spinofflive
Photo by Tim Clayton/Corbis via Getty Images
Photo by Tim Clayton/Corbis via Getty Images

ParentsNovember 20, 2016

I’m one of the many mums who bottle feed their babies. Where’s our support?

Photo by Tim Clayton/Corbis via Getty Images
Photo by Tim Clayton/Corbis via Getty Images

We all know that breast is best, but is it fair that mothers who are forced (or choose) to bottle feed are forever made to feel second best? Maryrose Painter wonders why there is so little help and information available to mums who hit the bottle.

Before I gave birth to my daughter earlier this year, I prepared myself for a breastfeeding battle. I had an honest conversation with my midwife, bought bottles and a steriliser, talked at length with my husband. I planned to give breastfeeding my best shot, but I also knew I might not be able to produce enough milk.

I had breast reduction surgery a couple of years ago. My surgeon warned me I might struggle to breastfeed and wasn’t able to predict how much milk I’d have. Some women have plenty of milk in spite of the surgery, others find they produce no milk at all. As I was suffering intractable back pain at the time, taking a gamble on breastfeeding children I did not yet have seemed reasonable.

Squishy was born with a healthy appetite. As per my midwife’s advice, I put her to the breast moments after birth. She had a good latch and a strong suck, but I couldn’t feel anything coming out of my breast.

Maryrose Painter and her daughter 'Squishy'
Maryrose Painter and her daughter ‘Squishy’

Squishy and I worked hard to get my milk flowing those three days in hospital. I let her suckle as long as she wanted, then I would pump afterwards. My nipples cracked and bled. The pump’s collection container stayed empty. Squishy wasn’t getting enough to satisfy her, so the nurses helped me to top her up with formula. Feed, pump, bottle, nappy, sleep, repeat. “When your milk comes in it’ll be like Niagara Falls!” my mother encouraged me.

It wasn’t.

A pathetic dribble of milk finally came on day four. Squishy still wasn’t getting enough to eat – 20 minutes at each breast didn’t dent her appetite in the slightest. Combining breast and bottle made each feed intolerably long, especially in the middle of the night. I was exhausted, and Squishy was getting frustrated with my underperforming dairy factory. We saw the hospital’s lactation consultant, who made suggestions about how to increase my milk production, but she couldn’t tell me whether I’d ever have enough milk. No-one could.

When Squishy was two weeks old, and the dark circles under my eyes were the colour of thunderclouds, and I was still answering the door in a spill-covered dressing gown, my midwife got down to brass tacks. “You’re doing all the right things, but if the tissue isn’t there, you might not be able to produce more milk. Do you want to keep going?”

I burst into tears and told her I just couldn’t.

From that day on, my daughter has been exclusively formula fed. According to Plunket, over 80% of babies are at least partially breastfed by their six week check-up. This is great news, because we know breast milk benefits babies. The Ministry of Health’s baby friendly initiative has demonstrably lifted breastfeeding rates, and that’s great.

But breastfeeding is not always possible, for all sorts of very good reasons. And for mums that can’t, or choose not to, there’s a big lack of support and information available. That’s a problem.

All the things that would have been really useful to be told – like which brand of formula to feed, how much milk and how often, which bottle to use, and how to tell if a different teat is required – I had to pick up piecemeal. I Googled, quizzed shop assistants and called Plunketline endlessly. These fact-finding missions were often tearful.

At three weeks, Squishy began to spit up her entire bottle after most feeds. Soaking wet with half-digested formula and my own tears, I called Plunket. The kindly nurse who answered the phone asked how much I was feeding Squishy and how often. It turned out I was overfeeding, and that baby’s tiny tummy couldn’t hold the volume of milk I was trying to put in it. I felt horrible. I had no idea it was possible to overfeed a baby.

At four weeks, Squishy started to get uncomfortable with wind. She pulled her knees into her tummy and howled after feeding. I tried desperately to get all her burps up, without success. Plunket suggested I try a different brand of bottle, but the nurse explained she wasn’t allowed to recommend any. I left Squishy with my husband and went to the baby shop. The wonderful lady behind the counter gave me a full rundown on vented and unvented bottles, wide neck and narrow neck teats. She asked all about my daughter’s feeding habits and whether she had a tongue tie. I bought the bottle she suggested and we’ve been using it with great success ever since.

At six weeks, my doctor’s nurse mentioned in passing it was good to roll the formula can on the bench to unsettle the heavier particles from the bottom, where they’d likely have settled in transit. News to me.

Squishy is now five months old. She’s doing well. I’m doing well. But it would have been easier to get here if someone had handed me a ‘formula-feeding basics’ booklet, or referred me to a bottle-feeding support group. As far as I know, these things don’t exist. But they should. We gain nothing as a society by pretending bottle feeding isn’t happening.

I’d like to see good information and support provided to formula-feeding Mums so we can feel nurtured, empowered and included. We deserve it – we’re doing the best we can for our babies, just like everyone else.

MaryRose Painter is a Wellington-based communications advisor and a proud mum of one. She likes Open Source software and correct grammar, and she’s on Twitter at @dickens_chicken.


This content is entirely funded by Flick, New Zealand’s fairest power deal. In the past year, their customers saved $417 on average, which would buy enough nappies for months… and months. Please support us by switching to them right now.

Keep going!
Getty Images
Getty Images

ParentsNovember 19, 2016

What is reasonable risk? One mum on why she leaves her kids home alone

Getty Images
Getty Images

Has our obsession with keeping kids safe destroyed something beautiful and valuable in their lives – and in ours? Lily Richards considers some new research that suggests unattended children are often in far less danger than many parents think.

Sometimes my partner and I leave our children alone at home while we walk down to the supermarket about ten minutes from our house. Our children are seven and four years old. We live in one of the safest suburbs in Auckland, we leave a mobile phone with them so they can call if they need us, and yes, part of me feels sick about it. But I also suspect I shouldn’t and here’s why: an American study released recently titled No Child Left Alone found that the moral outrage parents incur when they leave their children unattended is very often disproportionate to the actual risks their children face.

I grew up on the side of Mt Victoria on Auckland’s North Shore. Aged nine, I’d come home from school, stuff a heated burrito in my mouth, and head up the mountain. For hours I’d be totally alone, wandering the nearer side of the cone, 10 minutes from home but completely out of sight and totally not within earshot. In today’s climate my parents would be crucified for such lax judgement. Hearing about my after school freedoms, it’s likely they’d imagine my gruesome death in a hundred different guises.

Is the pervasive fear many parents feel for their children actually founded? Consider cars for a second. Children are more likely to die in car accidents than they are as the victims of abduction, yet no one crusades for cars to be made no-kid-zones. In New Zealand children are probably more likely to die inside their homes, at the hands of a family member or someone they know, than as a result of straying from them. Yet I feel confident that many parents wouldn’t condone my decision to leave our kids at home so my partner and I can walk to the supermarket.

Why? Research points to a wonky conscience. Morality has shifted in the last decade to favour the ever watchful parent and essentially criminalise the alternative, which I can’t think of a neutral adjective for as they all seem to be pejoratives: ‘lax’, ‘irresponsible’, ‘inattentive’, ‘careless’.

The researchers behind No Child Left Alone tested the theory that perceived risk was linked to moral judgement by undertaking a series of experiments in which participants were asked to rate the level of risk for children in various scenarios.

For example, a 10-month-old was left alone for 15 minutes, asleep in the car in a cool underground parking garage. In another, an 8-year-old was left for an hour at a coffee shop, one block away from her parent’s location.

To test the moral element of the experiment, the reasons given to subjects as to why the child was left unattended varied. They included the parents having to go to work, being injured, volunteering, relaxing, and meeting a lover.

Not surprisingly, the perception of risk to the child escalated when the participants (over 1,300 of them) found the parents to be acting immorally.

The researchers summed up their findings thusly: “People don’t only think that leaving children alone is dangerous and therefore immoral. They also think it is immoral and therefore dangerous.”

So where does this leave us? In New Zealand (according to the NZ Police) young children must never be left alone in a house or vehicle – they require constant supervision – and it is illegal to leave a child under the age of 14 without reasonable provision for their care.

What’s your definition of reasonable? Mine is locked inside a house with a mobile phone in case they need to call for help or request more rice crackers. The reason why this shifting morality (and the eventual blowback on parents) interests me is that I remember the rush of freedom I felt as a kid when I was alone.

Not alone in my room within the norms and regulations of my overlords (read: parents), but truly alone, on my own terms, in the wild (of Mt Victoria).

Some of the stuff I did defies explanation, probably because I wasn’t being watched and didn’t have to explain myself. I rolled fresh grass into papers I’d bought from the dairy across the road when I was 10 and tried to light them. I pretended I was being interviewed by Oprah and conducted both her side of the interview and mine. I spoke to fairies and pretended I was a single parent constantly angry at my recalcitrant ex-husband for letting the kids down. Shit got real. Shit got weird. I was able to go wherever my freaky brain took me and I honestly think I can partially credit those experiences for my ability to have ideas, to be brave and creative and think unusual things.

Young Boy with Backpack Hiking in the Woods Alone

Being alone outside as a kid is an antidote to the cult of noise and control and accountability that sucks life from all good things. In this condition, silence is a balm. Silence is the kind of space you naturally slip into when you’re alone.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m not suggesting we boot our kids out the front door and wish them the best – but I do think there ought to be less judgement and more rational analysis when we think about the kind of risks we’re willing to expose our children to. Are they terminal risks? Or, after some level-headed thought, are they the kinds of risks that have a 1 in 100 (or 1 in 1000) chance of going wrong but otherwise would really blow the kids’ hair back?

When my partner and I first started dating, we walked. That was our thing. We did it everywhere. We did it during parties. We did it early in the morning. We did it to get places and to have fun. We were walkers. Then we had kids and realised that their tiny legs and finite energy – and endless whinging – meant that we could no longer do the thing we loved.

We accepted this, and we waited. I grew fatter but that’s neither here nor there. Fitness and thinness wasn’t the reason we walked; we walked because it’s ancient and magic and it gets you talking. We walked because no one interrupts you when you’re walking; in such an unfixed way you are unavailable. And every now and then, when we decide it’s worth the risk to feel that magic again, we give the eldest a mobile and lock them inside. Then we walk down to the supermarket and talk widely, uninterrupted.

And what about the kids? They call us about seven times in ten minutes to tell us what the other one is doing or if they said something rude, or to inform us that they saw a bird or ate an old biscuit they found under the couch. In other words they use that freedom to be themselves and then relish in sharing these moments with us.

Lily Richards has two young children with her partner, an unfinished philosophy degree (in ethics) and an invidious interest in looking inside other people’s houses. She has reviewed books for The Listener and Metro magazine, started the 95bfm book review and was the book reviewer for TVNZ U.