spinofflive
Left: making murukku (Photo by Abhi Chinniah; design Tina Tiller); right: a kōlam (Photo: Getty Images)
Left: making murukku (Photo by Abhi Chinniah; design Tina Tiller); right: a kōlam (Photo: Getty Images)

KaiNovember 3, 2021

A Deepavali celebration in locked down Auckland

Left: making murukku (Photo by Abhi Chinniah; design Tina Tiller); right: a kōlam (Photo: Getty Images)
Left: making murukku (Photo by Abhi Chinniah; design Tina Tiller); right: a kōlam (Photo: Getty Images)

Due to the lockdown there will be no Diwali / Deepavali festival in Auckland this week, but in homes across the country, celebrations will go on – even if those celebrating are far from the people they love, writes Abhi Chinniah.

The festival of lights. You likely know it as Diwali, but in my Sri Lankan Tamil Malaysian family, we call it Deepavali. One of the most auspicious dates on our Hindu calendar, Deepavali was an opportunity to bring the wider family together. Our home was in Kuantan, the largest city on the east coast of peninsular Malaysia. Every year we would have an open house where a mass invite was sent out to neighbours, friends and family. Come one, come all, enjoy the food, it’s all home cooked! Tuck into my Amma’s spicy fish cutlets, lamb biryani and eggplant raita. Only the best at the Chinniah household. Everyone was invited to our home to be part of the celebrations.

And people would come, in droves. There would be a stream of aunties, uncles, cousins, cousins-of-cousins, friends, friends-of-friends. We’d laugh, eat, and then eat some more. Our home would be filled with colourful sarees, smells and music. We’d have guests from different cultural backgrounds arrive in traditional Indian garb, on a day when race politics could be mostly forgotten to make a point of celebration and unity. It was always a fantastic day, and a time I took for granted, with the false belief that there would be endless special occasions to give rise to what was at the centre of Malaysian society: large group gatherings.

Mum preparing food for the Deepavali feast (Photo: supplied)

I was born in Christchurch, where we lived until the late 90s. We moved back to Malaysia, and in 2010, at age 18, I returned to Aotearoa to attend university. Three years quickly turned into a decade. Home was only 8,891km away; it would be relatively easy to catch a flight back. Not having my parents steer me into cultural occasions meant I didn’t celebrate Deepavali during this time. I always wanted to but I didn’t know how – it didn’t feel the same without my family. I was aware of Deepavali events around Tāmaki Makaurau but paid them little attention. What was always a family-focused time of year was an empty shell without them. I’d promise to return for Deepavali every year, but something would always get in the way: lack of annual leave, a new job. Things that, in retrospect, meant nothing.

The next year, then the year after that, and then finally, a pandemic.

‘’Remember when I had children?’’ Amma said during one of our frequent calls. ‘’Will this ever end?’’ I don’t know, Amma, I hope it ends soon. I’ve forgotten what you smell like, and I miss your food. You’re getting older, and I am not there to see it. I want to touch you, hug you and kiss you. Please tell me everything is going to be OK.

It was equal parts sweet and heartbreaking when my parents told me they had printed images of me and my sister, stuck them on their bedroom wall, and would speak to “us” before bedtime. Photos used as a calming presence, a reminder that we are still there, in their lives.

What felt doable at the start of 2020 now feels impossible. Meanwhile, my family inches closer to a day that was once filled with celebration, hope, happiness and togetherness, but is now a shadow of what it once was. It’s now a reminder of what we are missing.

But time does not stop. In the absence of family, community has become a lifeline. Before our current lockdown, I was invited to an open house – my first open house experience in Aotearoa. It was as if I was suddenly transported back to east coast Malaysia. There was family, chatter and glorious food! We ate the best chicken curry, barbecued pork, fried noodles, curry puffs and tasty Malaysian sweets. I got to experience and remember that melting pot of cultures I come from and see almost-whole families together under one roof. It was beautiful.

My friend drawing a kōlam (Photos: Abhi Chinniah)

I often think about what Deepavali means to me. As I’ve gotten older I have realised the importance of celebrating my heritage and culture. Last year, I photographed an artist friend making savoury, divine murukku, a crunchy snack eaten at this time of year. She came to my home and drew a kōlam on my floor. The rice powder fell from her hands creating a beautiful work of art – a symbol of auspiciousness and divinity. As she drew, we talked about how much we missed our families; hers too is overseas and inaccessible to her. Coming together and sharing our cultural heritage brought a familiar feeling of nostalgia and joy. I don’t have all my immediate family, but I have people to share this day with.

So, this year, I’ll put on my best kurta and attempt my mother’s fish cutlets. I’ll tuck into the freshly made murukku I got from a lady out in Avondale. I’ll make biryani and light the baby diya that I bought off Trade Me. I’ll share these moments with my bubble: we’ll have music, a kōlam, food, and then more food. Most of all, we’ll be grateful we have each other. I’ll photograph all of it, video chat with my parents, and celebrate this culture I am so proud to be part of.

I’ll create my own traditions here in Aotearoa.

Happy Deepavali.

Keep going!
Diners sit near a sign promoting the British government’s ‘Eat out to Help out’ scheme to get consumers spending again after lockdown, in Manchester, August 2020 (Photo: OLI SCARFF/AFP via Getty Images)
Diners sit near a sign promoting the British government’s ‘Eat out to Help out’ scheme to get consumers spending again after lockdown, in Manchester, August 2020 (Photo: OLI SCARFF/AFP via Getty Images)

KaiOctober 26, 2021

Could government-funded vouchers help ease the hospitality industry’s woes?

Diners sit near a sign promoting the British government’s ‘Eat out to Help out’ scheme to get consumers spending again after lockdown, in Manchester, August 2020 (Photo: OLI SCARFF/AFP via Getty Images)
Diners sit near a sign promoting the British government’s ‘Eat out to Help out’ scheme to get consumers spending again after lockdown, in Manchester, August 2020 (Photo: OLI SCARFF/AFP via Getty Images)

Dining out vouchers and subsidies to help restaurants and cafes bounce back from Covid-19 restrictions have been proposed by industry bodies and the opposition. But similar schemes implemented overseas haven’t always run smoothly, explains Charlotte Muru-Lanning.

It’s clear that the hospitality industry is severely impacted by lockdowns, and the wider consequences of Covid-19. According to Restaurant Association of New Zealand data for September, Auckland hospitality businesses experienced a 78% decline in revenue compared to last year. And the country as a whole is down 56%.

As part of an eight-point “roadmap” to help the industry, the Restaurant Association of New Zealand is calling for government-funded dining vouchers. The proposed scheme, which would cost the government $300 million, would work out to around $20-$25 for every New Zealand resident over the age of 18.

The National Party has called for a similar scheme as part of its new economic plan, announced earlier in the week. The plan, dubbed “Back in Business” would include giving every vaccinated adult a $100 voucher to be used at hospitality or tourism venues nationwide.

Restaurant Association chief executive Marisa Bidois says businesses currently operating under level three restrictions have had it particularly tough, but members in level two areas say they’re struggling too. “The public has been a bit slower to come out again,” she says. “There’s a bit more diner hesitancy around the country.”

The voucher scheme is designed as a counter to this hesitancy, and to help the industry get back on its feet when restaurants are able to safely open up again, she says. 

Photo: Getty Images

The association has looked to similar schemes in New South Wales and the UK for inspiration.

While the New South Wales scheme, which began in March this year, has attracted little criticism so far, the same can’t be said of the UK scheme.

Called “Eat out to Help Out”, it was implemented in August last year. During that month the government offered diners up to a 50% discount on meals between Monday and Wednesdays. It was designed to kick-start the economy and to coax people out of their homes to spend after months of lockdown.

The scheme was reportedly popular among businesses and customers alike. However, research since has suggested the discount scheme helped spread the virus, and may have contributed to a second wave of infections. Thiemo Fetzer, a professor of economics who published the study, said: “The Eat-Out-to-Help-out scheme, hailed as an economic cure for the ailing sector, may have substantially worsened the disease.”

According to the research, between 8% and 17% of newly detected Covid-19 clusters were linked to the scheme during that period. The research found areas with high uptake of the vouchers saw an increase in new infections around a week after it began. 

Those same areas saw a decline in new infections a week after the scheme was finished, the study found.

Although Britain’s finance ministry rejected the findings of the study, prime minister Boris Johnson later conceded that it may have impacted infection rates. 

Bidois says the scheme proposed locally would have significant differences to that in the UK, which would lessen the risk of similar outbreaks. “We’re in a unique position where we can learn from some of the stuff that happened in the UK and say, ‘Right, well, we know this didn’t work and we know that didn’t work,’” she says.

The first of these differences is that the UK scheme operated before any vaccine rollout had begun. New Zealand, as we all know, has begun our rollout. While vaccines don’t offer us full protection against outbreaks, especially as children under 12 can’t get vaccinated, there is clear evidence that they reduce transmission and hospitalisations. 

Vaccine mandates, mask mandates and enhanced government leave support schemes for staff who are symptomatic or have had potential contact with Covid-19 could all be helpful approaches to mitigate this risk to customers and staff, Marisa says. 

She adds, “With any change it needs to be carefully considered so that we can balance reducing the spread of Covid whilst also ensuring businesses are able to plan and stay operational, as much as possible”.

Another difference, says Bidois, is that “we have quite restrictive measures that are put in place within our businesses”. There are restrictions around spacing between tables and the numbers of customers that can be in each hospitality venue. “The UK’s measures certainly are not as tight as the New Zealand regulations around dining,” she says.

The scheme proposed by the Restaurant Association also wouldn’t have the tightly bound timeframe that was built into the UK scheme. Bidois says they’re proposing the scheme “be spread over a year” to “limit people descending on hospitality within one month”. 

In addition to direct financial assistance to businesses, Bidois says the particular benefit of a voucher scheme relates to the impact eating out has on the wellbeing of customers.    

Alert level two dining at Amano in Auckland’s Britomart in May 2020 (Photo: Fiona Goodall/Getty Images)

While much of the criticism has stemmed from the idea that the economic gains of the UK scheme came at the expense of rising infections and strain on their health system, there was also some criticism of the economic impacts.

The report found no knock-on benefits to other businesses from people taking advantage of the scheme. 

In the UK, a massive portion of the government funds went to large chain restaurants too. Official figures showed more than nine in 10 discount claims were made by businesses with just one participating outlet, although between them these venues claimed only 52% of the total discount. This means large chains like Burger King, Mcdonald’s and Nando’s received larger amounts of money than smaller businesses.

Bidois says that while chains aren’t undeserving of this assistance, the association’s plan to create a register “would ensure that we could have a good cross section of the businesses as part of the plan as well”. 

“We want to make sure that our local cafe down the road is equally as supported as one of our larger, fast food chains,” she says.