One Question Quiz
All Black Beauden Barrett reacts during the Steinlager Series match between New Zealand and Ireland at Sky Stadium in Wellington, New Zealand, July 16, 2022. (Photo: Brendan Moran/Sportsfile via Getty Images)
All Black Beauden Barrett reacts during the Steinlager Series match between New Zealand and Ireland at Sky Stadium in Wellington, New Zealand, July 16, 2022. (Photo: Brendan Moran/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

SportsDecember 19, 2022

Exclusive: Beauden Barrett never asked for a ‘radical’ exemption from NZ Rugby

All Black Beauden Barrett reacts during the Steinlager Series match between New Zealand and Ireland at Sky Stadium in Wellington, New Zealand, July 16, 2022. (Photo: Brendan Moran/Sportsfile via Getty Images)
All Black Beauden Barrett reacts during the Steinlager Series match between New Zealand and Ireland at Sky Stadium in Wellington, New Zealand, July 16, 2022. (Photo: Brendan Moran/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

Reports emerged last week that New Zealand Rugby had rejected Beauden Barrett’s request for an exemption to play overseas for two seasons. It was actually NZR that suggested it, reports Dylan Cleaver.

If Beauden Barrett wants you to know one thing about his rugby playing future it is this: he never asked New Zealand Rugby for a special exemption to play for the All Blacks while playing for an overseas club.

The 31-year-old was surprised to read last week that “his request was rejected”, saying it is a fundamental misreading of what occurred.

Instead, Barrett, who is considering his post-World Cup playing options, was approached by NZR to ask if he would be interested in extending his international career beyond next year’s World Cup in France if the board agreed to a special exemption.

Subscribe to Dylan Cleaver’s sports newsletter The Bounce:

“Like a lot of players at this stage of their career, I’m considering my options for 2024 and beyond and when the contract people at NZR mentioned the possibility that I could play two years of club football overseas and remain available for the All Blacks I was obviously willing to listen,” Barrett said. “I love playing for the All Blacks and still believe I have something to offer, but as my career is nearer the end than the start, I’m also keen to explore other options and experiences.

“I was really disappointed by the [report’s] implication that I’d tried to put myself above the rules, though. One of the first things that’s drummed into you in rugby is that nobody is bigger than the team and I believe in that idea wholeheartedly.”

Barrett reiterated that it was not his idea and that he would never have raised it himself because he knew what the rules around eligibility were, having already taken advantage of a playing sabbatical during a 10-match stint with Suntory Sungoliath last year. Barrett said he was left feeling embarrassed by the implication he was trying to engineer a special exemption for himself.

Via a statement, NZR admitted it was they, not Barrett, who raised the idea.

“In discussions with Beauden about his potential to remain in New Zealand beyond the World Cup, NZR management raised a possible option of him playing for the All Blacks in between participating in offshore competitions in one year of a much longer term,” the statement read. “All parties were aware that further discussion and decision on this remained subject to NZR board decision.

“Any suggestion that Beauden proactively came to NZR seeking exceptional treatment is incorrect. He remains a highly regarded employee of NZR.”

Beauden Barrett scores a try in the last World Cup Final. Photo by Mike Hewitt/Getty Images

Halo Sport’s Warren Alcock,, who manages Barrett, said they had spent much of the past six months working on a “conventional” overseas contract for Barrett, where he would be leaving New Zealand permanently.

“He had a serious offer on the table and the mostly likely outcome would have been him signing a two-year contract overseas. The approach by NZR with this alternative proposal gave both Beauden and us the opportunity to rethink his plans beyond 2023,” Alcock said. “We had already advised NZR that Beauden’s plans post the World Cup was to sign overseas.”

Alcock said that Barrett was still unsure but was intrigued enough about NZR’s exemption idea to want to “explore every aspect of it”, knowing full well it would require board approval.

“From our point of view, we saw this as NZR trying to retain talent and I don’t think you can criticise them for being innovative in doing their job,” Alcock said.

The idea, had it been ratified, would have potentially seen Barrett sign with an overseas club – Racing Metro has been mentioned in dispatches, but Halo Sport would not confirm that – for two seasons, be available for the All Blacks in 2024, but then sign with the NZR from midway through 2025 through to the end of the Rugby World Cup in Australia in 2027.

“The quid pro quo for this arrangement was Beauden committing with NZR through to the end of the next World Cup.”

At that point Barrett would be 36.

“I’m still loving my rugby and right now if you asked me whether I think the 2027 World Cup is a realistic possibility, I’d definitely say yes,” Barrett said. “ Obviously a lot can happen between now and then with injuries and form and exciting new players emerging, so I never take anything for granted, but I look after myself off the park and genuinely feel I have a lot more rugby left in the tank.”

While intrigued by the prospect, both parties knew it would require sign-off and it is understood that the NZR board was persuaded by objections voiced by the Super Rugby clubs and the provincial unions, who didn’t want any hollowing out of the eligibility rules.

Beauden Barrett during a Blues Super Rugby training session (Photo: Phil Walter/Getty Images)

“We always knew it was a long bow,” Alcock said, “but we’re talking about an exemption for an All Black who would have played in excess of 120 test matches across 12 years and participated in three World Cups.”

Only four players have reached that mark – Richie McCaw, Sam Whitelock, Keven Mealamu and Kieran Read – and only Barrett and Aaron Smith are within striking distance.

“We always considered that was such a high threshold, so it’s not going to open the floodgates,” Alcock said. The idea of extending the runway on Barrett’s 112-match All Black career was attractive to NZR on two counts.

With Richie Mo’unga likely headed overseas on a three-year contract, there is a serious lack of depth in one of the most critical positions on the park. Barrett also offers utility value, having started tests at fullback for the All Blacks.

Second, as NZR moves into the Silver Lake era, one of the discussion points the American private equity giants raised was rugby’s apparent reluctance to showcase and promote their biggest assets, of which two-time World Rugby player of the year Barrett is clearly one.
It’s in Silver Lake’s best interests that NZR does whatever is in its power to retain its biggest brand’s most prized assets.

In that context, Barrett could have provided a fascinating precedent should NZR management have succeeded in creating a two-year sabbatical exemption, as the whole issue of playing breaks is still widely misunderstood by the general public.

“I’ve been involved in nearly every sabbatical deal, starting from the McCaw and Carter negotiations until more recently Whitelock and Brodie Retallick, and the rules are fundamentally clear,” Alcock said.

There are playing breaks (or rest breaks in the case of McCaw), offered to those who have played 70 tests. These are sanctioned by NZR and allow the player to come back from a single-season Super Rugby break and be immediately available for the All Blacks. They are conditional on the player signing with the national body through to the end of the next World Cup cycle, or long term.

“People are critical of sabbaticals because players often return a bit off the pace, but you have to remember what we’re actually signing is a four-year deal,” Alcock said. “There’s always an element of crystal-ball gazing with them but what we’re trying to do is get the player through to the next World Cup in peak form.

“For example, some people were critical of the deals we signed for Sam and Brodie in 2019, but nobody would doubt their place now and Brodie has said publicly he seriously doubts whether he would have got through to 2023 without the playing break.”

Where the confusion comes in is when people assume the likes of Damian McKenzie, TJ Perenara and Patrick Tuipulotu have been granted sabbaticals. Their situation differs in that they exercised an option to terminate their NZR contract, or did not extend their agreements. They effectively took a punt on themselves that they would still be valued by NZR when they returned from their overseas clubs, and the NZR offered them a new contract. They had to play in a competition – Super Rugby or Bunnings Cup – before they could be selected for the All Blacks again.

(Just to confuse matters more, there can be an injury exemption, such as when Tuipulotu was called in this year when there was a locking injury crisis.)

As for where Barrett’s future lies now, it is at least initially overseas post-World Cup, but at the very least NZR’s desire to see him play at the 2027 World Cup has got him thinking.

“At the moment I just want to enjoy Christmas with the family and begin preparing for a huge year of Blues and All Black rugby.”

Subscribe to Dylan Cleaver’s sports newsletter The Bounce:

Keep going!