting to be “very” or “extremely” concerned.

Despite Kiwis’ concerns about China, the country still easily tops the list of the “most important” Asian countries for New Zealand’s future, with 72% of participants deeming it most important, followed by Japan (66%), Singapore (53%) and India (52%).

When asked what single country New Zealand should invest more energy and resources in building a stronger relationship with, China was second only to Australia, with 90% of those supporting stronger ties with China pointing to trade and economic opportunities. The United States came in third, with 84% noting its importance for security ties.

The vast majority of those surveyed are also supportive of building New Zealanders’ Asia capability, with 79% agreeing that it is important for New Zealand students to learn about Asia, including Asian languages – a finding of particular interest given recent announcements that Te Herenga Waka and University of Otago intend to cut jobs and courses across their languages departments.

PM Chris Hipkins is heading to Beijing next week. (Photo: Marty Melville/AFP via Getty Images)

So what do New Zealanders’ mixed feelings mean for the prime minister’s upcoming China visit?

With New Zealanders making clear the importance they place on building trade and economic ties with China, it is not surprising that official communications have emphasised that the visit is a business trade delegation, and will actively promote New Zealand’s Covid-19-hit education and tourism sectors. Young notes that framing the trip in this way increases the chances it will be largely supported by New Zealanders.

Young is quick to point out that while it is a good thing that New Zealanders are keen to see investment in growing our Asia and China capability, they may be viewing China through narrow economic lens. “It could be as simple as they think it’s important because they [China] buy our commodity exports. If that’s the answer, then I think that that’s a pretty shallow and superficial way of thinking about an important country.”

However, perhaps in acknowledgement of New Zealanders’ growing China concerns, Hipkins’ press release also notes that he intends to discuss climate change, human rights and regional security when meeting with president Xi Jinping and premier Li Qiang next week.

Keep going!
Michael Wood has resigned all his ministerial warrants. Photo: Lynn Grieveson/Getty Images
Michael Wood has resigned all his ministerial warrants. Photo: Lynn Grieveson/Getty Images

OPINIONPoliticsJune 21, 2023

Chris Hipkins’ bonfire was meant to be for policies, not ministers

Michael Wood has resigned all his ministerial warrants. Photo: Lynn Grieveson/Getty Images
Michael Wood has resigned all his ministerial warrants. Photo: Lynn Grieveson/Getty Images

With a mixture of puzzlement and anger, Chris Hipkins has announced the resignation of Michael Wood – and the reverberations won’t stop there, writes Toby Manhire.

If asked at the end of March, when Stuart Nash was booted from cabinet, who might be next to go, few, if anyone, would have guessed Michael Wood. Diligent, punctilious, painstaking – that rare kind of creature who reads all the footnotes. So reliable was Wood that he had become the new minister of everything, the safe hands to catch the tricky portfolios, the details guy. So impressive had he proved as a minister that just over five months ago, when a vacancy popped up for Labour leader and prime minister, he was second favourite. 

And so it was with a palpable sense of astonishment that Chris Hipkins announced at a hastily arranged press conference this afternoon that he had divested himself of Michael Wood. Undisclosed shareholdings through a family trust, in Chorus and Spark, in the National Australia Bank, created conflicts in decisions he’d taken across his now former portfolios of transport, immigration, workplace relations and associate finance. 

“I don’t quite understand …” said Hipkins, and, “I still can’t quite believe …” in various forms at least half a dozen times across the press conference. If the earlier chapters of the Wood shareholding mystery, surrounding his non-disclosure and failure to divest shares in Auckland Airport despite being asked a dozen times by the Cabinet Office, were perplexing, this is beyond baffling.

Last week on AM, Wood was challenged to explain what had been going through his head. “Imagine you’re at home and there’s a job that you’ve got to do around the house, maybe it’s a little hole in the roof or an outdoor light bulb or something,” he told Ryan Bridge. “You know you’ve got to do it, it’s on your list, every weekend you think, ‘I should get on to that’, and then other stuff keeps coming up.”

The trouble is that this wasn’t simply a personal matter; the demands placed on MPs and ministers especially to be transparent about their interests is not a household chore but a public obligation. The hole in the roof is a hole in parliament. 

He went on to say: “This is an issue that I really profoundly regret, for me being in politics is a real calling and politics is about making life better for people and so this episode … and it giving an impression that it might be about other stuff is something that really cuts to the core for me.”

Transport Minister Michael Wood
Michael Wood in parliament (Photo: Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images)

It is right to be sceptical about any politician that starts talking about “a real calling”, but in the case of Michael Wood I have no doubt it is true. For him the idea of public service is a raison d’etre rather than an affectation. He is about as pious a politician as you’d ever meet. But piety is trumped by impropriety. “I think it would be fair to say he’s pretty crushed,” said Hipkins, but even if Wood does not yet grasp why he messed up, he will know that the mess-up meant he was done. Hipkins did not rule out a future in politics for Wood, but, in the understatement of the day, he said: “One of the things he has to do is make sure that he tidies up this part of his life.” And: “He will need to have a better explanation than the one he’s produced so far.”

Tomorrow marks five months since Hipkins was confirmed as Labour leader and therefore prime minister, emerging to declare for the first of what now seems like a million times, “our focus will be on the bread and butter issues that matter to people”. There would be no room for “distractions” in the cause. 

‘If you regularly enjoy The Spinoff, and want it to continue, become a member today.’
Toby Manhire
— Editor-at-large

Next came the bonfire: it was meant to be for policies, but soon started getting stacked with ministers, too. Stuart Nash was sacked. Meka Whaitiri – well, she divested herself over to Te Pāti Māori. Kiri Allan found herself uncomfortably close to the flames. Add to that the debacle of Three Waters, multiple crises across health and education, and a cost of living crisis that just had a ribbon marked recession tied to it, and, hell, the real miracle is that Labour, currently governing with a majority, remains not just in the race, but neck and neck with Christopher Luxon’s National Party

Labour now finds itself going into an election with new ministers desperately swotting up on a clutch of portfolios that could make the difference. The wider question is whether voters’ patience with Hipkins – and associated misgivings about Luxon – can withstand the rolling series of unforced errors. With each of those, the impression grows of a government deep in the nightmarish throes of third-termitis, a condition made all the more acute by the fact that this is its second term.


Follow our politics podcast Gone By Lunchtime on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or your favourite podcast app.

Politics