spinofflive
Donald Trump’s flirtation with ‘disinfectant’ use against Covid 
Genesis II Church of Health and Healing founder James Humble, centre, and an orbit of dangerous nonsense.
Donald Trump’s flirtation with ‘disinfectant’ use against Covid Genesis II Church of Health and Healing founder James Humble, centre, and an orbit of dangerous nonsense.

ScienceMay 28, 2020

New Zealand ‘bishop’ pushing bleach as a Covid miracle cure

Donald Trump’s flirtation with ‘disinfectant’ use against Covid 
Genesis II Church of Health and Healing founder James Humble, centre, and an orbit of dangerous nonsense.
Donald Trump’s flirtation with ‘disinfectant’ use against Covid Genesis II Church of Health and Healing founder James Humble, centre, and an orbit of dangerous nonsense.

They call themselves the Genesis II Church of Health and Healing, but they’re not a church, and the treatment they sell is called Miracle Mineral Supplement – but it’s chlorine dioxide, commonly known as bleach. Susan Strongman reports for RNZ.

A New Zealand website is advising people with symptoms of coronavirus to drink or inhale a bleach product sold by the Hauraki Plains-based “bishop” of a cult-like American organisation.

The ingredients used to make chlorine dioxide, or Miracle Mineral Supplement, as sold on Roger Blake's website
The ingredients used to make chlorine dioxide, or Miracle Mineral Supplement, as sold on Roger Blake’s website. (Photo: screengrab)

But experts warn that the product – chlorine dioxide – is dangerous, should not be taken, and will not cure Covid-19.

Ngatea man Roger Blake, who sells the bleach through his online business NZ Water Purifier Limited, is a ‘bishop’ of the Genesis II Church of Health and Healing.

The ‘church’ originated in Florida and is not religious. Its sole function is to promote the use of the bleach formula that it calls Miracle Mineral Supplement, or MMS, which its followers also sell. (To become a ‘bishop’ of the church, one can download a $320 video course, and must provide two video testimonials of people who have been ‘treated’ with MMS.)

Various claims about MMS made by Genesis II leaders include that it can cure HIV, hepatitis, acne, cancer and now Covid-19.

Blake told RNZ that millions of people around the world have “overcome” everything from cancer, to HIV to autism using MMS, that “thousands” of New Zealanders take it, and that he’s seen an increase in the sale of the product since the Covid-19 pandemic began.

The New Zealand website that advises people to drink the bleach, Miracle Mineral, is linked to the same Ngatea address as Blake’s online NZ Water Purifier business. The Miracle Mineral website provides instructions on how to consume the bleach product for both adults and babies.


Read more:

Siouxsie Wiles: Toxic lies of the ‘church’ pushing bleach as a Covid miracle cure


The site claims that bleach has been “tested effective against Coronavirus”. It explicitly tells users which of the products to buy from Blake’s NZ Water Purifier business and how to prepare them, with a link to the website where sodium chlorite and hydrochloric acid can be purchased for $33 in two 125ml bottles as “Water Purification Solution”.

When combined, the two liquids create a reddish-brown liquid, chlorine dioxide, which is commonly used as bleach.

Blake insists it is safe to drink chlorine dioxide – he does so himself, diluted with water to a concentration of 50 parts per million. If used to treat drinking water, the maximum concentration allowed by the Ministry of Health is 0.8ppm.

He said “dozens of studies” show it’s safe for human consumption. “It’s a no brainer.”

‘It’s extremely dangerous to consume it’

Medical researcher Dr Shaun Holt said products with names like MMS, Miracle Mineral Solution, Miracle Mineral Supplement, CD protocol or similar, have been around for a long time. “I’ve been giving warnings about this for 10 years now.

“It goes without saying it’s extremely dangerous to consume it. It’s industrial strength bleach. There’s not a jot of scientific evidence that it can help anything.”

Consuming bleach can cause nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and dehydration, which in severe cases can lead to death. The product can also be explosive if not handled with care.

Blake calls warnings about the dangers of drinking chlorine dioxide “fake propaganda.” He said he wouldn’t recommend it to people if he believed it was harmful.

In April this year Mark Grenon, an “archbishop” of Genesis II, to whom the New Zealand Miracle Mineral website is registered, said he wrote to US president Donald Trump describing MMS as “a wonderful detox that can kill 99 percent of the pathogens in the body”, that could “rid the body of Covid-19”. Grenon, who lives in Colombia, also claimed that Covid-19 was not caused by a virus, but was “a scam by Bill Gates”.

Genesis II 'archbishop' Mark Grenon drinks MMS - chlorine dioxide mixed with water
Genesis II ‘archbishop’ Mark Grenon drinks MMS – chlorine dioxide mixed with water. (Photo: www.brighteon.com)

Days after the letter was sent, Trump was criticised for speaking at a press briefing about the possibility of injecting disinfectant into the body as a way of combating Covid-19.

Earlier this month, Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) issued fines totalling $151,200 to MMS Australia for alleged unlawful advertising of Miracle Mineral Solution and other medicines.

In a warning about the product, the TGA said MMS was often marketed as water purification drops – as is the case with the product sold in New Zealand.

“It contains a high concentration of sodium chlorite, which is a chemical used as a textile bleaching agent and disinfectant. Products containing high concentrations of sodium chlorite pose a serious health risk if consumed by humans,” the TGA warned.

In April, a United States Federal Court entered a temporary injunction against Genesis II, preventing the sale of chlorine dioxide to treat Covid-19.

The US Food and Drug Administration cited concerns that “products that claim to cure, treat or prevent serious diseases like Covid-19 may cause consumers to delay or stop appropriate medical treatment, leading to serious and life-threatening harm”. In 2019, the FDA had warned parents not to give MMS to their children.

Under New Zealand’s Medicines Act, it’s unlawful to advertise the use of a product to prevent, alleviate, or cure any disease, without approval.

But Dr Holt said that in both New Zealand and overseas, people who sell the product play a “cat and mouse game” with authorities.

“They’ll make claims illegally and then they’ll try and hide them, or they’ll make implied claims, they’ll change the name of the product, or change the formulation slightly… It keeps cropping up.”

Indeed this appears to be the case with the product advertised on the Miracle Mineral website, where a 2009 letter from Medsafe is posted with the recipient’s name redacted (other letters posted on the same page are addressed to a ‘Mr Blake’ and a ‘Mr Roskam’.)

A screengrab of the Miracle Mineral Solution website's Covid-19 instructions
The website advises people with Covid-19 symptoms to drink (Photo: screengrab)

The Medsafe letter requests the removal of therapeutic claims of Miracle Mineral Supplement in relation to AIDS, hepatitis, malaria, herpes, tuberculosis, autism, and cancers. At the time, the bleach product was available to buy directly from the Miracle Mineral website, rather than via a direct link to a separate business owned by Blake.

Two years later, at the height of the Ebola epidemic in western Africa, Mark Grenon and the Genesis II founder, former Scientologist and self-styled archbishop Jim Humble, who claimed to have used MMS to help cure Ebola, presented a $US500-a-head, three day seminar from Blake’s Ngatea property.

In 2015, Medsafe again warned consumers that MMS was not safe. “These products produce chlorine dioxide which can cause serious harm to health when ingested. Symptoms include nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and those of severe dehydration which may be life threatening.”

On the Miracle Mineral website, users are advised that symptoms like nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea are “a sign that the MMS is working”.

Dr Holt says nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea are indications that the body has been poisoned, and that medical care should be sought immediately.

Waikato University biologist and science educator Dr Alison Campbell said there have been reports of parents giving MMS to autistic children as an enema, because they have been “sucked in by the narrative that it will ‘cure’ autism.” There is evidence to suggest a New Zealand mother associated with an anti-vaccination Facebook group treated her autistic son with a chlorine dioxide enema on multiple occasions.

Campbell said that when people were frightened or worried, it made them desperate and vulnerable to proponents of what she called “magical thinking” – the belief that a single product like MMS could cure a multitude of ailments.

“There is no evidence at all that it is ever going to work as claimed. I think it’s unethical to be promoting it and I think it’s amoral to be claiming it cures something like Covid-19.” (Blake called Campbell’s comment “ridiculous” and added that he thought chemotherapy was immoral.)

Campbell said that though chlorine dioxide was used to kill pathogens on surfaces, it was not approved for use internally “because it kills living things”.

The Ministry of Health medical safety authority, Medsafe, today published an alert warning consumers of the “potentially life-threatening side effects” of drinking MMS.

“Medsafe is not aware of any scientific evidence that these products are effective against pathogens in the body when the product is consumed,” the alert reads.

“Do not buy or consume (drink) Miracle Mineral Solution products or associated products described as water purification solutions. Consuming these products is the same as drinking bleach.”

Medsafe group manager Chris James told RNZ that the maximum penalty, on successful prosecution, for advertising an unapproved medicine was a maximum of $100,000 for a corporate body, $200,000 for an individual or a term of imprisonment not exceeding 6 months.

James would not say whether Medsafe would investigate.

Keep going!
Earthquake damage to state highway one near Ohau Point following the Kaikōura earthquake in November 2016 (Photo: MARK MITCHELL/AFP/Getty Images)
Earthquake damage to state highway one near Ohau Point following the Kaikōura earthquake in November 2016 (Photo: MARK MITCHELL/AFP/Getty Images)

OPINIONScienceMay 24, 2020

The best way to respond to emergencies is to prepare for them before they happen

Earthquake damage to state highway one near Ohau Point following the Kaikōura earthquake in November 2016 (Photo: MARK MITCHELL/AFP/Getty Images)
Earthquake damage to state highway one near Ohau Point following the Kaikōura earthquake in November 2016 (Photo: MARK MITCHELL/AFP/Getty Images)

From our recent spate of natural disasters to the challenges posed by Covid-19, we’re reminded that building resilience should be about avoiding or limiting damage in the first place, writes Richard Smith, Director, Resilience to Nature’s Challenges

May 18 marked the 40th anniversary of the volcanic eruption of Mount Saint Helens in Washington, USA. A contingent of New Zealand disaster resilience researchers planned to attend this year’s commemorations in Seattle to reflect on shared research on volcanic emergencies. But Covid-19 shifted those commemorations online, which included a great “as it happened” series of social media posts by the United States Geological Survey (equivalent to New Zealand’s GNS Science), with insights into the emotional state of the scientists who were closest to the disaster at the time.

The eruption in 1980 was perhaps the first widely televised volcanic disaster. It featured vivid live reports of the unbelievable collapse of the mountain, the knocked-down forests, the roiling ash plume, and the violent, steaming mudflows that effortlessly took out homes and highways. Well documented are the compelling stories of heroism and folly, of good and bad luck on the day, and tensions between scientists, officials and community members in the lead-up to the eruption.

It remains a benchmark for lessons in volcanic risk communication and understanding the destructive potential of a range of volcanic hazards, such as widespread ashfall on cities thousands of kilometres downwind of the volcano. Many of these lessons were important to how we in Aotearoa responded to the (much smaller) eruptions of Ruapehu in 1995 and 1996, and to our own civil defence planning for similar scenarios when Taranaki awakens.

The eruption anniversary is a reminder that while Aotearoa continues to successfully respond to the Covid-19 health emergency, the threat of other destructive natural hazards remain, along with a high potential for compounding disasters both here and globally. It’s also a reminder that building resilience to natural hazard-triggered disasters has to be more than a reliance on the capacity of our systems and communities to respond and rebuild.

Steam is pictured emitting from White Island on December 9, 2019 (Photo: John Boren/Getty Images)

Critically, it requires making decisions and taking actions (in advance of any looming threat) to avoid or limit potential damage and disruption from a range of uncertain future hazard events. Such actions reduce the risk of loss of homes, infrastructure, livelihoods, and social cohesion, and make any needed recovery faster and less costly in both financial and socials terms.

Maintaining a community’s focus (and need for investment) on such actions when no threat is obvious runs counter to human nature. We’ve evolved as a species to deal with imminent and certain threats, not seemingly far-off and vague possibilities. Part of the solution is to better understand and convey the “true” social costs of disasters, calculations which don’t currently factor into cost-benefit decision assessments of what we build, how we build it, and where we build it. 

One aspect of the Resilience National Science Challenge mission is to address that gap with improved models of the social and economic impacts of natural hazard events, helping to weigh up the benefits of investment upfront in disaster risk reduction compared to relying on clean-up, recovery and rebuild which are usually much costlier.

Given New Zealand’s recent experiences with destructive and disruptive natural hazards, it’s disappointing to see little reference to disaster resilience as part of this year’s budget. At a fundamental level, important determinants of national disaster resilience include the effectiveness of its public health systems and overall levels of education. In that regard, the significant investments in health and education signalled in the budget have the potential to make long-lasting (but difficult to measure) improvements to New Zealand’s overall resilience.

However, that system-level investment should be paired with specific consideration of minimising future disaster losses at a local and community level for any new building and infrastructure undertaken as part of the Covid-19 recovery. Reducing the impact of future disasters is a strategic choice to make today, with benefits for us now (such as reduced insurance premiums) and for the next generation (through greatly reduced social and economic impacts of the next ‘big one’).

To set us on a pathway to future resilience, choices about what we build and where we build it should be informed by robust physical and social science and, importantly, wide community participation in those decisions.