Image: Tina Tiller
Image: Tina Tiller

PoliticsNovember 29, 2021

The National Party’s new conscience 

Image: Tina Tiller
Image: Tina Tiller

How did the National leadership contenders vote on bills relating to abortion, gay marriage and euthanasia?

Tomorrow, the National Party will meet to decide its new leader following Judith Collins’ ousting last Thursday

Wondering who all the candidates are, and how their values align? Conscience votes are votes that are made according to an MP’s personal beliefs or, as is sometimes communicated, the stance of their constituents. It can be a chance for MPs to stray from the party line and represent themselves as individuals rather than party members.

In the past decade, prominent conscience votes have included the Marriage Amendment Bill (2013), which sought to legalise non-heterosexual marriage, the Abortion Legislation Bill (2020), which looked to officially remove abortion from the Crimes Act, and the End of Life Choice Bill (2019), which sought to legalise assisted death for the terminally ill. 

All three passed. Here’s how the contenders voted.


Simon Bridges

Photo of a middle-aged politician, eyes closed, chin raised, during a press conference bristling with microphones
Simon Bridges speaks to media after a caucus meeting at parliament on October 16, 2018 (Photo: Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images)

Marriage equality: NO, then YES?

Bridges initially voted against marriage reform, but in 2019, Bridges told Newshub, “my personal view has changed – simply, times have moved, we’ve seen it, it’s going incredibl[y] well.”

Decriminalising abortion: NO

Bridges voted against abortion reform, publicly stating, “I don’t see the case for change.”

End of life choice: NO

Bridges told NewstalkZB he believes in “the sanctity of life” and voted against the bill


Christopher Luxon

National MP Christopher Luxon
Christopher Luxon (Photo: Getty Images)

Marriage equality: UNKNOWN

Luxon wasn’t yet in parliament when the Marriage Amendment Bill was voted on, and has yet to express views on marriage equality. But he has been vocal about his evangelical protestant Christian faith. In 2019, as a newly elected MP, Luxon told Stuff, “My faith is a very personal thing … it gives me mission and purpose.” He has been characterised as one of the more conservative members of the National Party. 

Decriminalising abortion: NO

Luxon wasn’t yet in parliament when the Abortion Legalisation Bill was being voted on, but when he was selected as National’s Botany candidate in 2019, he told media he was against decriminalising abortion.

End of life choice: NO

Luxon wasn’t yet in parliament when the End of Life Choice Bill was being voted on either, but in 2019 said he was personally against reform of euthanasia law.


Mark Mitchell 

Mark Mitchell at parliament on August 6, 2020 (Photo: Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images)

Marriage equality: NO, then YES

Mitchell voted “strongly” against marriage reform, which he said was aligned with the views of his electorate. But in 2018, on the AM Show, Mitchell stated he’d now vote for same-sex marriage legalisation “without a doubt”.

Decriminalising abortion: YES

Mitchell voted for abortion reform. During the hearing Mitchell testified that “we should never, ever discount the stress and the torment that, in this case, the parents or a woman go through in terms of coming to that decision and making that decision”.

End of life choice: YES

Mitchell voted yes on the End of Life Choice Bill


Shane Reti 

Shane Reti at parliament on August 4, 2020. (Photo: Lynn Grieveson – Newsroom via Getty Images)

Marriage equality: UNKNOWN

Reti has not been forthcoming on his views about marriage equality. 

Decriminalising abortion: NO

Reti voted against abortion reform

End of life choice: NO 

Reti, who has worked as a doctor for over 16 years, opposed the End of Life Choice Bill. He told parliament, “I am the only MP – if this bill goes through – who will be able to give permission to euthanise people.” 


Nicola Willis 

Nicola Willis at parliament on October 20, 2020 (Photo: Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images)

Marriage equality: YES 

Willis was non-committal in this interview about banning conversion therapy, but she did say she would have voted in favour of gay marriage had she been an MP in 2013. 

Decriminalising abortion: YES

Willis voted strongly for abortion reform. In a speech given to parliament on the issue, Willis advocated for women’s rights and healthcare access. 

End of life choice: YES 

Willis supported the End of Life Choice Bill


Chris Bishop

Chris Bishop during a press conference at parliament on February 15, 2021 (Photo: Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images)

Marriage equality: YES (kind of)

Bishop narrowly missed voting on the marriage equality bill, being elected to parliament in 2014. However, he is a chair of The New Zealand Cross Party Rainbow Parliamentary Network, and on Australia’s legalisation of same-sex marriage, Bishop said, “Marriage equality is about dignity, respect, and the legalisation of love between people of the same sex. Nothing more, and nothing less.”

Decriminalising abortion: YES 

Bishop voted yes to abortion reform, writing in a Facebook post that he believed “women should make decisions about their own reproductive systems”.

End of life choice: YES 

Bishop voted yes to the bill, telling parliament that it “upholds individual dignity. It affirms individual autonomy. It sanctifies self-determination.”


Follow The Spinoff’s politics podcast Gone By Lunchtime on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or your favourite podcast provider.

Keep going!
Light rail for Auckland and Wellington is a contentious issue this election.
Light rail for Auckland and Wellington is a contentious issue this election.

OPINIONPoliticsNovember 26, 2021

Auckland light rail will be far from cheap, but the cost of inaction will be higher

Light rail for Auckland and Wellington is a contentious issue this election.
Light rail for Auckland and Wellington is a contentious issue this election.

By the end of year, the first line on the Auckland Light Rail network is set to be locked in. It’s a project that has the opportunity to shape the city for the next century, argues transport minister Michael Wood.

As New Zealand’s largest city rushes towards a population of two million by the early 2030s, we can choose to invest in infrastructure to create opportunities and liveability, or we can choke on our own growth. At the heart of the matter is the need to enable more housing in places where people can easily access work, education, and recreation. Done well, this growth can be accommodated in a way that reduces congestion and carbon emissions, and improves the environment of our city. Done poorly – as we have for much of the past 60 years – it will result in urban sprawl, ever more chronic congestion, disconnected communities, and complete care dependency.

The development of an efficient, accessible and linked-up rapid transit network for Auckland is the key to getting the right outcomes.

Light rail in Auckland will unlock tens of thousands of new homes, access to employment and education, and faster connections right across the city. As a lifelong Aucklander, I’ve seen first-hand how the past failure to invest in linked-up public transport has led to the chronic congestion and frustration many people deal with today. Some readers may recall “Robbie’s Rapid Rail Plan”, Auckland mayor Dove-Myer Robinson’s proposal of an extensive rail system across the city all the way back in the early 1970s. Just imagine the kind of city Auckland would be today if in 1975 the incoming Muldoon government hadn’t squashed Mayor Robbie’s bold transport vision. Well, the opportunity is in front of us again – do we finally invest in the high-quality mass transit system our growing city needs, or do we put our heads in the sand for another 50 years?

After months of public consultation, mana whenua engagement and community outreach, the Auckland Light Rail (ALR) team has now delivered a robust business case for the first line between the city centre and Māngere. This would connect key housing, education and employment hubs between the city and airport – allowing huge numbers of people to move freely, quickly and easily. The ALR team has provided three different options for taking the project forward, which cabinet will consider before the end of the year. The options have different benefits and trade-offs, but all deliver reliable journey times, reduce transport emissions, and offer potential for large-scale housing growth and urban regeneration in places like the Māngere town centre.

As Justin Latif noted in his article on The Spinoff earlier this year, a light rail line through Māngere would be an “economic game-changer”, with widespread support from the community, businesses and city councillors. The city centre-Māngere light rail corridor could support up to 66,000 new homes, which would accommodate a quarter of Auckland’s future population growth. It would also cut travel times in half, and offer affordable and consistent service. As in other international cities, light rail services would run every five minutes, so you wouldn’t need to plan your journey and could just show up and go.

Auckland Light Rail would be a transformative project for the city, shaping Auckland’s urban form for the next century. I see this first line between the city centre and Māngere as the spine of Auckland’s public transport network, connecting in with the existing heavy rail system, new mass rapid transit systems to the south and north-west, and at Wynyard Quarter, enabling a future line to link to the North Shore. 

The project would be the largest transport project in New Zealand’s recent history. After decades of under-investment, there is no free lunch here. But let’s be clear that the cost of inaction will be much higher. Pre-Covid, congestion in Auckland alone cost approximately $1.3 billion per year, a figure that will only get worse as Auckland continues its rapid growth. If we follow a model of urban sprawl, that too will require significant infrastructure investment at the city fringes.

Delivering light rail to Auckland is a manifesto commitment of our government, and it’s a top priority for me as transport minister. The best time to invest in public transport was yesterday, the second best time is today. So let’s not waste another half century depriving Aucklanders of the high-quality, low-emissions, linked-up public transport network that they deserve.