spinofflive
Grant Robertson and Jacinda Ardern have got in the car and are going shopping (Image: Tina Tiller)
Grant Robertson and Jacinda Ardern have got in the car and are going shopping (Image: Tina Tiller)

PoliticsDecember 2, 2019

Credit cards out: Where all that infrastructure money should be spent

Grant Robertson and Jacinda Ardern have got in the car and are going shopping (Image: Tina Tiller)
Grant Robertson and Jacinda Ardern have got in the car and are going shopping (Image: Tina Tiller)

A government announcement of more borrowing to fund infrastructure projects got us thinking – where should Grant Robertson splash the cash first? 

Cautious incrementalism on infrastructure has gone on long enough – it’s time to go shopping for some brand new toys. 

That was the message finance minister Grant Robertson gave the Labour Party conference over the weekend, saying there would be a significant amount of borrowing to bring forward “short and medium term” infrastructure projects. Billions of dollars could be borrowed in the process, and then put towards a range of projects. 

We don’t know exactly what they’ll be yet, with more details to be announced later in the month. But looking around the country, and the state of infrastructural neglect, what are some of the things that could end up getting funded? 

Here’s a speculative wishlist, some of which might end up getting the nod, and some of which might not. But there’s one thing all of these projects have in common – the best time to get started on them would have years ago. The second best time would be now. 

Hospital maintenance and upgrades

In keeping with what has been announced as the first project, ($400 million for school building maintenance and repairs) how about some cash for hospitals? DHBs collectively are sinking under a deficit of more than a billion dollars, with pretty much no fat left to cut to make savings. 

Some proper public transport for Tauranga

The big reason why the country has such a massive infrastructure deficit right now is because the population grew way faster than expected. Tauranga is an extreme example of that, going from a small seaside city a few decades ago to now being the 5th biggest in the country. An estimate in 2018 put the cost of bringing public transport in Tauranga into the 21st century at about $3 billion. And as port operations continue to expand, anything that can be done to reduce car numbers and free up the roads for freight is surely a smart approach. 

Speaking of which, the Golden Triangle train system could do with a nudge

The first leg of that is inching closer, in the form of a commuter train between Auckland and Hamilton. Forget for a moment that the particular service being rolled out next year is a bit mediocre – it’s not very fast, won’t have many services, won’t have many stops in key growth areas and will terminate at Papakura in South Auckland. Focus instead on the potential to make that – and links between both cities and Tauranga as well – a lot better. These three cities and the space between them is basically going to be the engine of New Zealand’s economic future, so it makes sense to spend a lot on getting it moving. 

Start now on the $600 million transmission network upgrades if Tiwai Point closes.

It’s often said that if the government told Tiwai Point aluminium smelter owner Rio Tinto to piss off tomorrow, then a massive amount of renewable energy would be freed up for the rest of the country. But that’s not the case, because there isn’t the ability to get it up to where it would be needed, in the North Island especially. Depending on how Rio Tinto’s strategic review goes, this could become much more important very quickly. 

Tiwai Point Aluminium Smelter, Southland. (Photo: Creative Commons)

A whole lot of new windmills 

Why not really, wind turbines are cool as hell. And we need a lot more of them if there’s ever going to be a chance of creating ‘green hydrogen’ – a potentially extremely useful heavy vehicle fuel if it is produced from renewable energy. You could even do it as some kind of public-private partnership, to entice gentailers (energy generators/retailers) who might be worried about electricity over-production bringing down wholesale prices. Windfarms also tend to work best in more rural areas, meaning skilled jobs for the regions. 

Expand the network of cycleways.

True story – putting in a leg of the nationwide cycleway around Ohakune has been massive for the town’s economy. It means there’s a genuine reason for tourists to come in the summer offseason, and it’s a really low-impact form of tourism as well. Cycleways got derided a lot when former PM John Key talked them up, but the network sees more than a million riders a year, so that’s not nothing. This would be a relatively quick, relatively cheap and relatively easy project to knock out early. 

Some big rural road upgrades and repairs. 

If the government wants to do something about mobility in the provinces, this is pretty much the only thing that will actually work. It’s really easy to forget in cities, where the roads are basically fine – if way too crowded. But take a part of the country like the Tararua District, especially from Dannevirke out to the East Coast. The roads are rooted to the point of being seriously dangerous, and the situation is only going to get worse when the hillsides covered in pine trees need to get harvested – not to mention the regular wear and tear of stock trucks, tourist vans and storms. See also, the ongoing confusion about what is going to happen with the stretch of State Highway between Levin and Ōtaki – as the blob-like Wellington region expands, the population of this area will only increase. 

Literally anything that will help deal with the country’s rubbish crisis

With the recently announced increase in landfill levies, now would be a great time to plow truckloads of money into enhanced onshore recycling systems. The developing world is sick of our rubbish, so we have to make this work here – there’s just nowhere else for it to go. Forget about it being economic, until we can actually reduce the amount of rubbish being produced that is just a cost we’ll have to bear. If that becomes a problem, just call it KiwiTrash and nobody will expect it to pay for itself. Technology recycling facilities could also stand to be stepped up – with the global demand for lithium rising rapidly, it is absolutely criminal to throw away technology containing rare earths and valuable components. 

Shore up Dunedin’s defences against flooding

With climate change bringing rising sea levels, South Dunedin in particular is going to flood repeatedly, and with increasing severity. Towns in the region, like Mosgiel and Lawrence, will also see this sort of damage, having been prone to flooding in the recent past. Assuming that nobody is willing to simply write these parts of the country off, investing heavily in better drainage systems (and possibly higher sea-walls to boot) will probably end up saving both lives and millions of dollars in the future.

Jacinda Ardern speaks at a press conference in March. (Photo by Kai Schwoerer/Getty Images)
Jacinda Ardern speaks at a press conference in March. (Photo by Kai Schwoerer/Getty Images)

PoliticsDecember 2, 2019

Dear Prime Minister: Please stop punishing beneficiaries in relationships

Jacinda Ardern speaks at a press conference in March. (Photo by Kai Schwoerer/Getty Images)
Jacinda Ardern speaks at a press conference in March. (Photo by Kai Schwoerer/Getty Images)

An alliance of groups is calling for an end to the law that can see people’s income support curbed if Work and Income NZ staff deem them to be in a relationship. Ricardo Menendez March of Auckland Action Against Poverty introduces the letter, which is published below in full.

Last week ActionStation, Child Poverty Action Group and Auckland Action Against Poverty, alongside groups from a wide cross-section of New Zealand, launched an open letter to the prime minister. We are asking her to change the law to end the use of outdated ideas of relationships which are depriving people of adequate income support.

Whether you’re considered to be in a marriage-type relationship by the Ministry of Social Development has a big impact on the level of income support they provide. If two people on a benefit are considered to be in a marriage-type relationship, they are moved onto the married benefit rate, which is lower than two individual benefit rates. This reduces benefit amounts which are already insufficient to live in dignity. What’s worse, if you’re considered to be in a marriage-type relationship with someone who is earning, for example, more than $44,000, you could see your benefit cut and be made financially dependent on the other person.

The law doesn’t clearly define a marriage-type relationship, so it is left to arbitrary policy underpinned by outdated Victorian-era values of relationships. The Ministry of Social Development use arbitrary criteria to assess cohabitation, emotional commitment, or financial interdependence. This means close friends, flatmates, or new couples could be considered to be in a marriage-type relationship even though they do financially support each other. This affects over 300,000 people who receive support from Work and Income, who face the prospect of being pushed into further financial hardship, or completely losing their financial autonomy, because they’re considered to be in a marriage-type relationship. The consequences of this particularly affect people living with disabilities and women who may be experiencing domestic violence.

Each year thousands of people on the benefit are investigated by the Ministry of Social Development in order to determine whether they are in a marriage-type relationship. This includes invasively trawling through years worth of private details, interviews with third parties without your knowledge, or being asked about your intimate sexual life. Many of these investigations are started by an anonymous tip-off line where people can accuse beneficiaries of being in a marriage-type relationship. After being investigated by the ministry you may receive a massive debt or even be prosecuted.

We are asking the prime minister show true compassion and change this outdated law, ensuring people’s income support needs are determined on an individual basis. We are also asking an immediate end to investigations into the relationship status of beneficiaries and a review of related outstanding debts to the Ministry of Social Development.


Read more:

How it feels to know the state may be snooping through your sexual and social life

The consequences of love: how finding a partner left me penniless

Her boyfriend abused her child. She was the one who was punished

Dear Prime Minister,

No matter who we are or where we live, we all know that relationships and connections with other people are what help us through the hard times. That strong communities are formed when we can rely on each other.

When we lose a job, become sick, or our relationship breaks down, being able to ask the people who care about us for support, in the ways that meet each of our needs, is key to getting through those hard times.

Right now, the government is isolating people and punishing them for supporting each other during hard times, instead of encouraging people to build strong connections and support networks.

People in politics have written the Social Security Act so a person at Work and Income can decide to stop or reduce a person’s income support if they believe they have entered into a relationship “in the nature of marriage”.

What this means, in practice, is that people who start dating someone for up to six weeks, or have someone to stay up to three nights a week, or even people who have long-term flatmates, are having all their financial support cut.

Some people at Work and Income have been insisting that friends, acquaintances, and new romantic partners should become financially responsible for that person, and often their children. There are no clear criteria used by people at Work and Income to decide whether to cut someone’s financial support.

This results in a random and unjust practice which lacks common sense. For instance, to determine if someone is reliant on another person financially, people have been asked by Work and Income caseworkers: “If they won the Lotto do you think they would give you some of it?”

This policy is eroding, not building, connections between people in our communities. It stops people developing new supportive relationships that over the long term help people live a normal life. It makes people fearful of connecting with others in case their income is cut by people in Work and Income, and harms their mental wellbeing.

Also, when people in government insist that a person becomes financially reliant on a new partner, it forces them, especially women, children and disabled people, into relationships that may be risky or abusive, without the financial independence to get out. It traps people in unhappy, dangerous and stressful living situations.

The government should instead be seeking to support strong connections between people and build strong, resilient communities. The solution is for people in government to change how relationships are treated by Work and Income New Zealand so people get what they need to live a dignified life that does not trap them in poverty and make them fearful to build relationships.

For instance, disabled people need to continue to get financial support to manage their health needs, regardless of their romantic status. And women raising children on their own need to have the financial independence to make decisions for the good of their children, whether they are in a relationship or not.

This government promised to overcome child poverty and overhaul a welfare system which is breaking – not making – connections between people. The government should be encouraging people to build strong connections because that’s what builds great lives, great communities and flourishing countries.

We are asking your government to individualise benefit entitlements to ensure that everyone can retain their financial independence, no matter their relationship status.

Signed:

Action Station

Auckland Action Against Poverty

Child Poverty Action Group

Disabled Persons Assembly NZ

Auckland Women’s Centre

Wellington Sexual Abuse Help

The Aunties

The National Network of Family Violence Services

The Mental Health Foundation of NZ

CCS Disability Action

FinCap