spinofflive
“Repurposing infrastructure is a big part of the next few decades,” van Bruggen says . “We need more inventive projects like Auckland’s Lightpath Te Ara i Whiti.”
“Repurposing infrastructure is a big part of the next few decades,” van Bruggen says . “We need more inventive projects like Auckland’s Lightpath Te Ara i Whiti.”

PartnersMarch 7, 2019

Aucklanders should be optimistic about Auckland’s future. Here’s why.

“Repurposing infrastructure is a big part of the next few decades,” van Bruggen says . “We need more inventive projects like Auckland’s Lightpath Te Ara i Whiti.”
“Repurposing infrastructure is a big part of the next few decades,” van Bruggen says . “We need more inventive projects like Auckland’s Lightpath Te Ara i Whiti.”

Urban designer Ben van Bruggen spoke to Jeremy Hansen about why we should stop listening to the vocal minority attempting to block change, and be inspired about Auckland’s development. 

WH Auden once said “we would rather be ruined than changed”. It’s a quote urban designer Ben van Bruggen refers to when I ask him about how we might change the minds of Auckland’s legions of NIMBYs, opposed as they are to increased density, e-scooters, cycle lanes, and anything else that represents a new way of approaching urban problems. But van Bruggen, the manager of Auckland’s urban design strategy at Auckland Council, says he isn’t going to expend a lot of energy in trying to change these people’s minds. “They are the vocal minority,” he says. “There are a group of people who actually want change but they’re not as vocal or not as demanding, because they may not have seen or been told the stories of what that future might look like. We should appeal to them.”

Van Bruggen is an optimist in a job where optimism is most certainly required. Auckland is in the midst of some acute growing pains, with a burgeoning population putting huge pressure on housing and transport infrastructure in particular. Van Bruggen isn’t daunted by this. In fact, he is so excited about Auckland’s potential that he moved here with his family from the UK in 2017. “I was just captivated by what Ludo [Campbell-Reid, Design Champion at Auckland Council] and his colleagues were saying about Auckland and where it was going. [There was] a discourse around what design meant in a place like this. As an urbanist you don’t get that many opportunities to have a city-wide perspective on what you’re doing. Auckland is small enough to understand, but big enough to matter.”

Ben van Bruggen

That said, the city faces challenges on multiple fronts. The population is growing by about 2.6 percent each year which, van Bruggen says, is “a lot to be contending with” for any developed nation. In the 1950s Auckland had a terrific tram system with one of the world’s highest rates of ridership, while nowadays some people (looking at you, Judith Collins) are still resisting a single light rail line down Dominion Road and through Māngere to the airport. The road toll is abysmal, and everyone knows we’re in the midst of a severe housing crisis. Still, van Bruggen’s optimism remains.

On housing: “The global finance approach to housing as commodity exists, so we have a housing crisis,” van Bruggen says. Auckland Council is already acting, he adds, as the planning regime allows for a million homes to be built within the city limits right now. So why do we have a crisis still? “We’ve given over much of our housing development to the private sector … they focus on a very narrow bit of the market. If we perhaps take more of a lead from Germany or Holland, where the public sector has a much higher role in enabling people to build for themselves – and it enables a rental market in high-quality renting and secure tenancy. Generally the government [there] owns the land and doesn’t sell it off … it takes a long-term estate management role in the city.”

The Good Citizen podcast: Download (right click to save), have a listen below, and subscribe to the series through iTunes (RSS feed).

“This is the sort of density in the suburbs that we need to bring intensity and people to our local centres,” van Bruggen says of the Ockham Bernoulli Gardens project in Hobsonville Point.

Urban design has, rightly, been sometimes criticised as a way of gussying up Instagram-friendly parts of a city for tourists and affluent residents while ignoring the needs of people who live outside these zones. Van Bruggen is concerned about equity too. He says it is essential that a city has a vibrant centre – indeed, central Auckland is now one of the fastest-growing residential communities in the country – but adds that it’s also vital to create the ability for residents to undertake most of their daily routines on foot or bicycle in their local areas. One of the problems Auckland now faces is how car-based sprawl has created inequity: the city’s cheapest houses are usually furthest from the centre and also from public transport hubs, which means the poor bear an outsize burden of long commutes and consequent lower productivity and time in which families are apart. The solution, he says, lies partly in transport-oriented development, where suburban shopping and residential hubs are clustered around transit stations, making access easier for everyone.  

There’s also the magic good urban design brings to a city, a feel-good factor that van Bruggen says can communicate the city’s essential values. He’s a huge advocate for inclusive cities, not only for the less able-bodied, but places that include indigenous design values in every urban design project they create. The focus on Māori design values at Auckland Council has come as a pleasant surprise to this UK transplant. “I have the privilege of working with some of the Māori designers in our team … it is interesting the way we’re looking at approaching projects, the way we are thinking about incorporating Māori culture and identity into the urban design of the city and not just applying a piece of art or sculpture. It’s about involvement and engagement with mana whenua and developing stories that we’ll all be able to feel proud of and share.”

Cities change radically, and quickly, when their citizens want them to. Van Bruggen cites the example of The Netherlands – in this case, a whole country – where a high number of children being killed on the roads in the 1970s led to an uprising demanding safe routes to schools. This started a movement of building cycle routes which has become unstoppable – nobody even questions the need for cycle lanes there any more, and now The Netherlands is not only one of the fittest nations on the planet, but also one of the happiest. Auckland, please take note.

Above all, van Bruggen thinks of successful cities as places where people enjoy being together – which is a very nice design objective to have. “It doesn’t have to be new, it doesn’t have to be polished, it doesn’t have to be shiny,” he says. “We will often gather in places where there are lots of other people gathering as well, in cities in particular. And those in themselves become successful places – places to sit and watch what’s going on, to feel safe. There’s a realisation or maturing of [Auckland]. One of the great things about Auckland, and one of the things that excites me, is that innovation and experimentation are not only accepted, they’re encouraged.”


The Good Citizen is produced in association with Britomart, the nine-block precinct at the heart of downtown waterfront Auckland where good ideas – and good citizens – are always welcome.

Where is your money going when you die? (Image: Getty).
Where is your money going when you die? (Image: Getty).

PartnersMarch 6, 2019

I bet you don’t have a will. This is why you need one.

Where is your money going when you die? (Image: Getty).
Where is your money going when you die? (Image: Getty).

In the final instalment of our Money Talks series, freelancers and sprightly young women Tess Nichol and Alice Webb-Liddall talk about the necessity of making a will, despite both being under 30.

Most of us couldn’t say when or how we’ll kick the bucket, but just about the only thing we know for sure in life is that it will end at some point, hopefully later rather than sooner. Despite this morbid certainty, an estimated 50 per cent of Kiwis haven’t got a will.

This means what happens to our money when we die is left up to s77 of the Administration Act – and that can create a whole lot of trouble for those we leave behind, says AMP managing director Blair Vernon.

“It’s not just about the assets you have, it’s about the clarity of instructions. I regard not having a will as the ultimate IOU to your loved ones.”

Thinking about how you’d like to be buried and who should receive items of high sentimental value (even if they’re financially worthless) will make the hard work of dealing with your death a little easier for your family.

If people want to forgo a will that’s their business, Vernon says, but he warns grief can heighten tensions between family members, especially after an unexpected death.

“You’d be surprised the amount of times families have an almighty argument after a tragedy because they can’t agree what was the intention.

“We want people to come together in a moment of grief and do the right thing for everyone and be able to have the courage to carry on, but sometimes the lack of will is the last straw and just creates a train smash.”

People could look into creating a will online, and pay for it online as well sometimes for as little as about $100.

“It’s a pretty simple investment for a removal of a whole lot of drama.”

So for Tess, who has just returned from overseas travel, and Alice, who is about to embark on an OE – and despite both being still in their 20s – maybe it’s time to think about planning ahead.

Tess: I’ll be honest, getting a will sorted has never once crossed my mind. It’s not like I’ve got any assets, and I’m only 29! What would I do, leave my brother and sister the $300 in my savings account?

Alice: I’m with you there, I’m not sure my stuff is worth fighting over. When I was little I used to see wills on TV and would secretly write down little lists of my stuff and who would get it if I died, but that was me at around age 9 so I’m not sure they’d stand up legally.

Tess: That’s really sweet and only a little morbid, Alice. I reckon once you start thinking about all the practical steps which need to be taken it does make you see the non-financial value of a will. Do I want to be cremated or buried, and where would I want my ashes scattered? I’ve never discussed that with my family, and I’d hate for them to end up fighting about anything because no one could agree about what I would have wanted. Have you Alice?

Alice: I’ve never talked about anything like that with my family. It seems kind of scary because I know if I bring it up then they’re more than likely to start talking about their own deaths and I’m a lot more comfortable with the idea of myself dying than my loved ones dying.

I definitely want to make sure my family isn’t over-spending if they ever do have to say goodbye, so I should probably at least let them know the basics of what I want to happen.

Tess: I totally agree – I don’t want to sting my family with a $10,000 burial cost. I want to be cremated! I never told them that. God, maybe I need life insurance as well. It’s all a bit grim isn’t it.

Alice: And I guess that’s why people put it off, because it is grim. Nobody wants to think about themselves or their loved ones dying. My (frankly terrible) philosophy that if I don’t think about things for long enough they’ll go away doesn’t really apply to dying.

Tess: Haha. Do you think going away will make you think about this kind of thing a bit more? I got travel insurance for my trip so at least that would have covered a few of the urgent things if everything went catastrophically wrong, but I guess I didn’t appreciate the fact that travel comes with a few more risks than staying at home and I hadn’t left any kind of plan for my family in case I never made it home.

Alice: It does make me think a little bit. I’m on the same boat in terms of travel insurance, that’s something I’ll definitely be getting. However, I’m an optimist so probably still won’t look into spending money on making post-death plans just yet. I think maybe having a talk about it and thinking about it can’t hurt though.

Tess: Yeah, a talk is a good place to start even if actually following through still seems a bit… premature? Although it’s quite good knowing you can do it online, if I had to go into a bank or something I’m honestly not sure I’d bother until I had kids.

Alice: Very true. Anything I can do while in my dressing gown on my couch is about 90% more likely to get done than anything that requires I put on pants.

Tess: Yeah if I have to put a bra on to run an errand, that errand is never going to get run. I’ll probably die early from my sedentary lifestyle so maybe I should start thinking about a will now, actually.

More from our Money Talks series:

An honest conversation between two freelancers about money

Love and money: two freelancers discuss managing money and relationships

How to spend it: two freelancers on why they buy the things they do

Full time vs freelancing: is being your own boss really worth the stress

How much do I need to retire? Two freelancers imagine life in 60 years

This content was created in paid partnership with AMP. Learn more about our partnerships here.