Thin Lizzy. Illustration by Lucy Zee
Thin Lizzy. Illustration by Lucy Zee

SocietyOctober 4, 2019

Admit it: Thin Lizzy is the best makeup you’ve ever used

Thin Lizzy. Illustration by Lucy Zee
Thin Lizzy. Illustration by Lucy Zee

Lucy Zee celebrates the little blue powder compact tucked away in every New Zealand makeup bag. 

You’re at a house party. You’re not quite drunk but tipsy enough to feel emboldened to look through the bathroom cabinet after your pee break. Behind the Korean face masks, Revlon ColourStay foundation, next to the antihistamines and Mario Badescu facial spray, lies a small blue compact and big fluffy brush, carefully and intentionally hidden.

Here lies the biggest secret of every modern New Zealand woman.

You want to know why your host looks so radiant in the middle of winter? You want to know why they’re so tanned and glowing when it’s 6 degrees outside? The secret is this: the Thin Lizzy 6 in 1 Compact. “No way!” You exclaim, “Jordan has such good taste. They would never stoop to buying Thin Lizzy?” 

Sorry to burst your bubble, but every person in this god green country has probably buffed on a few layers of Thin Lizzy – or its older counterpart Natural Glow – in their lifetime, including you. It is arguably the best makeup you ever used. But what’s so good about Thin Lizzy and Natural Glow you ask? Find out after this ad break. 

Everyone remembers their first time. Maybe you saw the infomercials back when it was ‘Natural Glow’ and found yourself hypnotised by Suzanne Paul’s accent. Maybe you were walking through Farmers and a promo woman offered to do your makeup at a Thin Lizzy pop-up. Maybe you were at your friend’s house watching them get ready and decided to test the thousands of luminous spheres on your own pallid skin. 

Whichever way you tried it, the results were clear. You looked amazing. The infomercial was not lying and that spoken word poetry commercial break really sold it. 

How could a single powder compact make your skin look like you just stepped off a Coromandel beach, high off happiness and adrenaline after seeing Six60 perform? Even through your dark days of self-loathing and mental exhaustion, slapping on a bit of Thin Lizzy gave the effect that you put in some effort when really it was barely none at all. 

It all seemed too easy. A few swipes of the 6 in 1 powder on your face and you were ready to hit the university pub crawl. Use it on your arms, legs and décolletage. Because it was a night out, you added a bit more to your cheeks as a blush and contour. Sure, you looked amazing, but at the same time it felt like you were cheating somehow. Was makeup supposed to be this easy? 

The icon

You could use it as a face foundation, a blush, a contour, an eye shadow, a lip colour and a body bronzer. It replaced six makeup items with one easy compact. But using it didn’t seem right as you got older – you were becoming an adult, you thought you should be putting in more work with this kind of thing, like everyone else seemed to be. You put your Thin Lizzy away in its paisley patterned metal tin and promised yourself you’d use a real liquid foundation one day. 

Thin Lizzy and Natural Glow were the gateway drug to “real makeup”. Sure, the powder made you look good but you wanted to wear real foundation – that’s what all the hot people in Girlfriend magazines were doing. No one was wearing a 6 in 1 powder at the school ball, were they? Could you even turn up to a job interview not wearing foundation? There must be a reason why makeup bags are made so big: the world is telling you that you need all these products to achieve “the look”. One small 6 in 1 compact can’t possibly be enough to do that.

After weeks of finally psyching yourself up, you headed to the department store to pick out a Maybelline foundation. Then, overwhelmed by the colour options, you tried on a few testers under the fluorescent shop lights. “Close enough,” you thought. 

You were wrong. 

As you smear the liquid foundation on you face you can’t understand why it isn’t just magically disappearing on your skin. It matched in the shop, so why isn’t it matching now at home?! It looks yellow, patchy and dry. Your chin is a different colour to your forehead, the dry skin around your nose is exaggerated with beige cornflake-like bits. It’s so hard, why is it so hard? Looking at your pancake face in the mirror you begin to regret the $30 you spent on the foundation and the $40 you spent on the blending sponge. It just soaked it all up. 

You wipe it all off with a wet wipe, several wet wipes, shocked at how much foundation people seem to put on their face every single day. 

Your ride is coming in less than 20 minutes and you still haven’t even got dressed. You reach for your favourite Thin Lizzy compact; small and smooth, it fits perfectly in your hand, a tell-tale peak of stainless steel in the middle – you’ve used this powder a lot because you love it. It’s reliable, it’s easy and it looks great on you. 

You rub your fluffy brush over the powder, taping off the excess, and, with an expert hand, you dust the 6 in 1 over your face. You add more to the cheeks for blush and sculpt out some cheek bones. You dust a little harder over the eyelids and cover the rest of your arms and legs with it too. You mix some of the powder with some lipgloss and, with the obligatory smack of the lips, you inspect yourself in the mirror. You’re beautiful, you’re gorgeous. You look like Rachel Hunter. 

You pop the compact into your bag with the brush in case you need to do any touch ups later. 

Everyone has secrets – your credit card debt, your inappropriate work crush, the state of your mental health. 

You don’t have to admit it out loud but you do have to admit to yourself: Thin Lizzy is the best make up you’ve ever used. 

Keep going!
‘These posters and the people who created them do not represent this university,’ said staff in an open letter.
‘These posters and the people who created them do not represent this university,’ said staff in an open letter.

SocietyOctober 2, 2019

Hundreds of University of Auckland staff sign open letter over white supremacist materials on campus

‘These posters and the people who created them do not represent this university,’ said staff in an open letter.
‘These posters and the people who created them do not represent this university,’ said staff in an open letter.

‘Racism and white supremacy have no place at the University of Auckland’, reads the letter, signed by many of the university’s most senior academics.

A large and growing group of staff at the University of Auckland have spoken out over the re-emergence of white supremacist propaganda on campus in an open letter.

The staff members, including many of the most senior academics at the university, write: “The signatories of this letter declare that racism and white supremacy have no place at the University of Auckland.”

The open letter, which by mid afternoon had been signed by 450 people, follows reporting by Craccum, which revealed that a new batch of posters and stickers had appeared on campus issuing white-supremacist dog whistles and linking to a website airing unambiguously white supremacist messages, such as urging “young white men [to] assume the mantle of re-taking control of our own country”.

The university vice-chancellor, Stuart McCutcheon, told Craccum the posters were “unfortunate”, but he would not be instructing staff to remove the posters, and nor would the university officially condemn the group or their message.

“I think there is a balancing act – and it’s particularly important at a university – between the rights of the people to free speech and the rights of people not to be upset by things,” he told Craccum. “The stickers themselves aren’t illegal … The particular posters I have seen … are not of themselves hate speech, they are not illegal, they are not inciting people to violence.”

He added: “I know some people go from those posters to [the group’s website] and form a view that it’s a right-wing or white supremacist group and they may well be right. But [the group] are … not illegal, and so I tend to the view that we should promote free speech wherever we can.”

In the open letter, the university staff are unequivocal: “We have no difficulty in identifying this group and such displays as white supremacist in nature.”

They continue: “Likewise, it is easy to state that the sentiments and ambitions it expresses are at odds with our nation’s foundation via Te Tiriti o Waitangi, however imperfectly observed: we never were a country for white men. Making this identification – along with an understanding of where such sentiments can lead – is part of the professional expertise of many scholars and students here at the University of Auckland. Finally, as human beings we clearly see that these sentiments are at odds with the norms of decent behaviour.”

The letter began circulating last night and its list of signatories has grown rapidly since.

It to date includes more than 30 professors and six “distinguished professors” – a status denoting “those who have attained positions of international eminence of the highest order”. There are a total of 18 distinguished professors at the university. Four of the original group of five distinguished professors have so far signed: Dame Anne Salmond, Distinguished Professor of Māori Studies and Anthropology; Sir Peter Gluckman, Distinguished University Professor, Liggins Institute; Brian Boyd, Distinguished Professor of English; and Peter Hunter, Distinguished Professor of Bioengineering.

Others on the list of signatories include Marston Conder, Distinguished Professor of Mathematics, Stephen Davies, Distinguished Professor of Philosophy, Professors of Physics Richard Easther and Shaun Hendy, Jane Kelsey, Professor of Law, and Juliet Gerrard, a Professor of Biochemistry who also serves as the prime minister’s chief science adviser.

The university’s acting vice-chancellor, John Morrow, said he had no doubt that Professor McCutcheon, who is currently overseas, would applaud the initiative.

“Universities are established to be society’s critic and conscience and this  is what we would expect from our community,” he told The Spinoff in an email.

“The open letter demonstrates our staff members’ exercise of their right to academic freedom and makes a welcome contribution to ongoing debate on matters that are central to the university’s values.”

One of the posters on Auckland University campus. We’ve censored the name of the website (Photo: Craccum)

The letter addresses the free speech question directly: “We understand the ‘absolutist’ position that some take that freedom of speech extends to the right to speak in ways that are hateful,” it reads.

“We also understand that the language of rights is complex and nuanced, recognising that such displays create an environment that brings harm to segments of our community, fraying the cultural tapestry that provides our diverse campus community with vitality and energy. We also note that by virtue of their race, gender, class, country of origin, religious affiliation, sexual or gender identity, many people empowered to judge conduct on university campuses are less likely to be the focus of hate speech, and may be slower to recognise its impact on its intended targets. However, ‘speech’ has many forms, including gesture and nonviolent protest. If these posters constitute ‘free speech’, the same can be said of the actions of individuals who remove those that they encounter.”

The letter concludes: “Let us make this clear: these posters and the people who created them do not represent this University. As staff, students and alumni of the University of Auckland, we work to ensure that such sentiments do not take hold on campus. Our goal is to ensure that everyone who comes here flourishes within an environment that celebrates free and open enquiry, teaches the lessons of the past, and builds a better future for all.”

Yesterday, a group of students and staff trawled the campus removing and pasting over any white supremacist linked material. Some posters included the words, “ZERO tolerance for protecting human rights and dignity – if the UoA can’t protect minority students from hate in the name of ‘freedom of speech’, they have no right to take these posters down.”