DSC_4347

ArtMay 30, 2020

In the garden – and with the PM – with artist John Ward Knox

DSC_4347

In a photo essay by Justin Spiers and interview with Spinoff art editor Mark Amery, artist John Ward Knox introduces his Karitāne home and garden, and various projects – bees, pond, a portrait on silk of the prime minister from a live sitting. Ward Knox also answers one of this year’s biggest mysteries: the origins of the flame paint job on the wall behind David Parker in his lockdown Zoom meetings. 

Where are you, John?

Karitāne, about half an hour drive north of Dunedin. It’s a little fishing village, a really lovely place. I’m very lucky. The house I’m in my mum [sculptor and community activist Barbara Ward] bought and I’m renting it off her until I can afford to buy it.

There is just a paper road between my property and the estuary – three metres of grass, a bank and then you’re in there, it’s really magical. I do a bit of floundering down there to add some protein to the diet.

You grew up in Grey Lynn, went to Elam Art School in Auckland and your art dealers are in Sydney, Auckland and Wellington. So why now Dunedin?

There’s a whole lot I’m still unravelling about why I’ve stayed here. I arrived as the 2015 Frances Hodgkins Fellow through the university and I was more in a professional art mode then. Going to everything and on the classic art school trajectory of just stepping up the ladder in terms of opportunities.

In Dunedin I was forced to reevaluate a lot of where I was coming from, because I realised a lot of my intention was inherited through art school tuition. Due to the small size of the place, my friend bubble expanded to encompass a lot more breadth of class and age than it had in Auckland. New interactions started a really healthy cavalcade of realisations that are about giving myself new foundations, built from a series of choices rather than inherited paths. That might sound a bit abstract, but Dunedin has allowed me a lot more space and to slow down considerably. The chasing of opportunities led to an internal burnout. I never really crashed and burned per se, but I started to realise there was something I needed to address in my own practice, which I’ve slowly started to do.

You’ve still got three art dealers – that’s a blessing, but it’s not a small number to satisfy!

Good point. When people have invested in your practice – like the dealers and people who have bought my art – they all have a vested interest in the continuation of the trajectory you’re on. But I think I’m finding a way to build those new foundations while keeping the superstructure I’m already invested in stable.

Speaking of building, I see you’ve been building a garden.

I’ve become much more interested in ecologies, and straight away that means I’m working on my garden. It starts from the ground up. When I inherited it it was just a flat section of grass. As well as growing food I’m trying to turn this patch into an ecologically healthy zone for all of the invertebrates that I can, from the bottom of the food chain moving up. I’ve reappraised the place of the lawn; how you can increase the breadth of health of insect life and therefore the whole strata of life within your own patch. That means allowing decay, essentially. I put a sign out on my front yard saying “green waste wanted” and people started trucking in all sorts of crap, to be honest. I’ve been chopping it up and laying it around this pond that I’ve built, letting it decompose and turn into soil over time.

I’ve been learning on the go. I’ve seen this huge growth in insects and birds, and with the pond I’ve got frogs now. I really liked the idea of reading in bed with the window open listening to them. That’s become really important to me – regrounding myself in an ecological rather than economic mindset. I did some gardening as a child but I never thought of building the soil or the soil as a repository of health, like essentially a battery for your future energy as a consumer of what comes out of it.

Has it changed the art you make? Where does that fit in?

I’ve really struggled with reconciling that ecological methodology with that economic reality. But in a lot of my works I was always trying to create a very delicate sense of balance and beauty; almost a suspension of belief, where things seem incredibly poised while at the same time being completely concrete. I can still do that but with a more ecological mindset. I’m more conscious of the production chain and where the materials are coming from. Most of my art is now coming from recycled or reused materials.

Your work has always been distinctive to me in its quiet awareness of surface, detail and material, in a way that’s treating the ideas with a gentleness.  The chess set – is that your studio set-up?

That’s my garage, that’s where I do my dirty works. Where I can make lots of dust and whatnot. The chess set was something I was doing over lockdown. Objectspace in Auckland [a public gallery] contacted me as part of their Maker series, where they wanted to give people the opportunity to learn how to do things with stuff they had lying around.

The wood is all from the legs of an old table and the pieces are fishing sinkers, old tool bits, and some fake pearls I had lying around. Upcycling, I guess, creating something really beautiful that will last a lifetime.

I think I’ve moved away from sculpture with “dangerous tactile poise” towards a more hands-on appreciation of touch and warmth. Objects that are imbued with time and patience. I really want to make sculptures that are rewarding to touch, and have the warmth of the maker in. I’ve always wanted to make magic with my work, which is not a sleight-of-hand trickery, but to show the magic that exists in objects naturally. To be able to transpose the beauty I see in something into an object.

Which brings us to bees. I interviewed the artist Anne Noble recently, a fellow beekeeper. She credits that practice with having a closer participatory involvement with and attention to nature.

That came out of economic hardship. I had a van that blew up. A friend of mine in Auckland who has a beekeeping operation got in touch saying, “come work with me and my bees, I have an old car I’ll throw your way”. It turned out to be an amazing experience. I enjoyed the labour but also that bees produce an excess, you’re not harming them at all. He threw in a trailer and a couple of hives for me.

I don’t think of them so much as a resource. I do take a little bit of honey but not really very much; it’s more one more ecological tier in the garden, a healthy thing to have around. The neighbours appreciate them and they are just a fantastic thing to have around and care for. And the honey’s delicious.

You’ve got a fairly active Instagram account, posting short video and images you’ve taken of nature around you close up, studying their movement and texture. I’ve seen great video work of yours in a similar vein at Robert Heald Gallery before. Is this all one and the same?

It’s got its own stream going, its own frame. Like the video works like a snapshot or little chunk of time, but giving it to people in quite an intimate setting, because people are really quite connected to their phones. In the same way a book has access to a person’s imagination. Except there’s a lot of visual chatter on a phone. Every day or so I’ll post a short video of a slow moment of something I’ve come across. A moment of poise, or an appreciation of touch or texture; something that’s good to give to people and a reminder, in a soft way, of the tactility of the world outside the device they’re encountering it on. It’s often very textural.

What are you working on at the moment? 

The paper title for a show at Darren Knight Gallery (Sydney, in July) is Surface Tension. Paintings and sculpture. I had lined up to go to Castlemaine in April to do some bronze casting, with the backbone of my show some very small bronzes. The methodology came from a work I showed at Ivan Anthony’s in Auckland, which was a small wooden sculpture I’d done a yakisugi treatment on. That’s a Japanese technique of burning the wood to preserve it, which gives a beautiful patina. It was a sculptural section of somebody’s neck, which shares with my painting the idea that I just show a cropped segment of information which leaves out the primary narrative elements in the scene so, as a viewer, you come to it with less direction and more freedom. So hopefully you have a more intimate and personal connection. I’ve got this idea to make three-dimensional versions of those paintings, wooden sculptural snapshots. Something that has all the texture and life of a narrative scene without the didactic elements. I’m planning to show those and paintings.

Next year with Robert Heald in Wellington I’m going to have the biggest painting show I’ve ever done, somewhere in the region of 40 dual-layer paintings. I paint on silk, which is transparent, and with a black oil paint. That allows you to see through the material most clearly where I have painted, as the pigment absorbs the light. You see through the shadows to the screen behind. I suspend one painting in front of another. A visual shift happens.

The exhibition will feature a short text describing a sound. Each of the works will consist of two paintings, depicting a person’s hands as they sign the word or words of some of the text. It will be a show that caters to the deaf community, but one that will not be limited to this community. I want to describe something fleeting and something easy to take for granted. I will need to liaise with a representative from Deaf Aotearoa Otago to ensure that my intention is not misguided or ill thought through.

That’s my little painting studio setup. What I’ve got going on is an entry into the Archibald [a prestigious annual Australian portrait award], with a triple-layer silk work of the prime minister. I was lucky enough to meet up with her in February or March, and take some photographs in her home in preparation – because you have to have a live sitting for this award. Unfortunately I’m not very good at multitasking: I was drawing quite poorly and making quite poor conversation as well, turning up in my Dunedin clothes hot and bothered and sweaty. So hopefully this will turn out beautifully and I will be vindicated or redeemed!

Which brings us to a chance to solve a media mystery – the location of an image that has amused people over lockdown. It’s of minister David Parker’s Zoom room with a painted hot flame frieze running up the wall. Funnily, The Spinoff piece speculated that it was “very Dunedin”. But in fact it’s Grey Lynn in Auckland, yes?

That’s my childhood bedroom he’s sitting in. [David Parker is John’s mother’s partner.] I must have been 10 or something and my parents allowed both my sister and I to choose the colours of our rooms. I chose orange and red with flames in the corners. My father [artist and musician Chris Knox] diligently painted that for me.

Before that it had been a dinosaur mural I’d painted on the wall myself. A little part of me is sad that it wasn’t a swamp scene behind David Parker in those meetings. I think if you’d asked me at the time whether country-altering decisions were going to be made in that room I would have said, “why yes, they will!”

John Ward Knox shows at Sydney’s Darren Knight Gallery from July 25. The Archibald Prize is held annually at the Art Gallery of New South Wales and has been delayed until later this year, dates to be announced.

Keep going!
Jacinda Ardern announces culture funding at  Te Papa. (Photo by Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images)
Jacinda Ardern announces culture funding at Te Papa. (Photo by Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images)

OPINIONPoliticsMay 29, 2020

Now is the time to invest in the creative arts

Jacinda Ardern announces culture funding at  Te Papa. (Photo by Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images)
Jacinda Ardern announces culture funding at Te Papa. (Photo by Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images)

The prime minister yesterday announced a package including $25m to ‘provide artists whose projects are funded by Creative NZ with jobs.’ An even more substantial investment in the creative arts will help drive our post-Covid recovery, argues Paul Millar.

When Covid-19 forced the postponement of the popular international literary festival WORD Christchurch, director Rachael King turned disappointment into an opportunity “to do something different” by focusing on New Zealand books and writers and giving them “the limelight they deserve”.

It was an astute move given the reported boom in post-lockdown sales of New Zealand books.  But then King – herself a talented novelist – does have experience in pivoting promptly in response to a crisis. Following Canterbury’s earthquakes she expanded WORD’s biennial festival into an ongoing events series that grows more dynamic year by year.

Many others also responded creatively to the earthquakes’ challenges. Gapfiller, Life in Vacant Spaces and the Festival of Transitional Architecture captured imaginations and instilled hope. The Christchurch Art Gallery, the Christchurch Symphony Orchestra and the Court Theatre proved equally flexible and inventive. As the then-director of the Christchurch Art Gallery Jenny Harper put it, “Art has shown itself to be nimble and agile and able to cement a feeling of regeneration.” Christchurch earned its place on Lonely Planet’s 2013 list of the world’s top 10 cities for its mix of “Kiwi inventiveness, creativity and resilience“.

That mix is also embedded in the city’s new Toi Ō Tautahi – Arts and Creativity Strategy, which sees the creative arts as being “about bringing wider benefits to the city—improving people’s wellbeing, sense of identity and connectivity, activating and bringing life to the city, attracting visitors and boosting the economy”. This strategy recognises “the role the arts and creative sector have and can play in healing, connecting communities and finding innovative solutions to a range of issues”.

There are excellent reasons to make this strategy, or something like it, Aotearoa New Zealand’s manifesto for creativity in the post-Covid world. The Ministry for Culture and Heritage reports that, “Economically, our cultural institutions, organisations, artists and creative minds make a significant contribution to our economy, with GDP of more than $11 billion before the Covid-19 pandemic.”

Susan Bidwell’s review of the international literature on “the arts in health” finds ample evidence “from both quantitative and qualitative studies that participating in creative arts can result in significant benefits to psychosocial health, including improved self-esteem, confidence, self-efficacy, improved social connections, and overall quality of life”. The historian and biographer Michael King wrote that “literature is one of the few things that makes sense of life, when life itself does not…. It is our writers more than anyone else who have been asking and answering questions about who we are and where we belong.”

Our children’s creativity is one of the first things we celebrate. The world must contain millions of scrapbooks of pre-school paintings collected by proud parents, and there are probably enough videos uploaded of children singing, dancing, acting and playing instruments to burn out a YouTube server farm. Some of these children go on to become students at the University of Canterbury’s Ilam School of Fine Arts and School of Music. Watching them grow as artists is tremendously rewarding, and a testament to the commitment of the academics training them. There are talented young artists like these right across the country.

Many will have something extra, not just talent, but originality, willpower, dedication, a tremendous capacity for hard work, and the courage to take risks. If they become successful artists they will have learned to be entrepreneurial, resilient, passionate, full of self-belief, and able to cope with disruption. They will persevere in the knowledge that success isn’t guaranteed, and that their next show might be their last. Their work will promote wellbeing, create a sense of community, contribute substantially to the economy, and, as a form of cultural capital, will have the capacity to enhance our reputation on the world stage.

The Millennium Sculpture In Cathedral Square, Christchurch (Photo: Eye Ubiquitous/Universal Images Group via Getty Images)

Artists want to make art, so let’s imagine ways to move beyond the existing structures and support them to produce work that also aids our recovery and enhances our wellbeing. What if we funded the NZSO, or one of our other orchestras, to base itself in Queenstown for a month in the ski season, and marketed vacation packages that included excellent skiing, fine dining, spectacular scenery, and evening concerts by world-class performers? What if kapa haka groups, theatre companies, comedians, musicians, and dancers were funded to travel to every town and city in New Zealand, and take the best of our creative arts to the regions? What if, as our borders slowly open, we market high-end art tours through the nation, stopping at galleries and craft workshops big and small, with artist talks along the way?

What if artists were funded to give master classes, public talks, studio and gallery tours? What if film makers and creative writers were supported to find ways to tell our Covid stories, document our challenges and triumphs, help make sense of life in the era of the pandemic, and ask and answer questions about who we are and where we belong? Start-ups such as small artist-run galleries were an important part of Christchurch’s post-quake period of creativity, with University of Canterbury Fine Arts graduates involved in a number of ventures like the Dog Park Art Project Space. With Covid predicted to impact negatively on prospects for young people entering the workforce, would support for young artists to develop creative projects be a better option than expecting them to wait for work on a jobseekers benefit? These are some of the ways we might further leverage the immense taonga that is our creative arts sector to drive recovery while supporting artists.

I am heartened that the creative arts is an area where central government has indicated a determination to lead. The support package in the 2020 budget is so the arts can “focus on the recovery, regeneration and revitalisation of the cultural sector”. The rationale for such a focus is encouraging: “The arts, heritage and cultural sector is central to the nation’s recovery and will underpin the new post Covid-19 world providing us with a legacy of stories for our future. This sector supports and reflects who we are as New Zealanders, binds communities together and brings our stories to the New Zealand and world stage.”

It is also heartening that the minister for arts, culture and heritage is the prime minister, Jacinda Ardern, supported by ministers Grant Robertson and Carmel Sepuloni. It has always been the case that meaningful support for the arts in New Zealand has depended on a few rare politicians with vision and mana. After the second world war, as part of the country’s healing, Labour prime minister Peter Fraser personally oversaw the establishment of the National Orchestra, which became the NZSO, and established the New Zealand Literary Fund. In the 1970s National MP Allan Highet, our first Minister for the Arts, founded the National Youth Orchestra and the New Zealand Film Commission and actively supported the Symphony Orchestra, the Royal New Zealand Ballet, and the Arts Council.

I feel confident that with visionary investment our artists and creative industries can play a leading role in hastening our recovery, economically, socially and culturally. But for that support to be meaningful, I think it needs to build upon the just-announced funding to help the arts “get back on their feet”, with a focus on the sorts of innovation I’ve outlined above. I’d hope that such investment would be widely and evenly distributed, with every region benefitting, given that all parts of Aotearoa New Zealand have produced great artists (our Booker Prize winners, Keri Hulme and Eleanor Catton, come from the South Island).

The international impact of artists like Kiri Te Kanawa, Witi Ihimaera, Patricia Grace, Alan Duff, Keri Hulme and Taika Waititi is all the argument needed to support even more robust investment in Māori artists. I hope the substantial impact of Pasifika artists – from Albert Wendt to Tusiata Avia, from the Naked Samoans to Fafswag, from John Puhiatau Pule to Louisa Humphrey and Kaetaeta Watson – means that in future rounds Minister Sepuloni continues to be given a strong say in allocating the budget.

But we shouldn’t assume that funding the creative sector is only the province of Culture and Heritage. Given this is an area where a little investment can reap significant returns, with an overall impact greater than some large primary industries, I would expect that the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment is also looking very carefully at ways to incentivise creative activity. Peter Jackson and Weta Workshops have shown it is possible to take something small and local and scale it up to match the best in the world.

A 2015 PWC report on the creative industries for We Create estimated the total economic impact of the music, book publishing, film and television and games industries to be $3,848 million and over 40,000 jobs – all this alongside the value of selling the Aotearoa New Zealand story overseas, especially now when the eyes of the world are on us and our response to Covid.

What about a funding scheme to incentivise getting even more creative minds – artists, composers, designers and writers – involved in businesses, or at the beginning of major new projects, particularly those underpinning our necessary move to a green and more sustainable economy? Such minds might provide a range of different perspectives and new innovative ideas for solving social, economic and planning issues, all the while telling our stories and promoting us internationally. Fostering creativity is vital for keeping pace with the changing nature of work. The Oxford Martin School, in a major study into the impacts of technology on future employment, concluded that ‘creative and social intelligence’ will be requirements for success in a rapidly automating workplace.

The remarkable and difficult weeks we are sharing in Aotearoa have taught us that for all our diversity, and despite our differences, we can unite in the face of crisis to achieve something that has made us “the envy of many nations”. But does this unity end as we move down the levels? Do we return to the status quo of work, consumption, commuting and worry as we recover, or do we feel more confident that we have it in our power to do some things better? As we enter the next stage on our Covid journey, and work towards a recovery that benefits everyone, we must not forget the importance of the creative arts.

Our greatest author, Katherine Mansfield, wrote: “Risk! Risk anything! Care no more for the opinions of others, for those voices. Do the hardest thing on earth for you. Act for yourself. Face the truth.” Perhaps her words also need incorporating into our post-Covid manifesto. It’s not a case of “could we do it?” – by quashing a virus that’s leaving many nations struggling, we have once again demonstrated our country’s capacity for imaginative and visionary powers that more inert countries lack. We should trust and believe in that same imagination and vision when we come to recognising the power of our creative and innovative arts to help transform Aotearoa New Zealand.