spinofflive
Ithaca by Alie Benge
Ithaca by Alie Benge

BooksApril 26, 2023

Sharp, witty, precise: a review of Ithaca by Alie Benge

Ithaca by Alie Benge
Ithaca by Alie Benge

Sam Brooks reviews a new collection of essays by writer Alie Benge.

A book of essays is a strange thing. Is it memoir? Is it criticism? Is it analysis? Is it some unholy mixture of all three, where an author alternates between looking into the middle distance and into their own navel? Even more crucially, how do you collect a series of disconnected writings in a way where they all benefit from sitting alongside each other, a royal flush of storytelling as opposed to a scoreless hand of clubs, threes, and diamonds – beautiful individually but existing very separately.

Alie Benge’s first book, Ithaca, is one of those non-fiction books that shifts between several forms. It is sometimes memoir, sometimes personal essay, sometimes criticism, sometimes analysis, sometimes even outright comedy. The one constant throughout is Benge’s voice – sharp, witty, precise. Whenever I’ve read her writing on this very site, I’ve always imagined her chatting directly to me, perhaps mid-cigarette, the coolest person in the room. 

There’s no doubt that Benge has lived a life that’s worthy of a book or three. As a child, she lived in Ethiopia with her Christian missionary family, spent time serving in the army in Australia, before completing her MA at the IIML in Wellington a few years ago. There’s a solid memoir somewhere in this book, and the personal essays about her romantic relationships in particular scratch at relatable scabs, but the lens Benge applies to her own life is oddly removed, soft-focus and hazy.

Benge is, again, a talented writer, with a keen sense of where to place an image, a metaphor, even a little turn of phrase, in a story to devastate us. Sentence to sentence, paragraph to paragraph, Benge’s writing is littered with enough gems to fill a Michael Hill store. Take the below, for example:

“We drove through the Piazza, past Haile Selassie’s palace, and Ghion Hotel: places I knew I’d been before, but I was sure they didn’t look like this. And with my heart dropping, I realised what I’d done: I’d forgotten this place. I’d broken my few memories into spare parts and with those parts I’d made something else, something that wasn’t real, and then spent my whole life missing it.”

Photograph of the writer Alie Benge beside cover of her book Ithaca.
Alie Benge (Photo: Ebony Lamb)

Unfortunately, that same surgical precision isn’t applied to the actual storytelling. When retelling the story of her remarkable life, Benge drops facts and events with little sense of import or weight. Thus, she sits in an uncanny valley as a storyteller – removed enough to remain detached, but not quite detached enough to be cold. That is to say, too often these essays end up being about a compelling, engaged narrative in favour of actually telling one. It leads to the feeling that you’re reading someone recount a story told by the person who actually lived that story; disorienting in a book written entirely in the first person.

That’s ultimately a matter of taste. My preference for personal essays is that you come away a bit shaken, with your perspective shifted a little after you read them, your lens widened. The better essays in the book do this. Take, for instance, the essay ‘Good Girl’, where Benge discusses her relationship with touch, and the aftermath of a sexual assault with startling clarity, and precision: 

“How else can another body hurt me somewhere that my own body can’t reach? I cannot enter in and pluck out the splinter that was left in me. Unwanted touch induces in me the same sick feeling, of an intimacy that isn’t right, isn’t real. It confuses love.”

In those moments, Ithaca rings true. It’s just that these moments feel scattered throughout, rather than structurally placed. I came away from most of Benge’s book being impressed by her craft, rather than emotionally engaged with her stories. However, this is likely the result of needing to create a distance between the writer and the narrative voice, given the nature of writing about personal trauma. While that remove is admirable, I’m not sure if that’s the reaction Benge is hoping to evoke. 

Where Ithaca misses the mark for me is that the essays, the stories, the criticism doesn’t add up to more than the sum of the parts. The essays sit alongside each other like uncomfortable coworkers pulled together for an office photo. This is most obvious when information is brought up in one essay that we’re already familiar with from an earlier essay, but as though we’re not familiar with it – like her history in the army, and a previous relationship. When that information is repeated, it gives the sense that each piece should be read and appreciated individually, rather than next to each other. It can make Ithaca feel like a friend repeating a story they’ve already told. You’re not angry they’re telling it, because they tell it well, but you do wonder why you were listening the first time around.

As a showcase for what Benge is capable of as a writer, Ithaca couldn’t be better. But as a book, I couldn’t help but want more – of everything. I wanted more cohesion. I wanted the essays to dive deeper. I wanted a little bit more analysis, a little bit more context. A collection of lovely essays by a talented, intelligent writer is never going to go down wrong, but this is a collation, not a curation. When I closed Ithaca, I wasn’t thinking of any of the stories told inside it. I was thinking of how much I can’t wait for Benge’s next book.

Ithaca by Alie Benge, (Te Herenga Waka University Press, $35) can be purchased from Unity Books Wellington or Unity Books Auckland

Keep going!
Image: Tina Tiller
Image: Tina Tiller

BooksApril 23, 2023

In defence of reading smut

Image: Tina Tiller
Image: Tina Tiller

Gem Wilder tracks her personal history of reading: from Dahl, Blume and Gee, to an English Lit degree, to the unabashed joys of smut.

I was teaching a workshop at a Writers Retreat recently when one of the participants asked me: “Would you say that smut is your slam dunk?” This sentence sounds absolutely bonkers out of context, so let me rewind for you and let you know how it came about. 

I’ve always been a reader. Apparently I could already read when I started primary school, where I then spent years joining the older classes when it came time for reading. After school I’d go to the library and stock up on books each day before catching the bus home. I worked my way through the catalogues of Roald Dahl, Maurice Gee, Judy Blume, Paul Jennings and Ann M. Martin. At home I scoured our ample bookshelves, taking in Noel Streatfeild, Uncle Arthur’s Bedtime Stories, illustrated children’s encyclopaedias, and memorising multiple poems from A.A. Milne’s The World of Christopher Robin. 

I read my way through high school then headed to university to study English Literature, where I discovered and developed a love for New Zealand, Māori and Pacific literatures. I read poetry and non-fiction, literary fiction and chick lit, biographies, science writing, nature writing, graphic novels. I’ve always been firmly in the camp that reading is reading, and it doesn’t matter what you’re reading, as long as you’re doing it. I’ve learned just as much, and more importantly gained just as much enjoyment, reading one of my kid’s middle grade graphic novels as I have reading a critically acclaimed Booker winner. 

But then I started to gamify my reading, setting myself annual reading goals and tracking the books I finished. In 2021 I read a total of 147 books, including approximately 40 titles that I was judging for the Acorn Prize for Fiction for the 2022 Ockham New Zealand Book Awards. This was a whole new level of reading, giving each book the critical attention it deserved, then discussing the merits of a short story collection vs a work of autofiction or a historical romance vs a contemporary satire with my fellow judges. It was an incredibly rewarding and exhausting task. And when it was over, I found I could no longer read. I’d overindulged, and a lifelong habit was suddenly out of my reach. 

Months later, doomscrolling TikTok one night, I came across an intriguing post. In just a couple of sentences, a scene was described from a Why Choose series (formerly known as reverse harem, meaning one woman + multiple men). These kind of TikToks are like teaser trailers for books, and they can be damn effective. I was interested enough (OK, let’s stop beating around the bush here, I had the horn) that I bought the series immediately and set about reading one of the most ridiculous, and ridiculously hot, pieces of literature I’d ever come across.

I’d hide my phone on the bus, huddled into myself in a paranoid cocoon as I read, convinced my fellow public transport users would see what I was reading and scoff. I didn’t tell any of my friends about the series, and again, when I followed up with yet another Why Choose Series, I kept it a secret. My “reading’s reading” mantra had found its limit.

But Why Choose wasn’t doing it for me. The storylines were beyond even daytime soap levels of wacky, and I couldn’t believe that with four men and one woman sharing a bed on the regular things could possibly stay as heterosexual as the books would have you believe. (Pro tip: I’ve since learned that if you want a little MM (male/male) or MMM action in your Why Choose to use the search term Crossed Swords. Makes perfect sense.) Anyway, I wanted to keep reading this brainless yet thrilling smut, but hadn’t quite found my niche yet. 

A selection of book covers from writer Keira Andrews.
A selection of books by Keira Andrews.

That’s when I came across A Forbidden Rumspringa. The cover image is of a young man standing in a field, shown from behind as he gazes into the distance at another young man standing by a horse drawn cart. The tagline read “When two young Amish men find love, will they risk losing everything?” I was sold. And this time, I felt this purchase was so ridiculous that I had to share it with my friends: “I’m always saying that people should never be ashamed of what they read, that bottom line is reading’s reading, but even I’m a little ashamed to have purchased this for Kindle.” 

But this was before I read it. After reading A Forbidden Rumspringa, the story of Isaac and David living in an Amish community in Minnesota, my shame about reading smut disappeared entirely. This book was good! The characters were endearing and loveable and complex. I learned so much about Amish life and culture that I didn’t know before. (To be fair, the miniscule amount of Amish knowledge I had before A Forbidden Rumspinga came entirely from watching the Harrison Ford thriller Witness in the 80s.)

A Forbidden Rumspringa was an engaging, beautiful and tense story. I was thrilled to discover it was the first in a trilogy. I devoured the follow ups, and a fourth novella in the series, and by that stage the algorithm had me pegged (no pun intended) as a dedicated MM smut reader. 

I purchased A Forbidden Rumspringa in August 2022. Since then I have worked my way through no less than 55 smut titles. Most of them have been MM (or MMM) due to the algorithm, but there have been some hetero reads in there too. I’ve learned about the popular genres in the smut world. Sport is a big one. I’ve read about ice hockey players and lacrosse players, American footballers, swimmers and gymnasts. There are plenty of books about ranchers (gay cowboys are A Whole Thing, and not just in the smut universe). Motorcycle mechanics get plenty of attention. There’s historical smut, though in the one pirate smut book I read I couldn’t get past the fact that they were very much unwashed, and that wasn’t particularly sexy to me. There’s the kink crowd, with plenty of daddies, littles, lingerie wearers and more that I won’t go into here. And like the dirty (in a bad way) pirates, there’s just nothing I find sexy about age play. But each to their own! 

And while I’m not into age play for myself, reading about relationships with clear power dynamics, and having the reasons for these explained, was incredibly enlightening. When I read smut, I’m doing it as a form of escapism, but, like with watching romantic movies or reading regular romance novels, there’s an element of idealism there that’s being applied to real life. When I’m reading about the reasons why someone might want their romantic/sexual relationship to be a place where they can escape the pressures of the world, feel safe enough to switch off and know that they will be entirely taken care of by their partner, I can understand that. When I read about the satisfaction someone might get from taking on a caretaker role in their relationship, I can understand that. They manage the delicate balance between caring for someone and wanting to be taken care of. And in these books full of idealised relationships, communication is happening all over the place. Yes, they are fucking like bunny rabbits, but they are also talking. They talk about their needs and wants and dreams. They set boundaries in their relationships, and have goals for themselves and each other, and they support each other to go after them. In the smut I read, enthusiastic consent is ALWAYS sought, and it is sexy af. 

In smutworld rich people have names like Charlemagne Hastings, Charles Preston Carmichael and Bentley Emerson Fox. They aren’t subtle. The men are called Levi and Logan, Ty, Aiden, Wyatt, Dex and Ash. Masculine names that are also young and cool. The women in smut have ethereal, nature-based names, more sexy sprite than femme fairy. Names like River, Briar and Sierra. There’s a lot of Henley wearing happening. I’m pretty sure I’ve read about men wearing Henleys in smut more than I’ve seen men wearing Henleys in real life. 

Many readers and reviewers have noted that MM smut is predominantly written by women, which raises questions of appropriation or fetishisation. There is valid criticism about whether a woman can accurately portray a gay relationship or the life experiences of gay men. I’ve pondered this for myself, why I have a preference for MM smut above any other kind I’ve read, and I think I’ve figured it out. There’s no misogyny. The men in these books treat women with respect. They may not want to sleep with them, but they love the women in their lives. They stand up for them. That’s damn sexy. And it’s keeping me reading. 

Getting back to slam dunks now. If you can, track down a copy of Coco Solid’s incredibly genius Horoeka Reading Grant essay “When floral muzzles didn’t come in my sinus-size I chose used basketball shorts”. In all the reading in all the genres I’ve done over the decades, it’s up there as one of my all time faves. In it, Coco discusses her unique research methodology, and questions who gets to name things “literature”. She talks about taking inspiration from Orlando Magic’s Aaron Gordon at the NBA Slam Dunk Contest. “I hadn’t written poetry or prose for almost a year until I saw that dunk” she writes.

I set this essay as recommended reading for the workshops I was teaching at. The workshop participants knew I’ve been reading smut because I told them. I’m no longer ashamed. I’m a smut evangelist these days. So when a workshop participant asked me if smut was my slam dunk, after recovering from the shock of such lyrical beauty in question form, I was able to answer yes. And now I’m off to find some NBA smut.