spinofflive
yt_portrait

ArtSeptember 4, 2019

Things I Learned at Art School: Yvonne Todd

yt_portrait

In the third instalment of Things I Learned At Art School, Megan Dunn talks to Yvonne Todd, the 2019 Arts Foundation Laureate who has received the Theresa Gattung Award for Female Arts Practitioners. Todd discusses fashion, Madonna’s aging process and what photography students never need to photograph again. 

What did you learn in art school?

After high school, I had to come to terms with the uncomfortable reality that I hadn’t achieved my potential. I had somehow ended up as an admin assistant at the Wattle Park Industrial Estate in Beach Haven. It took a couple of years to scrabble together a sense of purpose. I enrolled at Whitecliffe, which at the time was the easiest art school to get into – “write a short essay about yourself”, where I majored in photography. I learned to use a manual SLR camera, to develop film and make darkroom prints. Being able to control the focus and exposure and depth of field was a revelation.

My best work at Whitecliffe became a portfolio of images that I used to gain acceptance into the more rigorous programme at Unitec from 1994-1995. Where, with excellent teachers Allan McDonald and Dorina Jotti, I became increasingly ambitious for my work and started using medium and large format cameras and shooting with studio lighting. I learned the value of production, the care required to achieve certain results. By the second half of the first year I was orchestrating these lavish shoots, with carefully planned costumes, props, and locations. After Unitec, the plan was to show my ‘book of stills’ to a few magazine art directors and get lots of exciting paid work shooting editorials. But it didn’t play out like that.

Elam had a certain cachet that I thought would look good on my CV, so I applied for higher entry and started in third year. By this level, students were no longer cosseted and pretty much left to work things out for themselves. This suited me. I had worked autonomously for a few years. I avoided crit sessions and spent my time tootling around, getting Mike Disfarmer and Tretchikoff books out of the library, dutifully attending studio class but really just doing my own thing.

‘Angsty Self-Portrait from first year at Unitec’, Yvonne Todd, 1994.

What did you want to do at the start of your photography career?

I wanted to shoot exciting glamorous stuff like fashion and interesting documentary assignments. I always envisaged my work being in magazines. It’s like when you are a child and you imagine that you’re going to work in an office when you grow up. At Unitec I learnt that I could manipulate the look of the photos. I had this control over what I was doing, and I could make photos look like they were from a certain time period by using lighting and styling. My portfolio was filled with Bettie Page styled shoots but that’s not what magazines and art directors were looking for in 1996.

Most art directors now use Getty images and the big photo libraries. But back then you could actually ring art directors and trot in with your book and chat to them, that doesn’t happen now, they’re too busy for a start. It wasn’t a digital age, things took longer, photographers still shot on film.

I did an early fashion shoot for Pavement. When that was published, I was convinced that I’d get lots of phone-calls requesting my genius. I was quite confused that didn’t happen. I embarked on a wedding photography business with my friend and fellow student from Unitec, Geoffrey Heath. We had no idea of what to charge and failed to market ourselves aggressively, so our profits were minimal. I also started exhibiting on a modest scale, at artist-run spaces and this led to bigger institutional group shows and reviews.

Fashion photography is an important thread. In the mid-2000s you started buying elaborate designer costumes, often owned by celebrities, and that has now morphed into your own costume design and creation.

Yes, and I like looking at fashion photography especially the big budget creatively challenging productions from Vogue Italia. I like conceptual fashion. Some of my favourite designers are the more avant-garde Japanese designers like Comme des Garçons. I appreciate their work because in my everyday experience I’m surrounded by middle of the road mall type shops. Things beyond the everyday are interesting. I need spontaneity in my life and art.

Detail: ‘Morka’, Yvonne Todd, 2017.

Do you have a recent favourite photo?

From the last few years, Morka. I designed her dress and round headpiece. It was just such a nutty outfit and I really liked her expression. Humour’s an important aspect of my work.

Why as a society do you think we’re so hooked on women and fashion?

There’s endless ways of dressing someone. And you can borrow from different historical periods. It’s never-ending, there’s no limit to what you can create. I like the Sixties, the space-age era, but I don’t want my works to be faithful reproductions, I don’t see the point of that. In an essay the American author, David Sedaris talked about being nostalgic for the 1930s, an era that he wasn’t born in. So, it’s nostalgic for a time we didn’t experience, that’s a potent draw. In my formative years I was also inspired by Warhol, his films and his photography. I found his entourage of superstars fascinating. His characters were very image based. Each woman has a defining physical characteristic. So, I think reading about the Warhol superstars as a teenager, must have had some sort of profound life-long effect.

Your cast of women are like an entourage, aren’t they?

Sometimes I imagine that I’m an elderly woman on the verge of death and I wake up in a room and they’re all there. But then I saw this movie Youth starring Michael Caine and Harvey Keitel and that happens to one of the characters. He’s a film director and at the end, he’s surrounded by all the female characters from his movies. I thought, “That was my idea!”

That segues nicely into my next question: what do you think of Madonna’s aging process?

She’s not quietly withdrawing from public life. She’s making us take notice and that’s the opposite of how women are expected to age. So, her aging is provocative, there’s something defiant about it which I like. In the media it’s like we’re finally allowing women to be viewed in ways that they haven’t been allowed to be viewed before.

‘Chlora’, Yvonne Todd, 2001.

What is the worst criticism you’ve faced so far?

In 2002, after the inaugural Walters Prize finalists were announced, there was a blustering take-down of the finalists’ work, mine in particular, by a venerable Auckland art critic in the Sunday Star Times. It was dramatically titled ‘A Prize Sham’ with a large reproduction of one of my photos. It wasn’t that it was the worst criticism of my work; it was my inability to respond, my lack of agency. I saw my work through his eyes – he described it as ‘timid’ and felt totally deflated. All the positive things were eclipsed by this overwrought and rather poorly researched opinion piece.

In his essay, Sons and Lovers, critic Anthony Byrt says, “Todd’s work are a psycho-sexual form of self-portraiture” and that “Todd is the monster living inside her own labyrinth”. Comments?

It’s a good quote. I do see my photographs as self-portraits. I feel like me and the art are entwined. Art is like an extra appendage, a third arm or something.

Your survey Creamy Psychology opened at City Gallery Wellington in 2014. Did the survey change how you viewed your work?

I got pregnant with my first child not long afterwards, so I didn’t have a lot of time to process the show because I was straight into the next thing, which really was life-changing. Filling a gallery with flat, two-dimensional photographic works could have been a bit repetitive, but the survey was done really well: there was the sources room, the costumes were included, etc.

Installation detail: Creamy Psychology, City Gallery Wellington, 2014.

Have your photos changed since?

Maybe they’re not quite as heavy. There’s more playfulness and I don’t second guess myself like I used to. In the beginning, I found the art world quite terrifying. I think that’s why I was so bummed out by the early criticism around the Walters Prize because I was a newcomer. I felt that power balance for a long time, but you have to stop because otherwise, you won’t make anything. You get ‘analysis paralysis’, which as a photography lecturer I saw a fair bit of.

You made a recent video about your time teaching at Unitec.

I taught at Unitec from 2011-2016. I had a shared office with an iMac computer. Every day, I’d take a couple of low-res snaps of myself on the photo booth. It was usually during my lunch break, that’s why I’m shoveling a fork into my mouth in quite a few of the photos. During part of that time, Unitec was going through this very controversial restructuring, staff were facing redundancy.

I rediscovered the photos recently and as I flipped through them there was a sense of animation. I thought I could put this on a timeline with a soundtrack, it could be a video and I could put some cheesy effects in here and there.

I shot the photos for my own personal amusement, never thinking I would show them in a gallery yet there’s a real sense of performance in the video. It starts off quite optimistic and silly, but as time moves on it becomes more depressing.

When I did my Masters in Creative Writing, I wrote post-modern fairy tales and a male tutor looked at me wearily and said, “there’s always one”. Likewise, there’s always going to be a young female art student who’s doing dress-ups in some way.

I made a list of things that never need to be photographed by a photography student again.

  • Fairy tales
  • Girls wearing slip dresses or nighties holding lilies in graveyards
  • Girls in bathtubs
  • Friends smoking weed, especially from bongs
  • People and their geegaw collections
  • Abandoned/derelict houses
  • Underwater portraits
  • Childhood memories and nostalgia (dolls in particular)
  • Flowers
  • Angsty self-portraits (i.e. hunched in the corner of a room looking despondent).

This is the stuff I saw when I was a teacher and I did some of this when I was a student.

We’ve all been there. Tell me about Isabella from the new show. 

I had an idea to shoot a woman in a leather heavy metal-inspired ensemble. Isabella was recommended to me by her agency and then I found out she’s one of the top models in New Zealand. And she’s also an opera singer of some renown. Years ago, I read this great description of heavy metal as ‘a combination of Wagnerian opera and satanism.’ The best images just fall into place when you’re not trying to make something happen. Isabella is one of those.

I was looking at the Cosmopolitan covers that American photographer, Francesco Scavullo, shot in the eighties and nineties. They’re formulaic, everyone’s in a similar pose, big hair and tits and sultry pouts, but they’re really good. He’s got a real knack for the lighting and the posing. I wanted to replicate that glamorous quality in the Isabella photo. It almost looks like an album cover or an image that has a specific purpose, that’s been designed to reach a mass market.

‘Isabella’, Yvonne Todd, 2019.

How do you create something iconic that’s not a cliché?

The idea of familiarity is important. I often say, I want my images to look like they have been around, as if they’ve always been part of the visual landscape. I like to work with clichés and photographic tropes. I’m interested in advertising imagery. How do you create a connection? What are we looking for, what do we want?

Photography wants to be taken seriously as an art form, but I don’t care if it is or isn’t. I want to say to photography, don’t be so needy, don’t be so insecure. Get over yourself about the fact that you’re not painting or sculpture, it’s okay. That debate’s been going for a long time. We can all decide that photography is a valid art form and move on.

What’s the one thing you couldn’t live without…

My sense of the ridiculous.

 

Modern Independent Thinking at McLeavey Gallery, Wellington, runs September 4 -28, 2019.

Read another recent interview with Yvonne Todd on her 2019 Arts Foundation Laureate here. 

Previously:

Things I Learned at Art School: Edith Amituanai

Things I Learned at Art School: Simon Denny

Keep going!
Author Paula Morris takes a bus ride to experience ‘McCahon’s Auckland.’ Photo: Tom Moody.
Author Paula Morris takes a bus ride to experience ‘McCahon’s Auckland.’ Photo: Tom Moody.

ArtAugust 31, 2019

The dank and magical house where Colin McCahon lived

Author Paula Morris takes a bus ride to experience ‘McCahon’s Auckland.’ Photo: Tom Moody.
Author Paula Morris takes a bus ride to experience ‘McCahon’s Auckland.’ Photo: Tom Moody.

To mark the centenary of Colin McCahon’s birth, a weekend of events in August included a bus ride to experience ‘McCahon’s Auckland’ and an ‘open home’ at the McCahon House Museum. Paula Morris takes the trip. Buckle up. 

The first bus to Titirangi leaves at nine AM on Saturday and there’s a certain giggly excitement among the clipboard-bearing volunteers outside the Art Gallery and the passengers wandering up. We’re on a school trip, wearing mufti: that’s how it feels. Someone is late and holds up the bus. I already feel hungry, but have no packed lunch – a mistake, I soon realise, as my ticket for a bus back isn’t until 1:30.

The bus itself is small. Most of us look over 50 apart from two children who have been lured or coerced into coming, the way my brother and I were taken to Palmers with the promise of a playground and/or a sausage sizzle. One of the passengers may be Graeme Burgess, the heritage architect who worked on the conservation plan for the Colin McCahon House Museum and Artist Residency. My husband, Tom Moody, is hustled into the front seat so he can take photos. I sit near the back in a single-seat, wondering if I can just hide there for the day. I often like drives more than destinations.

‘McCahon’s Auckland’ bus tour with guides Sir Bob Harvey and Auckland Art Gallery’s Senior Curator, Ron Brownson. Photo: Tom Moody.

I grew up in West Auckland, and had piano lessons on Saturday mornings in Titirangi. In the 70s my mother liked to drag us all there to visit artist studios and look at brown pottery or copper plaques. (I inherited the copper plaque.) These days I go there en route to Karekare, or to have coffee at Deco, or to spend a weekend at Going West. But I’ve never caught a bus there in my life.

We’re on a bus because that’s how Colin McCahon travelled home for seven years, starting in 1953. He was working at the Auckland City Art Gallery and living in Titirangi. The bus ride then took almost an hour and a half, followed by a two kilometre walk down unlit gravel roads to the small house near French Bay, the first home that he and his wife ever owned.

It’s Colin McCahon’s centenary, which feels implausible: was he really born just after World War I? He grew up in the South Island and attended art school in Dunedin in the 30s, where he met fellow artist Anne Hamblett. She was four years older than him, and one of the ‘superior’ girls, as he said. After graduating Anne set up a studio with other artists, including McCahon. Her parents sent her to teaching college but she skipped classes. She refused multiple offers of marriage from McCahon, but he persisted, giving her a second-hand bracelet set with moonstones instead of an engagement ring.

Colin and Anne McCahon circa 1950s at French Bay. photo: Barry Miller.

They married in 1942, when he was 23; he’d been rejected for military service, and worked in factories, as a fruitpicker, as a labourer, or harvesting tobacco. Their wedding picture looks wartime and low-key, Anne in a dark suit and flat shoes. The 40s were beyond austere for them – four children, seasonal work, lots of moving around and forced separations. McCahon’s artistic career burgeoned but Anne stepped away from hers: she had children to feed and clothe. Anne could make a little money from illustration work for the School Journal, but she exhibited a painting for the last time in 1945.

They moved north to Auckland in 1953 because McCahon thought he had a job at the Auckland City Art Gallery. He did not. He worked there as a cleaner and then a temporary attendant until securing a permanent job, organising exhibitions and writing catalogue essays the following year. Titirangi in those days was the ‘sylvan slum’, said historian E. H. McCormick. The McCahons bought 67 Otitori Bay Road because it was cheap – a small bach at the bottom of a steep path, cloistered by bush, with an outside toilet.

McCahon House Museum. Photo: Tom Moody.

The house was dank, its rooms tiny. But at last McCahon had a job and a house, and despite the full-time work in the city, long commutes and endless building and gardening projects at home, the Titirangi years were intensely productive for him. Peter Simpson has written a book called Colin McCahon: The Titirangi Years on precisely this subject. Our copy is signed to ‘Tom and Rachel’, because Peter sometimes forgets my name.

Our guides on the ‘McCahon’s Auckland’ bus trip are curator Ron Brownson, who tells us art-related things, and former mayor Sir Bob Harvey, King of the West, who tells us history and gossip. Sir Bob asks us to imagine it’s a Friday night in April 1956, in a ‘dreary kind of Auckland’. Luxford is our mayor; Holland is prime minister. We must pretend that the bus rattles; that it has a wooden floor; that the male passengers are smoking; that everyone is wearing a hat. Auckland has no motorways. The American army had built a concrete road past Western Springs, where they had a camp in World War II, but their offer to extend it was refused by the New Zealand government. In 1956, all street lights in Auckland are turned off at midnight.

Colin McCahon, Kauri 1953, Courtesy of BNZ and McCahon Research and Publication Trust.

Colin McCahon would be sitting with his TEAL bag at his feet (he’d had a commission from them in 1952, but the airline didn’t like the painting: later they sawed it up and made it into a crate.) In his bag: cheap sherry. The West was dry, and the last grog shop was on K Road. McCahon drank a lot. He would have stayed in the city, says Sir Bob, until the pubs shut at six PM, so it might be eight before he arrived home, much later if the gallery had an event. There were no street lights at all on his road in Titirangi.

I’m glad we’re in a non-smoking bus, and not obliged to wear hats. I’m also absorbed by the commentary, traded between Ron and Sir Bob, sharing one mic and passing around laminated prints of McCahon paintings. In all the decades I’ve sped past St Joseph’s Catholic Church in Grey Lynn, I’ve never spotted the stained-glass windows by Milan Mrkusich. Now I want to visit the church to see them and his murals up close. I want to take another look at the brick police station in New Lynn, and the brick sculptures by Peter Lange.

St Joseph’s Catholic Church, Grey Lynn; Milan Mrkusich stained glass windows. Photo: Tom Moody.

Sir Bob knows the layers of places, the names of old theatres and roads, the locations of long-gone cage lifts and market gardens. He tells us about the criminal activities of his uncle and John Banks’ father, and about his own youthful plan – unsuccessful – to break into the zoo and ride a llama. He tells us about the mysterious grave of a ‘Danish princess’ in St Ninian’s churchyard, opposite the Hollywood cinema in Avondale – another place I want to visit again – and, more controversially, claims that Lynn Mall is the world’s oldest shopping mall, and that the Portage Road link between the Whau River and the Manukau is the narrowest part of New Zealand. (When we pass election hoardings, he gives his opinions on the candidates – ‘wonderful fellow’, ‘evil devil’, and ‘dull, but he’ll probably win’.)

The bus passes the McCahon house to do a U-turn at French Bay, where the tide is in and water looks glossy and serene. The road by the house itself is narrow, a muddy bank high on the opposite side, engorged with tree roots. A shed-like garage perches at street level, currently housing about ten chairs (I forget to count) where a ten-minute film on McCahon screens. McCahon painted here as well as inside the house. The family had no car.

Evidence of 2017 McCahon House Short Stay by John Reynolds. Photo: Tom Moody.

In town it was sunny but here in Titirangi it’s drizzling. Large umbrellas are propped against the side of the shed. The winding path down is slippery. The house – red boards, tin roof – looks like a shanty that’s rolled down the hill and settled in a gully of bush. I think about Anne, with four children and no car, trudging up an unsealed road to get to the nearest place that sold groceries. Peter Simpson says the house is a ‘few minutes’ walk from Titirangi village; McCahon said it was about ten minutes’ walk. He must have been talking about downhill. It’d be closer to half an hour uphill with small children in tow. Not that there was much money for groceries. “For the first month,” McCahon wrote, “we lived almost entirely on a diet of potatoes, parsley, and bags of rock-cakes given by a kind and ancient aunt”. Anne was resourceful, a good cook and sewer. A lot of friends visited – Charles Brasch, John Caselberg, Pat Hanly – to talk to her and McCahon, hanging out on their non-code wooden deck. She cooked for them all.

McCahon House Museum. Photo: Supplied

McCahon made many improvements and additions to the house, including a bathroom downstairs, but it remained Spartan and miniature in scale. Some tour-goers are horrified by the sleeping arrangements for the children, under the deck – wooden bunks open to the elements – and talk about little else. Forget the McCahon paintings on display in the house: have you seen the bunk beds? Things were different then, someone says. New Zealanders were hardier, their children less spoiled. Everyone was still worried about the polio epidemic. Sleeping in the fresh air was seen as healthy. In the winter, a volunteer says, they hung up a blanket to keep the rain out. In the summer, I presume, they were all savaged by mosquitoes. Later the two boys moved into the small room under McCahon’s garage studio. It had a clay floor.

‘The bunk beds’, McCahon House Museum. Photo: Tom Moody.

The artist residency studio sprawls to the left of the property, a high-ceilinged living area, with two bedrooms and (flash) bathrooms. The studio itself is big, and this weekend works by past residents are displayed on one wall. There we can have a glass of sherry and pick a rock cake from a tin. The high ceilings of the residency and its studio are nothing like the house: it’s a cathedral built next to an old chapel. It must have been cold and damp in that chapel.

Facsimile copy of McCahon family mural portrait amongst the trees and birds of Titirangi. Originally painted by Anne and Colin McCahon and children circa 1953, this reproduction in-situ dining room at MCahon House Museum. Photo: Tom Moody.

We’re there for hours. There’s much to see hidden behind sliding compartments in the house – photos, letters, context – but more than five people make any room feel crowded. The paintings get bumped. There are four on loan for this special weekend only. We’ve already seen them in laminated form on the bus; we’ve also seen them (again, laminated) on the nature walk. Tom and I take the first walk of the day, at ten, borrowing one of the big umbrellas. Because of the rāhui in the Waitakere ranges right now, our walk can’t go far, but we can look at the harbour (see: Manukau 3, 1954), squint at the trees (see: Titirangi, 1956/57), and cradle kauri seeds and cones (see: Kauri, 1953). On the bus trip home that afternoon, Sir Bob brandishes a laminated Towards Auckland (1953) when we crest the ridge, exhorting us to see the distant city as McCahon did.

One of the walk guides asks me about my first encounter with a McCahon painting. It was 1982, my first year at the University of Auckland. One lunchtime my friend Hamish Coney and I walked through Albert Park to the Art Gallery. I’d been to the gallery before, but not often. Our family was more into the Museum, where there was a mummy, a moa, and a stuffed elephant. Hamish wanted to show me something by McCahon, and I think it was Here I Give Thanks to Mondrian, painted in 1961, not long after he and Anne moved the family into central Auckland, to Partridge Street in Arch Hill.

Hamish leapt about, enthusing, as he still does. I liked the scrawl of words, the depth and intensity of the shapes. Back then, in callow youth, I don’t think I would have responded to the tree paintings, or the stark landscapes, say, in the same way. We no doubt wandered the whole exhibition, but this is the painting I remember. McCahon was the first New Zealand artist to infiltrate my idiot teenage consciousness. I didn’t know he was almost at the end of his painting life, about to be overtaken by dementia. His funeral, in 1987, was held at St Joseph’s Church in Grey Lynn.

Gramophone; McCahon House Museum. Photo: Tom Moody.

We watch the ten-minute film twice, and then loll in the residency’s living area, scrounging a muffin from a kind volunteer, and eavesdropping. Victoria, one of the McCahon’s children, calls in: she is no-nonsense, reminding people that 50 years ago the bush around the house wasn’t so tall and overwhelming. It wasn’t that dark, she says.

The bus trip home is more subdued. The driver is worried that every bus out was full, but our return bus has empty seats: this means the next and final bus back will be over-subscribed, sure to be overwhelmed by passengers desperate to escape Otitori Bay Road before dark. “They can catch an Uber,” someone says, and we’re off. Our tour guides, worn out with all the back-and-forths into town, make sporadic commentary. We don’t stick to the Great North Road this time, but sneak onto the motorway – at least, I think so, because I doze off somewhere around the Bunnings in New Lynn. When I wake I think of what Sir Bob said about how quiet the city was in the 50s, because there was much less traffic. When a kauri dam broke in the ranges, he said, you could hear it downtown.

 

McCahon House Museum. Photo: Tom Moody.

We’re asked to complete feedback forms, to help make a case for more Art Bus trips. In my view, it should run and run: tourists should be dragged off the double-decker that takes them to One Tree Hill and St Luke’s Shopping Mall and hustled onto the Art Bus. Even if there are no McCahon paintings in situ at the house, they could be shown the bunk beds, and the trees, and see how great things can come from very small places.

Note: Ron Brownson is the co-curator of A Place to Paint: Colin McCahon in Auckland currently showing at Auckland Art Gallery Toi o Tamaki until the end of January 2020.