spinofflive
leonie copy

ĀteaMarch 30, 2019

Media, Māori and me

leonie copy

A journalist reflects on a career in which the media has felt like a hostile environment for Māori and other minorities.

Most Pākehā couples that applied to adopt in the 70s didn’t want Māori children. Māori boys were at the bottom of their wish-lists. The couple that did adopt me were one of the rare exceptions. I grew up as a mixed-race kid in a mixed-race community during the 70s and 80s. It was a time when New Zealand was often polarised along racial lines because Māori were no longer willing to sit down and shut up.

Or was it polarised? Was the way Māori were portrayed in the media simply racist scaremongering? At the time I didn’t have the language to articulate these questions. I just knew – instinctively, awkwardly – that I didn’t fit into the story that was being told. I didn’t exist. When I did it was part of a group that was denigrated. This was the climate in which I tried to work out my identity.

As a 10-year-old I watched the protests about the Springbok tour and was alarmed as images spilled into my living room of adults beating the crap out of one another. I kept hearing the word apartheid and asked my parents what it meant. I was troubled by the explanation and wanted to know more. I bought the autobiography of the South African journalist Donald Woods, Asking for Trouble. Here was someone who was using words to challenge something that was wrong. But despite the magnetism of the idea of journalism, I could never fully commit to it. The journalism of New Zealand constantly told a story that didn’t reflect anything about the world I was trying to grapple with. It didn’t challenge something that was wrong. It was part of something that was wrong.

When I did finally get a job as a journalist the same misgivings I had as a kid about how the media covered race kept surfacing. Again and again for the next 20 years.

I reached a conclusion about this a long time ago. But now I’m going to say it.

The media in New Zealand is racist. Its newsrooms do not reflect New Zealand. They’re not intended to. Media companies have made no significant efforts to either increase the diversity of their newsrooms or to raise standards when it comes to covering issues around race, whether that is Māori or other ethnicities. Like Don Brash, deputy prime minister Winston Peters and plenty of other politicians, they’ve been quite happy to peddle racism because you know there’s a market and audience for it. They’re ill-equipped and/or unwilling to seriously tackle the racist crap they traffic in because it’s basically on the same page. Many of the stories are filtered through the assumption that your core audience is white. So your coverage is always about pleasing that audience and playing to its worldview, however narrow.

As the demographics of Auckland and New Zealand as a whole have changed in recent decades, media companies have not adapted or responded. Pākehā will soon be less than 50% of the population in Auckland, and yet you wouldn’t know that from the coverage by mainstream media outlets or from walking through their newsrooms.

What does mainstream even mean when you don’t reflect half the population or even pay them any attention? How can media companies whinge to the Commerce Commission that their businesses are in trouble because of Big Social Media when they have ignored half the potential market for years?

There has been a lot of coverage about the way the terrorist in Christchurch disseminated his heinous crimes, but there has been relatively little coverage of the way numerous journalists, columnists and media outlets have disseminated racism for years. The major media outlets – and I have worked for a number of them – have in my view made next to no effort in the time I have been a journalist to address straight out unprofessional coverage of issues related to race.

The education system has failed to educate children in New Zealand’s history. The media has perpetuated and amplified that failure by not informing the adult public about people who are not white. Not only has the media failed to inform people, in many cases it has actively used its power to create and maintain a negative attitude towards people who are not white, whether they be Māori or other ethnic groups. There’s an inability to interrogate white racism because there’s an inability to understand what it’s like to be subjected to it.

No one bears responsibility for the horrific crimes committed in Christchurch but the individual who carried them out. However, leaders of media companies do bear responsibility for the tone and content of a great deal of the public conversation. It’s unlikely that leaders of media companies have had to bear the negative consequences of their dereliction of duty. There’s an arrogant belief that words and images which portray people negatively simply because of their race are just ‘different points of view’ and ‘opinions’ or ‘robust debate’. You’ve probably never been on the receiving end of that racism and don’t know how destructive it can be.

Being Pākehā does not make you inherently racist. But it does not make you neutral either. The writer Patricia Grace once said to me that Pākehā don’t have to be bicultural, but Māori do. The media can’t even be bicultural, let alone multicultural.

If your response is, “but we’re hiring Māori/ethnic journalists,” sorry, that’s not enough. I was that journalist. To be honest it can be exhausting working in an environment where managers are completely unaware of their blinkered assumptions and don’t like to have them pointed out. There’s an unwillingness and reluctance to confront and refute the false assumptions of a predominantly white audience, along with a willingness to give a platform to an individual simply because they’ll provoke a controversy (and clicks), regardless of how uninformed or racist their view is.

The list really does go on. There’s ignorance of New Zealand history, even though the media is supposed to be writing the first draft of history. Ignorance is acceptable when reporting on Māori issues that wouldn’t be acceptable if that journalist was working on business or sport or any other round. Injustices and inequalities are ignored if they affect Māori or other ethnicities but comparatively minor problems facing Pākehā are given front page and ongoing treatment. Pākehā journalists and editors are the ones that decide on the news value of a story about Māori and how to cover it and you’re constantly wondering if you’re being oversensitive or whether you should be speaking up and run the risk of being perceived as difficult.

I’ve been that journalist who is expected to “get the story” in a way that is palatable or exciting to a white audience. I’ve seen Māori journalists turn into a brown version of their hectoring Pākehā counterparts as they try and meet newsroom expectations of how Māori are portrayed and their stories told. Or they simply become compliant and invisible.

I sat at the Canon Media Awards in 2017 and shook my head in disbelief when it was announced that an official complaint about a racist cartoon had been dismissed. It wasn’t the announcement that astonished me. It was the drunken cheer that went up from the table where Fairfax journalists were seated. These are the best journalists in the Fairfax stable and they were cheering for racism. Charming. Journalists from Māori Television were sitting at the next table.

The tagline “Our Loss of Innocence” is an example of framing a story in a way that is soothing for a white audience but dissonant for those who have been subjected to racism on a regular basis, including those Muslim communities so harmed by this event.

We are not innocent or untouched by racism. It is a deep and persistent part of our history and our present. Your bland calls for unity and peace and love reek of hypocrisy when in the past you have been happy to stoke racism or failed to call it out. You’ve done this, whether deliberately or otherwise, because you instinctively know there’s a market for it. Or because you lack the empathy to consider what that might be like for other people who aren’t like you.

Stop calling it white nationalism, far-right extremism, as if it’s limited to skinheads and nutters on the fringe. It’s simple – it’s racism. And it’s an attitude that is held to varying degrees by a huge swathe of white middle class New Zealand. It pervades every level of our society partly because you as an industry aid and abet it. Pretending otherwise is an insult to the victims. And it’s insulting to many people who have been challenging that racism in the media and society for years, only to be dismissed as “politically correct”. Translation: I’m allowed to be racist. So there.

Media leaders have failed. Failed by the standards of balance, fairness and truth. You’ve given a platform for your ‘talent’ to spout racist bile and promote them as ‘telling it like it is’ all in the name of clicks and ratings. Those on the left aren’t a whole lot better. At least the bigots make themselves known. Many liberal-leaning journalists are no more qualified to cover stories outside their bubble.

Do I expect contrition or humility? Hardly. Racism is a collective narcissism and narcissists are not known for critical self-reflection. Media love to portray themselves as the ones who power to account. And yet this institution which has so much power is unwilling to hold itself to account or tolerate anyone who tries.

Let the self-justification begin. I expect a catalogue of individual achievements to be wheeled out to deflect attention from the systemic failures, and then congratulate itself on making progress. I expect organisations will run around trying to find a brown person in your organisation and put them up as a brand ambassador to hide behind (suggestion to the cuzzies – don’t do it. Let them face the music on their own instead of delegating the shit job to you).

Sorry, you don’t get to assess your own performance in this area. You’re not qualified to.

We’re a country built on colonialism, another name for white supremacy. The media in the 19th century encouraged and supported the Land Wars against Māori. One of my ancestors was killed in those wars, fighting not for his land but against a Crown that was violating its promises of equal citizenship. The media of his day didn’t think that citizenship worth protecting. The media of today still doesn’t.

The language in those 19th century newspapers might seem crude in hindsight. But the same basic assumptions are still there in the media coverage of Māori and other communities today.

Related:

Shilo Kino wrote earlier about being a Māori journalist starting her career in a mainstream newsroom 

Keep going!
Brian Ireland in the Auckland Zoo’s Te Wao Nui trail (photo: Jane Healy/ Auckland Zoo).
Brian Ireland in the Auckland Zoo’s Te Wao Nui trail (photo: Jane Healy/ Auckland Zoo).

PartnersMarch 29, 2019

The chance to show 50,000 kids the meaning of mātauranga Māori

Brian Ireland in the Auckland Zoo’s Te Wao Nui trail (photo: Jane Healy/ Auckland Zoo).
Brian Ireland in the Auckland Zoo’s Te Wao Nui trail (photo: Jane Healy/ Auckland Zoo).

For most of his life, Brian Ireland had no idea about his Māori whakapapa, but when he discovered it he found a whole new way to look at the world and to teach about how we look after it. He spoke to Simon Day about bringing mātauranga Māori to the Auckland Zoo.

“Most of this interview should really be on a [psychiatrist’s] couch,” Brian Ireland (Te Āti Awa ki Whakarongotai) said to me as I turned on my voice recorder. He was joking, but it was also an honest recognition of the complicated personal journey that has defined his work educating children about the natural world and the value of indigenous perspectives in understanding it.

When Ireland was born his Pākehā paternal grandfather forced his Māori mother to give him up for adoption. He didn’t realise he was Māori until he was 28-years-old. Light haired and fair skinned, he believed he was Pākehā for most of the first three decades of his life. He didn’t understand the importance of the missing piece of his identity until he found it.


Listen to episode two of Good Ancestors, a four-part podcast that examines the role of children in our planet’s future on the player below, subscribe on iTunes, or download this episode (right click and save) brought you to by Auckland Zoo. 


Rather than a couch, the interview took place as we explored Te Wao Nui, the New Zealand trail at Auckland Zoo. Ireland was my guide on a sunny summer afternoon, the air was filled with the song of cicadas and the crunch of the construction of the zoo’s redevelopment. Ireland, a former education manager for the zoo who now contracts to them, is proud of the trail and hopeful of the way it puts Māori at the centre of the zoo’s communication.

Across its six zones, which represent different natural environments from the wetlands to the mountains, Te Wao Nui traverses New Zealand’s flora and fauna and engages deeply with mātauranga Māori – the Māori understanding and knowledge of the world. The trail puts mātauranga Māori on equal standing with Western knowledge of the natural world. And it is a powerful teaching tool for the zoo and the more than 50,000 kids who visit every year.

“The word ūkaipō is the mother source. For New Zealand, mātauranga Māori is ūkaipō, it’s the source of knowledge of New Zealand. It’s the first knowledge to come here, and it’s the longest knowledge that’s been here,” said Ireland as we stood in the shade of a puriri.

“The Western way is not the only legitimate way of seeing things. Especially in New Zealand. Both forms of knowledge need to be represented on a proper footing and not have one judge the efficacy of the other.”

A ruru/morepork at the Auckland Zoo (photo: supplied).

Discovering his own taha Māori was a powerful tool in Ireland’s understanding of his place and role in the world. While searching the records to find his birth family after he learned he was adopted, he was stunned to see his mother was listed as Māori. But, initially, when he attempted to contact his mother, she didn’t want to see him. So Ireland started a personal exploration of his new identity.

“I couldn’t believe it. I didn’t know where I was related to, or where my roots were, then the Māori thing just changed everything. I had no way of finding my whānau because I was shut off from that. So I just threw myself in,” he said.

Having worked as a golf course greenkeeper, then a landscape gardener when his first child was born, Ireland studied teaching to understand more about her education. Then he took the role as deputy principal of a kura kaupapa in Wellington. It was through one of his student’s mothers at the school that he was first introduced to his iwi, and his life was changed all over again.

“I remember sitting at my desk one day at 6 o’clock marking and this woman I’d never met before came and sat down at my desk. She’d obviously heard my mihi, or what I knew of it, somewhere, and she said ‘you’re coming away with me this weekend, you’re going to meet some people who brought your mother up’,” he recalled.  

He consented to this demand, (he admits he didn’t really have a choice) and up they went to Waitara in Taranaki, and for the first time Ireland met his Māori whanau.

“I met the aunties who took my mum in and it was mind-blowing. I got my first photo of my grandmother and my mother. It’s still pretty emotional thinking about it. What was important for me was my daughters. I thought they’d never get to see that side,” he says.  

It was years later, when Ireland was in his 40s, that he met his mother properly. The reunion has had a huge influence on both of them, and they’re now close.

“She’d carried a horrible amount of guilt around her whole life about having to give me up, and it really broke her. I saw this horrible guilt come off her shoulders, and to know everything is ok. It sounds like a bit of a Disney movie thing, but it was real, it was amazing,” he said.  

Ireland’s mother has become a hugely important part of his daughters’ lives. At 44 he discovered he had a brother. His eyes grow shiny with tears as he speaks about the effect the discovery of his whakapapa has had on him.

“I thought they’d never get to see that side. I could die happy tomorrow, now that it’s been done, and they know my mother. So they’ve got a grandmother they never had. It’s just opened up their world. It’s changed my life dramatically.”

The discovery of his Māori identity gave him a place to stand in the world. This understanding drew him to the land and a desire to share the unique knowledge Māori have for the protection of our natural environment. He saw an opportunity to reach children through mātauranga Māori, and a chance to instil an understanding of its value in the next generation.

At Te Kura o Otari, which sits on the edge of Otari Native Botanic Garden – the only public botanic garden in New Zealand dedicated solely to native plants – Ireland taught the curriculum in the forest. Later he moved down the road to Zealandia, where he was in charge of the education programme for the students who came through the new groundbreaking urban eco-sanctuary.

Then he had a chance to run the Auckland Zoo’s education programme, and later manage the outreach conservation education programme, where he took students to Rotoroa Island, and now to Tāwharanui Regional Park.

“Fifty thousand kids a year, that’s too good an opportunity to miss. I thought: this place has huge potential to do something from a Māori perspective.”

But, when Ireland first proposed the idea that the Māori world view could be wrapped into the zoo’s presentation of its work, some of his colleagues took some convincing.

“I think there was a perception from some people that if it was Māori it should be part of a museum programme, that it’s a social thing,” he said.

Mātauranga Māori is an understanding of humans’ place in the world that is locked up in nature, a relationship tied to our whakapapa. Everything comes from papa and rangi, humans are the pōtiki, the youngest descendants, and the birds, plants, and trees are all our elders. The zoo’s Te Wao Nui, Ireland insisted, with its range of indigenous flora and fauna, was the perfect place to explore this understanding, and a chance to embrace the huge potential Māori have to offer the conservation space. So he persisted.

“What we have here is the perfect place to do science. Look at the word science: pūtaiao. Pū meaning the root, the base. And taiao is nature. It’s the base of the natural world, that’s what science is for us,” he said.

Now, roughly 20% of the zoo’s visitor footprint is dedicated to indigenous flora and fauna, and many more endemic wildlife are managed off-display as part of breeding recovery programmes. Ireland’s role was to run the staff through workshops and get them on board with the content. Then he had to convince the schools that these species and this story and knowledge were valuable.

“True story, when I started here we had a programme that we’d developed, and schools got to choose between the exotic trail or a native New Zealand trail. Most schools chose monkeys, lions and tigers over our own animals – even though lots of our own species need just as much help in the wild as exotic animals. After just three years it was completely flipped, and now the schools are thinking native stuff is just as cool as the exotic animals at the Zoo.”

As we explored Te Wao Nui we encountered distinct parts of New Zealand’s natural environment as we visited the different nōhanga (habitats). In the Coast habitat, we watched a native seal feeding and penguins hid from the sun under an upturned dinghy. In the Wetlands area, we watched a family enraptured by huge tuna (eels). Night featured kiwi flicking through leaves for food. In the Island nōhanga, rare native skinks and geckos tried to camouflage. The Forest habitat’s birds were as curious as the visitors themselves. The journey provides a tactile immediacy to the diversity of New Zealand’s species and provides places for people from around the country to personally identify with.

“I wanted to be able to include all iwi, so no matter where you’re from if you come here as a Kura or a school, and you say “No hea koe? Where are you from?” You can say let’s go over this side, and you can show them the area relevant to them,” he said.  

As we watched a family and a kākā examine each other Ireland told me the story of the native parrot’s whakapapa. A proto version of the kaka came to New Zealand from Australia over a million years ago. From that one bird, it evolved into three species – the kākā, kākāpō, and kea – that represent the different environments they settled in.

A family meets a keā in the Forest habitat at Auckland Zoo (photo: supplied).

“Now we’ve got three completely different looking birds based on where they grew up and how they had to adapt. They all whakapapa to the same ancestor. That’s a New Zealand story,” said Ireland.

The zoo’s engagement with mātauranga Māori is dedicated to preserving these New Zealand stories at the same time as telling a contemporary story about the role of Māori knowledge in the conservation of our plants and animals. In his time at Auckland Zoo, Ireland has seen huge shifts in the way these roles are valued. He remembers Māori pūrākau (myth, ancient legend) being pejoratively perceived as fanciful stories. Now he uses them as essential teaching tools about our place in the world. He once found Māori historic relationships with the environment reduced to “snares, spears, and despair” focused around stories like the extinction of the moa. Now he sees the zoo engaging with the massive body of knowledge and the intimate personal relationship Māori have with the natural environment.  

“There’s more ethereal concepts that need to be included in conversations about how we monitor the health of things. We are coming around to that. It’s not simply a western science view of things. We include values, and intrinsic stuff in our conversations and unashamedly,” he said.

“That’s the sort of stuff we are trying to push through this programme, really upping that discourse that there’s another way of looking at this.”

This content was created in paid partnership with Auckland Zoo. Learn more about our partnerships here.