Astrid Glitter, the woman behind John, New Zealand’s only gay pornographic feature film. (Portrait: Byron Coll, Image Design: Tina Tiller)
Astrid Glitter, director of John, New Zealand’s first and only gay pornographic feature film, tells Sam Brooks why she remains so proud of it 16 years on.
The synopsis of John sounds like it could be any entry in the local film section of the New Zealand Film Festival. “John is a regular Kiwi guy who’s tired of one night stands. Men just want to shoot and leave, when John really wants to just have someone to love.”
John isn’t just another independent film, though. Released in 2006, John is the first, and to date only gay pornographic feature film made in New Zealand. Almost as unusually, it was made by a woman, Astrid Glitter. Her name is a pseudonym: GLITTER is a quasi-acronym of “girls like it too”. “Astrid”, meanwhile, just sounded cool.
Sixteen years after its premiere, this is the story of John and the woman who brought it to the screen.
Astrid Glitter poses with Byron Coll’s portrait of her, at the official launch of Chris and Eli’s Porn Revolution. (Photo: Jinki Cambronero)
The year was 2005. Glitter, an Aucklander working in the theatre and film industry, had been wanting to make a film herself for a long time. A friend had mentioned to her that they would love to see an adult film starring gay men and made in New Zealand. Glitter thought she could do that – with a feminist, sex-positive slant.
“I approached it as an independent film,” she says – this wasn’t going to be a quickly made video shot in a hotel room. The first stage was research. Glitter wanted to understand the genre: what the formulas were, what patterns she needed to follow, or subvert. “I looked at things I thought were rubbish and what wasn’t, down to how many minutes of sex was in an adult film, how many different kinds of performances, if they had a story, and how that story works.”
It was important to Glitter that the film had a real storyline that stood on its own without the sex scenes. The film follows John as he makes his way through Auckland’s gay scene, and is basically a sweet rom-com complicated by a female flatmate who is deeply in love with John. Despite John’s own yearning for love, a few of those men, predictably, want nothing more than an anonymous hook-up.
Also important? “Good music! That was really important because the soundtracks in adult films can be just atrocious.” The soundtrack, by composer Paul Frewin, remains one of Glitter’s favourite things about the film. Some tracks would sit perfectly in a 90s rom-com, others are full-on indie rock; there’s even a little bit of ska in there.
Glitter was firm that John should be a different sort of film than standard mainstream adult cinema. “I wanted to make sure that there were things in John that were positive influences,” she says. “To show that you could have adult material that was X-rated that still had positive messaging.” When a condom is used in John, for example, it’s shown in full – very different from the obfuscation and tricky camera angles used in most adult films to hide the use of condoms.
By November of 2005, the cast and crew were hired – the auditions required the actors to read a script and get an erection onstage. Filming began in the middle of December, and they shot for eight days, with one pick-up just after Christmas. “I remember on the very first day on set realising, ‘This is where I belong,’” Glitter recalls. “I remember that feeling of knowing that this is the role that suits me best. I was totally in a happy place.”
Post-production took place through the first half of 2006 before John was sent off to the censors in August, receiving the expected “X” rating.
Then, on September 9, 2006, John emerged into the world.
Astrid Glitter talks to a friend/fan at the launch of Chris and Eli’s Porn Revolution. (Photo: Jinki Cambronero)
The release was a glitzy event. After a cast and crew screening at a private cinema, Glitter limoed everybody to a venue on Karangahape Road, where attendees were served a “Glittertini” – 42 Below vodka, white creme de cacao, lycee liquor and rose syrup in a martini glass.
While John received an ecstatic response from the gay press, it was a rocky road to get the film out to people – despite, amazingly, it being included in the Buy New Zealand Made campaign. “We had the sticker on the DVD and everything!” laughs Glitter, still incredulous.
Glitter Films had to distribute the film independently. “It was just at that turning point where people still bought DVDs, there weren’t really any streaming services. If you wanted to do a download, you actually had to download it to your computer,” says Glitter.
She thinks that people were appreciative of what the film was trying to do, and the ground that it was breaking. “But if you look at the adult content that people wanted to buy, it’s generally a lot harder and a lot rawer than what John is,” she says. Her film was “quite soft in respect to gay adult material that might’ve been around”.
John was stuck in a no-man’s land; it was too adult to be the sort of independent film you’d see at the New Zealand Film Festival, and it was too “soft” to fit in with the hardcore gay pornography on offer. The price point was also an issue; they charged a premium because it was made with higher production values than, say, a video of two people in a hotel room.
Glitter Films did two production runs of John, the first one selling out thanks to orders in the US. The second run didn’t sell out, and Glitter still has the copies in her closet.
Glitter is philosophical about its muted reception. John wasn’t supposed to be a purely commercial venture, in the way that a lot of adult films are. When it comes to most pornography, if it’s not made cheap it’s unlikely to make money. Glitter thinks that’s why nobody else in New Zealand attempted a similar project. “They’re looking to do it for commercial value. I wasn’t doing that. I was looking to make a film.”
Despite the relatively small release, John did receive acclaim. Both the film and Glitter were nominated at the 2010 GayVN Awards, for Best Alternative Release and Best Director, and it was also an official selection for the Berlin Porn Film Festival. Although Glitter is no longer making adult films, she would love for John to make it to the New Zealand Film Archive, to be recognised as part of film history. “It’s an unusual thing in the history of New Zealand film,” she says. “No one had done it before, and I don’t believe anyone has done it since.”
She doesn’t talk much about John today, but she hasn’t forgotten the team who poured themselves into the project. “I may have been steering the ship, basically, but there were an awful lot of people that were helping to make it, and I thank them all,” she says. “They were also stepping out and doing something really different.”
Ultimately, despite how groundbreaking John was, and how much of a true unicorn it is in New Zealand cinema, adult or otherwise, to Glitter, it’s just a normal story. “Gay men want to find love too right? Sure hookups and one night stands are fun, but people want to find love too.
“That’s a normal story. Does it really matter if you’re gay or straight?”
‘Hutt Valley, Kāpiti, down to the south coast. Our Wellington coverage is powered by members.’
Joel MacManus — Wellington editor
Keep going!
OneTaste founder Nicole Daedone (Photo: Netflix. Additional design: The Spinoff)
OneTaste founder Nicole Daedone (Photo: Netflix. Additional design: The Spinoff)
‘Orgasmic meditation’ was sold as female empowerment; meanwhile the business behind it was being investigated by the FBI. Cult Trip author Anke Richter recounts her own visit to OneTaste, the bizarre company at the centre of a new Netflix documentary.
My friend Lena*’s sex life was as unexciting as that of many long-married couples in their forties. But then things changed radically after she asked her husband to do something unusual with her. It wasn’t to visit to a swingers’ club nor to run through the 64 positions in the Kama Sutra. He didn’t even have to take his clothes off. She only asked for 15 minutes of concentrating on her most sensitive body part, with specific rules and a timer.
The practice they both learned from a video instruction was called OM, orgasmic meditation. A woman’s clitoris is stroked in a very precise manner while every sensation and visual observation gets communicated in an emotionally detached way between giver and receiver: “I feel a tingling in my left toe” or “the lips of your vulva are turning dark pink”. The aim is not to climax or to hook up, but to feel your own bliss and become a new woman: turned on.
The OM intro video was a product of OneTaste, a California-based company selling its horny feminism as empowerment for “turned on” women. Khloe Kardashian was into it and so was Gwyneth Paltrow and author Naomi Wolf. In fact, most of Silicon Valley seemed to be into it and able to pay the steep course fees, hooked in by the charisma of OneTaste founder Nicole Daedone. Her sales pitch was a merging of Buddhist mindfulness with sexual liberation, and it worked.
I visited OneTaste in 2017, a year before serious allegations about their manipulative and abusive tactics came to light, and five years before the release of the new Netflix documentary Orgasm Inc, about the rise and fall of Daedone and her company. At the time I was something of a semi-professional sex cult tourist, visiting Osho’s former ashram in India (later immortalised in another Netflix documentary, Wild Wild Country), completing an unnerving course with The New Tantra in Holland, and dabbling in the shamanic world of ISTA, the International School of Temple Arts which has a strong base in New Zealand. And I had spent years researching the aftermath of our homegrown disaster of a sex cult, Centrepoint.
Orgasmic meditation, or “OMing”, was spreading in the conscious sexuality and self-development scene. OM houses – communities where Daedone followers lived together – sprung up in major cities around the world. The one I was going to stay in for a German newspaper, undercover, was Forest Hill OM house in a leafy suburb of San Francisco. Their house rules, sent in advance, instructed me to pull the curtains before unpacking my bags and warned that I shouldn’t start conversations with the neighbours about what brought me there.
When I got out of the taxi, I found myself in front of a large and imposing villa. A young woman in sweatpants introduced herself as Sandra*, a resident of the house, and gave me a tour. The stucco ceilings were high, the wooden floors polished, the taps in the black-tiled bathroom golden, and the oversize fridge stocked with kale.
My room was as big as a ballroom and had a chandelier, but no privacy. Only a few shelves separated the bed from the common room which was empty apart from cushions and yoga mats in a corner. That was the space for the daily OM group exercise, known at OneTaste as “morning practice”. I wondered if I would be woken up by ecstatic sounds in the morning, but Sandra yawned and said: “We’ll sleep in tomorrow, it’s the weekend.”
She was sharing a double bed with a housemate on rotation. The sleeping arrangement wasn’t just because of the astronomical rents in San Francisco, but part of OneTaste’s philosophy: such closeness would tear your boundaries down and lead to more authenticity and intimacy. “All your shit comes up,” Sandra said. It sounded triumphant, almost aspirational. Still, I was relieved that my bed was going to be mine alone.
OneTaste founder Nicole Daedone in a still from the documentary Orgasm Inc (Photo: Netflix)
The OM introduction course the next day was in a warehouse in downtown San Francisco where we were welcomed in by a man with a wide smile and a t-shirt that said “Powered by Orgasm”. All the staff wore black, the women in high heels and cocktail dresses, oozing a sexy corporate vibe. This was a far cry from the neo-tantra hippie festivals I had frequented over the years.
The OneTaste members seemed highly focused, checking their laptops while chatting to each other like a crew of flight attendants before take-off. Our group of 40 was ready to fly. I had been worried that I would be surrounded by desperate old men but was pleasantly surprised: most people were attractive, with diverse looks; half of them were women. I didn’t know at the time that it was a ruse. In fact most paying attendees were indeed men – predominantly affluent tech guys who’d struck out with dating – and female OneTaste members, disguised as participants, were making up the numbers.
Natalie Thiel, then co-director of OneTaste San Francisco – she has a brief appearance in the Netflix documentary – was our instructor. “We all crave contact, we all have desire,” she explained. “When a man shows his sexual hunger, he is seen as predatory or repulsive. When a woman shows it, she is seen as slutty and desperate. So we hide our desires.” Many were nodding. I felt guilty about my earlier apprehension about being surrounded by sexually starved men. What I didn’t know at the time was that further down the track, long time OneTaste members would be allegedly encouraged to act out their libido in a sexually violating way. Both the documentary and a BBC podcast series on the same topic include allegations of rape. OneTaste has taken legal action against Netflix and the BBC while rebranding itself under a new name, Institute of Om.
‘He mea tautoko nā ngā mema atawhai. Supported by our generous members.’
Liam Rātana — Ātea editor
Natalie began by writing ”orgasm 1.0“ and “orgasm 2.0” on the white board. The outdated model – orgasm 1.0 – was too focused on climax, an experience represented by a sharp upwards curve that suddenly dropped away. “Slow sex” on the other hand, as described by Daedone in her book of the same name, was the gateway to orgasm 2.0 and a new erotic paradigm: better communication, less shame and guilt, more authenticity and depth. What’s not to love?
All this, according to Daedone, we can apparently only access through a tiny spot on the female body, if we give it enough attention – the upper left quadrant of the clitoris, or the 1 o’clock position. It can’t get any more sensitive, Natalie told us: “This is where all the nerve endings come together.” To retrain the desire centre in our brain, we need to do daily orgasmic meditation, she said, calling it a “form of body hacking”. The way she described it, all perky and sparkling, she could have been peddling Tupperware to our group, if it wasn’t for the sprinkling of X-rated language like “pussy”.
During lunch, the hard sell started. Staff members around the table – all open, likeable, attractive – gave us heartfelt and well-rehearsed insights into how their lives had changed through OM and OneTaste. At the next table, they were already signing up newbies for further trainings, on trauma healing, empowerment and masculinity. Two weeks earlier, a OneTaste sales rep had called me from overseas, only hours after I had suggested interest via their website. She offered me a large discount if I paid by credit card on the spot.
Nicole Daedone’s name came up constantly on that day; the adoration for her was palpable. Millions watched her 2011 TED talk about ”the cure for hunger in the western woman” – an argument that better orgasms would satiate a widespread erotic craving that makes us eat, work, drink, diet and shop too much. Applicants for her week-long intensives paid over $US30,000 to be with her in person on the “The Land”, the organisation’s rural compound in Northern California. You couldn’t get more Nicole than that.
Before we were to experience the promised benefits of her miracle cure, we first had to learn how to find an OMing partner. We were encouraged to walk around the room asking others: “Would you like to OM?” The other person had to reply with an honest “yes” or “no”, no further explanation needed. It felt liberating to not take anything personally – their answer reflected only their preference, not a rejection of you. Everyone relaxed into asking for what they actually wanted, an exercise that is today a key part of many sexual self-development and consent workshops.
❓What is orgasmic meditation?
A woman lies on ‘a nest’ of pillows and ‘butterflies’ her legs (Daedone’s words), draping a leg over a fully-clothed man beside her.
⏰He sets a 15 minute timer.
Wearing latex gloves he then touches ‘the upper left quadrant’ of the clitoris pic.twitter.com/dnE1CcjJne
Then the demo started. Natalie pulled down her skirt and her husband Paul came closer. She laid down in front of us, naked legs spread open. Paul put latex gloves on and rested her hands on her thighs to “ground” her. He dabbed lube – a special one that you could only buy from OneTaste – on his left index finger and started with a rhythmic stroke, gentle like the flutter of an eyelid. Natalie made sounds. Paul looked dreamy and concentrated, strumming her like a guitar, while she instructed him: “more to the left.” She moaned. He smiled. She came. Then he placed her hand on her vulva to ground her again. Fifteen minutes were up.
We were instructed not to clap but instead to express what we felt – without any emotion or fantasies, just a nonjudgmental observation of sensations in our own bodies. At the end of the day it was finally our time to practise, but with all our clothes on so that OneTaste wouldn’t be violating any prostitution laws. Even without skin contact, there was a feeling of intimacy between me and my practice partner (they called them “strokers”, I was a “strokee”). My stroker didn’t stick to the strict etiquette of robotic detachment and smiled at me after the session, saying: “I really enjoyed doing this with you!” A huge faux-pas. He would have a long way to go to qualify as a “master stroker”, which they offered courses for too. Female staff members were already circling and honing in on promising male candidates – a recruiting technique known as “flirty fishing” from other cults.
“We want the masses,” Natalie told me after we finished up. “OM should become as popular as yoga.” She claimed that at that time, over 14,000 people had taken the course we did or had downloaded the app. She sounded enthusiastic and unstoppable. “Are we your kind of people?” Paul inquired with a wide smile and piercing look when I said goodbye.
The next morning at the OM house, I gathered up all my courage. “Would you like to OM?” I asked house member Gordon*, as casually as checking if he wanted to play a round of ping-pong in the garden. He said yes. Earlier he had told me how much unpaid work he was doing at OneTaste over the years to follow his passion. He wasn’t my type at all and badly needed a haircut, but looks or attraction were irrelevant in this context – this was not a date, but an OM.
Gordon took me up to his room where he had prepared the “nest” on the floor, with a mat and cushions in the right position. The bed was taboo. Because nothing about it was romantic or flirty, taking off my pants and underwear in front of a stranger didn’t feel any more uncomfortable than at the doctor’s office. Gordon was equally clinical, our eye contact stayed neutral. “I’ll touch you now”, he announced, lowering his hand. I wanted more, then less, and I voiced it. “Thank you”, was his calm reply every time, like a human vibrator on remote control. Then the timer on his phone went off. “Two more minutes.” We gave each other precise feedback about what we had each felt in our body, and that was all we ever spoke. My life hadn’t suddenly changed.
That night, the house held a barbecue. No alcohol, no loud music, no orgies. All the guests talked about the courses they had been on or were saving up for next. Sandra told me she gave massages after work to be able to afford a “Nicole Circle”, a women-only weekend with the leader that would set her back US$6500. Only gaunt and grey-haired Mark*, who had known Daedone since her wild days at the sex commune Lafayette Morehouse and followed her loyally on her unusual career path ever since, seemed weary. He became a sex addict in the early days, he told me. Now he was monogamous. OMing for him was “like walking the dog – you don’t always feel like doing it, but you know it needs to be done.”
Because I was flying out the next day, I missed the midday group OM. Despite my curiosity about OneTaste, it was a relief to be leaving. Even as a visitor, I felt subtle pressure to conform, to pick up the OneTaste language, to act like I was on board with it all and hungry for more. At San Francisco airport I passed the yoga room. Natalie Thiel and her team had told me that they were dreaming of their own OM room for travellers there. It sounded ambitious at the time, if not utopian. But since then, their utopia imploded.
What I experienced that weekend is now only taught online; OneTaste in San Francisco, Los Angeles and New York has shut down. In 2018 Bloomberg published an exposé revealing how the clit corporation was pushing students into expensive trainings, isolated them from their families, making them emotionally dependent and pressuring them into sex. In the following years Netflix and the BBC introduced the organisation’s controversial practices to a wider audience. While some sex therapists had praised OMing as a tool for more body awareness and better sexual expression, it had become the gateway drug for exploitative self-optimiszation – a trap. The sex cult had turned into an alleged sex trafficking cult.
But my friend Lena still swore by her orgasmic meditations – with the woman she now loves. After she realized her true desires through her daily OMing, she left her husband and had her coming out. Lena even thought of flying to the US to take a OneTaste course to go deeper, but the price tag stopped her in the end. I’m glad about both.
Anke Richter’s new book Cult Trip: Inside the world of coercion & control (HarperCollins) is out now. She will speak at Barrytown Hall near Greymouth on December 10 and at Splore on February 25.