FeatureImage_AfterTheParty.png

Pop CultureNovember 21, 2024

‘Deserves a Bafta’: After the Party premieres in the UK to five-star reviews 

FeatureImage_AfterTheParty.png

The acclaimed New Zealand drama has just premiered on TV in the United Kingdom, and the five-star reviews are already flowing in. 

Six months after it was called a “blistering” “tour de force” by Australian critics, and nearly a year since The Spinoff declared it the best drama New Zealand has ever made, After the Party has premiered today in the United Kingdom to equally rave reviews. The “gritty, wrenching and highly confronting” drama stars Robyn Malcolm as Wellington teacher Penny, who accuses her husband Phil (Scottish actor Peter Mullan) of a sex crime at a boozy house party.

What happens next is a six-part white knuckle ride through one deeply fallible yet doggedly determined woman’s quest to unearth the truth, while everyone else desperately tries to move on. 

So how have critics in the United Kingdom responded to our “dark, tense and highly provocative drama” after it aired on Channel 4 just a few hours ago? And did they also enjoy watching Phil Spencer’s New Zealand Best Homes, which followed it in the programming? We trawled the reviewsphere and found nothing but rave reviews. 

The Guardian UK: ‘Hands down the best acting on TV all year’ (⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐)

Lucy Mangan’s five-star review for The Guardian opens with glowing praise for Robyn Malcolm (“It’s a bravura performance from the very beginning”), continues with glowing praise for Robyn Malcolm (“surely the performance of the year”), and ends with glowing praise for Robyn Malcolm (“What a role. What an actor. What a performance”). And who can really blame her? 

Drawing comparisons with Happy Valley’s Catherine Cawood and Mare of Easttown Mare Sheehan, Mangan said that Penny is a type of middle-aged female character “who has seen too much of life not to know precisely how awful it can be.” Praising Malcolm, “whom you believe utterly”, Mangan describes “a portrait of a woman whose inability to compromise, to sigh and turn away from perceived danger or injustice, is both a flaw and heroic.” 

Peter Mullen and Malcolm in After the Party (Photo: TVNZ)

Beyond the complex middle-aged protagonists, Mangan also made another parallel with the “textured layering” and “immersive quality” of award-winning dramas Mare and Happy Valley: “absolute authenticity through and through.” The execution of the After the Party is “brilliant”, the supporting characters “uniformly well-rounded” but “Malcolm is the centrepiece.” Perhaps the only negative here in this total rave review is that she called Wellington a “small town”. Boo!

The Telegraph: ‘Robyn Malcolm deserves a Bafta’ (⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐)

Writing for The Telegraph, Anita Singh was also shouting from the rooftops about Malcolm’s performance, even suggesting Bafta buzz. “The best TV performance of the year is by an actor most British viewers won’t recognise, in a New Zealand production that most won’t see,” she writes. “The actor is Robyn Malcolm in After the Party; if Kate Winslet or Sarah Lancashire played this role even half as well, they’d have the Baftas all sewn up.”

While Singh admits she had been reluctant to watch the series due to the subject matter – “nobody’s idea of a good time” – she soon came round. “Penny is the type to come straight out and say what she thinks, unafraid of the repercussions. She’s earthy, unembarrassable and gloriously no-nonsense,” she writes. Unlike The Guardian, she resists the urge to call our capital city a small town: “the setting, a very windy Wellington, feels fresh to British eyes.” 

Another five star review, centered around a tour de force performance: “Penny feels messy and real, and Malcolm’s phenomenal performance will keep you hooked.”

iNews: ‘The best Kiwi drama since Top of the Lake’ (⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐)

Another five-starrer, this time comparing After the Party with Top of the Lake, another world class drama export. “Both are twisty and atmospheric, both have plots spun around ugly pasts rearing up in the present – and both star actors Robyn Malcolm and Peter Mullan,” Rachel Sigee writes. But After the Party… confidently establishes itself as its own entity: a blistering and intelligent drama of tangled morals, anchored by a remarkable central performance.”

Malcolm in a scene from After the Party (Photo: TVNZ)

Great! What could possibly go wrong here! “Marshall is immediately captivating as Penny,” Sigee continued, in a bigger national insult than calling Wellington a small town. “A woman of an age that television tends only to be interested in if they are extremely wealthy.” Even with the name slip up, iNews stuck the landing with this: “As challenging as it is compelling, this miniseries is a modern masterpiece.” Marshall, come and get your Bafta now. 

The Times: ‘Beautifully controlled’ (⭐⭐⭐⭐)

Okay take a deep breath and put down your pitchforks everyone, but The Times only dished out a measly four stars. “After the Party has been billed by some as the best TV drama of the year,” Carol Midgley begins. “That might be overstating things a shade, but it is certainly excellent.” 

Singling out the opening sequence in particular, where Penny delivers a frank monologue about pornography to a class of teenage boys, Midgley calls it “the best opening six minutes to a drama series I have seen in some time” thanks to both a “scorching performance” and “great dialogue”. More praise for Malcolm’s performance: “It is so nutty and layered, sometimes making Penny likeable, sometimes not: this is a performance so prevailing and so lacking in vanity as to compare to Kate Winslet’s in Mare of Easttown.” 

Midgley also heaped praise on the “beautifully controlled” storytelling, with the viewer only piecing the offending incident together through flashbacks. “Normally I hate flashbacks but these are well done,” she adds. A tougher customer who, although she found the final twist “a rug-puller that is not nuanced” still says “this is a series worth every hour of your time.” 

Watch After the Party here on TVNZ+.

Keep going!
Cynthia Erivo and Ariana Grande in Wicked
Cynthia Erivo and Ariana Grande in Wicked

Pop CultureNovember 21, 2024

Review: The magic of Wicked and the curse of corporate greed

Cynthia Erivo and Ariana Grande in Wicked
Cynthia Erivo and Ariana Grande in Wicked

The new movie musical is undoubtedly a fun watch, but it’s also proof that bigger isn’t always better, writes Stewart Sowman-Lund. 

Contains minor spoilers for Wicked. 

There’s no doubt that Wicked is going to be huge. No other pop culture event this year, save from maybe Charli XCX’s Brat, has had the overwhelming presence of Wicked. For the uninitiated, Wicked is a live action film adaptation of the wildly popular, long-running Broadway musical. It’s a prequel to the Wizard of Oz, providing an origin story for the Wicked Witch of the West, Elphaba, and the Good Witch, Glinda. The stage show has been running in the US since 2003, raking in well over $1 billion and becoming one of the biggest musical successes of all time. 

While it was inevitable we’d be getting a film adaptation at some point, I imagine there was some hesitation after the travesty that was the digitally fur-laden Cats at throwing a mega budget at a film with a lead character that’s bright green. But after the announcement that Wicked would be helmed by director John Chu (responsible for the excellent adaptation of Lin-Manuel Miranda’s In the Heights), and with pop megastar Ariana Grande and multi-award winning musical theatre legend Cynthia Erivo in the two lead roles, many of those fears were assuaged. 

None of my issues with Wicked, the film, lie with any of the creative talents involved. Grande has rightly been thrust into the awards spotlight for her turn as Glinda, and is poised to secure the pop-star-turned-film-star slot at the Oscars that many once felt may be reserved for Lady Gaga in Joker (but we all know how that turned out). Erivo, too, is perfectly cast as Elphaba, providing an emotional counter to Grande’s overwhelming glibness. Some of the strongest moments of the film come when the pair are on screen together, though they also highlight that while Grande clearly has the pipes for the role, she is a pop performer first and foremost and lacks the crisp diction that Erivo has honed from years on the stage.

Cynthia Erivo as Elphaba and Ariana Grande as Glinda

What I do have an issue with is the decision to split Wicked into two films. Apologies if this is the first you’re learning of this, but while the film has been marketed as just Wicked, an onscreen title card confirms this is actually Wicked: Part One – the story concludes roughly around where the stage production’s first act ends. 

I can see no creative justification for splitting what is already a tightly-crafted story into two films, especially given the runtime of Part One is basically the same as the entire Broadway production (interval included) – a whopping two hours and 40 minutes. There are some additional storylines inserted to try and justify the mega runtime, but none of them are particularly interesting. There’s a little more of Elphaba’s childhood, some further exploration of her Hogwarts-esque magical education, and some extra dance breaks here and there. It adds very little and, if anything, makes the runtime drag as the story heads toward its climax.

If you’re familiar with the production, you’ll also know that act one has the show’s biggest and best songs, climaxing with a show-stopping performance of ‘Defying Gravity’, one of the most memorable theatre songs in recent memory (and a surefire way to kill the mood at karaoke). On stage, it works by building anticipation for a second act that will start in 20 minutes. With a year-long intermission, I’m not sure the effect will be quite the same. What we’re left with is half a film that confusingly declares it is “the whole story” at the start, after just telling us we’ll all have to trudge back to the cinema again in 12 months time to learn how it all ends.

One issue that has been persistently called out since the first trailer debuted many months ago is the colour grading, and I’lll admit the decision to add a sepia tone over what should be a technicolour extravaganza was confusing – this isn’t Avengers: Endgame. Placing scenes from Wicked side by side with vibrant moments from the 80-year-old Wizard of Oz only highlight this.

Those quibbles aside, there is a lot to love about Wicked. Where Joker 2 was a misfire for its shabby musical direction, Wicked’s most Broadway moments soar. It feels like stepping into the live show and Chu, who has proven credentials with movie musicals (yes, even Step Up), effortlessly invites us into the world. The decision to rely on practical sets and, where possible, effects, contributes to a real life musical theatre feel. It has flashy set pieces, for sure, but often works best in its quieter moments. The rendition of ‘Popular’, with just Grande and Erivo in a university dorm room, is a highlight, as is the emotional peak when Elphaba and Glinda first forge their unlikely friendship.

And, yes, Defying Gravity retains its theatrical power on the big screen – I just wish it came in the middle rather than the end.

Verdict: I found more to love than hate about Wicked: Part One. It’s a product of Hollywood’s unfortunate obsession with bigger meaning better, but it’s also one that has a lot of heart and creative freedom at its core.