spinofflive
Dua Lipa performs in Auckland (Photo by Phil Walter/Getty Images)
Dua Lipa performs in Auckland (Photo by Phil Walter/Getty Images)

Pop CultureNovember 4, 2022

Dua Lipa live in Auckland and the power of arena-sized pop

Dua Lipa performs in Auckland (Photo by Phil Walter/Getty Images)
Dua Lipa performs in Auckland (Photo by Phil Walter/Getty Images)

Duncan Greive and Stewart Sowman-Lund attended Dua Lipa’s Future Nostalgia tour in Auckland this week. Both came away with a profound sense of joy.

Pop music’s back in town, baby! After two-and-a-half years of the pandemic, one of the biggest and most anticipated pop acts of the year arrived in Auckland this week: Dua Lipa. Touring her multi-Grammy nominated album Future Nostalgia, which was released in the very earliest days of the Covid-19 outbreak, the two sold out Spark Arena gigs have been a long time coming for fans. And they were worth the wait.

The Spinoff publisher Duncan Greive and live updates editor Stewart Sowman-Lund, both pop music obsessives despite their serious job titles, exchanged a series of frantic emails in an effort to hold onto the happiness they experienced at the concerts this week.

The build up

DUNCAN: This was my first big capital P Pop show since the lowercase p pandemic, and I had honestly forgotten what a beautiful candy floss rush it is just walking to Spark Arena with that electric energy – all these kids dressed up and out of their skin with excitement. It was maybe 80% wāhine, and def teen heavy – but there were also cute little pockets of couples my age and over, on their own, so you really felt like there was this community of pop obsessives here to commune with someone who has become among the best in the world at this specific thing right now.

I was gutted to miss most of Tkay Maidza, but the glimpse I got had beautiful, ebullient energy which got the room going. And I loved the thought which had gone into the pre-show music – Stardust and Jamiroquai and whole bunch of 90s/00s dance music which really spoke to Dua Lipa as a very English artist.

The princess of pop?

STEWART: People throw around monikers like that a lot these days (arguably too much) and I’d heard it referenced a few times in relation to Dua Lipa. Honestly though, it sort of feels right? It could just be a symptom of her 2020 album Future Nostalgia wearing its pop queen influences very much on its sleeve – Kylie, Madonna, a touch of Gaga – but after seeing Lipa perform the album almost in its entirety, it really feels like she’s earned that title. She might not be as well rounded as some of her obvious idols (famously, her dancing has earned some TikTok infamy), but the vocals, costumes, production value and… just general vibe in a packed Spark Arena made it obvious we’re dealing with some real pop royalty.

There’s something infectious about seeing big-scale, campy pop. My last gig at Spark was Billie Eilish – incredible, too. But while Eilish opted to make her show feel intimate and her audience feel closer, Lipa went full noise and I absolutely loved it.

It was a show about dancing

DUNCAN: It does always feel to me that at any given time there is one person who owns that space (even though I find “princess of pop” a spew phrase), and while Taylor and Beyonce and Billie are all different varieties of bigger, there’s something about synthetic pop music in which every song is a different giant arena-sized hook, and Dua Lipa is the best we have at that, for me, right now. I thought her dancing was legit, and really admire someone who responds to criticism by leaning into that and working their ass off.

I loved that she not only had a shitload of dancers with her, always changing and elevating the show, but that she credited them all on the big screen at the start. It was a nice acknowledgement that these productions require dozens of people at the absolute top of their art to gleam like this. Future Nostalgia felt like it drew on so many threads of 80s-00s dance subcultures, and the show did a great job of drawing on everything from electro to new romantics to turn-of-the-millennium house.

Dua Lipa and her dancers in Auckland (Photo: Phil Walter/Getty Images)

And she had vocals for days

STEWART: Totally agree on the dancing. One of my friends thought moments of the show were a bit “cringe” but I was fully drawn into the almost club-like atmosphere that was created by seeing a stage full of dancers performing very limb-heavy choreo. There was even a dance circle at one point that could have collapsed into corny but I thought felt joyful and authentic. It sort of felt like… I was part of it?

Beyond dancing, I was in awe of Dua Lipa’s vocals. I had no prior knowledge as to whether or not she could actually sing or had benefited from the heavy production on her albums. Turns out, she can more than just sing. She managed to elevate many of her biggest numbers so that they successfully sounded different to the studio versions, but not in a tacky remix-heavy way. Her voice just sounded polished, especially considering she was flinging herself around the stage at the same time. I can barely make a phone call while walking let alone sing.

It felt like a salve to the pandemic in the most pure way

DUNCAN: I so agree on her vocals – to sing with that combination of poise and energy throughout, while participating in allllll that choreography – was a lot. I also loved how the crowd met her at that, with a cathartic scream-sing for the ages to all those hits – not just her new songs, but that surprisingly deep catalogue like ‘Be the One’, which killed. I took two of my daughters, including my eight-year-old who absolutely belted the whole thing out at her first pop show. (Mystifyingly, some prudes at the Herald have decided it was not appropriate for kids which is absolutely wild to me – the lyrics are coy by contemporary standards and I feel like at this point it’s clear that we literally all have bums??)

It was also very much an end-of-the-pandemic feeling. Future Nostalgia came out two days into the first level four lockdown in March of 2020. I got the LP and it’s one of the few joyous memories of that time, dancing to it with our kids and taking a little break from the horror. To be here, in that big sold out room, remembering one of the most pure and quasi-religious sensations felt so special. I’ve seen so many all time pop shows here – from Gwen Stefani to The Weeknd to Katy Perry to Justin Timberlake to Kanye to Taylor. I didn’t think Dua Lipa would ever belong in that category. I think it’s pretty undeniable now that she does.

‘Media is under threat. Help save The Spinoff with an ongoing commitment to support our work.’
Duncan Greive
— Founder

And so many bangers!

STEWART: You’re absolutely right, Dunc. And what it all came down to for me was that setlist. How does somebody with just two full albums have the right to have produced that many bangers? With the exception of one collab I didn’t really know, the entire 90-minute concert was wall-to-wall hits, hooks and harmonies. I made the unwise decision to buy a seated ticket but after 20 seconds of the first tune – the catchy as anything Physical – I realised this was very much a standing gig. And I wasn’t alone – I only saw a handful of sitters in the stalls, and they very much appeared to be parents and/or guardians.

To once again contrast my experience at the Future Nostalgia tour with my trip to Billie Eilish, that was a gig I could happily sit down for – but at Dua Lipa, all I wanted to do was (badly) dance, (badly) sing and have the time of my life.

Keep going!
Was it about a canon of imperialism or was it about something else entirely? (Image Design: Tina Tiller)
Was it about a canon of imperialism or was it about something else entirely? (Image Design: Tina Tiller)

Pop CultureNovember 3, 2022

‘A weaker delivery’: Shakespeare funding feedback released in full

Was it about a canon of imperialism or was it about something else entirely? (Image Design: Tina Tiller)
Was it about a canon of imperialism or was it about something else entirely? (Image Design: Tina Tiller)

Was it really about Shakespeare after all? Sam Brooks sifts through Creative New Zealand’s feedback to the Shakespeare Globe Centre’s funding application.

Yesterday, Creative New Zealand made the unprecedented decision to proactively release its feedback to the funding proposal from the Shakespeare Globe Centre (SGCNZ). For nearly a month, the organisation being let go from CNZ’s Toi Uru Kahikatea Investment programme has been at the centre of a roiling controversy, with heated opinion pieces and responses flying back and forth both here and overseas

That SGCNZ was to be dropped from funding was reported in mid-September, but the story was reignited after the publication of an open letter from SGCNZ supporter Terry Sheat. That open letter highlighted two phrases from the nine pages of CNZ feedback to the application, in which the assessors questioned “the role and relevance of Shakespeare in Aotearoa” and claimed “the genre [Shakespeare] was located within a canon of imperialism and missed the opportunity to create a living curriculum and show relevance to the contemporary art context of Aotearoa”. This led to several days’ worth of media furore and talkback appearances. You can read a summary of the stoush here.

‘Love The Spinoff? Its future depends on your support. Become a member today.’
Madeleine Chapman
— Editor

Now, CNZ has published its entire feedback to the SGCNZ proposal in response to an OIA request. Its stated reasons for releasing the feedback include the “many requests” for the information, excerpts of the feedback already being shared in the public arena, and to provide more detail around the Arts Council’s decision to decline the proposal.

A statement from the organisation reads: “We don’t typically discuss declined applications in the public arena. While we’ve had to make an exception in the case of SGCNZ … we don’t typically discuss or comment on declined funding applications in the public arena for the following reasons.”

SGCNZ has been consulted on the release of this information. In the interest of clarity, The Spinoff has read through the feedback and pulled out relevant parts to help readers can understand the process.

No to all of this discouse. (Image Design: Tina Tiller)

The feedback

Two external assessors, whose names have been redacted for privacy reasons, were hired to provide feedback on the funding application, which the Arts Council then bases its decision on.  There are three overall criteria that the assessors hold the funding application against: relevance, viability, and investment outcomes (as in, whether the organisation aligns with the CNZ’s investment priorities). Underneath these three criteria, there are 10 factors the application is measured against, including budget, vision, planning and ability to deliver. The assessors score these 10 factors a number between 1 and 5, 5 being the highest.

The feedback for SGCNZ is largely positive from both external assessors, with all of its scores being either a 3 (“good”) or a 4 (“very good”). Positive feedback includes passages like:

“The endorsements that you highlight demonstrate that participation in the Festival can be life changing, leading to increased confidence and a life long passion for the performing arts.”

“Shakespeare’s texts remain imminently suitable for adaptation and experimentation, with young people drawing connections with Shakespeare’s themes and making the plays relevant to themselves and their audiences through directorial and acting choices.”

“This programme of activity is well conceived, with regional festivals leading towards a national festival, complemented by education workshops and other initiatives.”

The few critical notes from these assessors revolve around the organisation itself, not anything to do with Shakespeare. Those include one assessor noting they would have appreciated a “more robust self-examination of its practice and functions” and another wanting “to get a clearer idea of SGCNZ’s longer term goals and where it is heading”. That same assessor notes that the emphasis on succession planning in the application was not reflected in its strategic and operational plan, another part of the application.

Ultimately, the organisation scored a 70/100 on its application, with one assessor giving it 34 marks and the other 36. (To crudely give it a grade, that would be a B.)

Creative New Zealand also solicited feedback from a strategic advisory panel. That feedback is summarised here as recorded minutes, not the detailed feedback provided from assessors above.

It’s from here that the quotes “located within a canon of imperialism” come from, not from one of the assessors, as previously reported. This panel notes the strong youth engagement, positive impact of participants, and the continued love of Shakespeare, but agreed the proposal did not demonstrate “the relevance to the contemporary art context of Aotearoa in this time and place and landscape”.

The panel’s feedback is summed up in four bullet points: that the proposal was “not strong”, the organisation seems “quite paternalistic”, “located within a canon of imperialism” and “relies heavily on schools who have busy calendars”.

As a result, it did not recommend SGCNZ for funding. Its rationale was that the proposal did not demonstrate the relevance to the contemporary art context of Aotearoa, and the panel was concerned for the number of theatre organisations in the round. It also questioned the role and relevance of Shakespeare in Aotearoa.

Not to be, thanks. (Image Design: Archi Banal)

Recommendations from Creative New Zealand

This part of the feedback sums up what both the external assessors and the panel said, as summarised above.

Of particular note here is that Creative New Zealand staff noted that the views of the assessors and the panel “do not seem to be held by the many thousands of young people who have participated in the programme”, and that the panel hadn’t considered that the programme (by which it means the Sheilah Winn Festival and its resulting offshoots) acts as an on-ramp to a career in the performing arts. The CNZ staff also noted that this was one of the few proposals received with a “primary focus” on providing opportunities for youth participation and leadership.

CNZ staff also acknowledged that SGCNZ had consistently met or exceeded CNZ’s expectations for quality and alignment, and that as an organisation receiving less than $75,000 a year in funding, isn’t required to report on financial or organisational health. CNZ agreed that SGCNZ delivers on CNZ goals, and a gap will “be created by its exit from the Kahikatea programme”.

The CNZ staff finally noted that there were concerns about the relevancy and future focus of the proposal that challenged the assessors’ confidence in the organisation’s capacity to “deliver strongly”.

They did not recommend the organisation for Kahikatea funding.

Financial exposure

The one part of the application that remains opaque is the internal assessment, which looks at an organisation’s financial viability. It is largely redacted, to protect “information subject to an obligation of confidence”.

The one piece of information left unredacted is that “the organisation is perceived to be exposed to financial risk”, which led to it scoring a 2 out of 3. It’s important to note that without knowing what other organisations scored in this funding stream it’s hard to correctly weigh the importance of this ranking. At any rate, SGCNZ scored 12 of 15 in this internal assessment.

The Arts Council meeting

Here’s where the final decision actually gets made, based on the feedback in the application that you’ve seen above. Again, this feedback is provided via minutes, not detailed feedback.

The Arts Council discussed what options were available to continue youth participation and leadership offered by SGCNZ. The council noted SGCNZ would be able to apply for funding under the Annual Arts Grants (and might do better financially under this scheme), and that there were other organisations delivering to youth.

They ultimately agreed SGCNZ had a “weaker delivery to assessment criteria than others”, and approved the recommendation to not offer funding through the Kahikatea programme.

The outcome

Creative New Zealand funded 58 out of 62 applications that applied for the Kahikatea funding stream. Shakespeare Globe Centre NZ now receives funding through the Ministry of Education, and the Sheilah Winn Festival will go ahead as planned in 2023.

‘Hutt Valley, Kāpiti, down to the south coast. Our Wellington coverage is powered by members.’
Joel MacManus
— Wellington editor