blog march 18 upd2

PoliticsMarch 18, 2021

Live updates, March 18: Almost $1m to have Rod Stewart ‘rock the dock’

blog march 18 upd2

Welcome to The Spinoff’s live updates for March 18, bringing you the latest news throughout the day. Get in touch at stewart@thespinoff.co.nz

Top stories:

4.45pm: Green co-leader Marama Davidson and National MP Nicola Willis clash in house 

During question time at parliament today, MPs canvassed the worst economic downturn in the country’s history, shortcomings in the ongoing review of Pharmac and which DHBs are facing the chopping block next year. Then they turned to homelessness.

Thousands of New Zealanders have found themselves in motels and other emergency accommodations in recent months as the government’s social housing programme has fallen far behind demand and rents have shot up.

National’s Nicola Willis, one of the few MPs left in that party’s progressive wing, was tasked with asking questions of the associate minister of housing (homelessness), better known as Green co-leader Marama Davidson.

The associate minister revealed that in the past year, over 1,000 new spots have had to be created for the homeless and another 2,162 people are receiving emergency grants to stay in homes. Willis’s questions, though, didn’t focus on the number of people, but on who they are.

“Is she concerned by reports that children are being co-located in emergency accommodation with 501s and gang members engaging in violent and criminal behaviour?” asked Willis.

Yes, said Davidson, who then added, “We must make sure that we do not stigmatise any one group or community with crime.”

Question time then turned towards comments Davidson had made on Twitter and whether people concerned about living near homeless people housed in emergency accommodations are showing “racist and classist undertones”.

“Is she accusing New Zealanders who raise concerns about their safety in relation to increased numbers of people in emergency accommodation as being racist?” asked Willis.

It’s important to note here that an MP can’t call another MP racist in the house.

“I am accusing a member, a National member of this house, of attempting to stigmatise a group of people with little access to power and resourcing, of attempting to whip up stigmatising and dehumanising narratives around groups of people who need our support, around groups of people who need us to address the systemic causes of crime,” said Davidson. “Yes, I am accusing a National member of raising that dehumanising narrative,” Davidson answered.

A back-and-forth ensued about whether Davidson called Willis a racist. The speaker eventually concluded that she did not.

Over the past year, about nine more New Zealanders a day have turned to government for help because they’re homeless or about to be.

– Justin Giovannetti

3.30pm: Yet another call for the trans-Tasman bubble

You’re possibly sick of hearing about the will-it-or-won’t-it-happen trans-Tasman bubble – but here’s another update.

Business NZ is joining the calls for the bubble to open as soon as possible, saying Australian travellers would help plug the gap in our struggling tourism sector.

“It’s now 12 months since the 600,000 New Zealanders living in Australia and 75,000 Australians in New Zealand have been able to easily travel to see families and friends face-to-face and share important occasions like weddings and other milestone events,” said co-chair of the Australia New Zealand Leadership Forum Ann Sherry.

“And it’s not just those wonderful, personal connections. Our countries are very closely linked economically, with around $27 billion in two-way trade flowing between New Zealand and Australia (pre-Covid-19). This meant about 400,000 business trips a year across the Tasman. Plus, tourism companies on both sides have been left languishing without visitors from the other country – a gap that domestic tourism has struggled to fill.”

Earlier today, it was reported by both RNZ and Stuff that a bubble could be operating by the end of next month. Sherry said that the issue seemed to have stalled since Australia started quarantine-free travel for New Zealanders six months ago.

“Both countries have successfully managed the health risks of Covid-19, with testing and tracing regimes that are quickly snuffing out any cases appearing in the community. Now with vaccination rolling out in New Zealand and Australia it’s time the low risk of transmission between the countries is recognised with more open travel arrangements.”

2.30pm: Regional check – what’s happening outside of Auckland?

Time now for a sporadic live updates feature taking a look at some of the news happening outside of the main centres.

In Northland: A Bay of Islands peninsula could be turned into New Zealand’s most important kiwi sanctuary, according to a (paywalled) report in the Northland Advocate. The conservation project will see pests such as possums, stoats, feral cats and rats eradicated from 7600 hectares of land on the Purerua Peninsula. 

“We’re well placed to suppress the four main threats to our wildlife on the peninsula — possums, feral cats, mustelids and rats — with a view to eradication further down the track,” said Kiwi Coast Mid-North coordinator Andrew Mentor. “This should help the resident kiwi, kūkūpa, pāteke, dotterels, bittern, fernbirds and ōi (grey-faced petrel).” The peninsula had “massive” potential as a sanctuary, he said.

Also in Northland, some important dog news! Sheep dog Spot won the “short head and yard event” at the Rodney leg of the Northland circuit on Saturday. As reported in the Northland Age, Spot, and owner Mike Moody, also placed fourth in the long head event. Who’s a good boy? Spot is.

Meanwhile in Queenstown: Wakatipu High School is updating some of the more controversial themes from the musical Grease for its local production, reports the Otago Daily Times. “Some points of the show have been tweaked if actors felt uncomfortable or unable to disconnect with the content,” said drama teacher Jake Hansen. The 70s’ film has drawn criticism during recent rebroadcasts for perceived misogynistic, homophobic and slut-shaming lyrics.

1.15pm: Almost $1m to have Rod Stewart ‘rock the dock’

The overall cost of having Rod Stewart “rock the dock” through a performance of his song Sailing almost totalled $1 million.

An official information act request made by Puketāpapa Local Board member Jon Turner, and published on FYI.org, asked the New Zealand Tourism Board for: “the total costs to the taxpayer of having Rod Stewart sing ‘Sailing’ for the America’s Cup”.

The Spinoff’s Tara Ward wrote about the bizarre weekend performance, in which those at Auckland’s viaduct were encouraged to rock the dock. Rod Stewart, of course, is not in New Zealand.

In its response, the tourism board said while they would not disclose Sir Rod’s exact fee, the total cost of hosting the event was $918,000. “This includes Sir Rod’s fees, marketing and promotional budget and production costs associated with the event,” the response said.

“Sir Rod Stewart was chosen for this event as he has global appeal and a strong connection to New Zealand with two of his children born here he’s always felt like New Zealand was a second home.”

The rock the dock event was intended to bring New Zealanders together in a show of support for the teams and their fans around the world who are unable to be here, the board said.

He is sailing. Screengrab: TVNZ

12.55pm: No Covid-19 update today

Just a FYI that we won’t be hearing from the Ministry of Health today. The ministry will be sending out updates every other day, as the number of new cases has dropped since the recent community outbreak.

If you’re missing your daily dose of Ashley Bloomfield, see the 12.45pm update.

The next update will be tomorrow.

12.45pm: Control of water fluoridation could soon sit with Ashley Bloomfield

As if managing a pandemic wasn’t enough, Ashley Bloomfield could soon have even more responsibility. The government is proposing taking decision-making on water fluoridation away from district health boards and giving it to the director general of health.

Associate health minister Ayesha Verrall said the proposed change would simplify the decision-making process. “[It] means we are taking a nationally consistent approach that’s based on evidence,” she said. “The Fluoridation Bill as a whole recognises water fluoridation is a health-related issue. Right now only around 2.3 million New Zealanders have access to fluoridated drinking water.”

12.20pm: Covid-19, on this day

A daily look at where we were in the Covid-19 pandemic in New Zealand one year ago:

March 18, 2020: On this day one year ago, New Zealand confirmed eight new cases of Covid-19. At this stage, cases of the virus were continuing to pop up nationwide. These cases were recorded in Auckland, Christchurch, Waikato and Invercargill.

Overall, New Zealand had 20 Covid-19 cases in total.

A year ago, there were just 191,127 cases of the virus globally and 7807 deaths.

11.50am: NZ economy ‘resilient’ despite Covid-19 – Robertson

The finance minister said today’s GDP figures show our economy is “resilient”, despite the ongoing impacts of Covid-19.

As reported here, New Zealand’s economy experienced its greatest ever annual decline in 2020, contracting by 2.9% as Covid-19 shut the country’s borders and upended global trade.

In a statement, Grant Robertson said it’s “not surprising” that the numbers are fluctuating. “The world is dealing with the ongoing impact of Covid-19 and there will be volatility for some time,” Robertson said. “New Zealand had an extremely strong bounce-back in the September quarter and some of that has evened out in the December quarter.”

Robertson said that New Zealand outperformed countries that we compare ourselves to: Australia dropped by 1.1%, United States by 2.4%, the United Kingdom by 7.8% and Japan by 1.3%.

On The Spinoff: All the weird and wonderful moments from last night’s 6pm TV news

I don’t know if you’re aware, but New Zealand won the America’s Cup yesterday. No biggie. The 6pm news coverage of this historic occasion was, quite simply, insane.

The Spinoff’s Tara Ward dutifully watched both 1News and Newshub last night to compile the most comprehensive review of both.

Here’s an extract:

Simon [Dallow] was full of words and they all ended with exclamation marks. He began the bulletin standing by himself, a lone wolf of current affairs in the eye of the celebratory storm, but a rapturous crowd soon gathered behind him. They cheered whenever he spoke, lifting children into the sky and waving in triumph. He couldn’t hear a thing, but it didn’t matter. They were the 12 knot wind beneath Simon’s wings and he was up on both foils, living his best life live on the six o’clock news.

Things were slightly more composed on Newshub, which began by informing us the crowds were so big in the Viaduct that Auckland Council was asking people to stay away. In unrelated news, 1 News reported that mayor Phil Goff was in the Mumm tent getting stuck into the bubbly, while on the water, Newshub reporter Lisette Reymer captured frenzied fans leaping into the sea and police hooning around on jet skis. Lockdown was forgotten, Covid-19 didn’t exist. It was bedlam, and nobody was sorry.

Read the full report here

10.45am: New Zealand economy experienced largest ever decline in 2020

Political editor Justin Giovannetti has the details:

Covid-19 pummelled New Zealand like neither the great depression nor the global financial crisis ever could.

New Zealand’s economy experienced its greatest ever annual decline in 2020, contracting by 2.9% as Covid-19 shut the country’s borders and upended global trade.

The latest figures, released this morning by StatsNZ, shows an economy that hit the brakes in the final months of last year as continuing restrictions on travel began to weigh on the country’s businesses. New Zealand’s economy shrank by 1% in the final three months of the year, the worst showing among the countries with which StatsNZ compares its figures.

The world’s rich economies grew by 0.9% on average during that period, while Australia and Japan’s GDPs grew by nearly 3% in the December quarter. “The December 2020 quarter results reflect an easing of activities following a post-lockdown catch up in the previous quarter, and the continued absence of international visitors,” wrote StatsNZ.

Stats NZ said that these figures need to be taken into consideration when comparing the recent GDP results for different countries.

“Activity in New Zealand in the December 2020 quarter was down almost 1% compared with the same quarter in 2019, pre-Covid,” national accounts senior manager Paul Pascoe said.

“This dip is similar to Australia, but much less of a fall than seen in the European Union or the United Kingdom.”

Read more from Justin here

9.45am: Trans-Tasman travel bubble by ‘mid-April’ – report

Updated

Stuff has claimed that a travel bubble with Australia will be up and running by the middle of next month, with cabinet possibly making its decision as soon as next Monday.

According to the report, a paper is currently being discussed in a cabinet committee around what the bubble may look like, and that a meeting of the full Cabinet could make decisions early in the next week.

The opposition has upped its push for a bubble in recent days, with National launching a petition and sending out countless press releases on the subject.

If the decision is made next week, airports and airlines would have little time to prepare for the return of travellers heading for Australia. Covid-19 recovery minister Chris Hipkins said yesterday that Auckland airport would require 10 days to be ready for the bubble, while airlines have indicated that they would require three weeks.

10.30am: RNZ claims bubble by ‘end of April’

In a similar but competing development, RNZ has claimed the trans-Tasman bubble will be up and running by the end of next month.

8.30am: Law change sees hundreds of sex offenders back on register

A piece of news that slipped through the cracks yesterday:

An urgent law change by the government yesterday afternoon will see hundreds of sex offenders put back onto the national register.

The law change was made through urgent amendments to the retrospective provisions in the Child Protection (Child Sex Offender Government Agency Registration) Act 2016, to clarify the intent of parliament when the law was passed.

The changes were made following a Supreme Court decision that ruled the act did not apply to a person who had committed a qualifying offence before the law came into force on October 14 2016 – but was convicted and sentenced after that date.

“As a consequence of this decision, police has had to remove hundreds of individuals from the Child Sex Offender Register,” said police minister Poto Williams. “We are taking urgent action for the safety of our tamariki. The longer these offenders are off the register, the less ability police have to monitor them.”

The amendment will also ensure that any individuals sentenced for a qualifying offence after the Supreme Court decision can be placed on the register, either by confirming their eligibility or enabling review of any decision not to register.

“The urgent amendment to the retrospective provisions of the Act is essential for the wellbeing and safety of children, and their whānau,” Williams said.

7.55am: Challenger for next America’s Cup already accepted

There’s not a lot of news around today, surprisingly, so we’re going to start with the boat race.

On the same day that Team New Zealand raced to victory in the 36th America’s Cup, a challenger came forward – and was accepted – for the 37th.

But despite it already being official, Royal New Zealand Yacht Squadron general manager Hayden Porter told Newstalk ZB we’ll have to wait a little longer to find out where that challenge has come from.

“We have received a challenge for the 37th America’s Cup. There’s a lot of details to come, discussions will evolve over the next few days, weeks and months and things will happen from there,” he said. “It was all done out on the water – all details will be revealed in the next wee while.”

The Herald has previously claimed the challenge would be coming from the Royal Yacht Squadron, meaning Ineos Team UK would be the Challenger of Record whenever the next regatta takes place.

7.30am: Top stories from The Bulletin

Well, they won the boat race. If you tuned into the news bulletins at any time last night you’ll already know that Emirates Team New Zealand beat Prada Luna Rossa 7-3, after winning all of the sailing, engineering, logistical and rule-setting aspects of the competition. Which is lovely for them, and good for people who are fans etc etc, happy for you all. But there’s another news line out of it all worth paying attention to.

After the win, the government immediately committed further funding to keep ETNZ together, reports Stuff. One of the more controversial aspects of elite yachting in recent decades has been the team consistently tapping the government up for more support – at times the negotiations more closely resembled ransom demands, to be fair. As yacht race minister Stuart Nash outlined, some of the $136.5 million of public money set aside for the cup has not yet been spent, and in principle that would be made available to the team to build towards the next event.

Which will be held – where exactly? One of the most defensible justifications given for public money going towards the America’s Cup is that it acts as an economic development stimulus for various industries – tourism, hospitality, boat building and so on. It’s probably worth noting that take was heavily contested even before Covid closed the borders, let alone an event with limited superyachts and spending. There was also a credible report from the NZ Herald’s (paywalled) Caroline Meng-Yee that ETNZ has been shopping the event to other potential host cities around the world, before they even had their hands on the mug.

The syndicate has said they want to host the next event in New Zealand, but that is a long way away from a firm commitment. Getting access to that money will depend on it – and any future money the government could be asked for. In the government’s statement, PM Ardern said it “would be subject to a number of conditions, including an expectation the Cup will be defended in New Zealand.” Auckland mayor Phil Goff is keen too, and Stuff reports talks will start soon between the syndicate and other stakeholders. Many might be wondering – how high could the bill end up being this time?

Read more and subscribe to The Bulletin here

Keep going!
British Prime Minister Boris Johnson arrives at Downing Street after delivering a statement on the integrated review of Britains defence and foreign policy on Wednesday. (Photo: Wiktor Szymanowicz/Barcroft Media via Getty Images)
British Prime Minister Boris Johnson arrives at Downing Street after delivering a statement on the integrated review of Britains defence and foreign policy on Wednesday. (Photo: Wiktor Szymanowicz/Barcroft Media via Getty Images)

OPINIONPoliticsMarch 18, 2021

Britain is making a terrible mistake in boosting its nuclear arsenal, and NZ needs to say so

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson arrives at Downing Street after delivering a statement on the integrated review of Britains defence and foreign policy on Wednesday. (Photo: Wiktor Szymanowicz/Barcroft Media via Getty Images)
British Prime Minister Boris Johnson arrives at Downing Street after delivering a statement on the integrated review of Britains defence and foreign policy on Wednesday. (Photo: Wiktor Szymanowicz/Barcroft Media via Getty Images)

Boris Johnson announced yesterday that the UK will increase its nuclear warhead stockpile ceiling from 180 to 260 as an ‘ultimate insurance policy’ in response to an ‘evolving security environment’. They need to be called out, argues Angela Woodward of the Disarmament and Security Centre.

Some embarrassments are most helpfully imparted by a friend: that you’ve got spinach in your teeth, or toilet paper on your shoe, or that your defence posture threatening global nuclear apocalypse under the guise of “nuclear deterrence” has got out of hand.

And so New Zealand must pull aside its long-time friend and Five Eyes partner and explain that increasing one’s nuclear fire power capacity from around 16 megatons to approximately 52 megatons (Hiroshima suffered a mere 15 kiloton nuclear warhead, in comparison) through a £205bn nuclear weapons modernisation programme is going a little too far. After all, just one modern 100 kiloton nuclear weapon detonated over a large city would kill and injure millions of people, utterly overwhelm any medical response, contaminate the environment and disrupt the global climate, resulting in long-term and intolerable harm.

Britain has determined that this increase of up to 220 warheads represents the minimum credible deterrent necessary in the current international security environment. Just six years ago it told the Treaty on the Non-proliferation of Nuclear Weapons’ (NPT) 2015 Review Conference that it would only require 180 nuclear warheads by the mid-2020s.

The nuclear posture includes scenarios in which Britain would consider using nuclear weapons beyond the traditional nuclear exchange between nuclear-armed states, to include retaliation to chemical or biological weapon threats, and the undefined “emerging technologies”, presumably cyberattacks and devastating new conventional weapons. Under this new nuclear strategy, non-nuclear weapon states inside the 1968 NPT are now also included in Britain’s nuclear crosshairs if they pose an asymmetrical, non-nuclear threat.

Why must Britain be called out for this?

First, increasing its holding of nuclear warheads is incompatible with its obligation to disarm its nuclear weapons under Article 6 of the NPT. Britain acknowledged at the 2015 NPT conference that its reduction in nuclear warhead numbers at that time was undertaken pursuant to its Article 6 obligations, and that it was committed to a step-by-step approach to nuclear disarmament. So an increase in the nuclear arsenal is not contrary to a commitment to disarm? And since when did a step-by-step approach to disarmament involve moving backwards? It’s going to take some diplomatic doublespeak to square that circle at the upcoming NPT Review Conference, likely postponed until early 2022 due to Covid-19 travel restrictions.

Second, more nuclear weapons create more risks of nuclear weapons accidents or use, including through heightened tension between adversaries and miscalculation – not more security. Let’s not kid ourselves, the absence of nuclear weapons detonations since the second world war has more to do with dumb good luck than “strategic stability”. Nuclear-armed submarines have crashed into each other and suffered catastrophic power failures. Nuclear warheads have been accidentally dropped from aircraft and mistakenly flown between bases without authorisation. Nuclear exchange computer simulations have been mistaken for real-time missile launches nearly leading to retaliatory launches of dozens of nuclear weapons. More nuclear weapons embedded in war-fighting doctrines makes them more susceptible to actually being used. Nuclear deterrence relies on the assumption that they can and would be used under certain circumstances. Is that acceptable, by an ally? That alone is worth a regular ticking off, no matter how many nuclear weapons are in the stockpile.

Third, its nuclear power status has not protected it from aggression, including by other nuclear powers, to date. Remember when Russia poisoned Sergei and Yulia Skripal with the chemical weapons in Salisbury in 2015, or when Russia poisoned Alexander Litvinenko with radiation in London in 2006, or when Argentina invaded the Falklands/Malvinas islands in 1982? While the UK would not be the only nuclear armed state to claim a right to nuclear retaliation in response to biological or chemical weapons attack, it is difficult to see how this could be done without breaching international humanitarian law requirements for distinction, proportionality and necessity in any use of force. Nuclear power status is also no guarantee against armed attack involving conventional weapons, or attacks involving new technologies or against critical infrastructure. Aren’t resources better applied to more appropriate measures to prevent and respond to actual threats?

So what are nuclear weapons good for? Nuclear deterrence is inherently flawed. If you’re staring down incoming nuclear missiles, then your nuclear deterrence has failed. If you respond in kind, you can celebrate your victory from under the rubble of your radiated cities. Nuclear deterrence distracts attention and much-needed resources from actual threats and challenges. This includes climate change, the impact of Covid-19 and the inevitable pandemics to come and, in Britain’s case, the need to restructure its post-Brexit economy after a decade of financial austerity. Precisely how does a cash-strapped UK intend to pay for its nuclear hubris? Nuclear power status may be a luxury that the it can no longer afford, at least, not without disproportionate trade-offs in the day-to-day wellbeing of its inhabitants.

New Zealand officials and parliamentarians may be muttering expletives at Britain’s bold and diplomatically unpopular announcement but what can New Zealand actually do about it?

Perhaps the most valuable action New Zealand can take doesn’t involve Britain at all. As a long-time moral authority on nuclear disarmament and now, since 22 January 2021, a state party to the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW) which bans nuclear weapons under international law, New Zealand should continue its diplomacy to delegitimise the role of nuclear weapons in security doctrines and to encourage other states to join the TPNW. Pressure on the nuclear-armed states is growing. The treaty was borne out of the longstanding frustration of the non-nuclear weapon states at the lack of progress on nuclear disarmament. Now 54 states have joined the treaty and 34 others have signed. While the treaty prohibitions do not apply to states that have not joined, the treaty is anticipated to further entrench the taboo against nuclear weapons use and increasingly require nuclear states – and those who support them while ostensibly remaining nuclear-free – to justify their arsenals in the face of growing calls for nuclear disarmament.

Treaty bans on anti-personnel landmines, cluster munitions and even chemical and biological weapons created normative pressure that resulted in many possessor states to eventually renounce them and join those treaties. It is not too much to hope for that the TPNW will ultimately contribute to Britain similarly deciding to reduce and then relinquish its nuclear weapons.

Angela Woodward is an international law expert specialising in arms control and disarmament issues. She is a Council member at the Disarmament and Security Centre Aotearoa/New Zealand, based in Christchurch.