spinofflive
lit up city with illustrations of trees and stars and snails
Turning on the lights impacts plants and animals (Image: Archi Banal/Getty Images)

ScienceAugust 31, 2022

Bring back the night: Why we need to preserve darkness

lit up city with illustrations of trees and stars and snails
Turning on the lights impacts plants and animals (Image: Archi Banal/Getty Images)

Humans, and all the species we share a planet with, evolved for total darkness at night. With our urban areas increasingly flooded with artificial light, scientists, doctors and stargazers are making a case to preserve darkness.

The best thing about darkness is also the most frightening thing about it, the reason that makes it so easy to stay inside with the light switched on, and it is this: in the darkness you are small, and the universe is big. Ngā whetū gleam and sparkle. Te marama hovers, luminous, radiating the light of the sun you cannot see. In the darkness, the noises seem bigger, the rustle and chirp of other living things existing, not attending to you. There’s a gift in the darkness, when you wait for it: it’s the gift of noticing that the world sings songs you’re not part of, that a vast universe stretches beyond your skin. It’s as beautiful as it is terrifying. 

In urban Aotearoa – and increasingly in rural areas, too – these gifts of darkness are ignored. It’s the end of winter, and the earth is tilting back towards the sun. Still, twilights are early, and each evening hundreds of thousands of fingers around the country reach for light switches to illuminate kitchen benches and restaurant entrances and hospital corridors, truck stops and car parks and lumber mills. We let the light in. We keep the dark out.

‘Media is under threat. Help save The Spinoff with an ongoing commitment to support our work.’
Duncan Greive
— Founder

And all that light spills and refracts, tumbles upwards into the sky. The dark is less dark. Only the brightest stars gleam through the haze. Moths, on their way to pollinate flowers, cross the path of a streetlight they mistake for the moon. Confused, they hover, caught. 

For thousands of years, the tilt of the earth covered these islands in a cloak of darkness at the end of each day. The advent of electric light created a way to resist the inevitable darkness, more light for human wakefulness and work. But as normal – and as useful – as electric lighting is, the phenomenon is only a century old, and most of the world’s population didn’t get electricity until much later than that. In Aotearoa, Māori across the country observed the stars in a dark sky, the light of a fire or torch not travelling far. The light of the stars in darkness led people to these islands, and – as the celebration of Matariki reminds us – stars and darkness remain important to Māori today. 

hazy yellow light pollution rises from a city obscuring the sky
Light pollution creates hazy skies, concealing the stars. (Photo: Christophe Lehenaff/Getty Images)

This legacy of darkness can be read in biology, says Margaret Stanley. The associate professor of biology at the University of Auckland studies urban ecology, the way that living things are shaped by city environments. The species that humans share cities with have adapted to natural rhythms of light and darkness; human-created light can disrupt this, creating massive flow-on effects through the ecosystem.

Stanley gives the example of birds. “For birds, singing is absolutely critical to communicating – attracting a mate and holding a territory,” she says. One of the signals for birds to sing is the amount of light: like humans, they have circadian rhythms which are disrupted by light at night. “People complain about lights coming into their bedroom so they can’t sleep – outside in the tree, there might be a bird that can’t sleep for the same reason,” she says. 

But, in urban areas, humans have the power to alter the environment, often disregarding the needs of other species. The Auckland Transport lighting page, for instance, states that the council’s policy is to “alleviate the adverse effects of trees on lighting,” not considering the adverse effect of lighting on trees. Stanley says light can alter or damage how plants grow, form interrelated communities, and get pollinated.

lamp casts light on tree at night
Only thinking about how trees block lighting is an example of being human centred rather than thinking about the needs of other species (Photo: Chai Wai Chevy Wan/Getty Images)

It’s not just plants and animals that need darkness: it’s us. Guy Warman is an associate professor of anesthesiology at the University of Auckland, and studies chronobiology – the technical term for the biological clock. Traditionally, biology students are taught the principle of homeostasis, the assumption that inside an organism, everything is the same all the time. But more recent research shows this is not the case. Warman says our bodies are “rhythmic, strongly rhythmic, and that has an effect on our behaviour and physiology.” 

The biological rhythm is conducted, largely, by exposure to light and dark. “Our body [clocks] have an inaccurate period, and they’re regulated by light and dark,” Warman says. This inaccuracy allows patterns of sleep to adjust for the change in day length throughout the year. The biological clock is embedded in the other systems of the body, like hormones and digestion, and light and dark help these systems to synchronise and communicate. While daylight tends to be stronger than artificial light, it can still impact circadian rhythms. You’re not imagining it: getting out of bed at 7am in the winter dark is much harder than in summer – without morning light, you’re quite literally less awake. 

“Sleep is really undervalued,” Warman says. “It’s seen as a waste of time, but it’s essential for immune function, memory consolidation, wound healing, clearing byproducts from our body and brain.” The widespread availability of electric light, as well as work cultures that create an environment for revenge procrastination, do not encourage people to pay attention to their need for rest, and – closely connected – their need for darkness. 

The Milky Way, shot from Wānaka. Dark skies are important for regulating our circadian rhythms of sleep and wakefulness. (Photo: Sellwell, via Getty)

It’s understanding the cultural, social, spiritual, and biological value of night that inspires the work of people across the country who advocate for protection of the darkness. 

One way this is being done is through dark-sky places. The International Dark-Sky Association, or IDA, is a global organisation that can accredit locations that protect darkness. In Aotearoa, there are four such places: Rakiura and Aotea, which are dark-sky sanctuaries; Aoraki-McKenzie Basin, which is a dark-sky reserve; and the smaller Wai-Iti dark-sky park near Nelson. 

There are more than ten other communities around the country in the process of getting accredited. These projects are linked by Aotearoa’s Dark-Sky Network, an organisation aiming for New Zealand to eventually be the first accredited dark-sky nation. 

On a practical level, becoming a dark-sky place means meeting stringent requirements to shield and dim lights, making sure that all outdoor lighting only goes to where it is needed, rather than spraying uselessly into the sky. Managing a dark-sky place means taking regular readings of the darkness, ensuring it’s pristine, and holding public events to connect communities with each other and the glimmering blackness above. 

lines of light show the location of streets. hazy dark sky and light pollution
Light pollution in Christchurch shows how light directed into the sky wastes energy. (Photo: Sky Images/Getty)

“Our night sky is a taonga,” says Ralph Bradley, manager of the Wai-Iti reserve. A keen astronomer, Bradley started the six-year process to create the park after he couldn’t get planning permission for an observatory on his own property. While not everyone can get to dark-sky spaces, he says creating darkness can start in your own backyard, with shielding lights and using fewer of them, helping to make night safer for the creatures who depend on darkness.

It also makes a lot of economic sense to protect darkness, says Nicky McArthur, an ecologist who became involved with dark-sky protection due to her role protecting the Hutton Shearwater birds endemic to the Kaikōura region. Fledgling shearwaters, leaving the safety of their alpine nests for the first time, mistake a lit road for the shine of light on seawater and crash into solid ground. Working with the council to dim streetlights to prevent this tragedy, McArthur realised that preserving the darkness of Kaikōura could create tourism opportunities for the South Island seaside town in wintertime. But getting local businesses and developers to understand has been a struggle. 

“I need people to know that we’re not going to be in the dark, we’re not going to switch the lights off,” she says. Shielding outdoor lights, directing the brightness downwards, doesn’t mean reverting to a pre-electricity age: instead, it helps humans and animals to have dark when they need it, and light when they need it too. 

Dark-sky certification is only one way to protect the darkness. City councils, in providing street lighting, are one of the main sources of light pollution (although commercial and industrial lighting is a concern too). The numbers are staggering: there are 124,000 streetlights in Auckland, 48,500 in Christchurch, and 13,000 in Dunedin. In recent years, many councils have been phasing out older, less efficient sodium lights, and replacing them with LEDs, controlled by a central management system that can manage the lights remotely. Running these lights costs millions of dollars each year, but installing shielding and dimming lights once traffic volumes are low – now standard practice – can reduce the expense as well as the amount of light spill. 

But while the practical changes brought in by dark-sky projects or LED lights matter, it’s also vital to change our cultural relationship to darkness. “We want light everywhere at night so we feel safe,” says Stanley. But while lighting may create a feeling of safety, there’s no strong evidence that it materially reduces crime. Instead, over-lit cities waste vast amounts of energy and prevent people from the biological, psychological and cultural benefits of darkness and stars.

“I think we’ve forgotten to look up,” says McArthur. “The night sky evokes awe and wonder – it has been so critical through the history of humanity, for explorers, for Polynesian navigators.” Keeping the sky dark ensures that that awe can be passed on to future generations, a reminder that our human bodies are subject to the same rhythms as those of  other animals and plants. After all, the brilliance of the stars isn’t going anywhere; making friends with the darkness lets more of their light filter in.


Follow Nē? on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or your favourite podcast provider. 

Keep going!
Green hydrogen for freight is a mistake, says Cambridge professor David Cebon. (Photo: Supplied / Design: Tina Tiller)
Green hydrogen for freight is a mistake, says Cambridge professor David Cebon. (Photo: Supplied / Design: Tina Tiller)

PoliticsAugust 30, 2022

Has the government been fooled into embracing ‘green’ hydrogen?

Green hydrogen for freight is a mistake, says Cambridge professor David Cebon. (Photo: Supplied / Design: Tina Tiller)
Green hydrogen for freight is a mistake, says Cambridge professor David Cebon. (Photo: Supplied / Design: Tina Tiller)

An international transport expert says the New Zealand government has bought into fossil fuel industry greenwash, and is wasting time and money on hydrogen for heavy freight.

David Cebon should know what he’s talking about.

The Cambridge professor of mechanical engineering leads his department’s research theme: “Energy, Transport, and Urban Infrastructure”. He’s also director of the UK’s Centre for Sustainable Road Freight and has run a multi-million-pound active research project into decarbonising road freight for the past nine years.

Cebon is unequivocal that using green hydrogen – hailed as an attractive zero-carbon energy source – for freight is a waste of energy. “The physics absolutely proves that it is a waste of energy. The result of wasting energy, in one way or another, is pretty bad for the environment. As far as green hydrogen is concerned it means we need a huge amount of renewable energy – much more than people imagine.”

‘Help keep The Spinoff funny, smart, tall and handsome – become a member today.’
Gabi Lardies
— Staff writer

He says that needing to produce that amount of renewable electricity will derail attempts at decarbonisation. “That really threatens the whole decarbonisation project because we’re relying on decarbonising the whole electricity grid and if you suddenly have to manufacture vastly more, multiples more, three or four or five times more renewable electricity, that is going to make it incredibly difficult.”

The huge amount of electricity required also means hydrogen is very expensive to produce. “To power a green hydrogen vehicle costs three times more than powering an electric vehicle. They’re much more expensive to purchase – way more expensive than an electric vehicle to buy at the moment, and they certainly will be going into the future… It costs 30% or 40% more over the first six years of life to run a hydrogen vehicle, taking into account the capital cost and the fuel. The actual fuel costs three times more,” he says.

Hydrogen is also difficult to transport and huge quantities are required. “If you have one tanker carrying diesel and you want to provide the same amount of energy with hydrogen, you would need 18 trucks carrying hydrogen.”

As well as all this, new research suggests even green hydrogen energy isn’t as climate friendly as it’s touted to be, with significant potential for indirect warming impacts through hydrogen molecules leaking during the lifespan of the fuel.

Cebon says the New Zealand Government should be electrifying the heavy transport fleet to decarbonise, rather than moving toward hydrogen.

“The South Island of New Zealand is geographically about the same size as mainland UK. We’ve looked at the UK carefully and looked at journeys in the UK and what trucks do. It’s straightforward to do electric vehicles in the UK. I haven’t analysed every journey in New Zealand but I think that we would find that it’s just as easy to do electric vehicles in New Zealand as it is in the UK.”

Electric vehicles are already available and there’s no reason a move in that direction would be more costly upfront – what’s needed is investment in charging infrastructure, Cebon says. “Broadly you need to get electricity to the sides of the motorways and busy roads, and put in charging stations at roughly the same intervals as diesel stations, and some transport operations need to put charging infrastructure into their depots and warehouses.

“The problem is not the vehicles, the problem is the charging infrastructure. If you design the charging infrastructure carefully it’s perfectly doable.”

But the New Zealand government is forging ahead with its hydrogen strategy. MBIE’s  roadmap for hydrogen in New Zealand, published in April, looks at the “future New Zealand hydrogen economy”. It predicts that green hydrogen may account for around 8% of total energy demand by 2050, with heavy freight at the top of the list of use cases. “Demand for hydrogen is likely for heavy vehicle fleets, with other niche vehicle uses likely to follow similar technology tipping points,” the report says.

The government is already co-funding hydrogen refuelling stations and heavy freight hydrogen fuel cell trucks to the tune of $20 million from the Covid-19 Response and Recovery fund.

Last month Hyundai and NZ Post deployed the country’s first hydrogen truck, with Hyundai receiving $500,000 in government co-funding for a trial of five hydrogen fuel cell electric trucks.

And just last week the government announced it had established a a joint hydrogen research program with Germany, investing $6 million in three projects, each receiving $2 million over three years.

Cebon isn’t alone in his misgivings. Professor Susan Krumdieck, a renewable energy expert formerly of Canterbury University, now research director of the global Heriot-Watt University’s Islands Centre for Net Zero, says the government should have put a small fraction of this funding into more rigorous research before investing so heavily in hydrogen.

“Then the tens of millions so far wasted on the hydrogen pipe dream could have been spent on sorting out the low carbon freight supply chain in real world New Zealand,” she says.

But Megan Woods, minister of energy and resources, is adamant hydrogen could be an important part of New Zealand’s climate change response. “I don’t know the level of knowledge the UK road freight expert has of the New Zealand energy landscape, but what I do know is that our latest modelling suggests that hydrogen, as a home-grown next generation fuel source, could fit well into our wider energy and transport system as part of a mixed response to climate change.”

Energy minister Megan Woods says hydrogen vehicles are “an appealing option in certain situations”. (Photo: Michelle Langstone)

She says the government is investing in battery electric technology for freight, as well as hydrogen. “This investment is alongside, not in place of the roll out of battery electric vehicles and the associated charging infrastructure.”

The government has funded battery-electric vehicles for heavy freight, but these have generally been for battery-swap technology rather than for charging infrastructure. “Given the lack of demand currently for heavy vehicles, [energy efficiency and conservation authority] EECA’s investment in heavy vehicle charging infrastructure has largely been for demonstration purposes,” Woods says.

She points out that hydrogen vehicles can offer longer ranges, fast refuelling times, and more cargo capacity compared to battery-electric vehicles, “which may make them an appealing option in certain situations.”

The government is also eyeing an export market. “Hydrogen produced in New Zealand, thanks to our abundant renewable energy resources, could be cost-competitive with other likely exporters in the Pacific region, and could help meet global demand for low-carbon fuels, particularly among countries with less domestic renewable generation potential such as Japan, the Republic of Korea, and Singapore,” Woods says.

According to Woods there is “unprecedented momentum” overseas with major economies investing as hydrogen costs fall. “In 2021, the Hydrogen Council estimated the global investment in hydrogen projects amounted to approximately US$500b through to 2030.”

Fossil fuel industry lobbying for hydrogen uptake

But Cebon says the New Zealand government is investing precious public funds in projects that are at best a waste of time, at worst a real threat to decarbonisation. He fears the government’s strategy is the result of the worst kind of greenwashing by the fossil fuel industry to continue business-as-usual pollution.

“If you look around it’s very easy to see the fossil fuel industry is pushing hydrogen. The fossil fuel industry realises that green hydrogen is not a practical way to go. It uses so much electricity that nobody is going to be willing to do it. They’re counting on everybody falling back to grey hydrogen.” (Unlike green hydrogen, the process of extracting grey hydrogen does emit carbon dioxide.)

“Why would they count on everyone doing that? Because it increases sales of natural gas in an environment where natural gas and fossil fuel production is completely threatened by people electrifying heating and electrifying vehicles.

“On the one hand, the fossil fuel industry’s market is likely to drop away. On the other hand they can promote this silver bullet solution and say how wonderful hydrogen is and increase gas production.”

He says the fossil fuel industry’s record of successful carbon capture and storage is “really pitiful” despite the industry promoting it for the last 30 years – so the industry is looking for new ways to turn a profit without actually reducing emissions. “It’s quite clear why the fossil fuel industry is spending vast amounts of money on promoting hydrogen with politicians. Politicians are being openly lobbied by the fossil fuel industry in all countries.”

Cebon believes the New Zealand government is likely to be no different. “This is just the same dirty play the fossil fuel industry has been pushing for years. Hydrogen is the next part of that story.”

He says the fossil fuel lobby is hoping to catch politicians in a ‘sunk cost fallacy’, where they invest in hydrogen infrastructure but are then forced to use its more polluting forms when green hydrogen is too expensive or unavailable. “The situation that is being set up is we’ve got these people moving to hydrogen for vehicles and hydrogen-powered heating. But the hydrogen won’t be there. There certainly won’t be enough green hydrogen and the blue hydrogen, if it’s allowed, will be dirty as anything.”

Users will end up defaulting to grey hydrogen, Cebon says. “It just so happens that when you use that hydrogen in your truck it’s far worse than using diesel in the first place.”

‘If you value The Spinoff and the perspectives we share, support our work by donating today.’
Anna Rawhiti-Connell
— Senior writer

Cebon’s views echo those of a report by Earth Justice, a US nonprofit public interest dedicated to litigating environmental issues.

He would like to see the fossil fuel industry made responsible for its pollution. “At the moment they’re not responsible at all. They’re pushing for continuation of the same, and we know we can’t continue the same. And at the same time they’re polluting – it’s not just the CO2 that comes out of cars and trucks. It’s this fugitive methane that they leak with abandon and they don’t care about in a world which is rapidly going up in flames. And they’re lobbying for more of the same.”

However, Woods says  green hydrogen could become an important part of New Zealand’s clean energy mix. “This Government knows that by taking bold action, and looking at a range of smart strategies, including emerging technologies, we will maintain our competitive edge, decarbonise faster and support jobs in new, future-proofed industries.”

But, after his years of research, Cebon’s message is very clear: “There is no case for green hydrogen in freight.”

A version of this article first appeared in Carbon News.


Follow Bernard Hickey’s When the Facts Change on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or your favourite podcast provider.