The last living co-designer of the tino rangatiratanga flag, Linda Munn (Photo montage: supplied/Tina Tiller)
The last living co-designer of the tino rangatiratanga flag, Linda Munn (Photo montage: supplied/Tina Tiller)

ĀteaFebruary 6, 2022

The enduring legacy of the tino rangatiratanga flag

The last living co-designer of the tino rangatiratanga flag, Linda Munn (Photo montage: supplied/Tina Tiller)
The last living co-designer of the tino rangatiratanga flag, Linda Munn (Photo montage: supplied/Tina Tiller)

The last surviving kaitiaki of the tino rangatiratanga flag, Linda Munn (Ngāi Pōtiki, Ngāpuhi) wants people to ask first before capitalising on its symbolic imagery.

With the striking red and black background and bold white koru in the centre, the tino rangatiratanga flag is unmissable. It’s become a well-known symbol of colonial resistance since its creation in 1990. Whether it’s flying at Waitangi, or in the face of Richard Seddon on the streets of Paremata, the tino flag stands tall as a visual reminder of the failed promises of the Treaty.

In the Māori text of Te Tiriti o Waitangi, recognised by the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples as having legal precedence over the English text, Māori specified that they would retain tino rangatiranga (self-determination, sovereignty, autonomy, self-government, rule, control and power) over whenua, kāinga and taonga.

This obviously didn’t happen, so the struggle for tino rangatiranga continues and the flag’s relevance remains. Arguably, it’s more visible now than ever, with a new generation of activists embracing the symbol and flying it proudly.

Sadly, as its popularity has increased, so too has appropriation of it. In recent times, fringe activist groups have co-opted the tino flag for protests unrelated to kaupapa Māori. Flags are also being mass produced for profit, on the likes of AliExpress for $11.

Linda Munn, one of the original three designers of the flag, and the last living kaitiaki, wants the original kaupapa of the flag to be upheld.

“The main thing is for our people to feel like they’re unified. This is their flag, but don’t go and rip it off — still ask.”

In 2009, then-Māori Party leader Pita Sharples called for the flag to fly alongside the New Zealand national flag on the Auckland Harbour Bridge during the Waitangi Day celebrations in Auckland. (Photo: Hannah Peters/Getty Images)

A symbol of liberation and identity

The flag was born out of a design competition run by Te Kawariki, a collective of activists in the Far North in 1989. They wanted to create a national Māori flag to fly at Waitangi the following year for the 150th anniversary of the signing of Te Tiriti o Waitangi.

As the story goes, the design for the flag was drawn up by Hiraina Marsden on a napkin in a wharekai. It was later used as a basis for 10 flags of the same design that were sewn by hand by Linda Munn and Jan Dobson, supported by many others. Linda Munn emphasises the flag is the result of a group initiative, acknowledging the influence of Hilda and Hone Harawira within the Te Kawariki collective.

An official poster of the flag, printed by Te Kawariki, explains what the different elements represent. Munn attributes elder Poua Erstich for setting the kaupapa and tikanga of the flag:

The black represents Te Kore, the realm of potential being. It is the long darkness, from whence the world emerged: the formless, passive, the male element. The white represents Te Ao Mārama, the realm of being, the physical world. The koru represents the unfurling of new life: a promise of hope for the future. The red represents Te Whai Ao, the realm of coming into being, Papatūānuku, Earth Mother, sustainer of all living things. Red is the colour of the earth from which the first human was made. 

A $5 poster was printed locally to cover the costs of promoting the flag. Within days people were asking for one for their kohanga reo or to use the logo on their team uniforms. (Image: Mana News/Te Kawariki)

“It was meant to take away from the colonised flag, the New Zealand flag. The main point about designing something that is uniquely Māori, is that it’s for Māori and represents Māori,” says Munn.

Some of the kaupapa set by Te Kawariki included that it must never be worn on someone’s behind, that the dimensions can’t be changed, and it must be used to support kaupapa Māori, not for personal gain. The original artists also wanted any royalties to go towards setting up an arts wānanga in Ngāpuhi.

As the last surviving kaitiaki of the flag, Munn says she appreciates it when people approach her first and explain their kaupapa.

“There is a process, it’s not a huge one, I don’t make people jump through hoops. The key thing is that they have to give back. They have to pay it forward.

“Give back to your marae, you kōhanga reo, your community. If you’re working with homeless people, make some money, feed them, house them. It has to be going back into the community.”

In service of the collective

Alongside her work to protect the mana of the tino flag, Munn is dedicated to helping rangatahi and wāhine Māori.

She’s a mother, grandmother, daughter, sister, niece, and long-serving member of Te Rōpū Wāhine Māori Toko i te Ora (Māori Women’s Refuge).

“It’s something I’ve been involved with since I was kid,” she says, which put simply is about “keeping our women safe and alive”.

“Last year and in 2020, we lost some girls that I was personally working with, they were killed, and that really knocked us around. It really hurts us when our girls… get taken.”

This is the stark reality of the negative impacts of colonisation that Munn works tirelessly against. Beyond that, she also sits on hapū trusts that support rangatahi through education by finding them places in kura kaupapa, and getting them out of “mainstream bullshit”.

“If there’s a need, there needs to be something there to help them. Who better to help them than our own people? To help them know that there’s another way to learn.. to come back to the marae and learn wānanga space, not classroom-colonised.”

The tino rangatiratanga flag flies on the maunga during the occupation at Ihumātao. (Photo by Phil Walter/Getty Images)

Mahi toi as healing

Munn’s mahi has always been about wāhine, she says. This extends to her down time – she’s an avid painter, and says it helps clear her mind. She is currently preparing works for an upcoming exhibition she’s curating alongside Robyn Kahukiwa and Tracy Tāwhiao. The exhibition ‘Wāhine Māori – The art of resistance’ features the works of 12 Māori women who have opposed colonisation and the impact on their culture, their history, their language and belief systems.

From her garage studio, she has poured onto canvas her own whānau mamae caused by colonisation in the form of the work, Hineteiwaiwa.

“My grandmother died as a result of poor care in a hospital following childbirth, after being beaten up by my grandfather [causing her] to go into early labour. She haemorrhaged to death in Kawakawa hospital in a hallway.

“So this is acknowledging her and all our other wāhine who haven’t been looked after properly in a health service.”

Her other piece is about stories her grandmothers would tell, transmitting whakapapa, which she says is at the heart of her work. “It’s just me painting memories. That’s all art is. It’s a visual tool. It’s like when you’re in the marae or wharepuni, and you look at the carvings, you’re able to relate whakapapa.”

Read more about the history of the flag here.

The exhibition Wāhine Māori – The Art of Resistance opens on the 13 March at Northart Gallery, Auckland.


Follow The Spinoff’s te ao Māori podcast Nē? on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or your favourite podcast provider. 

Keep going!
DHBs have launched initiatives targeting tamariki Māori. Image: Tina Tiller
DHBs have launched initiatives targeting tamariki Māori. Image: Tina Tiller

PoliticsFebruary 3, 2022

‘A lot of catching up to do’: Vaccine rates for Māori kids are already lagging

DHBs have launched initiatives targeting tamariki Māori. Image: Tina Tiller
DHBs have launched initiatives targeting tamariki Māori. Image: Tina Tiller

A fortnight in, the contrast is stark. The paediatrician who stood alongside Chris Hipkins when the 5- to 11-year-old rollout was announced says it’s not too early to be demanding answers. 

A few days before Christmas, Chris Hipkins announced, along with a slew of measures to counter a virus that “keeps throwing new curve balls”, the rollout of paediatric vaccines. Children aged 5-11 would become eligible to get their first dose from January 17, said the Covid response minister. 

It came, by chance, a few hours after the Waitangi Tribunal issued the findings from an urgent inquiry into the vaccine rollout for Māori. The government decision to reject advice from officials to adopt an age adjustment for Māori in the vaccine rollout had led to breached treaty principles of active protection and equity, it found, while Māori health providers had been sidelined.

Speaking to media, Hipkins said decision makers had “learned from our experience with the adult rollout”. A fund of $120m had since been set up to support Māori providers and substantial resource would now be directed to iwi, hauora and community organisations, with a focus on Māori who lived in remote communities. There was no need for Māori to be put at the front of the queue because supply was not an issue – in effect there was no queue, he said. 

Standing alongside Hipkins at the December 21 press conference was Dr Danny De Lore (Ngāti Tuwharetoa), a paediatrician at Rotorua Hospital who had been a strong critic of the original rollout and urged the government to target tamariki Māori in the rollout to come. “Māori and Pacific organisations have already demonstrated,” he said in the Beehive theatrette, “that they know how to deliver vaccination programmes effectively in their own communities. As Māori paediatricians we are encouraged by the government making a commitment to by-Māori-for-Māori input, including ongoing technical and implementation communications and delivery of vaccinations.”

In response to media questions, De Lore said the tribunal findings would be used “to hold the government to account” on the tamariki rollout, but that “the indications from government are that they are listening, that they’re taking on board those lessons”. He was reserving judgment, however. “As the weeks go by towards the start of this vaccination programme, we’ll find out more about what the government’s commitment is.”

Just over a fortnight after vaccinations became available to 5- to 11-year-olds, the signs are not encouraging. The latest reported numbers from the Ministry of Health show that 20% of Māori aged 5-11 have had their first dose; among the remainder of the 5-11 population, the corresponding figure is 43%.

Does that stark contrast suggest a repeat of the inequities identified in the original rollout, or is it too soon to judge?

“I don’t think it’s too soon to be asking the government exactly what they’re doing. Because those numbers are really disappointing,” De Lore told The Spinoff. “In December we might have hoped that by this time those numbers would be a lot closer, but most people that I’m working with aren’t that surprised that they’re low. So it’s definitely not too early to be asking: what exactly are you doing to address this?”

Why is it so important Māori children are prioritised in the vaccination programme? A paper co-authored by De Lore for the NZ Medical Journal in December laid out the case: “Studies have shown that children are at risk of harm from both the direct and indirect impacts of Covid-19 infection and the pandemic. Because evidence suggests that Māori children are at a higher risk of all harms, we argue that Māori children should be prioritised in any paediatric vaccination programme.”

They added: “We ask those in charge of designing the paediatric vaccine roll-out to consider the principles of equity, Te Tiriti o Waitangi and social justice and to take this historic opportunity to change the direction of the last 250 years.”

That is underscored by another grim data point: among children under 12, Māori account for more than half of all cases since delta struck, and more than 60% of hospitalisations in the age group.

De Lore is not alone in expressing concerns. “It is concerning that inequities are again evident,” said Dr Dianne Sika-Paotonu, an immunologist at the University of Otago in Wellington. “Vaccination rates with respect to Māori and Pacific children, tamariki and tamaiki are lagging behind those from the general population for this age group. An equity focus that reduces barriers and builds trust will help everyone get the help and services they need at this time.”

“I know it’s early days, but these inequities are unacceptable,” said Rhys Jones, a public health physician at the University of Auckland specialising in hauora Māori. In a Twitter thread, he wrote that a “VERY different” approach from the original rollout was required, “a mana motuhake approach. And yet, so far at least, we seem to be getting business-as-usual from the government. That needs to change asap – the arrival of omicron means time is of the essence. Equity delayed is equity denied.”

The Ministry of Health had launched initiatives “to address the issues that were identified by the Waitangi Tribunal”, said De Lore. “But I think it’s just been really slow over the holiday period, and now there’s a lot of catching up to do … It’s just a shame it’s got this far behind.

“There are a lot of Māori health providers and a lot of Māori health professionals who are pretty experienced with Covid now. The government needs to be saying to them: what do you need? What can we provide? What do you want? And they need to be working out what strategies or what interventions are proving successful, and sharing that information.” 

The continued mushrooming of misinformation made it all the more urgent, said De Lore. “The big concern that a lot of us have is that the void just gets filled with misinformation and disinformation … that can seem compelling when it’s presented by somebody who you listen to. In the absence of anyone you trust or identify with getting you better information, it can really take hold.”

So to De Lore’s central exhortation, to “ask the government exactly what they’re doing”. Chris Hipkins was unavailable for an interview, but in a statement pointed to a programme that spans a whānau based-approach, a series of events and activities, and a data-driven implementation, together with a communications campaign drawing on input from a range of Māori and Pasifika organisations. 

A focus on tamariki Māori was “really important work and it’s actively under way”, said Hipkins. “I’m aware that the Ministry of Health has had input with Māori specialists from the Te Rōpu Whakakaupapa Urutā (the National Māori Pandemic Group), iwi and the New Zealand Māori Council, to co-design a specific programme for vaccinating our tamariki aged 5- to 11-years.”

He added: “The omicron outbreak and move to the red setting has presented challenges for whānau and for our vaccinating teams and requires additional new and different strategies to support the vaccination of tamariki. We’re continuing to monitor Māori vaccination rates and significant efforts are focused on this important work.”

Asked at Tuesday’s post-cabinet press conference about the contrast in Māori and non-Māori rates, deputy prime minister Grant Robertson said he was “extremely proud” and “really pleased” with the way the health ministry had worked with Māori stakeholders including health providers, the Iwi Chairs Forum and the National Māori Health Coalition to design and implement the tamariki Māori vaccination programme.

“I think over time you will see those vaccination rates rise considerably for tamariki Māori,” said Robertson, adding that the government has “learned a lot of lessons from the way we’ve gone about the whole vaccination campaign that is now informing what I think is a really good co-designed process”.

De Lore is not out of hope that the statistics will shift over the weeks and months to come.

“It’s quite clear that the government is trying to bring co-design into what they’re doing,” he said. “They’re trying to bring scientific expertise from Māori organisations. So I think lessons have been learned. There is good intent. It’s just a question of the implementation, and how fast it can be done.”