spinofflive
Paula Southgate: ‘Start it, make it successful, walk away. That’s what you should do as a politician.’ (Photo: Facebook / Design: Archi Banal)
Paula Southgate: ‘Start it, make it successful, walk away. That’s what you should do as a politician.’ (Photo: Facebook / Design: Archi Banal)

Local Elections 2022September 22, 2022

‘Don’t mistake being nice for being weak’: Paula Southgate and the ‘nice mayor’ label

Paula Southgate: ‘Start it, make it successful, walk away. That’s what you should do as a politician.’ (Photo: Facebook / Design: Archi Banal)
Paula Southgate: ‘Start it, make it successful, walk away. That’s what you should do as a politician.’ (Photo: Facebook / Design: Archi Banal)

As she seeks re-election to the Hamilton mayoralty, Paula Southgate tells Aimie Cronin it’s wrong to conflate niceness with inability to get things done.

I saw mayor of Hamilton Paula Southgate in the flesh for the first time about a month ago. It was obvious she was on the job even though she was in a bar – she had an urgency about her as she worked her way around groups. She stood out despite her title, wearing this tailored grey and black check suit. Because she’s so tall (nearly six foot three), the suit seemed endless and a bit magical, like she was Willy Wonka or something. No one really dresses like that in Hamilton. I felt happy that the city’s mayor was no longer the owner of a finance company and used car yard, but a woman who was moving around like a big-time operator looking sharp, cool, important. 

When I met her for coffee last week at a spot by the river, who knows what she was wearing, but her energy was the same. I arrived first and sat there trying to imagine how the encounter would begin; if she would shake my hand, what with Covid etcetera, or hug, or nothing. It was the latter. She came striding down the path talking on her cellphone and I hovered next to her until she was off the call. She seemed like she wanted to get on with business, like all good, busy mayors.

She had suggested we meet at the Vietnamese restaurant Banh Mi Caphe in town, but it was closed. She wondered aloud if the owners might let us in, her being the mayor and all. She wanted to give them a shoutout, she said, because they had been good to her. She poked her head in and someone who worked there frowned: “Closed.” Off we went with nowhere to go, but with the appearance of two people who were heading somewhere of the utmost importance. 

We ended up at Mr Pickles, the bar where I had first seen her. She ordered a single shot cappuccino even though it was 3pm and usually, she will take only chamomile tea after 2. 

Paula Southgate is nearly 59, she’s got a deepish voice, a bit of an English accent (she moved to New Zealand from England aged 15), and an endless-seeming stamina hovers over our conversation that made her appear as though she could talk about something or nothing for an infinite amount of time. If she were to enter one of those competitions where the person who touches the car the longest wins it, she would win the car without a doubt. The council’s draft annual plan meeting earlier this year took six days: “Boring!” says her rival deputy mayor Geoff Taylor, but Southgate is proud of her collaborative leadership style and says she likes to give everyone at the table a voice, even if it takes an age. 

Paula Southgate has been in local politics for a very long time. Specifically, 21 years. She has belonged to more groups and fronted more projects than any sane person would care to hear about in detail and she talks about them as though they are all very interesting. “Typical politician,” she said at one point, “chat, chat, chat.”

She wanted to communicate that despite being a career politician, she is also a person who embodies the spirit of the Geoff Taylor campaign slogan “making things happen”. She talked about a successful project she led at the regional council years ago that brought tūī back to the city. She credited so many people she tied herself up in knots, but the point is she fronted a project, worked with others well, and got something done. At one point she leant forward and dramatically banged the table, “that’s the good thing about projects,” she said, bang! “Start it, make it successful, walk away. That’s what you should do as a politician.”

A few moments later, she looked out to the river and said, “I guess people forget you are the reason that the tūī are back,” and it feels like a real moment. Then she immediately corrected herself, “I’m not taking all the credit!” she said, and listed again all the other people and groups who had anything at all to do with tūī at that time.  

Paula Southgate speaks during the Fifa Women’s World Cup ‘One Year To Go’ event at FMG Stadium Waikato. (Photo: Mike Walen/Getty Images for FIFA)

She seemed nice. “One of the biggest frustrations on this campaign is that people keep saying I’m nice,” she said, “and that nice people don’t get things done. That’s not true.” She seemed like she had practiced what she was going to say on certain matters like being nice, and when she spoke these words they came off in a sweet, rehearsed way, as though she was in a high school speech competition. Toward the end of our interview, she returned to the nice thing: “Don’t mistake nice for being weak, it’s not,” she said. “I can make hard decisions, I’ve shown that time and again. I personally prefer to collaborate and to partner, and I don’t mind being nice because I would rather be known for being nice than for being horrible, and it is a democracy not an autocracy. I do get things done, I’m very positive, I’m very collaborative; that’s what people will get if they vote for me.” 

It’s a testament, I think, to her niceness, that she seems to be very uncomfortable with the situation she finds herself in as she goes up against Geoff Taylor, current deputy mayor. There has been a falling out over the handling of Three Waters. Both are opposed to the reforms, but Taylor believes she should have stood up more aggressively to central government, that she’s sat on the fence when she should have given parliament the middle finger from the onset. 

“I didn’t like it 18 months ago,” she said, “but we thought we could influence it and that government would listen, and we tried. The model is not right for Hamilton, we all absolutely agree it is not right for Hamilton and we reject the bill. That’s the way it goes. You can’t be a blanket naysayer and say no, no, no to everything. What I would say is that I have always believed that across New Zealand, some reform in the way that water is managed is required, and both National and Labour have said that.”

Taylor says she has been seduced by Wellington and her inability to make traction against Three Waters is a sign of weak leadership; she says her approach has been “constructive and informed”. 

Same goes with central government’s resource management reform, that will allow three-storey apartments to be built through the city and its suburbs. Southgate said council had spent a lot of time planning how it would grow the city, “and then they came and trumped that with the medium density requirements for tier one councils and we were horrified, because all of a sudden instead of intensity going where we’re sitting in the CBD … it could go anywhere, like scattered seeds, right? And like everyone else, I was like, no.

“We opposed it, the government rushed it through, we didn’t have a lot of time to talk with our public about it, and the only tool we have available to us now is the district plan. Geoff could say we are being too weak. Perhaps he wants to say a blanket no to this, too, but what would a blanket no do? It’s a law. We have to give effect to the law.” She said council can’t stop it, but can soften it by looking at things like green space and traffic management. 

Paula Southgate has no shiny new projects she will be pushing in her campaign for a second term as mayor. “I’m going to continue the good work that we as a council, not just me, the collective council, said was important for the community.” She listed off a few of those things: finishing the revitalisation of suburbs Fairfield and Enderley, finish revitalisation of the Hamilton Zoo, revitalise the central city, implement safety improvements to intersections. Does she think Geoff Taylor could get these things done? “No matter who the mayor is, things get done, right, it’s just how things get done.” 

“My challenge, if I was going to be cheeky,” she said, “is to ask what has Geoff made happen on his own? Because I can talk a lot about what we, collectively, as a team have made happen.”

“What has he made happen,” she asked, looking at me like she expects an answer.

“Umm. Two hours free parking in the CBD?” 

“OK, that’s one thing … He was politically strong on two hours free parking,” she conceded, before rallying. “But of course everything needs the consensus decision of council and there wouldn’t be two hours free parking in the CBD if the majority of council hadn’t lined up with him. So how does that work?”

Please don’t make me answer again, I thought, avoiding eye contact. 

“No mayor can do anything without consensus. Not at all.”

‘If you value The Spinoff and the perspectives we share, support our work by donating today.’
Anna Rawhiti-Connell
— Senior writer

This election will be the first time Hamiltonians who bother to vote will use the single transferable vote system (STV). Neither mayoral candidate knows how things will shake out as a result of it. Southgate said she has been going around saying (she lowers her voice and sticks one finger out), “make me your first choice! Make me your number one!” to try and imprint the process in people’s minds. In 2016, she lost by an aching six votes to Andrew King, owner of Kings Finance and Kings Cars. She insists she didn’t stay up any nights swearing about it. That seems unlikely. 

I read through the transcript of our coffee meeting later and realised I failed to ask her about rates. Will she increase them as mayor? I texted her asking. I was met with silence when I asked the same thing of Geoff Taylor. She diligently replied with a whole lot of words that don’t answer either way, suggesting she probably will. I think she’s nice all right, but it will take a lot to get the politician out of Paula Southgate.


Follow our politics podcast Gone By Lunchtime on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or your favourite podcast provider.

Keep going!
All ballots need to be received by noon on October 8 to be counted. (Image: Toby Morris & Tina Tiller)
All ballots need to be received by noon on October 8 to be counted. (Image: Toby Morris & Tina Tiller)

Local Elections 2022September 21, 2022

A bunch of voting packs addressed to randoms arrived in the mail. What do I do?

All ballots need to be received by noon on October 8 to be counted. (Image: Toby Morris & Tina Tiller)
All ballots need to be received by noon on October 8 to be counted. (Image: Toby Morris & Tina Tiller)

Spoiler: don’t open them and vote. 

Local election fever is here. Or it might just be a head cold. Either way, a number of readers have got in touch since the distribution of voting papers began at the end of last week to say that between one and a whole heap of voting papers encased in paper envelopes have arrived at their home, addressed to some unknown human, presumably a former resident of the place. 

What to do? 

Should I open the envelope and vote for a second, third, whatever time, thereby being even more democratic than the average person?

Don’t do that. Electoral law guru Andrew Geddis, of Otago University, says, with a link to one of the pieces of legislation he has permanently open in a tab, if not tattooed on his midriff: “Do you really want to risk going to jail for up to 2 years?” 

And there’s a point of principle here, too; having more than one go at voting is hardly democratic. Vote early is fine, encouraged even. Vote often, not so much.

Unless you’re a property owner?

OK, sure – that’s a tricky one.

I don’t want to go to prison, but I don’t think anyone would know, and my opinions are excellent. Can’t I just …?

Prof Geddis again: “People might think, ‘I’ll cast several votes, and who will ever know? It’s a secret ballot!’ Well … surprise! It isn’t.”

He explains: “Every voting paper has on it a barcode that links that particular voting paper to the name of the voter it was issued to. This then allows the election officials to see who has actually cast a vote. So, if you use someone else’s voting papers, and they then apply for and cast a special vote, the election officials will see that two votes apparently have been cast by the same voter. At which point, they will get in touch with the voter and ask ‘what gives?’ And when the voter explains that they moved and didn’t update their details, so that they only cast one vote themselves, you very well may get a knock on the door from a police officer enquiring as to what happened to the voting papers delivered to your address.”

OK, so what do I do with the extra envelopes?

After nominations close, the Electoral Commission doesn’t have a formal role in the local elections (for more on that, read this). But we asked them anyway. A spokesperson patiently explained: “Voting papers are prepared and sent by councils – this isn’t our mail, so you might want to talk to one of the council electoral officers for their advice. However, our standard advice is that if people receive electoral mail that is not for them, they should send it back marked return to sender. That’s the advice we give when we send out enrolment update packs.”

Good advice; thanks, androgynous anthropomorphic orange goo. 

So what do the electoral officers say?

Great question. There are two companies that run almost all the local elections across the country, and we asked them both. 

Dale Ofsoske, electoral officer for Election Services, said of the envelopes addressed to people who aren’t you or your housemates: “These should be marked ‘Return to Sender – no longer at this address’ and put back in the post to us. This information is then collated and sent to the Electoral Commission to update their database.”

Warwick Lampp, chief returning officer for Electionz.com, however, said this: “It is an offence for anyone to open and action someone else’s voting documents, so they should just be destroyed.”

So: return to sender or return to dust. Either way, the critical thing is: don’t open them and fill them out, because (a) it’s not right, and (b) you could go to jail.

I think my voting papers may be stuck in someone else’s letterbox. What do I do?

Fret not. You can still vote. First, update your details on the electoral roll (or enrol for the first time) by going here.

You will need to cast a special vote this time around. Check your council website for information on where to do that. If you’re in Christchurch, go here; Wellington here; and Auckland here. Crack on, though. Voting is open now and closes at high noon, October 8. If you’re posting your voting papers back, you’ll need to get them in the post box no later than October 4.

‘If you regularly enjoy The Spinoff, and want it to continue, become a member today.’
Toby Manhire
— Editor-at-large

How do you post things?

Another good question. Post boxes, which used to stand, chests puffed across the land, linking the nation in wholesome epistolary bliss, are few and far between nowadays. You can head to your local NZ Post Shop (find your nearest here), while DX Mail post boxes can be found here

My voting papers haven’t arrived. What do I do? 

Special vote, as above. For more on this and other practical “how does this voting malarkey work” questions, read Shanti Mathias’s explainer

But wait there's more!