Image: Archi Banal/Tina Tiller
Image: Archi Banal/Tina Tiller

PoliticsFebruary 2, 2023

End in sight for Australian deportations denounced as draconian and inhumane

Image: Archi Banal/Tina Tiller
Image: Archi Banal/Tina Tiller

PM Anthony Albanese has announced changes to help protect New Zealand-born residents of Australia from deportation, following years of outcry about the toll on so-called ‘501s’. Don Rowe looks at why the policy is so widely reviled.

A major shift in Australian immigration policy means the government will now consider a wider range of factors before ordering the deportation of New Zealand-born residents under the notorious section 501 of the Australian Migration Act.

The new directive, issued by Australian immigration minister Andrew Giles, requires officials to weigh the strength and nature of a potential deportee’s connections to Australia as well as the impact on their children when making decisions regarding their visa. The length of time someone has lived in Australia is now a “primary consideration”, a government spokesperson said.

The change in direction comes almost a year since prime minister Anthony Albanese vowed to reconsider the policy Jacinda Ardern once characterised as “corrosive” to trans-Tasman relations.

Section 501 of the Migration Act, amended last in 2014 by hardline Liberal Party leader Peter Dutton, allows for the cancellation or refusal of the visa of any migrant on “good character” grounds. Dutton famously featured in a news piece in which deportees were antagonised on the runway of an airport. Elsewhere, he referred to deportees as “trash”.

Meg de Ronde, executive director of Amnesty International Aotearoa New Zealand, told the Guardian such “dehumanisation” was a worrying approach.

“I have to think by constantly demonising and singling people out – ‘taking out the trash’ – this degrading language is just compounding the trauma and the shame and humiliation of this.”

Failure to meet the “good character” test – which includes not only a wide range of criminal behaviour but also more nebulous factors like undesirable social connections – has seen thousands of New Zealand-born Australian residents deported.

The Villawood Immigration Detention Centre near Sydney, where many New Zealanders are held before being deported (Photo: Greg Wood/AFP/Getty Images)

Many of them have been held in inhumane conditions at Australia’s notorious detention facilities, some have ended up dead. In 2015, 23-year-old Junior Togatuki died in his cell at Sydney Supermax.

Togatuki, who had lived in Australia since the age of four, had been held for up to a month in solitary confinement. His psychiatrist reported an increase in psychotic symptoms and Togatuki’s medication was increased. Guards entered his flooded cell to find pleas for help written in blood.

Professor Gillian Trigg, president of the Australian Human Rights Commission from 2012-2017, told The Spinoff that conditions in detention centres are in breach of the UN Convention on Torture. The facilities, she said, “are designed to break people”.

Many deportees have lives in Australia: jobs, families, homes. Many have no connection to New Zealand at all, having not been back in decades. One man, born to an Australian mum holidaying in New Zealand in 1974, currently awaits deportation.

Those that do come back are often cast adrift, like Matthew Taylor who was found dead in a Porirua playground in 2017.

Tokens to remember Matt Taylor, a 501 deportee who died shortly after arriving in NZ (Image: Supplied)

The complexities of Australia’s immigration system, as well as the right to work, live and study that New Zealand-born migrants are granted on the Special Category Visa, mean many people never seek full citizenship. Day-to-day it’s not a critical distinction, but the act leaves non-citizen residents vulnerable to the workings of section 501.

Seventy-year-old Larice Rainne was deported in 2019 after spending 55 years living in Australia, even working for the government. She arrived in New Zealand for the first time since 1964 with a bag of clothes, no family and $200 to her name.

“Exile,” she said, “is a totally diabolical situation to be in.”

In 2015, a 15-year-old was deported in a secretive process that then-children’s commissioner Judge Andrew Becroft called a breach of Australia’s international obligations under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.

Other deportees have been blamed for an increase in gang violence and organised crime here at home. The man accused of murdering Sandringham dairy worker Janak Patel last year was reportedly a recent deportee, and figures released to RNZ under the Official Information Act revealed more than half of deportees have reoffended on arrival. Of the roughly 14,000 offences committed by deportees since 2015, almost 3000 were violent crimes.

Slain dairy owner Janak Patel, pictured on the cover of his funeral programme. (Photo: RNZ / Rayssa Almeida)

Some 501s are hardened offenders from Australia’s biker gangs, and have created sophisticated and professional criminal networks, police say. Organisations like the Comancheros have been blamed for intensifying violence and shootings, and in 2021 National Māori Authority chair Matthew Tukaki urged the government to “turn the planes around”. New Zealand is not a “dumping ground for Australian criminals,” he said.

Speaking in Auckland on Wednesday, prime minister Chris Hipkins said he welcomed the shift, especially the Australian government’s acknowledgement of potential deportees’ connections to Australia.

“Some of them have been there since they were very young children, and sending them to New Zealand when they have no connections here other than a very historic one isn’t really a fair or just outcome.”

Hipkins applauded the move as a “first step” and said work would continue on immigration rights and the “general treatment” of New Zealanders living in Australia.

The directive comes into effect on March 3, but for the thousands of whānau who have made their lives across the ditch the relief has likely already begun.

This is Public Interest Journalism funded through NZ On Air.

Keep going!
(Image: Tina Tiller via Stuart Donovan)
(Image: Tina Tiller via Stuart Donovan)

OPINIONOpinionFebruary 2, 2023

Auckland needs sustainable transport. Will we get it under Wayne Brown?

(Image: Tina Tiller via Stuart Donovan)
(Image: Tina Tiller via Stuart Donovan)

The devastating deluge has highlighted the need for urgent climate action – but how likely is that under our current mayor?

As a proud, unashamed JAFA, the recent floods literally hit home. Sirens blared nonstop all night Friday and all morning Saturday as a mighty torrent raged outside my window. It felt like the apocalypse that we know is coming hit Tāmaki Makaurau early. The ultimate apocalypse, climate change, was even acknowledged by new prime minister Chris Hipkins and new-ish mayor Wayne Brown as the cause of Auckland’s devastating deluge. 

Amid the climate crisis we find ourselves in, sustainable solutions are essential. Although Auckland’s emissions are tiny relative to other global cities and their parent countries, the time to act is now. If we did, our biggest city could become a leading global example for other cities to follow regarding sustainable solutions. A key ingredient for Tāmaki’s sustainability recipe has to be reducing transport emissions. Currently, transport is the primary source of Auckland’s greenhouse gas emissions. Transitioning from polluting to sustainable transport means a refocus from fossil fuel-burning cars towards public transport (PT), active modes (biking, walking, scooting, skating) and clean cars. 

Flooding outside Auckland's Eden Park after the record rainfall.
Flooding on Eden Park’s outer oval after the record rainfall in Auckland. (Photo: RNZ)

The recent floods were a wero laid down by mother nature to action sustainable solutions right now – not tomorrow, next week, next month or next year. How will Auckland and mayor Wayne Brown respond to this challenge? When it comes to sustainable transport it’s hard to tell, because Brown’s big transport policy is yet to be thought up, let alone put into action.

We do know that Brown’s big transport policy, announced last December, will be a co-authored plan with the Beehive covering cars, PT, freight, active modes, the port and a new harbour crossing. Since the plan is still in the formulation stage, it isn’t easy to investigate whether or not it will progress sustainability. The Spinoff contacted the mayoral office for comment, but we are yet to receive a reply. But some of Brown’s early actions as mayor indicate his stance on sustainable transport in Tāmaki Makaurau.

Mayor Brown appointed councillor John Watson as Auckland Council’s transport lead. Under the previous mayor, Phil Goff, councillor Chris Darby was the transport lead. Darby had Tāmaki heading in a sustainable transport direction, prioritising emissions reductions by investing in PT and active modes. It was a kick in the nuts to Darby and sustainable transport when Brown did not reappoint him. As Auckland’s transport lead, Watson is aiming for low-hanging fruit. Watson’s unambitious 2023 transport priority for Auckland is improved communication with PT users. AT is not off to a good start in achieving Watson’s goal. The earliest communication about how to get to the January 27th Elton John concert was on… January 26th. The priorities of Brown’s transport lead are in stark contrast to Goff’s equivalent. Darby was doing the hard yards to champion sustainable transport, which Watson has yet to do. 

Brown has also placed two Auckland councillors on the AT board, Mike Lee being one of them. Lee has proven to be a roadblock for a major sustainable transport project in Auckland’s inner west. He convinced Mayor Brown to delay a PT, biking and pedestrian upgrade spanning Grey Lynn, Westmere and Point Chevalier. These projects have been in the works since 2016, and advocacy groups Bike Auckland and Women in Urbanism urged leaders to go ahead with them after Lee’s efforts. 

A map showing the Inner West Improvement project's bike infrastructure.
A map showing the bike infrastructure in the proposed Inner west improvement project. (Image: Auckland Transport)

Brown has appointed councillors into powerful transport positions who have so far not been sustainability advocates. These appointments do not bode well for sustainable transport in Tāmaki Makaurau, nor do Brown’s comments. On January 25th, Brown penned a New Zealand Herald piece titled “The case for light rail is lighter than ever”. Auckland’s boss stated that light rail is not immediately essential and should be decided on after opening the City Rail Link, which at its earliest is roughly two years away. Brown also commented that the price for light rail has ballooned out of control. Although that is a correct assessment, it doesn’t mean that light rail should be rejected altogether. PT, including light rail, will be necessary for Auckland’s sustainable transport solution. Auckland light rail could be done more cheaply than currently proposed, for example, by choosing a surface-level option instead of the current tunnelled plan. 

So far, the actions and words of Wayne Brown suggest sustainable transport will not progress during his term as mayor. However, the key term there is “so far”. In the aftermath of Auckland’s first climate crisis catastrophe, both the public and many politicians are demanding sustainable solutions. Hopefully, the co-authored plan yet to come from Auckland Council and the Beehive will boost sustainable transport – but only time will tell how Tāmaki Makaurau, and Mayor Brown, respond to the wero laid down by mother nature to enact climate crisis solutions now. 

‘Become a member and help us keep local, independent journalism thriving.’
Alice Neville
— Deputy editor