ban1080

MediaDecember 29, 2018

Summer reissue: How NZ news livestreams became overwhelmed by anti-1080 activists

ban1080

Livestreams posted on Facebook by our major news organisations have been overrun by an army of anti-1080 activists. Hayden Donnell goes in search of the source of the spam campaign.

This post was originally published August 23, 2018

Yesterday the government announced new wheel clamping regulations. As it often does, the Herald posted live video of the press conference on Facebook. It was pretty standard political fare: Phil Twyford and Kris Faafoi said “cowboy clampers” roughly 300 times as they explained their half-hearted new rules. In the comments, though, a different story was playing out. Virtually no-one there cared about cowboy clampers or even Phil Twyford. Comment after comment flooded in, all variations on the same plea. Each carried some version of the words “ban 1080”.

I was watching the livestream for my fix of parking legislation information, but those comments were all I ended up seeing. There were just so many, and they were so insistent. The Herald’s moderator couldn’t control them, and appeared to have given up trying. It had to have been a concerted campaign. But who was organising it? And how often did this spam army strike?

I got in touch with a Herald social media manager, who said she first saw the mass 1080 comments about a month ago, mainly on live videos. A social media manager at Stuff.co.nz said the #ban1080 brigade had regularly deluged his website’s Facebook page in recent times. He’d noticed the comments first on a Facebook Live video of prime minister Jacinda Ardern’s press conference after returning from maternity leave. He’d tried to hide them but there were too many, and they came too fast. One News said something similar, as did Newshub. Every major news organisation’s Facebook feed had become riddled with anti-1080 fervour. They may have tried to do live videos on every topic from child poverty to wheel clamping, but the comments were always about 1080, and they were just about impossible to police in real time.

Where was the flood coming from? My Herald contact had a clue. She’d traced some of the comments on her page back to the newly formed Facebook group, Operation Ban 1080.

The page started up about a month ago, and has already grown to nearly 40,000 members. It’s mostly good-natured for Facebook. But if there’s one thing that fills its members’ heads with rage like buzzing swarms of wasps, it’s 1080. They believe it’s murdering the animals, waterways, and probably babies of New Zealand, and they won’t rest until it’s banned.

I searched the site’s history for evidence its members had overrun the Facebook pages of our major news organisations. The first hint I could find of the campaign came on August 1.

The campaign escalated after that. On August 6, a live video of Ardern was targeted.

More Ardern live videos were targeted in the following days.

At first the troll army limited themselves to political live videos. But the targets widened as time went on to other live videos, and any international stories.

There was some dissent, but mostly the group was united behind the cause of spamming every live news video with irrelevant calls to ban 1080.

Eventually the pages of every major news site had been spammed.

It was on Ardern’s Facebook page.

Not even the Green Party could escape the barrage.

I asked one of the site’s moderators how the spam campaign got started.

“It wasn’t really something that was promoted by anyone, all of a sudden it just started happening,” he said. “I saw a few of my mates commenting on a few live feeds then next minute it was just going [crazy] … Now every live feed I see from any news organisation that are streaming it just gets hammered in the comments from Supporters to Ban 1080 in Aotearoa.”

He said there was no strategy behind the campaign other than to get government and media to listen to the anti-1080 message. “It’s just a simple plea to the government to [hear] the [tens] of thousands that oppose the use of 1080.”


Read more: 1080 does not kill kiwis – it helps them live


At the very least Operation Ban 1080 has exposed a fissure in Facebook’s already terrible moderation tools. Its live videos are almost impossible to monitor with any amount of effectiveness. Comments come in faster than people can moderate them. If Operation Ban 1080 has proved anything, it’s not that 1080 should be banned, but that a committed group with a moderate following can overrun the social media feeds of our biggest news organisations with little-to-no organisation and minimal effort. That feels like a problem that could have some serious real world implications if it was seized upon by groups with worse intentions than some misguided environmental campaigners. It’s almost enough to make you want to ban Facebook.

Keep going!
Scarfies gave Taika Waititi his first big break, but how did it actually come together?
Scarfies gave Taika Waititi his first big break, but how did it actually come together?

MediaDecember 25, 2018

Summer Reissue: How a cult Dunedin film gave Taika Waititi his big break

Scarfies gave Taika Waititi his first big break, but how did it actually come together?
Scarfies gave Taika Waititi his first big break, but how did it actually come together?

It’s remembered as one of New Zealand’s best comic thrillers, but how did it happen? Joel McManus talks to director Robert Sarkies about his 1999 film Scarfies.

This piece was originally published on April 15, 2018

An empty flat. A quarter of a million dollars worth of weed. A drug dealer that wants to kill you. And you’ve taken him hostage in your basement. What would you do?

That was the question asked by Sarkies’ 1999 film Scarfies, the movie that put Dunedin and its notorious student culture on the big screen for the first time. It also kickstarted the careers of dozens of Kiwi filmmakers, including the current toast of Hollywood, Taika Waititi.

For years, Scarfies was the defining cultural export of North Dunedin. It was shown every year at O-Week and Capping Week, and every prospective fresher would watch it at home in wonder at the ruckus shit that awaited them in Dunedin.

Taika Waititi (nee Cohen) in Scarfies

For Robert Sarkies, who wrote and directed it alongside his brother and long-time collaborator Duncan, it was the realisation of an idea that had been kicking around his brain for three years, and a dream he’d had since he was ten years old.

Five first year students find an empty flat. It’s a shithole and cold as balls, but there are two selling points: free rent, and free power. Then they discover something amazing: a basement chock-full of weed. They flick the whole lot off to a local dealer, and suddenly they have more money than any of them know what to do with. But soon it all comes crashing down. The owner of the house comes back, and he wants to know what they’ve done with his stash.

“It was basically a ‘what if,’” Sarkies said. “You take a group of extremely naive characters and put them in an extremely stressful situation which would ultimately drive them to be prepared to commit murder.”

“It was my first film, so I just wanted something with an interesting enough story that even if I fucked it up, it had potential to succeed.”

$1.6 million to make Dunedin look shitty

Wikipedia lists the budget as $78,000, a number repeated on a few other websites. I asked Sarkies what it was like shooting on such a low budget, and he was dumbfounded. “No, that’s not right at all. Weird.”

While that figure may sound plausible today, in the pre-digital age and shooting on film, it wasn’t even in the ballpark. If he couldn’t get funding from the Film Commission, Sarkies reckoned he could raise some money and get it done for a minimum of $250,000. As it turned out, the Commission snapped the script up at the first opportunity and gave them $1.6 million to get it done.

The fact that it was falsely attributed as a micro-budget project doesn’t upset Sarkies; in fact it’s exactly what he was going for. Given the chance to shoot on a higher quality 35mm film, he turned the offer down. “I didn’t want the film to be slick, I didn’t want it to look great, I wanted it to have a bit of Dunedin grunge to it. But yes, we spent $1.6 million to make the film look kind of shitty. And it worked – it looks shittier every year!”

The lower quality film achieved that grungy look, and allowed him to treat his film stock with what he calls “healthy disrespect… I didn’t have to worry about pressing the button, I could pretend I was shooting on a digital.”

Although he “could never admit it to the ODT” at the time, his entire plan was to ensure that the Dunedin portrayed in the film looked grey and miserable. “I wanted to capture that gloomy feeling of mid-winter Dunedin,” he said. “We had a six week shoot and we only had five days of exterior shooting – any time the weather was shitty we went outside and shot, any time it was beautiful and sunny we filmed inside.”

“I just had to hoodwink Dunedin.”

Discovering Taika

Ask Robert Sarkies about Taika Waititi and he’ll repeat the word “cool” five times in the space of 30 seconds.

“I remember seeing his [audition] tape and thinking ‘Well he’s just fucking cool’. It was obvious back then. It was not obvious that he’d go on to direct Thor but his screen presence was just undeniable coolness. He’s just cool. I was like the opposite of cool, I’m just some little film geek, but he was just effortlessly like ‘Here I am, I’m cool and I’m funny’. There was no competition. I just went ‘well, there’s our Alex.’”

Waititi, who was credited on the film as Taika Cohen, had been living in Berlin and working as a painter, but getting cast in his first feature film was enough to draw him back home.

His character Alex starts out as a lovable rogue, but soon leads the flatties down a dark path.

“Alex is a bit of a control freak, but in a really subtle way,” Waititi said at the time, describing his character. “He really tries to avoid any emotional situation. Towards the end of the movie you’ll realise just how spiteful and nasty he can be, but there are some really likeable traits about Alex.”

Despite stunning the casting team with his audition tape, Sarkies said Waititi hit a few bumps along the way, “I remember the first day on set it was slightly tricky, he just wasn’t clicking into it. He was trying, but there was something slightly flat about it. But by the second day on set – just by observing the more experienced actors on set, he just totally clicked into it and he was an incredible presence every time we rolled the camera.”

Sarkies won’t take any credit for inspiring Waititi to become what he is today, at least not directly. “I guess Scarfies gave him that chance to see what average directing looked like and think ‘Oh, I could do better than that.’”

Sarkies and Waititi did work together again on a couple of commercials and a “terrible” TV drama called The Strip. “I think that was the show that made him decide he didn’t just want to be an actor,” Sarkies said, “because it was a pretty horrible show.”

Looking back, he never could have guessed that his nerdy filmmaking and comedy friends would be the global superstars they are today.

“Taika, Bret McKenzie, Jemaine Clement – I knew all those guys when they were just doing shows at a little theatre in Wellington. I remember thinking to myself ‘Gosh, there’s so much talent here, it’s a shame that only Wellingtonians are going to get to see them’. Little did I know.”

In the final interview of the DVD special features, Waititi is asked what he hopes to do in the future. “I wanna be in Lord of the Rings,” he replies, “I reckon I could play Gollum quite well, eh.”

That famous flat

49 Brown Street, which is both the real and fictional address, was for a time the most iconic of all the student flats. It was the 660 Castle Street of the early 2000s.

Robert was wandering the streets of Dunedin one evening, when he looked up from the Speight’s brewery and saw 49 Brown sitting in its iconic place on the skyline. “That’s gotta be the scarfies’ house,” he thought. It was dingy, and dark, and its hilltop view meant that the whole city could be captured in one shot.

Unfortunately, like most student flats, it was way too small to get a film crew inside. The party scenes, any of the scenes in the hallway, and a couple of the bedroom scenes were all shot in the actual house, but the kitchen, lounge and basement don’t exist.

What they needed was a set that was even worse than the house, which was pretty shit. “I basically wanted to create an environment that an audience could smell and feel the cold of,” Sarkies said.

There was an old abandoned building in Roslyn that was slated for demolition. It was covered in mould and hadn’t seen a bar of soap in a decade. It was perfect. All the set dressing and texture was there already, which worked out because they couldn’t afford it anyway.

The producers offered the contractors some money to halt the demolition and let them film there for a few weeks. They wouldn’t allow that, but they did allow the crew to help take it apart. The crew took out entire rooms and replanted them in their makeshift studio – an abandoned car park building on Princes Street. Their unconventional filming space meant the basement had to be built on the second story.

Creating a cultural icon 

Of the 50 people who made up the cast and crew, only one member of the crew had ever had a role in a feature film before. It was a crew of first-timers, from the directors to the actors to the producer.

For Sarkies, it was important that it wasn’t a cynically made film; it was young people making a film about young people. This meant that the culture depicted had some truth to it, which is why it resonated.

“It reflected something of a spirit of a place, a time and an age, that I was able to do because I lived all that. I didn’t lock anyone in a basement or contemplate murder or even smoke a lot of dope, but I’d been immersed in that world for years”.

“Every time you put something out into the world, and it resonates with the culture, it becomes part of the culture,” he said. “It was my dream that it would help give that culture, for a period, a specific identity, in the same way the capping shows of old and the Dunedin Sound did.”

This piece was first published in Critic Te Arohi, the magazine of the Otago University Students’ Association.