One of the posters on Auckland University campus. We’ve censored the name of the website (Photo: Craccum)
One of the posters on Auckland University campus. We’ve censored the name of the website (Photo: Craccum)

SocietySeptember 30, 2019

Auckland University refuses to remove white supremacist signs from campus

One of the posters on Auckland University campus. We’ve censored the name of the website (Photo: Craccum)
One of the posters on Auckland University campus. We’ve censored the name of the website (Photo: Craccum)

University of Auckland vice-chancellor Stuart McCutcheon says a new batch of posters from a white supremacist group is ‘unfortunate’ but the university will not remove or condemn them, reports Daniel Meech.

This story was first published on September 29 in Craccum, the University of Auckland student magazine.

The University of Auckland’s campus has played host to white supremacist posters for the second time this year. Students have reported finding blue stickers and multi-coloured posters scattered around the university’s quad area, law school, and general library. The stickers and posters encourage viewers to visit the webpage of a white supremacist group who wish “to build a new generation of capable, young white men who will assume the mantle of re-taking control of our own country”.

The website – which details the group’s motives, and provides contact information for new recruits to get in touch – says one of the group’s many aims is to battle the “propaganda promoting incoherent ‘diversity’ and ‘anti-racism’”. Their other goals include “revitalizing” the European culture in New Zealand, returning New Zealand into the hands of “strong men”, and stopping the government passing policies which are “at the expense of the European community”. According to the website, women, non-Europeans, and non-heterosexual individuals are strictly forbidden from becoming members.

Vice-chancellor Stuart McCutcheon says although the group’s posters are “unfortunate”, they are protected by free speech. As a result, he will not be instructing staff to remove them from the university’s campus, and the university will not officially condemn the group or their message.

“I think there is a balancing act – and it’s particularly important at a university – between the rights of the people to free speech and the rights of people not to be upset by things,” McCutcheon told Craccum. In his view, the group’s anti-minority rhetoric does not constitute hate speech, and so there is insufficient reason for the university to intervene with the dissemination of their message.

“The stickers themselves aren’t illegal,” he says, and “the particular posters I have seen … are not of themselves hate speech, they are not illegal, they are not inciting people to violence.

“I know some people go from those posters to [the group’s website] and form a view that it’s a right-wing or white supremacist group and they may well be right. But [the group] are … not illegal, and so I tend to the view that we should promote free speech wherever we can,” he told Craccum.

One of the stickers that have recently appeared on campus. We’ve censored the website name. (Photo: Craccum)

McCutcheon says he empathises with minorities who feel threatened by the appearance of white supremacist posters on the university’s grounds. “I absolutely get that,” he said, “but I do think that in a university in particular – and in society generally – we should think quite carefully about boundaries on free speech where what is being said is not illegal.”

Auckland University Students Association president George Barton said he disagrees with McCutcheon. “While the vice-chancellor is correct in saying that we operate in a society that has free speech, we also operate in a university that strives, within that context, to be safe, inclusive and equitable for all students, as enshrined in the Student Charter,” he said. “In my view – and I think the vast majority of students’ views – that involves recognising that these kinds of views don’t belong in our university”. Barton told Craccum he would be speaking to university security and Campus Life about removing the posters.

This isn’t the first time white supremacist rhetoric has appeared on campus. In April this year, university students reported finding similar posters plastered around Albert Park and the Clock Tower. Around the same time, a group of post-graduate students lodged a formal complaint with the university, alleging a student with neo-Nazi views had threatened them and made them feel unsafe.

At the time, Vice-Chancellor McCutcheon said reports of an increasing problem with white supremacists on campus were “unsubstantiated” and “utter nonsense”, but that the university would support anyone who said they felt unsafe on campus. McCutcheon also promised the university did not “condone any sort of harassment and will always act” against discrimination and harassment.

Two years before that, the university made headlines when lampposts and buildings around the General Library were covered with dozens of posters calling on white men to oppose “white genocide”.

Barton says AUSA “encourage students who see these stickers and posters to remove them”. McCutcheon also says that – while he personally believes the group are entitled to spread their message on university grounds – “if people want to take down other people’s posters, there isn’t a whole lot I can do about it”.

Keep going!
Olivia on the runway during New Zealand Fashion Week (Photo: Brooke Waterson)
Olivia on the runway during New Zealand Fashion Week (Photo: Brooke Waterson)

SocietySeptember 30, 2019

I thought the fashion world didn’t want people like me. I was wrong.

Olivia on the runway during New Zealand Fashion Week (Photo: Brooke Waterson)
Olivia on the runway during New Zealand Fashion Week (Photo: Brooke Waterson)

Throughout history, fashion has had the power to advance cultural discussions, writes Grace Stratton. 

For its summer 2019 issue, fashion magazine i-D – constantly hailed as a source of inspiration in fashion culture – put neurodiverse environmental activist Greta Thunberg on its cover. By featuring an advocate like Thunberg so prominently, i-D is telling us something important: that the role of the fashion industry isn’t just to make money, but to be an advocate and vessel for cultural discussions that matter.

When I first became interested in fashion, I expected to be shut out. I used a wheelchair and, as a consumer, I never saw myself or others who lived with disabilities reflected in the industry. In reality, from the moment I entered the fashion space, I felt accepted. I will never forget my first Fashion Week in 2017, when Murray Bevan, founder of fashion PR company Showroom 22, came up and asked me to let him know if I had any problems accessing anything. 

I grew up believing that the fashion world didn’t want me, and I was wrong. The individuals working within it were welcoming, and all had things that made them different – just as I did. 

Rebecca Dubber wears Jockey, left, and Not For You, right, on the Resene Designer Runway at New Zealand Fashion Week 2019. Photo: Stefan Gosatti for Getty

Very quickly I learned that, in the fashion industry, your differences are your strengths. They are what drives you and they do not need to be assimilated to normality in order for you to find success. In the real world we don’t teach people to be proud of their disabilities, we teach them to loathe them, or at most to simply be neutral. I do not believe this. I believe that I, and people like me, should be proud of our access needs – I really like my body and how it navigates space, and I should not have to justify that to you. 

Our response to people with access needs should be to embrace, innovate, design better and challenge ourselves to look inwards at the historical narratives we carry. We need to critically ask “why do these needs exist?”. I have seen these responses to my access needs more frequently in the fashion industry than I have anywhere else.

Fashion has had the power to advance cultural discussions throughout history. The 2008 “Black Issue” of Vogue Italia, which sold out in the US and UK within 72 hours of publication, reflects this. Featuring portraits of the leading black supermodels of the day and celebrating black women in the world of politics, art and entertainment, the issue came at a time, according to fashion activist Bethann Hardison, when “few people in the fashion industry were talking openly about the need for more inclusion of black models on the runways, on covers and in advertising”. 

The “Black Issue” took away any excuses that fashion publications or houses had not to include black models, while helping to further the discussion about cultural inclusion in the industry. This conversation is of course still being had today, and we still have a long way to go, but that single magazine issue had a real effect: it made people feel seen by fashion in a way they never had been before. And that’s where my desire to work in fashion comes from. Once you understand fashion, you realise it’s not just about the clothes. 

Fashion has power – and we must speak truth to that power.

Kelsey and Amelia, shot for All for All by Adam Bryce

I have lived my whole life as a wheelchair user. At 20 years old, I actually really like my wheelchair and I like my body. Fashion helped give me an avenue for expressing myself beyond my chair, changing my power over who I was and how I articulated myself to others. My daily navigation of the world still includes having to duck and dodge my way around people’s misguided perceptions of who I am and what I need, and I still have to answer the odd question about whether or not I can have children – but that’s usually just overly keen shopkeepers. 

It is tiring to have to navigate this, but it becomes normal. Around five months ago, I realised that the flawed notions surrounding disability that I experienced didn’t have to be accepted. That’s when I turned to fashion to make that change. Five months later All is For All, the company I co-founded with Angela Bevan, has placed six models who live with various disabilities in New Zealand Fashion Week, and we work with some of New Zealand’s leading brands.

Although we’ve brought light to accessibility, we still have a long way to go. But when you place a model who is drop-dead gorgeous and uses a wheelchair in an editorial or on a runway in her lingerie, you directly challenge the flawed notions surrounding disability. Society implicitly teaches that disability is to be fixed or avoided, so placing a wheelchair user on a runway helps to challenge and break down this narrative. Because, of course, the narrative is wrong. 

Once the audience sees that wheelchair-using model in the context of fashion, they might start to wonder how she navigates the world everyday. They might start to have a greater understanding of her capacity to be in the world, successfully, as exactly who she is. 

They might even start looking at the whole world differently. 

You can listen to Grace Stratton’s podcast Inclusion Policy here