spinofflive
Elon Musk, with hellfire in background

SocietyFebruary 13, 2025

Help Me Hera: Is Elon Musk the antichrist?

Elon Musk, with hellfire in background

I’m a proud atheist who outgrew my religious upbringing. So why am I getting antsy about the rapture all of a sudden?

Want Hera’s help? Email your problem to helpme@thespinoff.co.nz

Dear Hera,

I’m a proud atheist and since I managed to move past the childhood trauma of my religious upbringing and into adulthood, I’ve been confident that the Book of Revelations and all the happy bedtime stories from it that my father used to tell me as a child were just that — stories — no more believable than a Disney princess movie. But this Trump/Musk business has got me rattled. The world feels like the apocalypse is just around the corner, and if you were looking for a high-quality antichrist candidate, surely you couldn’t do much better than Elon Musk? What if Dad was right after all and the Rapture really is on its way?

Kindest regards,
Agitated atheist

Dear Agitated,

Nietzsche once said, “In heaven, all the interesting people are missing.” Maybe this statement made sense in the context of a fundamentalist Christian morality, in which using a comb on a Sunday was tantamount to pledging your allegiance to Satan.

These days, hell isn’t what it used to be. They’ve sold off the red velvet chaise lounges, extinguished the pits of eternal fire, and refurbished the underworld in wall-to-wall grey carpet. They’ve dismantled the wall of human skulls and replaced them with Funko Pop display cases. Gone are the sodomites and the suicides, the thieves and alchemists. My conception of hell is a never-ending Koru lounge, with catering by The Compass Group and a custom cryptocurrency.

I’m no atheist, but I don’t believe in hell or divine retribution. If you ask me, the only hell worth worrying about is the suffering we inflict on other living beings. One trip to the medieval torture museum was enough to convince me that no afterlife could be worse than the misery some people endure in this lifetime. Similarly, I find it hard to imagine a heaven without wind or trees, or a small black cat asleep in a patch of afternoon sunlight. That doesn’t stop me from entertaining a few zany metaphysical theories. What’s the point of bearing witness to the mystery, if you don’t put your money on a couple of rogue horses? But I don’t pretend to have the answers, let alone the ability to coherently articulate the question.

But even if I’m wrong, and Satan’s waiting in her red convertible to take us all to the tarnation station, I would never flatter Musk by putting him in the same league as the devil. Best case scenario, he’s a sentient human footstool or volunteer hall monitor, who keeps getting shunted between the various circles of hell and is destined to spend eternity making a nuisance of himself by laughing too loudly at Ghenghis Khan’s jokes and hanging off Thatcher’s coattails.

‘If you regularly enjoy The Spinoff, and want it to continue, become a member today.’
Toby Manhire
— Editor-at-large

When we compare these notorious bedwetters to the forces of biblical evil, we’re playing straight into their PR handbook, rather than recognising them for what they are, which is a cabal of insecure mouth breathers. They want you to think they’re evil because it’s a lot more flattering than the reality. Elon Musk isn’t a nefarious Bond villain, who’ll show up on the day of judgement in an EV submersible. He’s not even Patrick Bateman. For one thing, he doesn’t have the cheekbones. He’s a garden variety loser with an emerald mine trust fund, acting out narcissistic grievances and childhood insecurities on an unprecedented geopolitical scale. He’s the spoiled cousin you always hated, who threw a tantrum every time his mother refused to buy him  more Dragonball Z cards – if that same cousin had the ability to legally confiscate your insulin. He’s made it abundantly clear he cares too much about what people think of him, and is leaning into the “supervillain” archetype because it looks better on his resume than “petulant loser.”

The bad news is that none of this makes any material difference to the world’s current political trajectory. In fact, it probably makes the situation a lot worse. There’s nothing more frightening than a billionaire with hurt feelings, who has unprecedented political influence and a list of ideological resentments burning a hole in his pocket. There’s good reason to believe he’s more volatile and unpredictable than any ordinary bigot with a hateful ideology because his only guiding principle seems to be shoring up his own power and wealth at the expense of literally everyone else. At least Satan stood for something. Musk truly puts the banal in the banality of evil.

I don’t think you’re wrong to be worrying about the end of the world. Honestly, it’s a shitshow out there. But please don’t waste your energy fretting about the four horsemen. This is an all too human problem, that needs a human solution. Either that or a well-timed meteor, leaving several of the more prestigious monkey and lizard species intact.

In the words of Doris Lessing winning the Nobel, “I’m sure you’d like some uplifting remarks of some kind.” As a part-time advice columnist for an antipodean online media organisation, I don’t pretend to know how to fix things. What I do know is that prayer won’t help, and neither will live animal sacrifices. We need some kind of urgent collective action based on solidarity and class consciousness.

But don’t flatter old Apartheid Clyde by pretending he’s anything but a business hick in Team Rocket cosplay. I think we can afford to give Satan a little more credit than that.

The campaign calling for members of the public to ‘report’ suspected Israeli soldiers holidaying in New Zealand
The campaign calling for members of the public to ‘report’ suspected Israeli soldiers holidaying in New Zealand

OPINIONPoliticsFebruary 12, 2025

Not in our name: A call for principled advocacy for Palestinian rights

The campaign calling for members of the public to ‘report’ suspected Israeli soldiers holidaying in New Zealand
The campaign calling for members of the public to ‘report’ suspected Israeli soldiers holidaying in New Zealand

Human rights advocates must uphold human dignity, rights and justice, while rejecting the discriminatory tactics we oppose, writes Taimor Hazou.

Two weeks ago the Palestinian Solidarity Network Aotearoa (PSNA) launched a campaign inviting New Zealanders to call a hotline if they suspected an Israel Defence Force (IDF) soldier that had served in Gaza was holidaying in New Zealand. The hotline was immediately criticised across the board, from  Jewish community groups to cabinet ministers to the chief human rights commissioner.

As a Palestinian New Zealander, I have spoken out against the hotline as well. While it arises from legitimate concerns, it is ultimately flawed, potentially discriminatory and counterproductive.

The goal of barring potential war criminals from entry to New Zealand is laudable and supported by many; the campaign’s execution and messaging, inexcusable. Despite warnings from community leaders and advocates advising against the hotline, PSNA leaders ignored concerns well before the public backlash.

This is not the first time PSNA leadership has dismissed the counsel of its allies. It has since refused to apologise, retract, or take accountability for the disastrous campaign. PSNA president John Minto insists “the hotline will save Palestinians lives” but has failed to explain how? Yes, some Palestinians support Minto, not for the hotline, but for his past advocacy for our cause. Which makes this latest ill-advised campaign and Minto’s stubbornness around it so disappointing.

John Minto after being pepper sprayed at a Palestinian rally. Image: Instagram

As early as February 2024, Palestinians in Aotearoa have raised legitimate concerns of encountering potential war criminals here in New Zealand. These concerns were not imaginary, as was explained to senior public servants – those in the February meeting spoke of hearing Israeli soldiers on our whenua openly boasting about committing atrocities, attempting to intimidate Arab New Zealanders. It was not the only example presented.

This unconscionable behaviour and the hurt caused has been ignored. Yet, numerous cabinet ministers have been quick and eager to denounce the potential harm to “innocent” conscripted soldiers by the hotline.

In meetings with public servants and in correspondence with the minister of immigration, we have asked: 

  • How are Israeli soldiers assessed for war crimes? 
  • Are units like the Golani Brigade – sanctioned by the UN for human rights abuses – barred from entry? 
  • If not, why not? In the absence of tangible measures to protect citizens, transparency on these issues is a reasonable demand.

The government failure to show equitable concern for the safety of its citizens, has left Muslim and Palestinian New Zealanders feeling demeaned and unheard.

Adding insult to injury, Palestinians are continually held to higher standards. A local Jewish leadership forum boasted guest speaker Colonel Yaron Simsolo, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) head of infantry doctrine. Why aren’t New Zealand Jewish leaders expected to uphold New Zealand human rights values or condemn the “settlement expansion”; the domicide of Gaza; and the attempts at ethnic cleansing of Palestine and Gaza?

Palestinian and Muslim New Zealanders feel frustrated and undervalued as human beings. Communities with lived experiences of war crimes deserve protection from the trauma of potential perpetrators roaming the whenua.

‘Help keep The Spinoff funny, smart, tall and handsome – become a member today.’
Gabi Lardies
— Staff writer

Australia requires military personnel to complete an extra visa questionnaire on their service and specifically involvement in war crimes. Canada has rejected 2,800 suspected war criminals from 2003-14, with a review finding: “domestic efforts to address war crimes and genocide are of increasing importance” and it has “obligation to end impunity”.

The Israeli visa waiver (meaning Israelis do not need to apply for a visa for visits to New Zealand shorter than three months), under these circumstances is an example of inconsistent government policy with the norms, expectations and principles of a democratic state or political parties committed to law and order.

Unfortunately, rather than focussing public attention on these systemic policy failures, the PSNA hotline resorts to targeting individuals, undermining fairness and equity.

Palestinians have been subject to the discriminatory practices of collective punishment and guilt by association. It is morally inconsistent, unreflective of our oppressed experience, and damages the credibility of the qadiyieh (cause) to employ the methods of our oppressors to achieve liberation.

We have an obligation to the past injustices of our people and to other causes to ensure our consistency.

While public sentiment is in opposition to the Gaza genocide, in Aotearoa, the public was instead moved to debate antisemitism and the ethics of targeting individuals. This is an unforgivable miscalculation by the PSNA.

Advocacy efforts should always focus on systemic policy failures and not individuals. Seasoned human rights activists, like Minto, should not be making these types of errors. 

a flyer for an activist campaign, with "genocide hotline" written in white on black background at the top and underneath "israeli soldiers are holidaying in New Zealand!" written in red and a sepia toned cropped image of a soldier in a helmet and sunglasses
The “hotline” campaign imagery (Photo: PSNA)

Effective advocacy could have demanded: 

  • equal protection for migrants from war criminals; 
  • banning military units like Netzah Yehuda, Givati and Golani Brigades; 
  • visa restrictions on military personnel of nations violating international law; 
  • transparent Canada-type policy barring war criminals.

These are meaningful actions that elevate international law, which New Zealand could emulate. This would align New Zealand with our allies, reaffirm our commitment to global order, and the international conventions our nation committed to after the sacrifices of WWII.

The goal of Palestinian advocacy is to shed light on occupation, apartheid and genocide, demanding meaningful action from the international community. Campaigns must stay focused on systemic issues, not unnecessary controversies that alienate allies.

Public advocacy requires governance, strategy, consultation, and alignment with the principles we fight for. This campaign has failed all these benchmarked standards. Public moments like these call for recalibration and reflection through ownership and leadership.

As Palestinians in Aotearoa, we must reject racism and amplify justice. As Palestinians we must demand accountability, the capacity to err and the ability to learn, of everyone but particularly of leadership purporting to advocate on our behalf.