spinofflive
fb-groups.png

InternetJune 21, 2024

A tribute to the best and weirdest community Facebook groups

fb-groups.png

From Avondale to Rolleston, there’s something for every nosy neighbour.

There’s that old saying, “never read the comments” about social media. In 2024, it’s still really bad advice. It’s like telling KFC-eaters to throw out the delicious, crispy skin, or cigarette smokers not to inhale that sweet, sweet nicotine.

I know this because my secret guilty pleasure is signing up to community Facebook groups for neighbourhoods I don’t belong to. I do it solely to read the comments. Like, really read them. All of them.

One of my most frequently visited is I LOVE KARORI! (Wellington, NZ!). I’m totally there for the comments, and about 15,350 of its 15,400 members are too, by the looks of things. But what I actually love most about I LOVE KARORI! (Wellington, NZ!) is its name. All enthusiasm. ALL CAPS. I swear it used to have about ten exclamation marks, but it’s still good even with just two. I mean, just look at it. Read it.

“I LOVE KARORI! (Wellington, NZ!)”

Now read it out loud, in character. Pretend you’re the OG Big Save Furniture lady, clearing up a common geographical misconception. Your motivation is that you really love Karori, but you just want to make sure everyone understands exactly which Karori you’re shouting about.

Felt good, didn’t it? Well, that’s the kind of joy I get from perusing the musings of my not-neighbours. Hopefully you can also appreciate how important (and potentially unreliable) the name of a community Facebook group can be.

So here’s are some noteworthy community group names I’ve come across, for better or worse.

10. Aro Valley People’s Republic

This group name is a clever play on some sort of socialist, countercultural image. A quick scroll of posts shows harmless advertisements for chakradance at places called The Innermost Gardens and people asking for directions to the community compost shrine/area. So far, so good.

However, a closer look in the comments reveals an undercurrent of grumpy-old-nimby sentiment, sort of like reptilian shapeshifters that can only survive on a diet of little shits who play their electric guitar too loudly at night. Like most Wellington suburbs, it appears a new cycleway has been built here, the urban equivalent of an electric fence designed to keep nimbys firmly in their la-z-boys at home. Electric guitar kid is probably safe for now.

9. Swanson / Massey / Ranui Community Group

A huge group (22,000) and an excellent service for reporting dogs on the loose or locating your missing dog that’s presumably on the loose. Google hasn’t launched in this area yet. Instead, this group provides a platform for locals to share knowledge on stuff like which local fish and chip shops are open whenever there’s a public holiday. FYI, they’re always open.

8. Berhampore Peeps

This group’s brand feels like it was carefully ideated and workshopped by unsettlingly friendly folks heavily armed with post-it notes. A mostly pleasant place where residents give away mostly useful household items from this century. Maybe too pleasant?

7. Newtown Peeps

Next door to Berhampore, the Newtown Peeps are mostly concerned about a mail thief. The saving grace here is that everyone seems to have excellent CCTV footage of their mail being stolen.

6. Point Chevalier Community

Originally called Pt Chev Community Group, and not to be confused with Pt Chev Community, this group seems to be where media commentator Russell Brown started publishing a new blog this year about the Meola Road roadworks. Pretty sure a disgruntled resident went out and measured road widths on said roadworks at one point, so extra points for being home to the last person in Aotearoa to use any form of data or evidence to inform their complaints online.

5. Rolleston Community Forum

More a “forum” for advertising new businesses in the area, and less a “community”. No idea if this is the real Rolleston. This group has the vibe of a new subdivision still dominated by show homes. It also reveals a serious gap in our intellectual property laws, competing with three(!?) groups called Rolleston Community Page, Rolleston Community Group and Rolleston Community for residents’ attention. I can’t work out which group is best for spying on the suburb formerly known as Canterbury’s Town of the Future, but I am pleased that my nail, beauty, lunch and gutter cleaning needs will all be met when I visit soon.

4. I LOVE KARORI! (Wellington, NZ!)

Points off for not being as much Live, Laugh, Love as the name suggests once you take a look inside. Turns out Karori has Big Boomer Energy, so the hottest topics tend to be roadworks, traffic, the bloody council, cycle lanes, dishing out FB utu “to the stranger in the blue hatchback” who wronged you on your commute this morning, and youths in hooded sweatshirts out after dark (yes, seriously). Perfect resource if you’re doing your PhD on first world problems.

3. Johnsonville Community Noticeboard

Exactly what it says it is and exactly as boring as it sounds.

2. Avondale Community, New Zealand

Does Avondale count as West Auckland? (Exactly the type of poll for a community page.) Because this group is another excellent service for reporting and locating dogs on the loose. An objectively, genuinely useful and well-rounded neighbourhood group, it seems to have a bit of everything and isn’t dominated by a single topic of complaint. Whether it’s a kerfuffle with lots of police surrounding a local petrol station, your car being broken into, or empty nangs clogging up your gutter, someone in this group will have witnessed it. My anecdata suggests that Avondale is the nosy-neighbour capital of Aotearoa, so this community group is almost perfect.

1. Crofton Downs

This group name is a proper power move because it doesn’t feel the need to give you any kind of self-description or purpose. It’s like the community Facebook group version of answering the phone with only your full name, in a low voice, with no actual greeting. I’m too intimidated to join, so whoever these people are, wherever this place is, they win.

Keep going!
The image shows a laptop with a screen displaying a sign saying "Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment." Surrounding the laptop are multiple surveillance cameras pointed towards it.
Image: The Spinoff

InternetJune 19, 2024

Unpacking MBIE’s bad romance with a US-Israeli surveillance-for-hire firm

The image shows a laptop with a screen displaying a sign saying "Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment." Surrounding the laptop are multiple surveillance cameras pointed towards it.
Image: The Spinoff

The Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment has called it quits with shady spyware peddlers Cobwebs Technologies, but is now in the market for another data-harvesting cyber mercenary match. Violet Blue explains.

Last week’s announcement that Aotearoa’s Ministry for Business, Innovation and Employment ended its contract with Israeli-US surveillance-for-hire “cyber mercenaries” Cobwebs Technologies likely came as a surprise to many. That’s probably because MBIE worked pretty hard to keep it quiet.

Before you pour one out for MBIE’s spyware besties, rest assured the ministry is planning to replace Cobwebs citizen-tracking data collection tools with another flavour of spyware peddlers. 

Just maybe not the same one in a different hat. “As the procurement process is ongoing, we are unable to provide further comment on possible decisions around future suppliers, including the option not to renew the contract with Cobwebs,” Jacqui Ellis, MBIE’s general manager of data, insights and intelligence, told The Spinoff via email. “As part of evaluating the options, MBIE will continue to ensure that the use of these types of tools is responsible, appropriate, and proportionate.”

That’s going to make for some tricky shopping in the surveillance-for-hire space. Even Hacking Team sold “lawful interception” tools to governments and law enforcement until their active role in global human rights abuses came to light. 

Let’s rewind for a minute. In 2020 MBIE contracted Cobwebs Technologies (now PenLink Cobwebs) to use its surveillance product suite. No one, including the Office of the Privacy Commissioner, knew until MBIE was forced to admit it. The Office of the Privacy Commissioner confirmed this to The Spinoff via email, saying it “became aware of MBIE’s use of Cobwebs Technologies in October 2022, following media coverage”.

Per RNZ, “The first searches using Cobwebs began in 2022. MBIE said they had been carefully targeted and closely controlled.” Phew, sounds less bad when you put it like that. But to speak infosec for a minute, it’s weird for someone to take two years from buying an off-the-shelf capability to actually running their first intelligence search.

According to product descriptions and demos, the Cobwebs family of products harvest personal and online data, geolocate targets using mobile ad tokens and other tools, scrape the dark web, image and face processing modules, profile creation including friend and family connections, and carry out AI-driven “predictive monitoring” and predictive policing. 

One of the company’s add-ons, Lynx, provides a network of proxies so clients, like government analysts or the LAPD, can hide their identities. That’s handy, because predictive policing tools are notoriously inaccurate, consistently racist, and astonishingly incompetent at monitoring threats.

Cobwebs maintains that it only creates and stores creepy detailed profiles about us by collecting publicly available information, like your old LiveJournal posts rating X-Files actors by hotness, or Mum’s embarrassing Facebook baby photo collection of you. 

Image: Tina Tiller

Yeah, about that.

One year into MBIE’s contract with Cobwebs, a funny thing happened to Cobwebs’ access to Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp. Meta banned them in December 2022. That’s saying a lot coming from a company who spent years turning the word “Facebook” into an antonym for “privacy”, and the ban wasn’t even a matter of professional jealousy. 

“​​We removed about 200 accounts which were operated by Cobwebs and its customers worldwide,” Meta’s Threat Report on the Surveillance-for-Hire Industry explained. “This firm was founded in Israel with offices in the United States and sells access to its platform that enables reconnaissance across the internet, including Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, Twitter, Flickr, public websites and ‘dark web’ sites… the accounts used by Cobwebs customers also engaged in social engineering to join closed communities and forums and trick people into revealing personal information.”

One of the Cobwebs clients Meta named in these violations was New Zealand, along with Saudi Arabia, Hong Kong and other countries. “In addition to targeting related to law enforcement activities, we also observed frequent targeting of activists, opposition politicians and government officials in Hong Kong and Mexico.”

Well, that’s awkward. Especially considering that per RNZ, MBIE’s “business case had specified the tools must be able to search the encrypted WhatsApp platform, and span audio, video, images and text – collecting information without a person knowing – which could include family details, financial, health, political and religious information.” Further, documents RNZ obtained showed that MBIE’s intelligence spy unit MI “had sought and got the ability through Cobwebs to reach into people’s private Whatsapp channels, as well as search the likes of Facebook and Twitter”. 

Responding to Meta’s threat report, Cobwebs CEO Udi Levy, one of three ex-Israel Defence Force intelligence operatives who founded the company, told Israeli business daily Globes, “This report was false.” 

But that was then, and this is now-ish. An investigation by Vice found that Cobwebs’ core system, Tangles, was marketed as late as 2023 as being designed to circumvent changes social media sites make to their API rules. If you’re unfamiliar, APIs handle a wealth of sensitive user data and rule changes often come after breaches, or similar inappropriate access (like Cambridge Analytica). Currently, Cobwebs’ Web Intelligence Webinar explains that one of its main challenges and goals is to “get past privacy restrictions as much as possible”.

Conceptual image with a bunch of floating eyeballs in different sizes overlooking a red phone
Image: Getty Images

It’s good MBIE let that contract lapse this year, though I bet it was uncomfortable to be in the room during 2023’s US Summit for Democracy. That’s when New Zealand joined 11 nations, including Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States, in agreeing to responsible use of commercial spyware. “Israel, a key spyware exporter, is not part of the deal,” reported Cyberscoop. “At time of purchase, Cobwebs Technologies was an Israeli-based company,” MBIE said in its email comments to The Spinoff. “In July 2023, Cobwebs Technologies was acquired by Spire Capital, changing ownership to a wholly owned US company.”

Let’s just hope MBIE makes sure to get all its data back after the breakup. Cobwebs offers clients the options of self-storing the data, or keeping it on Cobwebs’ own servers. Among what information RNZ was able to obtain, “One of the documents, the business case, shows Cobwebs stores the data.” 

An OIA obtained by RNZ showed that MBIE’s “data collected using the Cobwebs tools is stored in Australia”. That’s also where the Office of the Privacy Commissioner stores their data, confirming via email: “It made this decision following a full privacy impact assessment (PIA)… It is our expectation that agencies also undertake this level of care.”

We still don’t know who might’ve been swept up in those Cobwebs-powered MBIE dragnet searches. One of the serious risks inherent in products like those sold by Cobwebs is that they scrape data indiscriminately and profile people inaccurately, with lots of racial bias and collateral collection of innocent people’s data, not just those under suspicion – even on a good day, when they’re not bragging about breaking API rules like Cobwebs has

MBIE (which Immigration New Zealand is part of) told The Spinoff via email: “The Cobwebs tools were not focused on any specific nationality or ethnic group. They were solely used for the purpose of managing the risk of, including preventing, maritime mass arrivals.” 

MBIE acknowledged, “A mass arrival has never arrived in New Zealand; however, they have in many other countries and present an ongoing risk.”

In light of that, the pretence that New Zealand needs to protect itself from mass maritime arrivals feels like the half-drawn horsie meme of excuses. Unless MBIE has a time travel machine, in which case concerns about invading boatloads of migrants are warranted. 

Anyway, we all hope the Office of the Privacy Commissioner gets to go on the next MBIE surveillance-as-a-service shopping trip. It does too, telling The Spinoff it “would expect to be informed of any significant surveillance procurement by a government agency particularly where this technology is new or untested in New Zealand. Our expectation is that the agency would have conducted a PIA and provided assurance to the Privacy Commissioner.”

So who is Aotearoa’s next top surveillance model? It sure seems like MBIE’s trust in Cobwebs may have been misplaced, and we wish them luck in their next cyber mercenary Tinder match.

‘If you regularly enjoy The Spinoff, and want it to continue, become a member today.’
Toby Manhire
— Editor-at-large