spinofflive
Budget 18: a long and winding road. (Image: Toby Morris).
Budget 18: a long and winding road. (Image: Toby Morris).

Budget 2018May 15, 2018

How Budget ’18 could skirt the ‘no new taxes’ promise

Budget 18: a long and winding road. (Image: Toby Morris).
Budget 18: a long and winding road. (Image: Toby Morris).

Budget 2018: If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it’s probably a tax, says Grant Thornton’s Dan Lowe. 

Budget day is fast approaching and the predictions are coming thick and fast. Many will be watching with keen interest, not just because it’ll be Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern’s first budget since being elected, but because it’ll be the first Labour budget since 2008. After spending almost a decade out of power, May 17th represents an excellent opportunity for both Labour and Ardern to plant their flags on the fiscal map.

But some bold pre-election promises have put the government in a difficult position. In September last year Labour announced that there would be no new taxes until after 2020, while its Budget Responsibility Rules – a self-imposed agreement between Labour and the Greens to reduce core government expenditure and debt – means the government has given itself limited room to manoeuvre when it comes to spending, a move that’s attracted its fair share of flack.

The government has already indicated the books don’t have enough cash, and costly initiatives like free tertiary education for the first year of study will only compound their problems. The government needs more revenue but its pre-election pledges have hamstrung its scope to choose how, when and where it can get money from. The Tax Working Group is currently looking at a number of tax-related possibilities, but it won’t be until February 2019 that we see the group’s final recommendations.

This is where the art of euphemism has really stepped up. If you don’t call it a tax, then it’s not really a tax, right? Let us consider recent developments: an increase in excise duty on petrol; the removal of the concession on low value imported goods; and, probably my favourite, ‘land value capture’. This option was tabled with some political genius from Finance Minister Grant Robertson: We can’t do it all through the tax take and so we need to find new, innovative ways to generate revenue that can support growth.”

There is no doubt that our tax system needs adjusting and with the rapid changes that are occurring all over the world a significant rethink and overhaul will be necessary. I actually embrace the concept of the Tax Working Group (TWG) and what it stands for – intellectual powerhouses combined with public consultation to review the current framework and tackle the challenges that we face as a society. This is a great initiative for a high level strategic approach, but by its nature nothing happens at speed.  

Kiwis are engaged on this topic too. The TWG consultation process resulted in 6,700 submissions and over 16,000 votes on their online poll. This is unprecedented engagement, showing that many New Zealanders realise something needs to change to ensure funding of our core public services in the future.

With all of these challenges, limiting what can be done in the immediate term because of a pre-election promise is not what New Zealand needs. We need to be agile and focused on the changes that are required now and how best they can be implemented.

Historically there’s been a lot of deep seated resistance to introducing a capital gains tax (CGT), which is why Governments keep shying away from bringing it in. But is it fair not to? If you run a business for ten years and make a million dollars profit annually, you end up paying $300,000 in tax every year. But if you sell it after just one year for $10 million (based on future revenue projections), the tax you end up paying is zero. It’s economically inequitable.

So what do I think is needed in this budget?

Introduce a capital gains tax on everything except the family home (taking the market value of assets on the date of announcement as the new cost base). When it comes to being an international anomaly, New Zealand’s lack of CGT stands out. Interestingly enough, the introduction of a CGT topped the TWG polls when asked “What tax issues matter most to you?” This suggests there’s a big change happening among Kiwis who have traditionally been deeply resistant to the idea of a CGT.  

Reduce corporate tax rates. New Zealand’s corporate tax rate is high in OECD terms. Businesses need reasons to operate at the bottom of the world, and when it comes to New Zealand, there needs to be an economic incentive.

Raise the personal income tax thresholds to account for fiscal creep that has occurred over the years, but retain the current tax rates. Introducing an additional rate for those on high incomes would also help boost government revenue, while aligning New Zealand with other OECD countries. Tag these thresholds to annual inflation:

Make superannuation contributions compulsory and remove tax on these contributions. Currently, contributions to superannuation schemes come from after-tax income (once PAYE has been deducted). This restricts the speed at which the retirement savings can grow and also acts as a disincentive to contribute. What if we allowed people to grow their nest egg by deferring the tax on contributions and the income it generates until the point of withdrawal? This could encourage people to increase their contributions (particularly as they get closer to retirement) as it produces a more favourable economic outcome. Imagine that, New Zealanders actively engaged with their retirement savings! It’s a change that would reduce the burden on the country to support retirees, because New Zealanders would be saving more for their retirement, thanks to the incentive on the way in and the fact that the investment would compound.

Leave GST alone. Our broad based approach is the envy of other countries. Exempting fruit and vegetables is a noble idea, but in practice it would create no end of complexity and the only winners would be the tax accountants.

Of course none of these ideas will be considered by the government – not in the first term anyway – as they all relate to tax. But through some clever euphemisms and fudging, we may see new community charges, levies, contributions or user fees to help fund the government’s spending.

I for one can’t wait to receive my temporary refund adjustment.


This content is brought to you by Grant Thornton New Zealand – a national team of business advisors who are committed to unlocking the potential for growth in their people, clients and communities.

Keep going!
Finance Minister Steven Joyce poses with the Budget described as a the ‘one dollar bill’ budget by almost nobody (Photo by Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images)
Finance Minister Steven Joyce poses with the Budget described as a the ‘one dollar bill’ budget by almost nobody (Photo by Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images)

PartnersMay 13, 2018

The ‘fudge-it budget’ and more of the best (and worst) Budget nicknames

Finance Minister Steven Joyce poses with the Budget described as a the ‘one dollar bill’ budget by almost nobody (Photo by Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images)
Finance Minister Steven Joyce poses with the Budget described as a the ‘one dollar bill’ budget by almost nobody (Photo by Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images)

With Budget day fast approaching, how will it be sold to the public? And how will the opposition go about pinning a derisive name on it? Let’s look back at some of the best and worst attempts.

Budgets are complicated, big hairy beasts of policy packages rolled out to the public in the space of an hour. Journalists get slightly more time to digest them if they go along to the morning lockup, but they’re sworn to secrecy and get their phones confiscated at the door so they can’t tweet it out.

As such, the way the budget gets sold, and countered, on the day itself, can have a huge impact on how it gets perceived and remembered. And the key to that is coming up with the right perfect, pithy epithet. A good name for a budget can be defining for months or even years. A bad one sometimes won’t even make the paper the next morning.

So with that in mind, here’s a reverse chronological list of what names have worked, and which have barely made a ripple. 

2017 – New Zealand

The ‘one dollar bill budget’

Then Labour leader Andrew Little tried to get this one moving as a response to National’s tax cuts, which were very handy for those on high incomes, but offered little for those who weren’t. Little’s example was a cleaner, who would get $11 more on the tax cuts, but would lose $10 in other support. Hence, one dollar.

Verdict: One dollar Bill? Because of Prime Minister Bill English? Any takers? As it turned out, no. We have one dollar coins here, thank you very much. 2/10

2014 – New Zealand

The ‘fudge-it Budget’

Remember David Cunliffe? Won the Labour leadership in a coup and then led them to a crushing defeat against the rampant Sir John Key led National Party. His big criticism of the election year budget was that the much vaunted surplus achieved by finance minister Bill English was a mirage based on craft accounting. English, Mr Cunfliffe proclaimed, was fudging it.

Verdict: This name gains points for coming up with a handy rhyme. It loses points because most people quite like fudge. 5/10

2008 – New Zealand

The ‘block of cheese budget’

You’re going to start seeing a theme develop here, where the opposition tries to attach a super relatable name (everyone knows about cheese) to a budget to describe the tax cuts contained in it. In 2008, the Labour government was on its last legs, desperately flailing around to try and stave off their upcoming defeat. One of the methods used by finance minister Michael Cullen was tax cuts – $16 a week for those on incomes on the average wage of $45,000. Then-opposition leader Key said it was a family sized block of cheese, but look, either inflation has been in reverse since then, or prices have gone down or something, because I just looked at Countdown’s website and you can get a kg of Signature Range Edam for $7.90. I mean, that’s a lot of cheese quite frankly. Should you really be eating two kgs of cheese a week?

See also the ‘chewing gum budget’ in 2005, where much the same epithet was being used to describe those tax cuts. Results have been combined due to similarity.

Verdict: Can we maybe get beyond tax cuts being the primary measure of whether a budget is good or not? 3/10

How much cheese is in your budget? (Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images)

1991 – New Zealand

The ‘mother of all budgets’

Coming out of the wild economic reforms of the 4th Labour government, finance minister Ruth Richardson delivered a radically austere budget that ripped huge chunks of the welfare state apart, and unleashed another wave of privatisations. It was so radical in fact, that it contributed to former PM Sir Robert Muldoon’s decision to resign. The wider economic programme, with the equally catchy name ‘Ruthanasia,’ contributed to huge unemployment and put severe pressure on the health system.

Verdict: There’s a good double meaning here. It was like a mother in that it was so all-encompassing. But it was also like a mother, in the sense that The Datsuns might say was from hell. 8/10 

1958 – New Zealand

The ‘black budget’

Perhaps the most well–remembered budget epithet in New Zealand’s history. The so-called Black Budget was delivered by Labour’s Arnold Nordmeyer, who in response to a growing balance of payments crisis, hiked sin–taxes dramatically. Smokers and drinkers were whacked heavily, and because people quite enjoy doing both, the government’s popularity plummeted, and they were bundled out of office in 1960. It was an unfortunate single term of government for the Labour party, who endured near permanent opposition between 1949 and 1984.

The Black Budget had a weird second life as part of a hammy campaign for DB Export beer in 2010. Have a look at this horrifically misleading and ultimately pulled advertisement.

Verdict: The name has stood the test of time, and become something of a cultural touchstone for New Zealanders of a certain age. Not necessarily a good touchstone, but a touchstone nonetheless. 9/10

1909 – United Kingdom

The ‘People’s budget’

This was described by then Chancellor of the UK David Lloyd George as a “war budget,” but the enemy was poverty, rather than the Germans (who in a few years would also be the enemy). It introduced land taxes, and taxes for those on higher incomes, and dramatically increased spending on social welfare. The land tax proposal was later dropped, due to pressure from the House of Lords, but regardless, it was transformative in the lives of Britain’s poorest. Every once in a while there are calls in Britain for another one.

Verdict: Remarkable in that George himself got to name and frame the budget, rather than leaving that up to the opposition. 10/10

2018 – ??

And with New Zealand’s own budget about to be read on Thursday, here are some predictions for the names parties will try and attach to it.

Labour: Probably something soggy and unmemorable like the “caring budget.”

National: Will probably hone in hard on free tertiary fees, and how spending there means money can’t be spent elsewhere. They’ll play on parental fears about their adult children and call it the ‘binge drinking budget.’

New Zealand First: It is literally impossible to predict what phrases Winston Peters will come up with. 

ACT: The stardancing budget. Because it’ll all be utopian, head in the clouds stuff (But really, what else has David Seymour got on at the moment?)

Greens: The Green budget, to remind everyone that they exist.


This content is brought to you by Grant Thornton New Zealand – a national team of business advisors who are committed to unlocking the potential for growth in their people, clients and communities.