Finance minister Nicola Willis and prime minister Christopher Luxon
Finance minister Nicola Willis and prime minister Christopher Luxon

The BulletinMarch 19, 2024

PM refuses to rule out new taxes to pay for tax cut plan

Finance minister Nicola Willis and prime minister Christopher Luxon
Finance minister Nicola Willis and prime minister Christopher Luxon

The finance minister is denying that there’s a $5.6b shortfall in paying for the government’s campaign promises, including tax cuts. At his post-cabinet press conference yesterday, the PM refused to rule out new taxes to pay for the cuts, writes Anna Rawhiti-Connell in this excerpt from The Bulletin, The Spinoff’s morning news round-up. To receive The Bulletin in full each weekday, sign up here.

PM won’t rule out new taxes

At a post-cabinet press conference described by the Herald’s Thomas Coughlan as “slightly chaotic” (paywalled), prime minister Christopher Luxon stuck with the promise of tax cuts being delivered in this year’s Budget on May 30 but would not say whether they would be the size promised in the coalition agreement and would not rule out new taxes to pay for the tax cut plan, including new taxes on working people. That was a question posed in response to a promise by Nicola Willis last year, who told the AM show in August that “[There will be] no new taxes to working people, our view is that the tax system has become unfair because the squeezed middle of everyday working people are paying higher rates of income tax.” Willis ruled out a GST hike earlier this month on the AM show.

Deputy PM agrees with shortfall assessment

As interest.co.nz’s Dan Brunskill reports Luxon said we need to wait for the Budget to see how the tax cuts look and how they might be funded. As Brunskill notes, elsewhere in the press conference, he said the tax package would be funded partly through “revenue raising measures” and partly through “savings that have been identified.” Muddying the waters is deputy prime minister Winston Peters agreeing with an assessment by Vernon Small published in the Sunday Star Times during his state of the nation speech on Sunday. It found the gap between National’s figures from August last year, and estimates now suggest there’s a $5.6b shortfall. The Herald’s assessment is slightly more favourable, suggesting there’s a $3.3b gap.

Willis holding the line

As RNZ’s Katie Scotcher reports, Willis is currently denying suggestions of a $5.6b shortfall, saying she won’t guarantee promised tax cuts will arrive in July until the policy has been discussed by the cabinet. Responding to speculation about how the Budget might look by saying cabinet needs to agree and to wait until it’s published is the government’s prerogative. Speaking to RNZ’s First Up this morning, Willis “I remain confident we can fund our tax reduction objectives in a way that’s responsible and affordable.” When asked whether the government can afford all its commitments after his state of the nation speech on Sunday, Peters replied, “our ones, yes.” The Post’s Thomas Manch has an astute read this morning on the length of Luxon’s wick in allowing Peters to raise questions about tax cut funding and make comments comparing co-governance to Nazi Germany. “How long will Luxon let this go on for? As long as Luxon wants the coalition to hold,” he writes. “This is quintessential Peters strategy,” he says.

‘It’s not the time for tax cuts’ – former Reserve Bank economist

If this is all sounding familiar, the run up to last year’s election was littered with talk of fiscal holes and wonky tax plan costings. Council of Trade Union analysis released last August suggested there was a shortfall of at least $3.3-5.2b in National’s tax and spending plans. It went both ways, with Peters claiming there was a $20b hole in the last government’s books and that public service bosses were being told to cut 10% from budgets to fund it. Three economists from across the political spectrum independently reviewed National’s figures on how much revenue the foreign buyers tax would raise and found it short by $450m. NZ First scotched that tax in its coalition agreement with National. One of the economists who made the independent assessment was former Reserve Bank economist Michael Reddell, who said yesterday, “I think many economists would take the view that we are starting with such a large fiscal deficit bequeathed to them by the Labour government that it’s not the time for tax cuts.”

Keep going!
NZ First leader Winston Peters photographed in 2017. (Photo: Phil Walter/Getty Images)
NZ First leader Winston Peters photographed in 2017. (Photo: Phil Walter/Getty Images)

The BulletinMarch 18, 2024

Peters’ Nazi comparison pushes Greens’ bad week from the headlines

NZ First leader Winston Peters photographed in 2017. (Photo: Phil Walter/Getty Images)
NZ First leader Winston Peters photographed in 2017. (Photo: Phil Walter/Getty Images)

Labour’s Chris Hipkins says New Zealand deserves better than a deputy PM who behaves ‘like a drunk uncle at a wedding’, writes Catherine McGregor in this excerpt from The Bulletin, The Spinoff’s morning news round-up. To receive The Bulletin in full each weekday, sign up here.

Co-governance and Nazism share a similar impulse, says Peters

On Saturday, New Zealand’s most mercurial politician returned from a short trip to Asia, where he held a series of serious, high-level meetings in his role as foreign minister. On Sunday, he was back in rabble-rouser mode, delivering his state of the nation speech to a packed audience of NZ First faithful. According to a report by Stuff’s Glenn McConnell, the deputy PM spent the first part of his speech attacking the previous Labour government before pivoting to culture war issues including te Tiriti and co-governance. He said the latter was pushed by people who thought “their DNA made them somehow better than others” and compared it to the ideology of Nazi Germany. Asked about it later, Peters defended the comparison, saying New Zealand’s Jewish community would “understand” what he meant. Labour’s Chris Hipkins said it was a reprehensible comment. “Kiwis deserve better than a deputy prime minister who behaves like a drunk uncle at a wedding,” he said.

Another week of bad headlines for the Greens

Before Peters’s speech, the biggest politics story of the weekend was the fallout from the Greens’ suspension of MP Darleen Tana over migrant exploitation allegations levelled at her husband. Commentators observed that the Tana news could hardly have been more badly timed for the party, coming just a day after former MP Golriz Ghahraman appeared in court on shoplifting charges. Writing in the Sunday Star-Times, Andrea Vance notes one striking similarity between the two cases: having learned of the allegations, each time the Greens waited multiple weeks before informing the public. It’s a pattern of behaviour that “signals the Greens are no longer as wedded to openness as they once were,” writes Vance. “And frankly, a disdain for the role of the media.”

MP and her bosses both have questions to answer

For Vance’s colleague Luke Malpass (paywalled), the Greens’ silence on the Tana matter is understandable given that the MP said the official complaint against her husband came out of the blue. “What is a leadership supposed to do with that – put out a press release saying someone’s spouse has an employment law hearing, which the MP says she knows nothing about and there was no suggestion that she did? No.” Tana’s failure to disclose a second Employment Relations Authority complaint is the more serious problem, Malpass says. “Sins of omission are still sins. And in politics neglecting to tell your party leader important information is most commonly viewed as lying.” The string of recent scandals raises questions about the quality of the Greens’ vetting of potential candidates, writes the Herald’s Thomas Coughlan. “There are also questions around whether the caucus needs to be read the riot act over the importance of fronting up to the party hierarchy as soon as an MP becomes aware of a potential problem.”

Labour keeps its powder dry

Meanwhile in Wairarapa, the Labour Party was wrapping up its caucus retreat. With controversy growing over the apparent $5.6 billion fiscal hole in the government’s books, it’s likely there were conversations in Masterton about whether Labour should go on the attack. So far Chris Hipkins has been content to stand back and let National dig its own hole. That’s a mistake, suggests the Sunday Star-Times’ Vernon Small (paywalled). “With this government making a wasteland of its predecessor’s reforms, Labour’s low-key approach and its reticence to defend its record is letting National off the hook”.