Photo: Christophe Suarez / Biosphoto / AFP
Photo: Christophe Suarez / Biosphoto / AFP

ScienceJune 5, 2019

What does it feel like to be struck by lightning?

Photo: Christophe Suarez / Biosphoto / AFP
Photo: Christophe Suarez / Biosphoto / AFP

Lightning strikes about 190,000 times a year in New Zealand – one strike every 167 seconds, on average. So what does it feel like to get hit? Kate Newton reports for RNZ.

Tucked under a large bush on a rainwashed coastal hillside, Martin Williams was watching the sky above Sponge Bay get darker and darker.

He and another fisheries officer had been there for half an hour, concealed in their usual vantage point on a cliff above the bay, with a view of Sponge Bay Island and the rock shelf running between it and the Gisborne coastline.

The area was a hot-spot for shellfish gatherers, who would wait until the tide was low enough to walk right out along the rock shelf to the beds of pāua ringing the island. Poaching was common. It wasn’t unusual for Williams and his workmates to nab people with sacks full of hundreds of undersized pāua. That day in 2014, they were surveilling a group of divers who had headed out in the poor weather – a possible tell-tale sign that they were up to no good.

As drizzle continued to fall, Williams and the other officer, Laura Hansen, were starting to wonder why the divers weren’t coming in. The sky beyond the island, over Young Nick’s Head, was nearly black and bolts of lightning were coming down there regularly now. Later, Williams heard that more than a thousand lightning strikes hit Gisborne that day. “We were going, ‘Wow! That is impressive,’ because they were big strikes.” As they waited, one bolt came down in the middle of the bay – “a solid crack, right down into the water”.

Finally, the divers came back to shore and started heading up the track. The two men would have to pass the officers’ hiding place to reach the car park but Williams, not wanting to linger much longer in the deteriorating weather, suggested to Hansen that they cross over the stile at the head of the track and walk down to meet the men.

The officers and the divers converged on a small ridge about 20 metres past the stile and Williams asked to inspect the catch. He was standing just a little higher than everyone else on the track; a smidgen more exposed.

As he reached down to take the sack from the men, there was an immense, cracking boom and the world exploded with white light. Then came a voice inside Williams’ head, slow and warped. It said: you’ve just been struck by lightning.

Lightning strikes about 190,000 times a year in New Zealand – one strike every 167 seconds, on average. That’s disappointingly infrequent for Craig Rodger’s tastes. A professor of physics at the University of Otago, he has specific research expertise in lightning. “We are low [in terms of frequency]. We are like, a thousand times lower than most of the world,” he says. “To give you a feeling, the global average lightning rate is 44 a second. You have to wait three minutes in New Zealand for there to be a lightning strike, on average, and in that time globally there’s been about 7500.”

In some parts of the world, there are thunderstorms so reliable that they have names. “I’ve heard of Hector, which is a thunderstorm just off the coast of Darwin,” Rodger says. Named by the locals, Hector shows up every evening, and his punctuality is such that storm researchers converge in Darwin to study him.

In New Zealand, the North Island is more lightning-prone than the South Island, but the South Island’s west coast gets hit more than any other region of the country, due to spring storms that course their way from the Tasman Sea to the Southern Alps, zapping their way up the mountains.

Lightning is, essentially, a gigantic spark. Inside a thundercloud, huge winds cause pieces of graupel – a kind of soft hail – to swirl round, smashing into each other and knocking tiny bits of electric charge off. Eventually, a huge negative charge builds up in the lower part of the storm clouds: a highly unstable situation. “That charge wants to be grounded, it wants to get cancelled out, so it will leap from the cloud to ground to cancel the charge out,” Rodger says. “But in doing so, a huge electrical current flows as the charge flows from the cloud to the ground and we see this as a big electrical spark, which is the lightning flash.”

Not all lightning flashes make it to the ground. About three-quarters of all lightning is within clouds or between clouds, Rodger says. “But the stuff we tend to care about is the stuff that involves the ground – where we live.”

The most dangerous type of lightning comes from the top of the storm, where the build-up of energy is positively charged (think of the cloud as a giant battery). The danger has nothing to do with the charge itself, but how high up in the storm system it is. “By the time it’s going to leap all the way down to the ground you need to have relatively special circumstances and those special circumstances lead to very large currents,” Rodger says.

Positively charged lightning strikes are often termed by researchers as ‘bolts from the blue’ because they travel sideways from the top of the cloud, sometimes grounding many kilometres away from the storm, he says.

“With the negatively charged lightning it tends to be straight down and it’s raining, you know there’s a thunderstorm, because you’re under it. But with the positive lightning it’s going sideways and you might not even be aware there’s a thunderstorm happening a few kilometres away – you’re not being rained on, everything’s fine – and then suddenly, bzzzt, this lightning flash arrives really close to you.”

Lightning is always on the look-out for the easiest electrical path to flow through to get to ground. “It’s looking for high points, so the top of church steeples, power lines, towers.” A human, as a living electrical system, creates “a very nice path” for that current to flow through, especially if they’re the highest object in the area, Rodger says.

That could explain what happened to Martin Williams as he stood on that small ridge, several kilometres away from the main storm. “If the lightning was about to do that and he suddenly stood up and became the highest high-conductivity line, that would make sense.”

Positive lighting – if that’s what it was – can carry up to a billion volts and a current of 300,000 amps. How did Williams survive that? “I can only suspect that he wasn’t zapped directly – that he was close and so it felt really bad.”

It might have been indirect, but Williams says the immediate sensation that day at Sponge Bay was of a huge, percussive force. “It felt like you’d actually been walloped by something, or you were inside a bass speaker.”

As the bolt struck, there was a millisecond flash of intense, burning heat, that had already dissipated by the time his brain could even register it. But the strangest sensation, as he stood on that coastal ridgeline – somehow, he’d held his ground – was a sense that time had dilated and the whole world had dimmed. “It was like someone actually turned down the brilliance on your TV… It was like you’d shifted into the twilight zone.”

In that slowed-down, suddenly silent world, Williams’ realisation that he’d been hit by lightning was followed immediately by another: “I’m still alive.” Then the world came back with a rush. “Suddenly time caught up and you just felt like a tingling, like pins and needles throughout your whole body – it actually felt like you had ants crawling all over you.”

Martin Williams at home in Gisborne. He survived an indirect lightning strike in 2014. Photo: RNZ / Kate Newton

He realised his workmate, Laura Hansen, had also been hit, but the strike had missed most of her body, clipping her round the head as she threw herself to the ground. “I was going, “Laura! Shivers! We got struck by lightning, we’re alive!” She wasn’t too happy, I think she probably took it a bit more seriously than I did.” The divers, standing slightly lower on the track, were untouched but in disbelief at what they’d just seen.

Williams managed to discharge most of the static electricity still fizzing through his body by walking down to the wire fence next to the stile and grabbing hold of it. But the buzz – a combination of adrenalin and the electric charge – lasted all afternoon.

He and Hansen considered getting checked out at the hospital, but by the time they’d inspected the divers’ catch – turned out, it was entirely legal – and driven back to the office, the worst of the static had subsided and they didn’t seem to have sustained any injuries.

Williams has his own theory as to why the pair survived nearly unscathed. “When we look back on it, when you go to that Sponge Bay area there’s a metal rail that runs along the car park area. And I think what happened is the bolt of lightning was going directly to where the metal rail was. As I leant over and stood up, I interrupted the flow of lightning as it was going towards the car park area.”

He believes that metal rail saved his life. “If I’d got a direct hit, I’d have been absolutely fried.”

People do get “absolutely fried” although ACC figures suggest injuries in New Zealand are both rare and not usually serious. In the last three years, only 13 ACC claims have been made for lightning injuries, at a total treatment cost of about $1700.

Last December, a lightning bolt from a huge electrical storm struck rugby posts at Hamilton North School, travelled through the ground and hit a school building, giving four teachers a shock that landed them in hospital with similar sensations and symptoms to Martin Williams.

Cows killed by a lightning strike in Hamilton in 2018 Photo: Supplied / James Miles

Less lucky were four cows killed by another lightning strike in the same storm. The physiology of cows – and the fact most of them live outside in New Zealand – makes them comparatively more prone to lightning shocks than people, Craig Rodger says.

When lightning hits the earth, it momentarily creates a huge electric field, with voltage spread across the ground for hundreds of metres. “They say the safe thing to do as a human being if you’re out and there’s going to be a lightning flash somewhere near to you is to put your two feet close together. Then there’s very little voltage difference between your feet, and so only a very small current will flow.”

Cows, however, being “big long creatures”, have about a metre or so between their two sets of legs. “That means that there’s quite a significant voltage difference between the forelegs and the back legs of the cow, and so a current will flow through the cow’s body, through the heart and quite possibly disrupt it and stop it.”

In lightning-prone parts of the world, the phenomenon is a known and real occupational hazard. The most commonly struck group of people in the world are Cuban agricultural workers. “Cuba is a lightning hotspot,” Rodger says. “Then there’s lots of agricultural workers who are working outside. Put that combination together, and then I’m imagining rakes and hoes and things being waved round, and you’ve got problems.”

Golfers in Florida are next in line: Florida has disproportionate shares of both lightning strikes and retirees – put them together and you have an army of people walking around with makeshift lightning rods in their hands.

At its most lethal, a direct lightning strike can trigger cardiac arrest. An emergency medicine specialist at Waikato Hospital, John Bonning, says three-quarters of people who are directly hit will go into cardiac arrest, and 10 percent will die. “And 100 percent [who survive] will lose consciousness and not have much recollection.” Indirect hits, or side strikes via the ground or nearby structures, can result in a spectrum of injuries or symptoms, but few of them cause lasting damage.

One of the first things emergency doctors treating suspected strike victims look for are skin markings. Sometimes these are small entry and exit burn marks, but in about one in five cases, a very unusual symptom occurs. The energy of the strike can prompt electromagnetic interactions with skin moisture (sweat or rain), creating peculiar red, raised patterns on the patient’s body. Known as Lichtenberg figures, they look like spreading ferns, or actually, complex fork lightning – a weird physical onomatopoeia.

It can get even weirder, Dr Bonning says. “This is another very unusual statistic, which I have never seen but is described, [which is] that the steam created by evaporating sweat or water on your body can, in fact, explode your clothes from your body.”

Emergency medicine specialist John Bonning says by the time most lightning strike victims arrive at hospital, they’re either “dead, or alive and going to be fine”. Photo: RNZ / Kate Newton

Presuming a lightning strike victim survives, there can be some other more lasting effects. Ruptured ear drums and tinnitus, either temporary or permanent, are common. About 15 percent of direct strikes result in dislocated shoulders from the immense jolt of electricity, similar to what can happen when someone gets tasered, Dr Bonning says. “That immediate, complete contraction of every muscle in your body because of this massive amount of electricity that’s gone through you just physically jolts the shoulder out of joint.”

Sensitive organs, such as the pancreas and eyes, also don’t respond terribly well to large volumes of electricity coursing through them either, Dr Bonning says. “[Strike victims] can develop cataracts in up to 10 percent of lightning strikes… This intense electrical voltage that goes through the body can just cause a variety of different complications and the lens is just one of these sensitive organs.”

Other temporary symptoms can look like stroke injuries. “Their arm might be numb, they may not be able to walk, may not be able to talk, they can be stunned, they can have confusion, often amnesia.”

While those symptoms will quickly subside, Dr Bonning says lightning strike victims can underestimate the psychological effects. “Particularly if it’s a significant strike … that is something you would really want to look at somebody for psychological follow-up and support.”

Often though, the only damage is some achy muscles. “You probably will, the next day, feel really quite sore.”

Martin Williams stands on the hill above Sponge Bay, Gisborne, where he was hit. Photo: RNZ / Kate Newton

On a summer day in 2019, Martin Williams is back on the cliff edge above Sponge Bay, trying to pinpoint the exact spot where lightning struck five years beforehand. The water below is peacock blue and the sun is so bright it forces your eyes closed. Not even the most benign of clouds marks the sky. “Here,” he says. He mimes how he reached down to take the bag of pāua from the divers.

Ask Williams if he ever noticed side effects from that stormy day and he just gestures to his bald head. “All my hair fell out.” Only joking, he adds. A Lotto ticket he bought immediately afterwards didn’t win a cent. “My near-death experiences don’t come out with financial gains.”

The one lingering effect, if it counts, is a much more circumspect attitude to big weather. “If I see any sign of a thunderstorm, I’m not out there – I’m not going to do that again.”

Keep going!
Students march through the streets of Wellington during the climate strike. (Photo by Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images)
Students march through the streets of Wellington during the climate strike. (Photo by Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images)

ScienceJune 4, 2019

The cure for climate change could be in our own backyard

Students march through the streets of Wellington during the climate strike. (Photo by Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images)
Students march through the streets of Wellington during the climate strike. (Photo by Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images)

Climate treaties, sustainability goals and energy commitments are proliferating around the world. The answers to these targets must involve new materials and research in this area is happening in New Zealand, writes Dr Geoff Willmott.

Last Friday, students across the country walked out of school for the second time this year in protest against climate change inaction, joining their peers from more than a hundred countries. The current imperative for action on climate, energy and sustainability issues is clear. We must use less fossil fuel, or figure out how to capture the emissions. We want to keep our waterways clean, and to protect our coastlines from erosion and pollution. We need new, more sustainable modes of living, while still retaining a good quality of life, with hopefully pain-free transitions.

All of a sudden, microplastics, nitrate concentrations, and exploration permits are dinner-table discussion items. The Zero Carbon Bill is being debated in parliament, energy capability in Taranaki is being proactively realigned following the Just Transition summit this month, and the number of businesses joining the Climate Leaders’ Coalition is nearing 100.

When a new sustainability target is proposed, it is usually recognized that it won’t be reached by continuing with the status quo, and also that organizational change can only get you so far. To reach an aspirational target, technologies that do not yet exist will be required. So how do these advances actually get done?

Materials science, which is what we do at the MacDiarmid Institute, must be a central part of the answer. As materials scientists, we spend our time developing and exploring new materials (or ‘matter’, or ‘stuff’), trying to find new and interesting properties. If you want to store energy more efficiently and use more sustainable materials than lithium-ion batteries, then you will need to build batteries using new and better combinations of materials. If you want to reduce CO2 emissions by improving capture of gases at an industrial plant, you need to have a material that is better at storing or separating gases than what we have at the moment. If you want to build a hydrogen economy, then you will want to develop catalysts and processes to efficiently produce hydrogen using renewable energy sources.

MacDiarmid Institute Principal Investigator and Massey University Professor Shane Telfer and PhD student Omid Taheri in the lab where they’re exploring the potential of metal organic framework to match the size and shape CO2 molecules (photo: supplied).

Understanding and developing new materials can seem like a fairly innocuous corner of scientific endeavour. Yet materials science affects your household and lifestyle as much if not more than any field of research, and we have world-leading materials scientists working here in New Zealand.

At the MacDiarmid Institute, our people have become deeply motivated by the rather intimidating mission of the survival of our species, and this has become a more intensive focus of our research. Last week, our Techweek event featured research that’s making a difference to our chance of living safely on this planet.

We heard about research at Massey and Canterbury Universities which is exploring an exciting new class of materials known as metal-organic frameworks. These can be thought of as ‘molecular sponges’, and could be designed to efficiently store or separate gases, with obvious implications for reducing emissions. We also heard about research in Wellington to tackle the problem of enormous power consumption by data centres feeding our insatiable appetite for data storage, streaming and processing. The aim is to develop more energy efficient, faster computers using superconducting materials. Superconductors need to be operated at very low temperatures, so our researchers are addressing this challenge.

The event also included speakers from local companies that are creating solutions to our biggest problem. Hiringa Energy, based in Taranaki, has dedicated themselves to the supply of hydrogen as an alternative to fuels which emit greenhouse gases. They are aiming to meet the challenge of establishing production, distribution and refuelling infrastructure to enable adoption of hydrogen technologies. The Auckland start-up Mint Innovation has developed a chemical process for recovering valuable metals such as gold and copper from electronic waste, which otherwise ends up in landfill.

MacDiarmid Institute researcher Dr Eva Anton working in the clean lab researching new computer memory for superconductors (photo: supplied).

So the research that could help mitigate climate change is happening in our backyard, and much of it is publicly funded. Stable support for our university and CRI researchers is and will continue to be essential for making progress. However, there is nothing like an economic incentive to get things really moving, and sustainability and climate challenges are also economic opportunities. Solutions, advances, and efficiencies that are found to be effective in New Plymouth or Parnell can be exported. We can try to save the world, and we can also make a buck while we’re doing it.

Taking discoveries from the lab to the global marketplace can be difficult, but this type of story is familiar to the MacDiarmid Institute – it’s part of our DNA. We’ve come to understand innovation pathways, and are especially well-placed to identify and support the early pipeline ‘twinkles in the eye’ of researchers and entrepreneurs. With 16 spinouts from our researchers, we’re fulfilling the vision of our founder Sir Paul Callaghan that the face of the New Zealand economy can be changed through invention and manufacture of high-value products and IP, which can then be exported and leveraged globally. Our graduates are tech-savvy, socially aware, and ready to lead a new wave of progress at this essential moment.

Some may argue that New Zealand should not strive for leadership in this area; that in a globally competitive race, we lack the scale to compete and would be better off focusing adoption of technologies developed elsewhere. However, in many cases our scientists are filing patents and attracting investors, so we know that the research is already world-leading – and we can’t adopt a technology if we don’t foster the research base that develops the relevant expertise in-country. Moreover, several key sustainability issues are local in nature, with fresh water quality perhaps the most striking example. We can also achieve scale by working together through initiatives such as Taranaki’s National New Energy Development Centre.

But most of all, we should not need to be reminded that every global New Zealand success story – ever – has held on to their aspirations in the face of challenges of scale.

The MacDiarmid Institute is the sponsor of The Spinoff’s science section.