spinofflive
A member of New Zealand’s Antarctica team – in summer. (Photo: Supplied)
A member of New Zealand’s Antarctica team – in summer. (Photo: Supplied)

ScienceJune 28, 2023

Lessons from Antarctica on how to get through winter

A member of New Zealand’s Antarctica team – in summer. (Photo: Supplied)
A member of New Zealand’s Antarctica team – in summer. (Photo: Supplied)

While the dark days of New Zealand’s winters don’t hold a candle to Antarctica’s, there’s no doubt they can still affect our physical and mental health. So what can we learn from the experts – people who spend six months of the year in darkness?

This story was first published on Stuff. Listen to the podcast version here.

It’s 9am in Antarctica and Greg Kukutai has taken his laptop outside into absolute darkness.

In -45C conditions, the winter leader of Scott Base pans the camera about to show, well, not much. The lights of the base are blazing but everything else is black.

Back inside, base engineer Steve “Sooty” Denby describes how a group gathered on the ice in April to watch as the sun dipped below the horizon.

“It’s pretty amazing to watch the sun set and know that’s it for another six months.”

While the dark days of New Zealand’s winters don’t hold a candle to Antarctica’s, there’s no doubt they can still affect our physical and mental health.

Time and again it’s been proven that when light dies sadness will rise and, while feelings of melancholy commonly accompany the change in season, experts are warning this year’s slump might feel even worse.

That’s because with much of New Zealand’s last summer missing in action, so too are the myriad essential health benefits the sun provides – things like vitamin D, mood-boosting serotonin and an all-round improvement in mental wellbeing.

Combine this deficit with three years of pandemic-induced upheaval, the continuing cost of living crisis and a country already struggling with mental health, and we’re sitting ducks for a national downer.

Flooding at the Redwood Park Golf Club in Swanson, West Auckland, January 2023 (Photo: Genna Hukui/Supplied to Stuff)

Niwa climate scientist Gregor Macara stops short of labelling last summer as the worst ever, though admits it’s hard to think of one worse. “For Auckland and Hawke’s Bay it’d be hard to beat how bad it was – pretty dour and depressing.”

But just as record rainfall drenched and damaged those regions, others were simply robbed of the sun and its benefits.

By the end of May, Auckland’s north had only seen 64% of its usual sunshine, losing 333 hours worth. Wairarapa lost 286 and Northland was cheated of 195. Meanwhile, the West Coast saw more than 100 extra sunny hours and Central Otago scored at least 200 more than usual.

“Gee, I wish we could have shared them,” says the latter’s mayor Tim Cadogan, “it was a wonderful summer except for a sense of guilt about our friends in the North Island.”

A photo of Antarctica in the summer months. Right now it’s shrouded in total darkness. (Photo: Christina Hulbe, CC BY-ND)

Down in Antarctica, Denby is in his fourth winter of complete darkness. A team of abut 18 staff run the base during its six-month winter – almost half have worked in the defence force.

”They sort of screen you before you come down – to see if you can handle it…some don’t.”

Denby says he’s pretty used to it now but admits to a creeping melancholy that can take hold once the sun goes. He also experiences T3 syndrome, a condition found in polar explorers and caused by a decrease in levels of the thyroid hormone. Its effects include forgetfulness, cognitive impairment and mood disturbances.

“I can walk from one end of the base to the other and when I get there think “what am I doing here?”. I have to carry a notebook…it’s not as disastrous as it sounds, it’s quite funny.”

Back in NZ, when summer literally went south, Kiwis took flight. In the week beginning May 8, when torrential rain caused havoc in Auckland, Flight Centre saw bookings to Eastern Europe’s coming summer rise by 70%.

In recent weeks, the travel agency has also seen bookings to Latin America and the Caribbean rise by more than 30%, and to northern Africa by 28%.

But for those of us who can’t afford to follow the sun, experts say we can at least bring the sun to us.

Dr Alan Rosenthal and his light box are beaming in from Washington on Thursday, 40 years after he first described seasonal affective disorder – or Sad – a type of depression related to the changes in seasons.

Marked by symptoms including fatigue, depression, hopelessness and social withdrawal, Sad is estimated to affect from about 1% to 10% of the global population with women more commonly affected than men.

Lack of sunlight can adversely affect our health – both physical and mental (Photo: Getty Images)

Back in 1976, Rosenthal found that when he moved from his native South Africa to the US both his and his wife’s moods and energy levels slumped during the country’s colder winters – when the weather got better, so did they.

Then, at a party a few years later, he met scientist Alfred Lewy who’d been researching the sleep hormone melatonin and how light affects mood. The pair got talking, studies started and, ultimately, a syndrome was born.

Sad was formally recognised by the American Psychiatric Association in 1987 but Rosenthal says it’s always been a thing; we just didn’t have a name for it.

Yes, he says, everyone tends to get a bit glum in winter, but seasonality – or how we respond to the seasons – comes on a spectrum.

“Some people won’t know what you’re talking about, other people will feel bleh and others will feel really under the weather. It’s a matter of degree.”

Rosenthal recommends a range of tactics for combating Sad though being prepared for its onset is the single most important. Cognitive behavioural therapy has also been shown to work, as has meditation, a healthy diet and, in essence, fake sun.

A light therapy box is designed to mimic sunlight and is used to treat people suffering from Sad (Photo: Getty Images)

The sun box currently sitting on his desk is used daily by the psychiatrist as soon as he recognises Sad sneaking up on him. Mimicking outdoor light at about 10 times the intensity, the screens are one of the most popular and effective treatments for Sad: sufferers typically use them for half an hour twice a day.

Rosenthal says studies have shown symptoms of Sad and other depressions can quickly improve with the use of lamps, much faster than antidepressants which can take weeks to work. Even so, he encourages people to embrace whatever help they need: “there’s nothing wrong with medication.”

Eric Bird, technical director of the Scott Base rebuild programme, says it might be fake, and won’t be there for another four years, but sunlight is finally coming for Antarctica’s winter. When new buildings are shipped from New Zealand to the ice in 2027, new technology in the form of tunable LED lights will mimic daylight’s natural ebb and flow when the real thing is nowhere to be seen.

“One of the key issues is seasonal affective disorder and the effect on circadian rhythms…you don’t realise how it impacts you until it does. I’ve been down there a couple of times, but I’m not brave enough to do a winter.”

Anna Wirz-Justice, a New Zealander and emeritus professor at the Psychiatric Hospital of the University of Basel, is a world authority on sleep and depression research, last year adding the prestigious Daylight Research Award to her many other accolades.

She introduced light therapy to Europe as a treatment for Sad and says while the mechanisms are still unknown, it “works extremely fast to improve depressive mood”.

“It is also efficacious in non-seasonal and bipolar depression, often in combination with medication, and in a variety of sleep disorders to stabilise timing. We know that the light information from the retina is transferred via a specific neuronal tract to the biological clock, separate from visual function.”

Recently, a new pathway has been found whereby light information goes directly to regions of the brain involved in mood and sleep regulation.

“The clinical effects are well documented and beginning to be accepted by the medical establishment, and the way light works is beginning to be elucidated,” she says, “but because it can’t be patented there is little effort to carry out the large randomised double-blind placebo controlled clinical trials that would speed up inclusion in treatment guidelines.”

As for Sad’s grip on New Zealand, Wirz-Justice doesn’t know of epidemiological studies investigating the prevalence.

“If we compare our data in Switzerland at 47 °N where 2% of the adult population suffer from SAD and 8% from the ‘winter blues’ then it could be assumed that a similar prevalence could be found at 46°S in Dunedin and less in the North Island.”

For a week in June 2020, Wellington recorded a total of six minutes of sunshine (Image: Tina Tiller)

Psychologist Marc Wilson says that although Sad is accepted by a majority of the clinical and research community it’s got a kind of twilight existence; apt really, when you think about it.

“It’s not recognised as a disorder in its own right in the Hypochondriac’s Guide to Psychiatric Disorder (the DSM-5), but rather as a sub-type or ‘specifier’ for depression.”

Wilson says there are pros and cons to this, stressing the importance of an appropriate diagnosis to rule out “normal” depression which can also get worse in winter; bipolar or atypical depression.

“The downside is that some research says clinicians may not think of going that route, and therefore may not offer the treatment of first choice.”

When it comes to any sort of winter blues, Wilson says the one thing that is known is that not doing anything won’t help. Even a 30-minute walk has been shown to be as good for your mood as anti-depressants, he says, and a break in routine is often, particularly with experiences that involve other people, also beneficial.

“Unfortunately, all common sense… nobody will go for it.”

That might be the case on the mainland but Antarctica’s winter team know all too well the dangers of doing nothing. As well as just keeping an eye on each other and keeping communication open, the staff take part in organised activities designed to boost their mood.

So far there’s been a high-spirited game of hide and seek, an escape room challenge – undertaken in fancy dress – drives out to watch the stars and auroras, as well as social occasions involving the US staff from nearby McMurdo Station. Those Americans are also soon to be challenged to a game of mini golf, played in the dark.

Games aside, Kukutai says staff still have to be tough and sometimes that means talking about feelings. Sometimes it just means celebrating the little things.

And when the sun finally rises in August, Antarctica’s winter people will do just that, Denby says.

“When you get your first feeling of heat from that sun it’s hard to imagine. You walk around a building, it’s still -30C but you feel it, that warmth is amazing. It’s a revelation.”

Expert’s top tips for beating Sad and making the most of winter

Get outside: preferably for half an hour at the same time every morning. Yes, even if it’s not sunny.

Embrace the ‘snuggliness’ of winter; use the season to rest and recharge.

Break your routine by doing something new or something you haven’t done for a while.

Get therapy: whether its from light, a health professional, or both.

Do something nice for yourself: take a bath, or schedule an hour to read a book. Drop someone a text to say you’re thinking of them.

Bring that outside light in: clear shrubs back from windows; clean the glass; get a skylight if you can.

Know that it’s OK to sometimes feel low but it’s more than OK to ask for help.

Keep going!
a grid paper background with a tectured photo of corn overlaid over hexagonal molecule esque illustrations
Corn is a crop that has been genetically motified in other parts of the world. Image: Archi Banal

ScienceJune 26, 2023

New Zealand’s three-decade ban on genetic modification, explained

a grid paper background with a tectured photo of corn overlaid over hexagonal molecule esque illustrations
Corn is a crop that has been genetically motified in other parts of the world. Image: Archi Banal

After years in the scientific wilderness, GM is once again a hot political issue. Dr Tony Conner explains what our current law says, and why removing the ban could transform agricultural science in New Zealand.

So, what does GMO stand for?

GMO stands for Genetically Modified Organism. Genetic modification may also be referred to as genetic engineering or transgenics.

And what exactly is that?

Genetic modification involves taking DNA from the genome (the complete set of DNA) of an organism such as a plant or animal and inserting it into the genome of another organism. The purpose is to transfer the ability to make new substances or perform different functions. There are no barriers to where the DNA can come from. DNA from microbes, animals, plants, and even entirely synthetic DNA made in the laboratory can be transferred into other microbes, animals, or plants. GM development needs to be undertaken in carefully controlled conditions in the laboratory. In the case of plants, DNA is inserted into single plants cells that are then be multiplied in cell cultures in the lab and regenerated back into complete plants.

Gene editing is different to genetic modification, in that this may only involve making a change to the genome, as opposed to introducing DNA from another organism.

Flowers on a genetically modified apple tree (Photo: Supplied / Plant and Food Research)

What are the laws now? Wasn’t it a big deal making those laws in the first place?

Genetic modification in New Zealand is governed by the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms (HSNO) Act 1996, with various amendments in the 20 years since. This law was a big deal for New Zealand in that it has dictated what we can do with these technologies and any modified organisms, including the discovery of potential risks and benefits. It is largely based on what we knew at the time about the risks and benefits of GMOs. The original act established the Environmental Risk Management Authority (now called the Environmental Protection Authority), a government agency responsible for regulating activities that affect Aotearoa’s environment.

Essentially, the regulations in place mean that GMOs cannot be released out of containment in New Zealand without going through a very rigorous and complex approval process, and that is very high bar to meet. Gene editing is considered in the same class as genetic modification in New Zealand, even when it doesn’t involve foreign DNA being introduced.

Has much changed in the past two decades?

The number of field tests (outside of containment) on GMOs in New Zealand substantially declined after the introduction of the HSNO Act in 1996, and virtually ceased after a later amendment. The regulatory procedures were cumbersome and it would take more effort and cost to obtain an approval for a field test than undertaking the field experiments themselves. Amendments to the HSNO Act meant GM plants in field tests could no longer be allowed flower to prevent pollen being dispersed by wind or insects. It is virtually impossible to absolutely guarantee the absence of flowers, even with manual removal of flower buds. The prevention of flowering means grain and fruit cannot develop. Evaluation of grain and fruit would usually be a key purpose for field testing GM crops.

The inability to undertake appropriate field tests over the past two decades has also seen a marked reduction in the laboratory development of New Zealand crops with characteristics that might have benefits for our industries and consumers. Missed opportunities for New Zealand scientists working at the forefront of global developments include the development of vegetables that are more resistant to pests and diseases, and a “tear-less” onion.

What might it look like if laws were loosened?

Depending on the extent to which the regulations in New Zealand were loosened, it may allow for field tests on GMOs to once again be undertaken in New Zealand. Once such field tests are scaled up it may also allow a pathway for the growing of GM crops in New Zealand.

When a pathway to field tests and release of GM crops is re-introduced, we can expect New Zealand scientists will rapidly re-engage in the laboratory development of new opportunities to improve our crop plants. This could create huge opportunities for our farmers and growers to be more productive and sustainable, which would improve our environment and boost our export industries for the benefit of all New Zealanders.

An example of genetic modification for pest control. (Image: Royal Society of New Zealand)

Who would gain the most benefit?

Everyone will likely benefit from the ability of New Zealand’s primary industries being able to grow GM crops. In the Americas, Asia, Africa, and Australia, farmers and horticulturalists have been growing GM crops with pest and disease resistance for up to two decades. More recently this has expanded to improved quality characteristics of the harvested food and fibre. Re-establishing the ability for New Zealand scientists to work on New Zealand problems for the crops we grow will result in benefits such as:

  • Environmental sustainability from the reduction in pesticide use to control pests and diseases
  • Fresh fruit and vegetables with fewer blemishes from pest and disease damage, meaning less waste
  • Food and fibre with improved nutrition and storage life
  • Better and more consistent yields for farmers and horticulturalists
  • Plants that will help reduce greenhouse gas emissions
  • Plants better adapted to the forthcoming constraints of climate change (e.g. winter chilling for fruit production)
  • Novel methods to control the increasing numbers of invasive weed and pest species.

Is there anything else I should know about this?

Overseas, the use of genetic modification or gene editing is widespread and in Aotearoa, despite our regulations, we consume many imported products that are derived from these GMOs.

In many cases, it is no longer possible to determine whether an organism is the result of genetic modification or traditional plant breeding, unless the exact method is revealed by the developer.

Over the past 20 years the distinction between genetic modification and traditional plant breeding has become increasingly blurred. There is now a plethora of tools and techniques encompassing plant biotechnology that provide a complete continuum from ‘hardcore GM’ involving the introduction of totally foreign DNA from bacteria to plants, through to traditional plant breeding.

While regulation is important for managing risks, the precision and power of modern scientific tools offer greater confidence of achieving the desired changes in plants, compared with traditional breeding.

It is not the technology that causes potential harm, but rather what the technology is used for.

Dr Tony Conner is Emeritus Scientist at AgResearch.