spinofflive
Illustration: Toby Morris
Illustration: Toby Morris

SocietyMay 31, 2020

A short history of the New Zealand jersey

Illustration: Toby Morris
Illustration: Toby Morris

From the highs (Ralph Hotere’s turtleneck), to the lows (Bain), the jersey is as much a part of this place as the jandal or the Swanndri, but it resists such easy nostalgia, writes John Summers. 

Whenever it comes time to lure tourists back to our shores again, we really must work on our slogan. Forget hobbits or 100% pure, it should be something honest, simple, practical. It should be “bring a jersey”.

Not only does this embody those qualities but it is also about jerseys, an item of clothing that is inescapable in most regions of this country. I don’t believe it’s by chance that New Zealand is home to the world’s largest jersey, which was displayed for a time at a knitwear store in Geraldine (I have no explanation for why the same store also had on show an exact replica of the Bayeux Tapestry made from knitting machine parts). After all, our climate punishes complacency. For at least six months of the year, only a fool leaves the house without a warm layer. Our economy, that other great, uncontrollable force, is to blame, too, with its reliance for so long on sheep. 

Even the word jersey itself has a meaning particular to this place. Elsewhere they talk of sweaters, of jumpers. Jersey in other countries tends to be used exclusively for the top you wear to play basketball or ice hockey, not something you pull on when it’s getting nippy out. I think we could go one further too, and argue that jersey isn’t an exact translation for sweater or jumper, but tends to mean some plain and rumpled thing, best stored balled up and stuffed into a bag or flung onto the backseat of the car. It should fit at the elbows and at the chest maybe but only there – it is essential that parts sag, the neck gaps, the belly is stretched. Maybe there is a hole, the result of a cigarette or of walking carelessly past chicken wire. Maybe it’s not like this at all, but in some way it is, too: a garment that gets worn. 

There is a small industry in histories of things in this country. Over the years, we have produced a history of New Zealand cafes, of sheep, of skateboarding. I have to say that I was a little sneering of these books a while back. It blew my mind that someone wrote a history of New Zealand kitchens. I imagined a chapter: “The Formica Years”. But I have since come around, and now realise these topics provide the lens or the angle, an insight only, and the real story is us, who we are played out through hot drinks or countertops.

And so I have come to hope and expect a history of New Zealand jerseys will be produced some time soon, a book that would chart progress from the heavy, dull-coloured things of the colonial era through to the garish batwing creations of the 80s and the thin, merino sheaths that became part of the business casual uniform in more recent years. Already this history exists if you train your eyes. Most attempts at documenting our lives wind up documenting our jerseys too. The works of those two masters of photography, Ans Westra and Marti Friedlander, include many wool-clad New Zealanders. 

Edmund Hillary sporting a lovely jersey on the Everest expedition in 1953. (Photo: George Lowe/Royal Geographical Society via Getty Images)

If there is then a history of jerseys (the usual milestones represented: Hillary and Tenzing relaxing, post Everest, Tenzing impossibly dapper in a silk cravat, Hillary submerged in wool), there is also an art history of jerseys. One of the most frequently used photographs of Colin McCahon is of a sombre man, staring with dark eyes into the camera while wearing a jersey composed of perfect squares of black and white: a contrast of light and dark, day and night, life and death, nothingness and creation. They say his painting is good too. On this theme, see also the images of a young Ralph Hotere emanating a sort of Miles Davis cool: slim, feline almost, in a fine black turtleneck. His work, his jersey concerned with the colour black, a subsuming black, subsuming, in this case, the neck. 

Ralph Hotere in the 1974 Sam Pillsbury directed National Film Unit documentary

These are high points. The jersey belongs with our low moments too. Inevitably I must turn to Bain. That story has had its hold on us for 30 years now with its mystery and its sudden and gruesome unveiling of a particular vein of New Zealand life: the family turned disastrously inward, bookishness and god-bothering giving way to resentment and violence. An aberration in the way we like to see ourselves, symbolised then by the aberrant jersey, David’s strangely patterned jerseys (his own design, it was revealed during the retrial) becoming a kind of shorthand for the whole sad saga. 

And yet, as much as it is a part of this place, the jersey is never found in the usual catalogue of Kiwiana. A good thing too. It is more important than that, cannot be reduced to a simple, cheery symbol – there is no single type of jersey as instantly recognisable as the buzzy bee or the chequered print of a Swanndri (I insist the latter is a separate entity, related, yes, but different still). It resists such easy nostalgia. We’re wearing them too often, and not, as is the case with jandals, during the happy days of summer.

The jersey is everywhere and it is varied, it changes with the seasons and the fashions, it is adapted and altered, and all the while something essential remains: a need, a part of life, a way of life. Thinking of my own 37 years, I think of jerseys worn inside cold flats. I think of jerseys worn outside, while tramping, in the shade of the bush. I think of itchy jerseys worn as a child to church. I think of school days and uniform jerseys. I think of late summer parties in backyards, the warmth of the day disappearing. I think of jerseys. 

 

 

(Photo: Getty Images)
(Photo: Getty Images)

OPINIONSocietyMay 31, 2020

Why New Zealand must join the global call for a people’s vaccine

(Photo: Getty Images)
(Photo: Getty Images)

Like other pharmaceutical products, a potential Covid-19 vaccine is at risk of being controlled by corporate interests. New Zealanders should join the call for a vaccine that’s free for everyone, writes Jo Spratt of Oxfam.

As we celebrate a long weekend and head further away from the restrictions of strict lockdown, many of us will be feeling thankful to be living in Aotearoa. 

Five months into the global pandemic, the global infection rate has gone past 5.64 million and the collective recorded death toll is now more than 353,000. Worldwide, governments’ efforts to contain the spread of the coronavirus have ranged from resolute to disturbingly chaotic. 

Since March, when lockdown was first imposed in New Zealand, hundreds of New Zealand businesses have collapsed and thousands of jobs have been lost. Twenty-one people have died. The complications and pain of recovery may mostly lie ahead of us. But as each day passes and our health officials have no new cases of infection to report, we can take some comfort that thanks to timely leadership, and by working together, we’ve earned ourselves a bit of a breather.

What we can’t be is complacent. Borders can’t stay closed indefinitely. The virus is highly contagious. In New Zealand, as elsewhere, we will need a vaccine to be protected. And ultimately, pretty much every person on the planet needs to get the jab as well.  

On May 18, while many in New Zealand were still raking over the budget leaves, Ashley Bloomfield and other health leaders met virtually for the World Health Assembly. There were high hopes for the meeting’s outcome but it was derailed by what some commentators described as a Trump administration seeking scapegoats for a pandemic it had mishandled from the start.

The resulting World Health Assembly decision on access to vaccines, treatments and tests for the coronavirus supports the use of existing global trade rules to override corporate patent rights in the interest of public health, and tasks the World Health Organisation to come up with options for scaling up global manufacturing and distribution capacity for vaccines, tests and treatments. But despite acknowledging that vaccines, treatments and tests are global public goods, there is no requirement for pharmaceutical corporations to pool their patents – a process that would enable anyone with the means to manufacture or import affordable copies. There is also no guarantee that vaccines, treatments and tests will be made available to individuals free of charge.  

As Anna Marriott, health policy manager at Oxfam International, put it: “The resolution agreed at the World Health Assembly leaves too many barriers standing in the way of a vaccine for all. A people’s vaccine must be patent-free, mass produced, distributed fairly, and made available, free of charge, to every individual, rich and poor alike. World leaders must commit to putting public health before the profits of the pharmaceutical industry.”

The lacklustre outcome from world health leaders reveals the work still to be done in securing what people everywhere need – a free vaccine that is fairly distributed to every person, in every country. 

Elsewhere, however, the call for an affordable and accessible vaccine is gaining momentum.

In the days just before the World Health Assembly, more than 150 world leaders, economists and health experts signed an open letter calling on all governments to unite behind a people’s vaccine against Covid-19. Signatories included the presidents of South Africa, Senegal and Ghana as well as the prime minister of Pakistan and New Zealand’s own former prime minister Helen Clark. 

Clark was credited with championing the cause, using her strong international connections to encourage a number of significant leaders to sign on in support. As she told Carl Zimmer, a science columnist with The New York Times, “These vaccines have to be a public good. We’re not safe till everyone is safe”.

In New Zealand, there’s another reason why all New Zealanders need to sign this global petition to ensure everyone has the chance to receive the vaccine.

New Zealand may have joined many countries and companies in the global race to develop an effective Covid-19 vaccine. But of the $37m funding, launched by the government this week, $10m will go to domestic research. This is small compared to what wealthier countries and pharmaceutical companies are throwing at the challenge. If and when a vaccine is developed, experts suggest New Zealand stands a high chance of being one of the last in line. If distribution of the vaccine is left to market forces, New Zealand would not have the scale or purchasing power to compete with countries such as America, Germany, China or even Australia. We may be left waiting.

However, we of course know that Covid-19 won’t wait and the situation is incredibly urgent. And if the prospect of not being able to access a vaccine for ourselves and our families is a scary thought for us here in New Zealand, imagine what it would be like for a mother or father living in a crowded squatter settlement on the outskirts of Port Moresby, or in one of the world’s crowded refugee camps. 

At this moment, almost a million people are seriously at risk in refugee camps like Cox’s Bazaar in southern Bangladesh. The first cases of the coronavirus were confirmed in mid-May in this crowded camp, where more than one million people have settled. In this camp around 250 people are sharing just one tap and have living space that is less than 3.5 metres per person. It’s hard to imagine the plight of the people in such camps who have been forced to flee their homes, who have already suffered so much hardship, and who are simply not set up to cope with a pandemic like coronavirus. 

New Zealand, along with other small nations, has an opportunity to put pressure on governments and pharmaceutical companies to ensure a Covid-19 vaccine that is available for everyone. Now is the moment for us all to join the worldwide call for a people’s vaccine.

Dr Jo Spratt is the advocacy and campaigns director at Oxfam New Zealand.