spinofflive
(Image: Tina Tiller)
(Image: Tina Tiller)

ĀteaJuly 22, 2021

Three things you didn’t know about the 1981 Springboks tour

(Image: Tina Tiller)
(Image: Tina Tiller)

This week marks the 40th anniversary of the rugby tour that divided a nation. While countless books and articles have been written about that time, some important details have faded with age. Leonie Hayden looks back at three of them.

Merata Mita’s documentary Patu! opens with a group collecting signatures on the street in Auckland to petition the government to stop the upcoming Springboks’ tour of New Zealand. A young passer-by starts arguing with the organisers, asking how would they feel if a group of “wogs” or “Blacks” came over here. One group member explains that she’s married to a Black South African man. Undeterred, the man continues his tirade about what would happen if “they” were in charge.

It’s 1981 and Mita’s grainy film footage captures one of those most divisive periods in our history since the New Zealand Wars. It was a battle that played out on the rugby field, in the streets, within the halls of parliament and at kitchen tables all over the country. But the fight for New Zealand to take a stand against South Africa’s apartheid regime was far from new.

The New Zealand Rugby Football Union had left rugby legend George Nēpia and other giants of the game at home in 1928 to conform with South Africa’s segregation laws. In 1959, the Citizens’ All Black Tour Association had tried to demand “No Maoris, no tour” when Māori players were excluded from the team’s 1960 visit. They weren’t successful then, but Māori players would go on to tour South Africa as “honorary whites” in 1970 and then in 1976 – the same year as the Soweto uprising that saw hundreds of children and student protestors murdered by police.

While Robert Muldoon campaigned on sports and politics being kept separate, deftly side-stepping the Commonwealth members’ Gleneagles agreement, the world had very much decided the two were connected. Black African nations boycotted the 1976 Montreal Olympics in protest of our ongoing engagement with South Africa. New Zealand was becoming a pariah.

And so when the 1981 tour was announced, anti-apartheid groups such as Halt All Racist Tours (HART), Citizens Association for Racial Equality (CARE) and the Patu Squad (led by Hone Harawira, Donna Awatere, Josie Keelan and Ripeka Evans) began a national campaign to stop it in its tracks.

Ultimately, the demonstrations and petitions to Muldoon’s government – plus a national poll showing only 46% public support for the tour – fell on deaf ears and the South African team were officially welcomed to New Zealand at Te Poho-o-Rawiri marae in Gisborne on July 19, 1981.

Tā Graham Latimer’s wero

It was a pōwhiri with teeth.

The welcome for the Springboks took place at the same time as Māori activists were spreading glass across Gisborne’s Rugby Park ahead of the first game. The speakers that evening comprised Te Poho-o-Rawiri kaumātua, dignitaries of the Tairāwhiti Māori council, and the president of the New Zealand Māori Council, the late Sir Graham Latimer.

To many the welcome would have looked like a sign of a generational divide – conservative assimilationists on the marae versus activists on the field – but Latimer ensured the pōwhiri wasn’t an occasion that ignored or played down what was at stake. In fact, he very politely told Springboks captain Wynand Claassen and his team they wouldn’t be welcome again while apartheid remained in South Africa.

Left: Māori Council president Sir Graham Latimer. Right: a protestor in Gisborne, July 22, 1981.

Per tradition, it was Latimer’s role as the New Zealand Māori Council president to extend a greeting to any international group being welcomed onto a marae. The speaker before him, Tom Fox, had emphasised with some pride, and to much applause, that the Tairāwhiti branch was the only Māori council that actively supported the tour.

Latimer, however, was less effusive. “I am fully conscious of the fact that I do not have a complete mandate to make this welcome,” he began. “Seven out of the nine district councils that make up the New Zealand Māori council are opposed to the tour, and one is undecided.” A long pause, silence from the crowd.

“Fifty-four per cent of the general public of New Zealand has expressed opposition to your tour. That’s in a poll. The last time such a tour was mooted, only 16% were against the tour. That you have come has been seen by some as a major victory but it must be recognised that if there were only another 6% against the tour, there would be neither a political party not a rugby union game enough to extend an invitation to you.”

He continued: “There can be no doubt in my mind that we will not be making another such welcome on a Māori marae – I emphasise that point – unless your government can show it is prepared to change its policies on apartheid. We hope we can look forward to a time in the not too distant future when you could be welcomed on any marae. It would be a pity if this could be looked upon as the last international tour by South Africa.”

Latimer finished by giving an especially warm mihi to Errol Tobias, the first player of colour to tour with the Springboks. “I believe he represents hope for 18 million South Africans, for whom there appears to be little hope.”

The genius of Latimer’s challenge was in its statesmanlike delivery. While much of his speech was received with (presumably) shocked silence, he was still rewarded with a huge round of applause at its conclusion, even though he had just told those gathered they would not be welcome in future under the same circumstances. The extraordinary recording of that evening, housed in the Ngā Taonga archive, captures a mild-mannered assassin executing an entire squad with diplomacy.

Naturally we have no way of measuring the effects of that speech on either the Springboks or apartheid. But it may have been the last time the issue was discussed politely.

Police violence was far worse than than they’d like you to remember

Nicknamed the Day of Shame, July 22 saw the Springboks’ opener against Poverty Bay. Three hundred protestors marched to Rugby Park in Gisborne via a nearby golf course and attempted to breach a fence. Rugby fans jumped into action and a brawl broke out between the two groups. Police arrived to break up the fighting, and only two men managed to run onto the field. Thirteen were arrested and many were hurt in the resulting brawl, but it was nothing compared to the violence that was to come.

Over the course of the next two months, police, in particular the infamous Red and Blue riot control squads, would become more and more comfortable with using extreme violence against unarmed protestors, causing serious and sometimes permanent injuries. Pro-tour rugby fans were also brutal in their retaliation.

Singer and journalist Moana Maniapoto, then a first-year law student at the University of Auckland, remembers when the fence came down at the second game in Hamilton on July 25. “Everyone’s leaning on it, pushing and pushing it, and then the next minute the fence came down and you just heard this ‘Run!’ You’re just swept along. So then I’m in the middle thinking, ‘what am I doing here? They’re gonna kill us!'”

Brawling between protestors and rugby fans on Sandringham Rd, Auckland (Photo: Alexander Turnbull Library)

She recalls looking up at thousands of angry faces in the stands. “They were totally rabid. Screaming, yelling and throwing cans of beer at us.

“The police arrived, just the ordinary cops, not the Red Squad, and I actually thought, ‘oh this is good, surely they’re not gonna let us get murdered’. Then the commissioner came on and said the match has been called off and there was this huge roar from the crowd. At first it was like, ‘yay!’ and then ‘oh my god. How the hell are we gonna get out of here?’”

Maniapoto, along with land protector Eva Rickard and another friend, managed to escape into the surrounding streets. “The cops were sporadically placed so you had to make a run for it to the gate. Then the cops recognised Eva and they were abusing the shit out of her. But we got out, and we were very lucky, my friend’s father heard on the radio that the match had been cancelled and he circled until he found us. A lot of people got attacked.”

Marx Jones and Grant Cole flour bomb Eden Park in a hired Cessna. 

She would go on to attend protests in Rotorua and at the third test in Auckland – the latter resulting in a violent clash between police, protestors and rugby fans on the streets of Mount Eden. “Red Squad came out of nowhere and nutted off at everyone. I was with the least militant bunch when they charged. We were just standing there. Couldn’t believe it. I was batoned, kicked by heavy police boots while on the ground. Shock for a young freshie like me. They just smashed into us and left people lying on the ground in their wake.”

For further proof you need only watch the violence through Mita’s lens. The dull thud of police batons hitting flesh and human skull, and the wails of the injured, some of them young teenagers, is the haunting soundtrack for nearly half the film.

Baton-weilding police and anti-tour demonstrators clash in Molesworth Street, Wellington, July 30 1981. (Photo: Ian Mackley/Alexander Turnbull Library)

Maniapoto scoffs at the selective memory that it was “New Zealand” who took a stand against apartheid. “It’s held out as a landmark, framing New Zealand as a global social justice advocate. It wasn’t New Zealand; it was people power. It was activists, people from across all walks of life, and there were far fewer of us than there were in the stands.”

She talks abut the Nelson Mandela exhibition hosted at Eden Park in 2019 – a strange venue considering the violence that played out on the surrounding streets 38 years earlier. She says at the launch none of the speakers from the New Zealand Rugby Union came close to admitting they’d been wrong, or offering an apology. Instead everybody spoke proudly about the stand taken by the protestors. Says Maniapoto: “They’re starting to rewrite the history!”

The good bishop saves the Patu Squad

It was at the last test at Eden Park on September 12 that a young Hone Harawira, one of the leaders of the predominantly Māori and Pasifika Patu Squad, was finally caught.

Harawira and a handful of others had been arrested at Waitangi earlier in the year, and although they had been denied bail, they were turfed out of the cells for causing a ruckus and told when to attend their court date. They didn’t show up.

The group had outstanding warrants for their arrest before the tour even began.

“It must have got out to the police that we were all going to be involved in the tour, and one by one we were all picked up. One of the brothers, they got him before it started! So he spent the whole of the tour in Mt Eden,” Harawira chuckles.

Demonstrators overturning a car on Onslow Road, Kingsland, Auckland. Photographed by an Auckland Star staff photographer 12 September 1981. (Photo: Alexander Turnbull Library)

Harawira says he was caught early on after the test that ended with Marx Jones’ aerial flour bomb attack, so hadn’t been involved in the upturning of a cop car, or the violence that erupted on an unprecedented scale outside Eden Park. Nevertheless, Harawira was charged with the assault of a police officer who’d had both collar bones broken.

“It wasn’t me but they wanted someone to pin it on so they pinned it on me.”

He says he had seven charges against him. “They were serious charges. Three charges of participating in a riot and four charges of assault with intent to cause grievous bodily harm. Which all carried a total of something like 98 years.”

Justice being neither blind nor in a hurry, Harawira wouldn’t stand trial for another two years, alongside many others who he notes were mostly brown, despite the vast majority of protestors being Pākehā. “Most of them were members of the Patu Squad.”

As he had many times before, Harawira planned to defend himself in court. He’d had University of Auckland law lecturers Jane Kelsey and David Williams to rely on for advice, but this time he wasn’t sure it going to be enough.

Hone Harawira in 1981, in Merata Mita’s documentary Patu! (Photo: Merata Mita/NZ on Screen)

“The day before my court date, I’m sitting out the back in the cells thinking ‘jeez, what am I gonna do?’ Then the brain wave came to me. Bishop Desmond Tutu had been invited over by the Anglican church to come and do a speaking tour. Interest was still very high in apartheid South Africa. My mum knew George and Jocelyn Armstrong, who were part of the organisation that brought him over.

“So I rang my mum and said look, I want Bishop Tutu as a witness. She said, ‘He wasn’t there!’. I said, ‘that doesn’t matter! I want him for my witness’. So she said ‘OK when is it?’ And I said ‘Tomorrow! I’m gonna need him by about 10.30.’”

The next day Harawira and 10 others prepared to stand trial.

When the time came for him to give his defence, his star witness wasn’t there. “I read my statement. I’d come to the very end and I was dragging it out. I didn’t want to get out of the dock ‘cos I knew it hadn’t been enough to get me off. Then the door burst open, and someone looked at me with a big smile and just nodded and I knew then. So I asked the judge: ‘Can you please call my witness?’”

Archbishop Desmond Tutu leading Nelson Mandela through the neighbourhood in Soweto where Mandela lived, on the first day of his release from prison. (Photo by David Turnley/Corbis/VCG via Getty Images)

Harawira still laughs at the memory of the stunned faces of the judge, prosecution and jury as as the now-Archbishop Desmond Tutu, in his signature dark suit and purple cleric’s shirt, walked into the courtroom.

“And then I’m thinking, ‘What the fuck, now what do I do?’

“So he takes the stand and I go, ‘Could you please tell the court your name?’ And then I said, ‘Can you please tell the court your address?’ And he gave an address in Soweto. Instantly, if the room wasn’t already charged, everyone was completely wide-eyed now.

“And then I said, ‘Can you please explain to the court what apartheid is?’. And away he went. He must have spoken for 20 minutes. It was absolutely stunning. You could have heard a pin drop.”

He says that after Tutu had finished, neither he nor the prosecution could think of any more questions.

“As Bishop Tutu stepped out of the dock, all 11 defendants, we all stood up. Then our lawyers stood up, then the public, the screws from Mount Eden, the police stood up, then the jury stood up. Half of them were in tears. If was one of those moments. I knew right then and there we were gonna get off.” He crows in delight at the memory.

The group were acquitted of all charges.

“It’s kind of hard to believe but it’s all true. Meeting Nelson Mandela himself and going to his tangi, that’s another story.”

Keep going!
Tamariki at Te Umuroa marae on the outskirts of Ruatāhuna (Image: Alex Braae, edited by Tina Tiller)
Tamariki at Te Umuroa marae on the outskirts of Ruatāhuna (Image: Alex Braae, edited by Tina Tiller)

ĀteaJuly 14, 2021

We go our own way: Tūhoe youth set sights on their future

Tamariki at Te Umuroa marae on the outskirts of Ruatāhuna (Image: Alex Braae, edited by Tina Tiller)
Tamariki at Te Umuroa marae on the outskirts of Ruatāhuna (Image: Alex Braae, edited by Tina Tiller)

At a marae on the outskirts of Ruatāhuna in Te Urewera, representatives of the Crown listened to Tūhoe ranatahi speak of their dreams of self-sufficiency. Alex Braae was there. 

It was brutally cold up in the hills on July 2, a significant day for both the recent past and future for Tūhoe. Dozens of locals were wearing orange vests, preparing a hāngī, directing traffic around the entrance to Te Umuroa marae in Ruatāhuna, and wrapping hands around steaming cups of tea. 

Representatives of the Crown, including the chief executives of several government departments, arrived a bit before midday, when the wintry sun was at its strongest. They were there to recommit to a Service Management Plan (SMP) signed as part of a political compact a decade earlier. 

The Crown was there to listen as much as speak. After a pōwhiri and kaputī, the microphone was given to the future of the iwi. 

“We’ve been asking our kids to dream. We’ve been asking our ranatahi to dream. They still have the innocence. They still have the ability to see what can be,” said Te Ori Paki, the communications manager for Ngāi Tūhoe governing body Te Uru Taumatua. He was introducing what Tūhoe people and representatives of the Crown had gathered to listen to.

The history of Tūhoe since colonisation includes both harsh sanctions placed on the iwi, and struggles to reclaim mana motuhake. The leaders of the iwi have a vision of Tūhoe that is largely independent of the Crown, with both the land confiscations of a century ago and the police raids of a decade ago still fresh in the memory.

And the ranatahi from the four valleys of Te Urewera who spoke have taken that vision and run with it, thinking about what their home in Te Urewera could look and feel like. It extended beyond self-governance, into deep self-sufficiency, truly sustainable environmental management, and a recognition of Tūhoe culture being distinct not only from Aotearoa generally, but even within te ao Māori. 

“What does that mean to me? In 2050, te reo ō Tuhoe is the only language I hear around me,” said Whareparoa Titoki from Waimana. The Tūhoe dialect includes a dropping of the G from words like rangatahi and tikanga. Within Te Urewera, te reo is already very strong.

The pull of Te Urewera was also clearly strong for those who had either grown up in or returned to the whenua. In describing what 2050 looks like to her, Jaz Wagner said, “Home, Waikaremoana, will be more exciting than Australia, Wellington, you name it.” The vast majority of the population of Te Urewera is Tūhoe, but a majority of the iwi itself lives outside of the rohe. 

In an interview after the speeches, Erana Kihi from Rūātoki said “our biggest challenge as Tūhoe is reconnecting our disconnected.” She grew up in Hamilton, but her mother made sure the family returned regularly to the marae. It’s a lot harder for urban Tūhoe to stay connected, said Kihi, who told the story of one person who came from Auckland for a recent ranatahi gathering. 

The group of ranatahi speakers from Waimana (Alex Braae)

“She knows she’s from Tūhoe – born in Wellington, grew up in Hamilton, lives in Auckland. And she turned up and said, ‘I saw a pānui online, I registered, I’m trying to find out who I am’. That right there, that is our target audience – that’s the whānau we want to bring home,” said Kihi. 

“You’re born Tūhoe if your toto and your whakapapa says so. But like you would have heard, the values of what we hold dear and the measure of what is a good Tūhoe – you have to experience that by living at home.” 

What drives this vision of self-sufficiency? Speakers kept on coming back to Te Urewera itself, as a provider for what they needed to sustain themselves. And the ranatahi stressed the point that their dreams were for the people as a whole, not for themselves as individuals. 

The difference in mindset from the world outside of the inaccessible mountain range is hard to quantify, but speakers described a vision for different kinds of doctors, teachers, and structures for organising communities. It was deeply utopian, and relied heavily on Tūhoe going their own way. 

The Crown could play a limited role in that, said Kihi, under agreements signed around the delivery of social services. “But if they default on it [the agreements] we’re more than happy to continue on our path, because we’ve been doing it for hundreds of years – I think we can do it for a couple hundred more.” 

The Crown comes to Ruatāhuna 

Mana motuhake is at the heart of the SMP. It recognises in writing the aspiration for Tūhoe to hold the “maximum autonomy possible in the circumstances”, particularly in the provision of social services. 

In showing up to recommit, there appeared to be an implicit acknowledgement from the Crown of wrongs committed in the past, and a need to do better in the future. The Māori Law Review described the “innocuous, even boring-sounding” document as a potential “watershed moment” in Crown-iwi relations. 

From the Tūhoe side, the aim is to progressively reduce dependence on the government, in favour of community-led approaches instead. And there’s an element of necessity from the Crown side, in that there’s very little government presence in Te Urewera – a pair of small police stations, but no Ministry for Social Development offices or hospitals. If something does happen, Whakatāne or Rotorua can be a long way away. 

MSD chief executive Debbie Power speaking at Te Umuroa marae (Alex Braae)

MSD chief executive Debbie Power dispensed with her notes in a speech responding to the ranatahi. She was “a bit apprehensive about coming here today… because I felt the weight of the responsibility”. 

Following on from her was Glynis Sandland, a senior executive at the embattled Oranga Tamariki. She spoke about coming from a family in which she was told not to speak te reo, because the generation before had been beaten for it. She said seeing what Tūhoe are trying to do inspired her. 

Her speech described a partnership beginning from a meeting of Te Uru Taumatua and the Oranga Tamariki Whakatāne office. Since 2019, the partnership had taken a much more practical direction, Sandland said. 

“What this means in real terms is inviting Tūhoe kaimahi to work alongside us, for Tūhoe to challenge us, to question our intent and our processes,” said Sandland. That included the increasing use of Tūhoe whānau, rather than state care facilities, for children, in line with the expectations of the iwi. 

“This is a natural thing. We think that it’s not, but it’s a natural thing that people be able to call on their own to make things work. And at times, we need to get out of the way to make that happen.” She described this as one of the organisation’s greatest challenges. 

Drug and alcohol treatment is another area that Tūhoe are increasingly taking on for themselves. In an interview after a hāngī dinner for the gathering, Te Uru Taumatua chair Tāmati Kruger said what works in Te Urewera might not necessarily work in the cities.

Te Uru Taumatua chair Tāmati Kruger (Image supplied)

“Communities like Ruatāhuna, everybody knows everyone’s business, right? So if you’re a P addict, you can’t keep that secret for long,” said Kruger. That changes the methods that can be used. “We confront each other in order to find a way through to mending it.” 

“If somebody is committing crime, usually you have people who confront those issues, and people won’t keep quiet. I don’t know if that’s an advantage or disadvantage, but in the city you enjoy anonymity. Here you don’t.” 

A ‘normal’ iwi? 

At the end of the presentations, Kruger got up to speak. He may or may not have been joking, but he said he told the ranatahi to act like Tūhoe is a “normal” iwi in front of the guests – only to be reminded by the ranatahi that isn’t how Tūhoe really see themselves. 

The SMP has been held up as a potential model for other iwi to follow. Māori Party co-leader Rawiri Waititi told Newshub “Tuhoe is probably an example of how they have been able to negotiate within the system to come up with their own sovereign solutions to their problems.”

Tūhoe tamariki at the pōwhiri at Te Umuroa marae (Image supplied, Erana Kihi)

Kruger himself wouldn’t be drawn on that question. “I don’t know – I don’t have any relationship with any other iwi, I’m not part of any circuit where I sit down with any iwi leaders or chairs.” 

It underlined the point that kept coming up throughout the hui – these were Tūhoe approaches, for the Tūhoe rohe, rather than necessarily being a map for the whole country to follow. 

The types of projects currently being pursued by Tūhoe underline this. Rather than social housing, they want to build eco-villages around marae, aimed at housing multi-generational families rather than necessarily just nuclear families. They’re also pioneering research into natural road surfaces, to avoid having to put tarseal on the largely unsealed section of State Highway 38 that runs through Te Urewera. 

These initiatives were welcomed by MBIE chief executive Carolyn Tremain, who said “we acknowledge that your view of economic development may differ at times from ours, but we look forward to exploring those differences, and seek a deeper understanding so we can find common ground”. 

It isn’t unusual for young people to look to the future and imagine how it could be better. But for the Tūhoe ranatahi, there was a clarity of vision and demand to be involved. As Torere-nui-a-rua Te Pou put it, “we want to be living this in 2050. We don’t want to be still talking about this, we want it to be part of our daily life.” 

Nobody knows what the world will look like in 30 years. But it seems clear Tūhoe will still be where they have been for centuries, in the heart of Te Urewera.