AI_Generated-Ads.png

PoliticsJune 8, 2023

How to spot an AI political ad (for now)

Guest writer
AI_Generated-Ads.png

Where National led, others are sure to follow. So how can we tell which ads feature real people and which are AI-generated fakes? Design guy Tim Gibson has some tips.

What a time to be alive. From Popes in puffers, to Levi’s diversifying their fashion models so fully that they’re not even living organisms any more, to AI-made ‘Aotearoa carnage’ ads from our own National Party, we’re awash with AI imagery.

Can we keep up with it all? How many fingers does Vladimir Putin have anyway? Is it OK to use imaginary people in ads endorsing (or attacking) real political parties? And how much should we care if gran thinks that farmer really grew a strawberry the size of a melon?

I’m an illustrator, art director and creative director in the advertising industry, and I have an unhealthy interest in how AI is changing and challenging creative jobs like mine. In this piece I want to show you how to spot fake images – and why it’s going to get a lot harder to spot fakes in the future. 

Alongside the words, you’ll find some new bespoke political ads for Election 2023, helping our political parties appeal to new market segments with pretend people who may (or may not) look exactly like us.

Each piece was generated using the Midjourney art generator app, and all used a similar prompt structure: a smiling person (described with demographics like age, apparent gender, race and clothing) giving a thumbs up, in a described setting. And voila: hyper-targetted ads in mere seconds, and practically for free.

The main images were generated using Midjourney 5.1 – the latest version – and prompts were not re-rolled or developed, even if they resulted in apparent errors. Each set of images took approx five minutes of labour. 

All this is to say that these images are pretty realistic, but I have also left some obvious ‘tells’ that could have easily been fixed or avoided by someone paid better than an opinion writer, or a social media content creator for the National Party.

Along with the finished product, I’ve included gifs showcasing the incredible advancement in AI image generation, from MidJourney v1 (February 2022) through to v5.1 (May 2023). Apologies in advance for the horror show that awaits.

So, how do you spot an AI-generated image?

The classic tells include faint watermarks, odd-numbered fingers or limbs and giraffe necks. All these still crop up from time to time, but like vestigial tails, they’re being bred out of modern AI models and can be easily avoided with a mere ‘re-roll’ of a prompt. Finding them now is almost retro at this point. I’ve included a few egregious examples in my ads for the trainspotters, even when more ‘perfect’ generations were available to me.

Here’s what is still worth keeping an eye out for:

The ‘AI Grasp’

This is a sort of fumble-fingered, alien grasp of a teacup, sword, pen or placard. Imagine my Pākehā five-year-old using chopsticks for the first time. Or that time John Key tried a three-way handshake with Richie McCaw and Mr RWC Rugbyface guy.

Extra limbs

AI beings have the ability to hold babies and kiss them, while simultaneously handing out fliers to the parents. How do they do that? Extra limbs.

‘Dad drinking’

AI people can’t drink or eat without looking weird. Like when your dad asks for a sip of your soda and then really gums up the lid before re-depositing most of the liquid from his mouth back into your bottle. Like that. Or any of the real photos of John Key interacting with food or drink.

Goblin goat eyes

Strange, possessed eyes out of a horror movie, or like any sheep’s eyes if you care to look at them. Terrifying. 

Lad mag skin aka ‘the Maxim Effect’

Remember when soft-core babe magazines for ‘the blokes’ were all the rage, and the photo-retouchers decided human skin was revolting and needed to have all of its pores replaced with a Gaussian blur? Kinda that.

Spectacles, wallets and watches

The subtle interaction between glasses and faces is still proving tricky for AI, as are human hands interacting with wallets. Any watch or clock face is often garbled like a Dali dream. 

Buckles and buttons

Buttons appear in weird places on clothing, and buckles magically hold up straps, clothing and objects using bizarre foreign shapes and alien logic.

Doodle details

AI art tends to feature an impressionistic approach to tattoos, written text, graphic design and jewellery. As with impressionist art, it’s an illusion of detail that convinces on a cursory glance but breaks down into nonsense when you look more closely.

Whether or not we should accept AI ‘models’ in our political advertising is still up for debate. What is clear is that these kind of images are going to be an increasing part of our everyday lives, and until media organisations and image creators start digitally tagging their AI-generated images we are going to be left on our own in separating real from fake.

So go forth armed with these AI-spotting tools safe in the knowledge that never again will you be taken in by fake AI imagery – at least until Midjourney releases its next update and likely fixes most of the ‘tells’ listed above.

Which will probably be shortly before our elections in October.

Keep going!
Michael Wood and a sticker chart for listening (Image: Archi Banal)
Michael Wood and a sticker chart for listening (Image: Archi Banal)

PoliticsJune 7, 2023

What to do when your child (Michael Wood) just won’t listen

Contributing writer
Michael Wood and a sticker chart for listening (Image: Archi Banal)
Michael Wood and a sticker chart for listening (Image: Archi Banal)

The former transport minister was asked 12 times to sell his Auckland Airport shares and didn’t do it. Emily Writes, a parent, knows exactly what that’s like.

It was revealed at question time today that now-former transport minister Michael Wood was asked 12 times by the cabinet office to sell his Auckland Airport shares. Today, my son, the Minister of Demanding I Cut His Honey Toast Into Diagonal Pieces, was asked seven times to put his shoes on. 

It made me realise that the parents of Aotearoa are uniquely qualified to give the cabinet office advice on how to deal with ministers who are largely unmoved when you say “I am not going to ask you again” before you ask them again.

So, here’s my advice, gleaned from a decade of my children vehemently and aggressively not listening to me when I ask them to put their plate in the dishwasher and/or pick up their bloody fluffing towel off the bathroom floor.

Michael Wood not listening (Image: Anna Rawhiti-Connell)

First, I would ask if the cabinet office considered telling Michael Wood they would “count to five”. When using the “count to five” technique it’s important you actually know what the punishment will be when you inevitably reach five. 

Will Michael Wood be sent to his room? Will he have no time on the Xbox? Will his play date with Grant Robertson be cancelled? If you don’t figure this out before you get to five (and believe me you will get to five) you’ll be stuck trying to figure out on the spot, while sleep deprived, what you’re meant to do.

If the counting to five doesn’t work (and it probably won’t), the cabinet office could also try a short time in. The time in is different to the time out because our generation of parents have listened to too many experts telling us we will ruin our kids’ lives if we give them the same discipline we had. A time in is exactly the same as a time out but on Instagram you say you did a time in instead of a time out so you don’t get judged. A home-made glittery sensory shaker timer for Michael Wood to hold while he has a five-minute time in might also help. This actually appears to be what Chris Hipkins has opted to do (for now).

If that doesn’t work (and it probably won’t), I suggest some gentle parenting. It’s important the cabinet office is on the same eye level as Michael Wood so there’s no parent/child imbalance. Explain to Michael Wood that even though you know his shares are special to him, and you know he loves his shares, he has to sell them. Offer a cuddle and see if he would like to swap his shares for something else, like a skateboard.

If gentle parenting doesn’t work, it might be time to bring in the big guns. Call Michael Wood’s nana. Bringing in a grandparent is a big deal but grandparents can give a unique perspective that parents can’t. The cabinet office may be able to get Michael Wood to sell his shares without even calling his nana. Just the threat of “Do you want me to call your nana and tell her you won’t sell your shares?” might be enough. It’s like the Old Days when they said “When your dad comes home…” except now dads know how to emotionally connect with their children so we don’t use it any more.

If the threat of Nana still doesn’t get Michael Wood to sell his shares, the cabinet office could try yelling. Yelling “For the love of God can you just sell your damn shares we are already late, and I don’t have time for this. ARE YOUR EARS PAINTED ON just sell your shares OK” will definitely not work but sometimes you just have to yell because YOU JUST HAVE TO.

‘Like a thousand-piece jigsaw puzzle, each member is vital to the whole picture. Join today.’
Calum Henderson
— Production editor

If yelling doesn’t work, the cabinet office could use a sticker chart to support Michael Wood in working on his listening goals. Each time Michael Wood listens, he gets a gold star. He will inevitably decide that he’s no longer interested in the sticker chart and you’ll lament that you spent 20 fucking dollars on stickers.

My final suggestion is bribery. The cabinet office should tell Michael Wood that if he sells his shares he will get an extra 15 minutes playing Fortnight or one Lego set under $25.

If he still won’t listen….well, your guess is as good as mine.

Politics