spinofflive
Image-1

MediaDecember 9, 2015

Are New Zealand’s Quotes of the Year Really All By Men?

Image-1

Earlier this week Massey University released their list of the quotes of the year. They were all by men. Alex Casey finds that a little odd.

This week Massey University has released their list of contenders for 2015’s Quote of the Year, with competition organiser Dr Heather Kavan pointing out that 2015 has shown a notable lack of quotes by politicians. It doesn’t take a magnifying glass to see that there is something else missing as well: women.

Of the ten contenders put forward for this competition, only one of the quotes came from a woman. Only it’s her recollection of a man’s words. And it’s one of the most powerful men in the country, whose weird statement of harassment will probably be printed on a bumper sticker someday. Other than that, we have broadcasters, rugby players, reality heart-throbs and students – all of one gender.

My concern, if my memory of high school exams is correct, is that history only tends to remember quotes, and that this damn piece of crap list might get printed off, shot into space, and picked up by alien life as the only surviving piece of evidence of life in New Zealand in 2015.

It’s a shame people in the future won’t see the reality that, in 2015 and ALWAYS, there are just as many women pinging out zany one-liners or making important, breathtaking statements. The only difference is that no one making our very important lists seems to be paying any attention.

I decided to try and analyse a few of the nominated quotes to see if they really warranted a slot on such an era-defining and representative list.

Image-1
#HeforHe

“That’s a very tantalising ponytail” – Amanda Bailey

Amanda Bailey’s recollection of John Key’s drop dead creepy zinger before he pulled her ponytail in a long-running stint of physical harassment. Yes, we found out this year that our Prime Minister pulls women’s ponytails and we are all good with it, at the end of the day he’s just a larrikin bloke and that’s what real New Zealanders want.

The French love the coq” – David Seymour

ACT MP David Seymour, the world’s oldest boy, was explaining that some countries love national logos but don’t necessarily put them on their flags. His example was France, and that they adore their national logo of The Gallic Rooster, also known as le coq. What our leaders of academic industry found particularly enticing about this was that coq sounds like cock, which is another word for penis. Also, incidentally, a key piece of anatomy needed to secure a place on this list.

“Squeaky sand, eh!” – Art Green

After Poppy Salter popped out a surprising and ultimately watershed fart on The Bachelor NZ, I was sure it would be remembered in the annuls of history forever. The fart spoke volumes. Poppy did all the leg work – at what I’m assuming was a massively lower pay rate – and yet Art Green sweeps all the accolades. This is a very niche corner of mansplaining, which I hereby declare ‘fartsplaining’.

“We’ve been asked to vote for the tallest dwarf.” 

This is literally an extremely popular saying straight from the halls of Urban Dictionary. Hate to play Devil’s advocate here, but where’s my luxury prize for dropping clichéd idioms at the drop of a hat? We’ve had the wool pulled over our eyes on this one: this is not only lazy but exceptionally dwarfist. Oh well, no point crying over spilt milk just because someone isn’t playing with a full deck.

“I survived the Kills!”– Joe Irvine

No disrespect to Joe Irvine, but this electric television moment shouldn’t be remembered by a TWEET, but with Kills’ killer line of venomous assonance. “I personally find it artistically atrocious” is a far more resonant, punchier memento than this, which is essentially a slogan ripped from the dusty Fear Fall merch at Rainbows End. Also, can you ever imagine anyone admiringly quoting this aloud?

“No man should have his wife’s brain on his shirt.” – Philip Morgan

This is a casual as quote from a domestic murder retrial, because we live in a country where one in three women will experience abuse from their partners in their lifetime. It’s particularly grim that the only representation of a women’s brain on this list has to be so unrelentingly literal.

*

All I can hope is that, along with this reductive list of the New Zealand experience in 2015, people in the future might also see this Boot’s Theory list of women’s quotes, or the hashtag #quotewomen2015. There’s so much more to us than farts and ponytails, and it’s about time that people stopped burying their heads in the (squeaky) sand.


Read more from Alex Casey on feminism and television here

Keep going!
Capture001

MediaDecember 4, 2015

Interesting Bits From NZOA’s 2015 Annual Report

Capture001

NZ On Air has released its 2015 annual report. José Barbosa pulls up some things to applaud and some things to question.

Such is the current media environment the release of NZ On Air’s state-of-its-work report feels a bit like a message in bottle chucked into a chum bucket and fed to Jaws. The funding body has its cheerleaders and its detractors, but its importance to the media consuming public, the various production industries and just about everyone who wants to make stuff has arguably never been greater. But is NZ On Air really adapting to the “changing needs of audiences”? I thought I’d take a look to try and figure it out.

The Great Public Funding Doughnut

The first thing to point out is where NZOA puts the dosh. This is their breakdown.

Capture002

Note the smallest slices; NZ On Air spends about the same amount of money on admin as it does digital media and way more than on regional TV. Part of NZ On Air’s remit is to get local content to the audience and the report argues national TV is still where the majority of our eyeballs are. For example, NZ On Air says Country Calendar draws in nearly 600,000 viewers (admitedly this is a surprise, I swear every time I’ve caught the show they’re either talking to seaweed farmers or someone who wants to farm wekas).

Fine and dandy, but where exactly is local content being screened? Gaze ye upon the NZ On Air graph for TV below.

LOCAL CONTENT BY CHANNEL

It’s been charted and commented on for a while, but commercial TV’s disinterest in local content is still striking.While local content on TV is growing (not an easy thing in this age of funding freezes), it’s being driven mostly by Māori TV with a thimble full of help from Prime and FOUR. However, as NZ On Air notes, first-run new content didn’t grow at all over the year due to the “difficult economic environment”.

The Great Digital Migration

Earlier this year NZ On Air released a discussion paper about possibly changing their strategy for funding children’s content. It came out of commissioned research around how children use digital devices and the internet. The figures quoted in the report from the research show how deep into digital children are:

  • 66% use the internet daily.
  • 77% have access to tablets or smartphones.
  • 88% watch TV every day.
  • YouTube rivals TV2 as the “main source of entertainment”.

If the kids are heading online in a big way, so are creators. According to a presentation given by Brenda Leeuwenberg, NZ On Air’s Head of Digital, at Webfest earlier this year, there were 55 applications for web series funding in the previous funding year. In the current round there were 110 applications.

Music is also heading online and faster than other forms of content. According to a 2014 NZ On Air survey:

  • 60% of all respondents said they found new music on the radio.
  • 36% said via streaming services such as Spotify, Youtube and Soundcloud.
  • 67% of 15-24 year olds use streaming services.

A Crawl Or A Stampede?

NZ On Air’s reckons that audiences are in the middle of a “slow shift” to digital. The report is, in part, their case for claiming they’re addressing that shift with appropriate levels of funding; alltracks.co.nz is mentioned four times, as is the 1.5 million visits to thecoconet.tv, among other projects. Their stance is TV is still king, so it makes sense to drop the majority of funding there.

That brings us back to where we started: the funding doughnut at the top of the page. There’s an argument that NZ On Air should retreat from the legacy media room, backing out slowly waving a pair of birds in the air as they go. That’s plain nuts, those 600K Country Calendar viewers would dictate otherwise.

A better, more interesting argument to make is that spending around the same you spend on staff,  stationary and instant coffee sachets on digital media investment is inadequate. The spend in digital media investment needs to grow and it needs to happen faster than NZ On Air appears willing to facilitate.

It should be recognised that NZ On Air is in a hard place, they have to justify how they spend our pingers and it’s probably a hard sell to Government when research shows the audience is still watching TV. It could also seem that the argument being made here is more than a little self-serving. However, even with that in mind, a 2.6 percent spend on digital still seems hugely inequitable. And while the aforementioned May discussion paper seems to point to a forthcoming restructure of children’s funding, it’s not just the under-16s that are moving to digital.

NZ On Air could stand to be bolder in its digital and online push. Most of us are already here. It’d be great if they could join us.

Random Thoughts

  • The signal that they’re looking for new ideas around regional news and informational services is a welcome one. It’s a part of the media oak that’s been left to wither on the branch.
  • Equally welcome is the reported increase in hours of captioned and audio described for hearing and sight impaired audiences. It’s a band of services that the entertainment and information industry has almost completely ignored.
  • Arguably the most important thing to come out of reading the report is that it started a trail which lead to a surprising place. If you’ve ever wondered what John Key might have sounded like at the birth of Jesus Christ, wonder no more.

 

Update, 2:52pm: NZ On Air has been in touch to say the digital part of the doughnut refers to online content only. They also point out that “.. Every piece of content we create must now be online as well as wherever it is first broadcast, so that means there’s actually a heck of a lot of digital content created within the other parts of the donut.” 

They’ve also stated that,as per their Statement of Performance, they will increase the digital media fund by $400K to $3.8m for 2015/16.

Any increase in funding during an apparently never ending budget freeze is something of a Christmas miracle, but we still think the balance for where funding goes leans too far in TV’s direction.